Irreversible Electroporation as a Valid Treatment Option for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: An International Multicenter Experience.

PURPOSE: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare tumor with currently no established standard of care. This international multicenter retrospective study assesses the use of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) as an ablative tool to treat HEHE and provides a clinical overview of the current management and role of IRE in HEHE treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2023, 14 patients with 47 HEHE tumors were treated with percutaneous IRE using CT-scan guidance in 23 procedures. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Primary outcome measures included safety and effectiveness, analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and treatment response by mRECIST criteria. Secondary outcome measures included technical success, post-treatment tumor sizes and length of hospital stay. Technical success was defined as complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin (intentional tumor free ablation margin > 5 mm). RESULTS: IRE treatment resulted in technical success in all tumors. Following a median follow-up of 15 months, 30 tumors demonstrated a complete response according to mRECIST criteria. The average tumor size pre-treatment was 25.8 mm, accompanied by an average reduction in tumor size by 7.5 mm. In 38 out of 47 tumors, there was no evidence of local recurrence. In nine tumors, residual tumor was present. There were no cases of progressive disease. Median length of hospital stay was one day. Only one grade 3 CTCAE event occurred, a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement. CONCLUSION: The current study provides evidence that IRE is a safe and efficacious minimally invasive treatment option for HEHE.

Future liver remnant augmentation preceding ex vivo hepatectomy with IVC replacement: a strategy to achieve R0 margins.

PURPOSE: Ex vivo hepatectomy with autotransplantation (EHAT) provides opportunity for R0 resection. As EHAT outcomes after future liver remnant (FLR) augmentation techniques are not well documented, we examine results of EHAT after augmentation for malignant tumors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of six cases of EHAT was performed. Of these, four occurred after preoperative FLR augmentation between 2018 and 2022. RESULTS: Six patients were offered EHAT of 26 potential candidates. Indications for resection were involvement of hepatic vein outflow and inferior vena cava (IVC) with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (n = 3), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2), or leiomyosarcoma (n = 1). Five patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and four had preoperative liver augmentation. One hundred percent of cases achieved R0 resection. Of the augmented cases, three patients are alive after median follow-up of 28 months. Postoperative mortality due to liver failure was 25% (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: For select patients with locally advanced tumors involving all hepatic veins and the IVC for whom conventional resection is not an option, EHAT provides opportunity for R0 resection. In addition, in patients with inadequate FLR volume, further operative candidacy with acceptable results can be achieved by combined liver augmentation techniques. To better characterize outcomes in this small subset, a registry is needed.

Three Possible Variations in Ex Vivo Hepatectomy: Achieving R0 Resection by Auto-transplantation.

The collaboration of hepatopancreaticobiliary with transplant surgery expands technical options and opportunity for potentially curative resection in traditionally inoperable cases.  We identified and describe three different types of ex vivo hepatic resections that include (1) explantation with formal hepatectomy, (2) explantation with re-implantation of the whole liver after vascular reconstruction, and (3) explantation with formal hepatectomy after future liver remnant volume augmentation.

Ex vivo liver resection coupled with associated liver partition and portal vein ligation: Combining existing techniques to achieve surgical resectability.

Incorporation of liver transplant techniques in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery has created an opportunity for the resection of locally advanced hepatic tumors formerly considered unresectable. A 73-year-old woman presented with cholangiocarcinoma involving inferior vena cava, all three hepatic veins, and right anterior portal pedicle, initially deemed nonoperative. This case demonstrates the first combined application of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and ex vivo resection to perform an R0. For diseases dependent upon resection, surgical advances and innovations expand the spectrum of interventions through interdisciplinary techniques.

Strategies That Reduce 90-Day Readmissions and Inpatient Costs After Liver Transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is hospital-resource intensive and associated with high rates of readmission. We have previously shown a reduction in 30-day readmission rates by implementing a specifically designed protocol to increase access to outpatient care. The aim of this work is to determine if the strategies that reduce 30-day readmission after LT were effective in also reducing 90-day readmission rates and costs. A protocol was developed to reduce inpatient readmissions after LT that expanded outpatient services and provided alternatives to readmission. The 90-day readmission rates and costs were compared before and after implementing strategies outlined in the protocol. Multivariable analysis was used to control for potential confounding factors. Over the study period, 304 adult primary LTs were performed on patients with a median biological Model for End-Stage Liver Disease of 22. There were 112 (37%) patients who were readmitted within 90 days of transplant. The readmission rates before and after implementation of the protocol were 53% and 26%, respectively (P < 0.001). The most common reason for readmission was elevated liver tests/rejection (24%). In multivariable analysis, the protocol remained associated with avoiding readmission (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.55; P < 0.001). The median length of stay after transplant before and after protocol implementation was 8 days and 7 days, respectively. A greater proportion of patients were discharged to hospital lodging after protocol implementation (10% versus 19%; P = 0.03). The 90-day readmission costs were reduced by 55%, but the total 90-day costs were reduced by only 2.7% because of higher outpatient costs and index admission costs. In conclusion, 90-day readmission rates and readmission costs can be reduced by improving access to outpatient services and hospital-local lodging. Total 90-day costs were similar between the 2 groups because of higher outpatient costs after the protocol was introduced.

A prospective study of a protocol that reduces readmission after liver transplantation.

Health care has shifted to placing priority on quality and value instead of volume. Liver transplantation uses substantial resources and is associated with high readmission rates. Our goal was to determine if a protocol designed to reduce readmission after liver transplant was effective. We conducted a prospective study of a protocol designed to reduce readmission rates after liver transplantation by expanding outpatient services and alternatives to readmission. The 30-day readmission rate 1 year after implementing the protocol was compared to the 30-day rate for 2 years prior to implementation. Multivariate analysis was used to control for potential confounding factors. Over the study period, 167 adult primary liver transplants were performed with a mean biological Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 21 ± 8. Fifty-seven (34%) patients were readmitted. The most common reason for readmission was biliary complications (n = 13). The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 40% before implementing the protocol to 20% after implementation (P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the protocol remained associated with readmission (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.92; P = 0.03). The mean length of stay after transplant was 13 ± 12 days preprotocol and 9 ± 5 days postprotocol (P = 0.09). Alternatives to readmission, including hospital lodging and observation status, were main factors in reducing readmission rates. If the most recent definitions of inpatient admission and observation status were applied over the entire study period, then the readmission rates preprotocol and postprotocol were 31% and 20% indicating that the revised definition of observation status accounted for 45% of the reduction in the readmission rate. Readmission after liver transplantation can be reduced without increasing length of stay by implementing a specifically designed protocol that expands outpatient services and alternatives to inpatient admission. Liver Transplantation 22 765-772 2016 AASLD.

Abdominal transplantation for unresectable tumors in children: the zooming out principle.

PURPOSE: To present our experience in abdominal transplantations to manage unresectable abdominal neoplasms in children and to describe the role of extensive surgeries in such cases. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 22 abdominal transplantations in 21 patients for abdominal tumors over 16 years. Transplantation techniques included liver transplant (LT), multivisceral transplant (MVTx), and intestinal autotransplant (IA). Follow-up intervals ranged from 0.3 to 168 months (median 20 months). RESULTS: LT alone was performed in 15 patients for primary malignant (11) and benign (4) liver tumors. Pathological classification included HB hepatoblastoma (6), HCC hepatocellular cancer (3), hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma HEH (1), angiosarcoma (1), benign vascular tumors (3), and adenoma (1). IA was performed in four patients for lesions involving the root of the mesentery; tumors of the head of pancreas (3) and mesenteric hemangioma (1). MVTx was performed in 2 patients for malignancies; pancreaticoblastoma (1), recurrent hepatoblastoma (1), and in one patient as a rescue procedure after IA failure. Four of the eleven patients who underwent LT for malignant liver tumor had metastatic disease at presentation. Six of them died of recurrent neoplasm (3), transplant-related complications (2), and underlying disease (1). All LT patients who had benign tumors are alive with functioning grafts. All IA patients survived and are on an oral diet, with one patient requiring TPN supplementation. One of the three patients who underwent MVTx died of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Allo/auto transplantation for abdominal tumors is a valuable modality when conventional treatments fail or are not feasible.

Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: Outcomes and prognostic variables.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors remains a topic of debate. There is no established MELD exception, making it difficult to obtain donor organs. METHODS: A multicenter database was created assessing outcomes for liver and multivisceral transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and identifying prognostic factors for survival. Demographic, transplant, primary tumor site and management, pathology, recurrent disease and survival data were collected and analyzed. Survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Analysis included 85 patients who underwent liver transplantation November 1988-January 2012 at 28 centers. One, three, and five-year patient survival rates were 83%, 60%, and 52%, respectively; 40 of 85 patients died, with 20 of 40 deaths due to recurrent disease. In univariate analyses, the following were predictors of poor prognosis: large vessel invasion (P < 0.001), extent of extrahepatic resection at liver transplant (P = 0.007), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, predictors of poor overall survival included large vessel invasion (P = 0.001), and extent of extrahepatic resection at liver transplant (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: In the absence of poor prognostic factors, metastatic neuroendocrine tumor is an acceptable indication for liver transplantation. Identification of favorable prognostic factors should allow assignment of a MELD exception similar to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Excessive immunosuppression as a potential cause of poor survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation for hepatitis C.

Appropriate recipient selection of simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains controversial. In particular, data on liver graft survival in hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) SLKT recipients are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of HCV+ SLKT recipients (N = 25) in comparison with HCV- SLKT (N = 26) and HCV+ liver transplantation alone (LTA, N = 296). Despite backgrounds of HCV+ and HCV- SLKT being similar, HCV+ SLKT demonstrated significantly impaired 5-year liver graft survival of 35% (HCV- SLKT, 79%, P = 0.004). Compared with HCV+ LTA, induction immunosuppression was more frequently used in HCV+ SLKT. Five-year liver graft survival rate for HCV+ SLKT was significantly lower than that for LTA (35% vs. 74%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio of liver graft loss in HCV+ SLKT was 4.9 (95% confidence interval 2.0-12.1, P = 0.001). HCV+ SLKT recipients were more likely to succumb to recurrent HCV and sepsis compared with LTA (32% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001 and 24% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.030, respectively). Ten HCV+ SLKT recipients underwent anti-HCV therapy for recurrent HCV; only 1 achieved sustained virological response. HCV+ SLKT is associated with significantly decreased long-term prognosis compared with HCV- SLKT and HCV+ LTA.

When and why portal vein thrombosis matters in liver transplantation: a critical audit of 174 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To identify complications associated with different techniques utilized to treat portal vein thrombosis (PVT) during primary liver transplantation and their impact on survival. BACKGROUND: PVT remains an intricate problem in liver transplantation, and the long-term outcomes of patients with PVT who undergo transplantation are not well defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all consecutive adult patients who underwent primary isolated liver transplantation from 1998 to 2009 (median follow-up period, 89 months). The outcomes of patients with PVT were compared with those without PVT. RESULTS: Among 1379 recipients, 174 (12.6%) had PVT at the time of transplantation [83 (48%) complete and 91 (52%) partial]. Among PVT patients with reestablished physiological portal inflow (PVT: physiological group; n = 149), 123 underwent thrombectomies, 16 received interpositional vein grafts, and 10 received mesoportal jump grafts. In 25 patients, physiological portomesenteric venous circulation was not reconstituted (PVT: nonphysiological group; 18 underwent cavoportal hemitranspositions, 6 renoportal anastomoses, and 1 arterialization). The PVT: nonphysiological group suffered a significantly increased incidence of rethrombosis of the portomesenteric veins and gastrointestinal bleeding, with a marginal 10-year overall survival rate of 42% (no PVT, 61%; P = 0.002 and PVT: physiological, 55%; P = 0.043). The PVT: physiological and no PVT groups exhibited comparable survival rates (P = 0.13). No significant differences in survival were observed between complete and partial PVT as long as physiological portal flow was reestablished. CONCLUSIONS: The subset of PVT patients requiring nonphysiological portal vein reconstruction was associated with higher complication rates and suffered diminished long-term prognoses. For the most severe PVT cases, a comprehensive approach is critical to further improve outcomes.

Liver natural killer cell inoculum for liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Natural killer (NK) cells are innate immune lymphocytes. NK cells contribute to host antimicrobial and antitumor immunity. Liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased recently. The possibility of NK cell immunotherapy for liver cancer has been studied. RECENT FINDINGS: Adoptive transfer of interleukin-2 (IL-2)-stimulated NK cells extracted from donor liver perfusate could increase an antitumor response without causing toxicity against 1-haplotype identical recipient intact tissues in patients with live donor liver transplant. Donor liver NK cells showed the most vigorous cytotoxicity against an HCC after in-vitro IL-2 stimulation, compared with donor and recipient peripheral blood NK cells and recipient liver NK cells. IL-2 stimulation led to an increased expression of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) on liver NK cells. T-cell contamination and risk of graft-versus-host disease can be minimized with a T-cell depleting agent such as anti-CD3 antibody. SUMMARY: Allogeneic NK cells might have an advantage for adoptive immunotherapy. Liver NK cells from a deceased donor liver can be used safely as adoptive immunotherapy under current good manufacturing practice conditions for the treatment of liver transplantation with HCC. IL-2-stimulated liver NK cells have strong cytotoxicity, express TRAIL and secret interferon-γ.

Long-term deleterious effects of aortohepatic conduits in primary liver transplantation: proceed with caution.

Aortohepatic conduits provide a vital alternative for graft arterialization during liver transplantation. Conflicting results exist with respect to the rates of comorbidities, and long-term survival data on primary grafts are lacking. To identify the complications associated with aortohepatic conduits in primary liver transplantation and their impact on survival, we conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of all consecutive adult (n = 1379) and pediatric primary liver transplants (n = 188) from 1998 to 2009. The outcomes of aortohepatic conduits were compared to those of standard arterial revascularization. Adults with a conduit (n = 267) demonstrated, in comparison with adults with standard arterialization (n = 1112), an increased incidence of late (>1 month after transplantation) hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT; 4.1% versus 0.7%, P < 0.001) and ischemic cholangiopathy (7.5% versus 2.7%, P < 0.001) and a lower 5-year graft survival rate (61% versus 70%, P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss in the conduit group was 1.38 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.85, P = 0.03]. Notably, the use of conduits (HR = 4.91, 95% CI = 1.92-12.58) and a warm ischemia time > 60 minutes (HR = 11.12, 95% CI = 3.06-40.45) were independent risk factors for late HAT. Among children, the complication profiles were similar for the conduit group (n = 81) and the standard group (n = 107). In the pediatric cohort, although the 5-year graft survival rate for the conduit group (69%) was significantly impaired in comparison with the rate for the standard group (81%, P = 0.03), the use of aortohepatic conduits did not emerge as an independent predictor of diminished graft survival via a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, in adult primary liver transplantation, the placement of an aortohepatic conduit should be strictly limited because of the greater complication rates (notably late HAT) and impaired graft survival; for children, its judicious use may be acceptable.

Liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava: lessons learned through 2,000 cases.

BACKGROUND: We aim to demonstrate the utility and efficacy of the "piggyback technique" (PBT); liver transplant (LT) with caval preservation. STUDY DESIGN: Adult LTs were performed with intent to use the PBT except in cases of juxtacaval malignancy or technical difficulty. Hepatic venous outflow was established between the donor suprahepatic cava and the joined ostia of all recipient suprahepatic veins. Technical variants with the donor cava and recipient retrohepatic cava were used as needed. The experience was divided into 2 eras: E1 (1994-2002), E2 (2002-2010). RESULTS: We completed 945 of 1080 LTs in E1 (87.5%) and 851 of 920 LTs in E2 (92.5%) using the PBT. Thirty day mortality was 4.6% in E1, 3% in E2 (p = 0.02) with 2 intra-operative deaths in E1. One, 3, 5 year patient survival was 83.7, 75.6, 69.3% in E1 vs. 86, 78.4, 73.8% in E2 (p = 0.057). Graft survival was 77.7, 69, 62.3% in E1 vs. 84, 76.2, 71.2% in E2 (p < 0.0001). Median operative time and hospital length of stay improved in E2 (p < 0.0001, 0.0001). Outflow variants were used more frequently in E2 (11.3% vs. 6.1%). Nine patients (0.5%) developed outflow obstruction, 6 in E1, and 3 in E2. Twice, it was recognized and corrected intraoperatively. Seven patients presented with refractory ascites. Six were successfully treated (4 balloon dilatation, 2 surgical revision), one patient died after attempted dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: The PBT can be used as the preferred technique in adult LT. With experience, the technique was used more frequently, with more variants, with improved outcomes. Outflow obstruction was a rare complication.

Peripheral blood gene expression analysis in intestinal transplantation: a feasibility study for detecting novel candidate biomarkers of graft rejection.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the putative candidate biomarkers of graft rejection in peripheral blood of intestinal transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood gene expression analysis was performed in intestinal transplant patients. The results were matched with concurrent graft biopsies using bioinformatics. RESULTS: Peripheral blood samples (n=11), of 3 adult patients [transplant day (n=1), no rejection (n=1), minimal rejection (n=2), mild rejection (n=5) and severe rejection (n=2)] were collected. Bioinformatics: Enrichment Analysis: The three most affected pathways differentially expressed in rejection versus a pool of healthy volunteers were related to protein translation: translation initiation, translation elongation termination, and translation in mitochondria, with p-values for all rejection stages in all patients in the 10-4 to 10-18 range. No significant enrichment was observed for these categories in the day of transplant sample. In addition to translation, significant enrichment of several immune response categories was observed in rejection samples. Subsequent gene set enrichment analysis verified these results. The level of enrichment was very high (p-values of 10-5-10-60) and increased with the level of rejection in all patients. Genes significantly down-regulated in translation related gene sets included ribosomal proteins RPL13A, RP L22, RPS23, RPL13 and RPL10A, that could be used as potential biomarkers for future experiments. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study we found a list of genes (involved in translation) significantly downregulated in the peripheral blood of three intestinal transplant patients during rejection. These results will be verified in further studies with increased number of patients and with isolation of peripheral blood subpopulations.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: lessons learned and future directions.

The past 2 decades have witnessed an exponential increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States and, concurrently, the development of liver transplantation as an effective modality in its treatment. "Early" HCC has been defined, allowing patients with unresectable HCC to be granted priority for transplant over the past decade. This situation has produced a dramatic increase in the number of transplants for HCC. The challenge has been how to expand the indications of liver transplant for HCC with improved cancer-free survival and fewer transplant-related complications without adversely affecting non-HCC transplant candidates.

Is surgical resection superior to transplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with either liver resection or transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis of 413 HCC patients from 1999 to 2009. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients with HCC underwent surgical resection (n = 106) and transplantation (n = 270) or were listed without receiving transplantation (n = 37). Excluding transplanted patients with incidental tumors (n = 50), 257 patients with suspected HCC were listed with the intent to transplant (ITT). The median diameter of the largest tumor by radiography was 6.0 cm in resected, 3.0 cm in transplanted, and 3.4 cm in the listed-but-not-transplanted patients. Median time to transplant was 48 days. Recurrence rates were 19.8% for resection and 12.1% for all ITT patients. Overall, patient survival for resection versus ITT patients was similar (5-year survival of 53.0% vs 52.0%, not significant). However, for HCC patients with model end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores less than 10 and who radiologically met Milan or UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival rates were significantly improved in resected patients. For patients with MELD score less than 10 and who met Milan criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival were 92.0% and 63.0% for resection (n = 26) versus 83.0% and 41.0% for ITT (n = 73, P = 0.036). For those with MELD score less than 10 and met UCSF criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival was 94.0% and 62.0% for resection (n = 33) versus 81.0% and 40.0% for ITT (n = 78, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Among known HCC patients with preserved liver function, resection was associated with superior patient survival versus transplantation. These results suggest that surgical resection should remain the first line therapy for patients with HCC and compensated liver function who are candidates for resection.

The effect of donor-recipient cytomegalovirus serology on adult liver transplantation: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the outcomes of adult liver transplants, according to their donor-recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in the study all adult primary liver transplants, from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2005. Follow-up was until December 31, 2007. According to the donor-recipient CMV serology, patients were divided into positive-negative (PN), positive-positive, negative-negative, and negative-positive groups, and all received CMV prophylaxis for 4 months posttransplantation. Hepatitis C patients received conventional immunosuppression, whereas all other patients received either conventional treatment or alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) induction. RESULTS: We studied 438 adult liver transplants. Comparisons were made between high-risk group patients (PN) versus all others: 5-year patient survival was 74.31% vs. 78.8%, (P=NS) and graft survival 63.87% vs. 74.77%, (P=0.042). Five-year freedom from rejection was 42.84% vs. 51.95% (P=0.036). CMV infection (n=3) or disease (n=27) was observed in 30 patients (PN [n=23], positive-positive [n=6], and negative-positive [n=1]). Incidence of CMV infection was 9.8% overall and 34.84% and 2.5%, respectively, for the PN group versus all others (P=0.0000). Patients who received Campath-1H induction did not have an increased incidence of CMV infections compared with those who received conventional immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, in adult liver transplantation, CMV donor-recipient PN serology is associated with rejection, graft survival, and CMV infection but is not correlated with patient survival, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) occurrence, or viral hepatitis recurrence. The introduction of more potent induction immunosuppression did not accentuate these negative outcomes.