An Investigation of Associations between Pain Catastrophizing and Pain Disability in a Diverse Sample of Persons with Endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate associations between components of pain catastrophizing (using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale; rumination, magnification, and helplessness) and components of pain disability (using the Pain Disability Index; family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behaviour, self-care, life-support activity) in a diverse sample of persons with endometriosis. METHODS: A total of 686 persons with a self-reported clinician-identified diagnosis of endometriosis participated in this study. Two-tailed independent samples t tests were used to examine between-group differences in pain disability and pain catastrophizing among those below and above clinically relevant moderate pain intensity levels. Between-group differences in pain disability among those below and above the clinically relevant pain catastrophizing level, and between-group differences in pain catastrophizing among those below and above the clinically relevant moderate pain disability level, were also analyzed. RESULTS: Experiencing moderate or greater levels of pain intensity was associated with increased levels of pain disability and pain catastrophizing (P < 0.001). Strong associations between clinically relevant levels of pain catastrophizing and increased levels of pain disability (P < 0.001), in addition to between clinically relevant levels of moderate pain disability and increased levels of pain catastrophizing (P < 0.001), were found at both the total and subdomain levels. CONCLUSION: Pain catastrophizing significantly affects pain disability and vice versa. Future research should examine the temporal relationship between catastrophizing and disability to inform intervention practices. Health care providers are strongly encouraged to evaluate the effects of endometriosis in patients using a biopsychosocial framework.

"Blue balls" and sexual coercion: a survey study of genitopelvic pain after sexual arousal without orgasm and its implications for sexual advances.

Background: Blue balls/vulva has received increasing interest from the public in recent years, sparking debate about genital physiology, controversy around "sexual release" as a treatment for this type of pain, and sexual consent. Aim: This cross-sectional, mixed-methods online study aimed to evaluate the general understanding and frequency of blue balls/vulva and whether individuals have ever been pressured to continue sexual activity because of a partner's fears of experiencing pain without orgasm. Methods: A total of 2621 individuals with a penis (n = 1483) or vagina (n = 1138) were recruited for an online survey on the experience of "blue balls/vulva." Quantitative analyses consisted primarily of descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses. Between-group differences were analyzed (based on whether respondents reported having a penis or vagina), and responses to open-ended questions were examined via thematic analysis. Outcomes: The primary outcomes of interest were reports of the belief in blue balls/vulva, the frequency and pain characteristics of blue balls/vulva, and the incidence of being pressured to continue sexual activity due to a partner's fears of experiencing pain without orgasm. Results: Results indicated that significantly more individuals with a penis than a vagina reported believing that blue balls are real, endorsed experiencing pain when they approached orgasm but did not ejaculate, and reported moderate and severe pain. Significantly more individuals with a vagina than a penis reported being pressured into a sexual act due to a partner's fear of experiencing pain without orgasm. Results from the thematic analysis indicated that participants recognized that those with a vagina are expected to act sexually to prevent their partners' experience of blue balls, despite agreement that this phenomenon should not be used to coerce or manipulate partners into engaging sexually. Clinical Implications: Education on the frequency of this phenomenon and methods to relieve pain alternative to partnered sexual activity should be addressed in patients who present with this condition. Strengths and Limitations: Although the survey was brief, it provided information from a relatively large sample about whether people believe that this phenomenon exists, how many experience it, how painful it is, and how often it has been used as an excuse for a partner to continue sexual activity. Conclusion: Results indicated that severe pain exists in a minority of individuals, that solitary sexual and nonsexual activities can help to alleviate the discomfort, and that this pain is not a valid reason to continue unwanted sexual activity.

An Investigation of Sexual and Relationship Adjustment During COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the mitigation measures put in place have resulted in universal disruption in the usual ways of life for individuals. The current study sought to investigate how aspects of sexual health (well-being and functioning) and relationship satisfaction changed or remained stable during the pandemic. During two separate time points (Time 1 including Time 1 and a retrospective baseline, Time 2), participants completed online measures of sexual well-being (sexual pleasure, partnered and solitary orgasm frequency, sexual distress), sexual functioning, and relationship satisfaction. Participants reported slight declines in sexual pleasure, frequency of orgasms with a partner, and frequency of solitary orgasms from pre-COVID-19 (retrospective baseline) to Time 1, with no significant differences in sexual distress and relationship satisfaction. For individuals with vulvas, sexual functioning improved from Time 1 to Time 2, whereas no significant differences in sexual functioning were observed for individuals with penises. Aspects of sexual health and relational satisfaction did not sufficiently change across time points to be considered meaningful health outcome changes. Given that minimal disruptions were noted in pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19 sexuality, these results highlight the potential resiliency of individuals' sexuality when facing sudden changes in their daily lives. Implications of COVID-19's effects on sexual well-being and relationship satisfaction research are broadly discussed.