Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 211
Filtrar
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 33(1): 43-8, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22033720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent literature shows an increasing portion of imaging studies being conducted and interpreted by nonradiologists, especially across the modalities with the highest RVUs. We examined the trends in the Medicare technical charges for private office neuroradiology studies submitted by subspecialists to identify utilization trends among MR and CT scanner owners or lessees over the last decade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of neuroradiology studies performed on MR and CT machines owned or leased in private offices was determined from the CMS PSPSMF for 1998-2008. Studies billed through technical and global charges were aggregated. Utilization rates and utilization rate CAGRs were computed by specialty and by imaging study. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2008, MR studies grew by a factor of 2.5 and CT studies grew by 2.1. In 2008, radiologists charged the technical/global fee in 1,386,669 (56.6%), neurologists in 82,360 (3.4%), neurosurgeons in 29,218 (1.2%), multi/IDTF in 617,933 (25.2%), and other specialists in 334,843 (13.7%) of neuroradiology cases. Changes from the 1998 base rate to the 2008 rate per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries were 24.1 to 39.7 for radiologists, 1.03 to 2.4 for neurologists, 0.15 to 0.84 for neurosurgeons, 2.2 to 17.7 for multi/IDTF, and 1.3 to 9.6 for other specialists. All specialties, except for multi/IDTF, showed greater MR utilization increases than CT. Neurology (CAGR of 10.6%), neurosurgery (22.1%), multi/IDTF (23.2%), and other specialists' (24.6%) MR growth outpaced that of radiology's (5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: All nonradiologists showed greater overall utilization growth in private office neuroradiology than did radiology. Also, nonradiologists generally showed greater utilization increases in MR than CT. Radiologists' private office neuroradiology technical fee share shrank from 83.6% to 56.6% between 1998 and 2008.


Assuntos
Aluguel de Propriedade/economia , Neurorradiografia/economia , Neurorradiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurociências/economia , Propriedade/economia , Prática Privada/economia , Radiologia/economia , Aluguel de Propriedade/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurociências/estatística & dados numéricos , Propriedade/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Privada/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 22(9): 1643-9, 2001 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11673155

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Powerful tools, including CT and MR imaging, have revolutionized neuroimaging. These are routinely used, but the extent and variation of use has not been studied. Our purposes were to determine the use rates of MR imaging and CT (of spine, brain, or head and neck), myelography, conventional angiography, and MR angiography in diagnosing neurologic disorders; to study trends in use; and to determine regional variations in use. METHODS: We used the National Part B Medicare Database for 1993 and 1998 to compare rates of use for these procedures in 10 geographic regions. RESULTS: In 1993 and 1998, respectively, 13,897 and 19,431 (39.8% increase) neuroimaging procedures were performed per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries nationwide. Use of brain or head and neck CT (30.4%) and MR imaging (43.6%), spinal CT (3.5%) and MR imaging (83.0%), myelography (56.6%), and conventional angiography (24.3%) increased in 1998 versus 1993. Increases in MR angiography were not assessed, because this procedure was not reimbursable in 1993. Regional use of brain or head and neck and spinal CT and MR studies varied considerably; ratios of highest and lowest rates were 1.38-1.56. Use of MR angiography, myelography, and conventional angiography varied three- to fourfold. CONCLUSION: Use of MR and CT studies of the brain or head and neck and of the spine increased considerably in the Medicare population between 1993 and 1998. Use of conventional invasive procedures such as myelography and angiography increased strikingly, contrary to the expected decline. Regional use varied substantially.


Assuntos
Angiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Angiografia/tendências , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/estatística & dados numéricos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Mielografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mielografia/tendências , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/tendências , Humanos , Medicare , Estados Unidos
14.
Radiology ; 216(1): 265-8, 2000 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10887259

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the extent to which emergency medicine physicians have assumed responsibility for performing and interpreting ultrasonographic (US) studies in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The national 1997 Medicare Part B database was searched by using standard US procedure codes, location codes, and physician specialty codes. The authors determined how many US studies were performed in EDs and what percentage of those studies were performed by emergency medicine physicians, radiologists, or other physicians. RESULTS: During 1997, 234,820 ED US studies within nine major examination categories were performed in Medicare patients nationwide. Emergency medicine physicians performed 1,551 (0.7%) of these studies. When echocardiographic examinations were excluded, emergency medicine physicians performed 458 (0.2%) of the remaining total of 196,158 studies. CONCLUSION: Although emergency medicine physicians have claimed to be actively involved in ED US on a broad scale, the data reveal that their involvement in 1997 was minimal. This raises doubt as to whether they can properly train their residents to perform US or maintain their own competence at acceptable levels.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Ultrassonografia/classificação , Estados Unidos
15.
J Okla State Med Assoc ; 93(5): 203-8, 2000 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10826227

RESUMO

This article summarizes the primary recommendations of the Agency for Health Care Quality's recently published Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guidelines. Specific recommendations are outlined to assist physicians in treating patients who smoke to end their use of tobacco.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Aconselhamento , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Aumento de Peso
16.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 174(1): 27-31, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10628448

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical and academic productivity over a 2-year period in a university hospital radiology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical productivity, as determined by the number of total professional relative value units generated, was compared with academic productivity, which was determined by the number of published peer-reviewed articles, published non-peer-reviewed articles, published abstracts, and presentations delivered by each full-time clinical faculty member. The relationships of age, academic rank, administrative position, and division within the department were also assessed for their effect on relative value units and academic productivity. RESULTS: We found a significant inverse relationship between relative value units and the number of published peer-reviewed articles, published abstracts, and presentations. Age, academic rank, and administrative responsibilities had no effect on the number of relative value units. Faculty in the neuroradiology and cardiovascular-interventional radiology divisions generated more relative value units than did other faculty members. CONCLUSION: Faculty members with higher levels of clinical productivity showed significantly lower levels of academic productivity. This finding is consistent with the idea that increases in the clinical workload may diminish research output.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Docentes de Medicina , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Editoração , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 10(8): 1007-11, 1999 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10496700

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Vascular surgeons have become concerned recently about perceived threats to their practices posed by the growth of interventional radiology. The authors studied nationwide 1996 Medicare Part B procedure data to determine the seriousness of these threats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The national Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master File for 1996 was searched. Two hundred thirteen distinct Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes were identified for therapeutic surgical and percutaneous interventional procedures performed to treat noncardiac vascular diseases. For each code, determination was made of total volume, specialty of the physician providers, and Medicare Part B reimbursement dollars paid to the providers as professional fees. In view of the conflicts among various specialties over peripheral vascular interventions, the authors also determined the percentages of these procedures performed by radiologists, surgeons, cardiologists, and other physicians. RESULTS: A total of 759,548 noncardiac therapeutic vascular procedures (operations or percutaneous interventions) were performed during 1996 in patients receiving Medicare benefits. Radiologists performed 135,103 (17.8%) of these procedures but received only 10.4% of professional reimbursements. By contrast, surgeons performed 510,871 (67.3%) procedures, but received 78.0% of professional reimbursements. Cardiologists performed 4.7% of procedures and other specialists performed the remaining 10.3%. Radiologists performed 75.5% of percutaneous transluminal angioplasties, the majority of thrombolysis procedures, stent placements, and portal decompression procedures, and approximately half of inferior vena cava interruptions. Cardiologists performed 12.6% of percutaneous transluminal angioplasties, surgeons performed 6.3%, and other specialists performed 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of overall physician workload and professional reimbursements paid for invasive treatment of all types of noncardiac vascular disease, surgeons predominate and do not appear to be seriously threatened by interventional radiologists. Radiologists perform three-fourths of noncardiac percutaneous transluminal angioplasties and a majority of other percutaneous interventional therapies for vascular disease, but some inroads have been made by cardiologists and surgeons, particularly the former.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiologia Intervencionista/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialização , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Cardiologia/economia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Médica , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare Part B/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiologia Intervencionista/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Acad Radiol ; 6(5): 299-304, 1999 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10228619

RESUMO

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare color Doppler ultrasound (US), computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for the evaluation of accessory renal arteries and proximal branches of the main renal artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six subjects who had undergone conventional arteriography of the renal arteries participated in a prospective comparison of Doppler US (45 patients), CT angiography (52 patients), and nonenhanced MR angiography (28 patients). Conventional arteriography depicted 28 accessory renal arteries and 21 proximal branches of the main renal artery within 2 cm of the aorta. RESULTS: US depicted five of 24 accessory renal arteries seen at arteriography but no proximal arterial branches. CT angiography depicted 24 of 26 accessory renal arteries and 13 of 17 proximal arterial branches, as well as 15 additional accessory renal arteries not seen at conventional arteriography. MR demonstrated 11 of 15 accessory arteries, as well as four additional accessory arteries not seen at conventional arteriography. MR did not depict any of nine proximal arterial branches seen at conventional arteriography. CONCLUSION: When compared with US or nonenhanced MR angiography, CT is the preferred method for evaluation of accessory renal arteries and proximal branches of the renal artery.


Assuntos
Angiografia , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Hipertensão Renal/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
20.
Radiology ; 211(2): 337-43, 1999 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10228511

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare results of helical computed tomographic (CT) angiography with real-time interactive volume rendering (VR) to CT angiography with maximum intensity projection (MIP) for the detection of renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent both conventional and CT angiography of the renal arteries. Images were blindly reviewed after rendering with MIP and VR algorithms. MIP images were viewed in conjunction with axial CT images; VR models were evaluated in real time at the workstation without CT images. Findings in 50 main and 11 accessory renal arteries were categorized as normal or by degree of stenosis. RESULTS: All arteries depicted on conventional angiograms were visualized on MIP and VR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for MIP and VIR images demonstrated excellent discrimination for the diagnosis of stenosis of at least 50% (area under the ROC curve, 0.96-0.99). Although sensitivity was not significantly different for VR and MIP (89% vs 94%, P > .1), specificity was greater with VR (99% vs 87%, P = .008 to .08). Stenosis of at least 50% was overestimated with CT angiography in four accessory renal arteries, but three accessory renal arteries not depicted at conventional angiography were depicted at CT angiography. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of renal artery stenosis, CT angiography with VR is faster and more accurate than CT angiography with MIP. Accessory arteries not depicted with conventional angiography were depicted with both CT angiographic algorithms.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Angiografia/métodos , Sistemas Computacionais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...