The effect of different oral hygiene treatments on the occurrence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in ventilated patients.

BACKGROUND: We compared the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) among patients treated with comprehensive oral care to those treated with conventional methods of oral care. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, controlled study in an intensive care unit of 90 ventilated patients. Patients in the study group received a comprehensive oral hygiene treatment regimen that involved tooth brushing, suctioning, sodium bicarbonate, rinsing with an antiseptic solution containing 1.5% hydrogen peroxide and a mouth moisturiser. Patients in the control group received a more conventional treatment that included cleaning with a sponge and atraumatic clamp, and rinsing with a 0.2% solution of chlorhexidine gluconate. RESULTS: Among the 90 patients admitted to the ICU, 8.9% of the study group developed VAP compared with 33.3% of the control group (p< 0.004). The development of VAP per 1,000 ventilation days was 10.2 in the study group, and 29.5 in the control group (p< 0.06). The mean number of ventilation days and the mean number of hospitalisation days were also lower in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who are ventilated, a comprehensive oral hygiene treatment regimen that includes tooth brushing, suctioning and rinsing with an antiseptic is more effective in preventing VAP than more conventional protocols.

Favorable outcome of pediatric fulminant myocarditis supported by extracorporeal membranous oxygenation.

Myocarditis among pediatric patients varies in severity from mild disease to a fulminant course with overwhelming refractory shock and a high risk of death. Because the disease is potentially reversible, it is reasonable to deploy extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) to bridge patients until recovery or transplantation. This study aimed to review the course and outcome of children with acute fulminant myocarditis diagnosed by clinical and echocardiographic data only who were managed by ECMO because of refractory circulatory collapse. A chart review of a single center identified 12 children hospitalized over an 8-year period who met the study criteria. Data were collected on demographics, diagnosis, disease course, and outcome. The patients ranged in age from 20 days to 8 years (25.5 ± 29.6 months). Echocardiography showed a severe global biventricular decrease in myocardial function, with a shortening fraction of 12% or less. Ten children (83.3%) were weaned off extracorporeal support after 100-408 h (mean, 209.9 ± 82.4 h) and discharged home. Two patients died: one due to multiorgan failure and one due to sustained refractory heart failure. During a long-term follow-up period, all survivors showed normal function in daily activities and normal myocardial function. The study showed that ECMO can be safely and successfully used for children with acute fulminant myocarditis diagnosed solely on clinical and radiographic grounds who need mechanical support. These patients usually have a favorable outcome, regaining normal or near normal heart function without a need for heart transplantation.

Survival of critically ill patients hospitalized in and out of intensive care units under paucity of intensive care unit beds.

OBJECTIVE: The demand for intensive care beds far exceeds their availability in many European countries. Consequently, many critically ill patients occupy hospital beds outside intensive care units, throughout the hospital. The outcome of patients who fit intensive care unit admission criteria but are hospitalized in regular wards needs to be assessed for policy implications. The object was to screen entire hospital patient populations for critically ill patients and compare their 30-day survival in and out of the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Screening teams visited every hospital ward on four selected days in five acute care Israeli hospitals. The teams listed all patients fitting a priori developed study criteria. One-month data for each patient were abstracted from the medical records. SETTING: Five acute care Israeli hospitals. PATIENTS: All patients fitting a priori developed study criteria. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survival in and out of the intensive care unit was compared for screened patients from the day a patient first met study criteria. Cox multivariate models were constructed to adjust survival comparisons for various confounding factors. The effect of intensive care unit vs. other departments was estimated separately for the first 3 days after deterioration and for the remaining follow-up time. Results showed that 5.5% of adult hospitalized patients were critically ill (736 of 13,415). Of these, 27% were admitted to intensive care units, 24% to specialized care units, and 49% to regular departments. Admission to an intensive care unit was associated with better survival during the first 3 days of deterioration, after we adjusted for age and severity of illness (p =.018). There was no additional survival advantage for intensive care unit patients (p =.9) during the remaining follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: The early survival advantage in the intensive care unit suggests a window of critical opportunity for these patients. Under economic constraints and dearth of intensive care unit beds, increasing the turnover of patients in the intensive care unit, thus exposing more needy patients to the early benefit of treatment in the intensive care unit, may be advantageous.