Cytokeratin 13 Is a New Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of cytokeratin (K) 13 on the corneal surface and to validate its application in the diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). METHODS: This prospective comparative study included 26 corneal impression cytology (IC) specimens from patients diagnosed with LSCD. Twenty-three IC specimens from normal donors served as controls. K12 and K13 expression were detected on the IC specimens by immunohistochemistry study. The number of K12 + or K13 + cells in all areas of the IC was quantified using ImageJ software. RESULTS: The epithelial cells harvested from IC specimens from control corneas were all K12 + . In eyes with LSCD, K13 + and K12 + /K13 + cells accounted for 93.8% and 2.6%, respectively, in the cornea. In eyes with sectoral LSCD, the median number of K13 + cells in the clinically affected area was higher than that in the unaffected area (810.0 vs. 115.0 cells/mm 2 ; P < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the LSCD severity and the number of K12 + cells (r = -0.284, P = 0.16) or K13 + cells (r = -0.011, P = 0.95). The presence of at least 16 K13 + cells/mm 2 was suggestive of LSCD. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of K13 + cells on IC specimens provides a simple and reliable method to detect conjunctival epithelial cells on the cornea. K13 is a marker for diagnosing LSCD and localizing the involved area in sectoral LSCD.

Effectiveness of Molecular Testing Techniques for Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Approximately 20% of thyroid nodules display indeterminate cytology. Molecular testing can refine the risk of malignancy and reduce the need for diagnostic hemithyroidectomy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance between an RNA test (Afirma genomic sequencing classifier) and DNA-RNA test (ThyroSeq v3 multigene genomic classifier). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This parallel randomized clinical trial of monthly block randomization included patients in the UCLA Health system who underwent thyroid biopsy from August 2017 to January 2020 with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology category III or IV). INTERVENTIONS: Molecular testing with the RNA test or DNA-RNA test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnostic test performance of the RNA test compared with the DNA-RNA test. The secondary outcome was comparison of test performance with prior versions of the molecular tests. RESULTS: Of 2368 patients, 397 were eligible for inclusion based on indeterminate cytology, and 346 (median [interquartile range] age, 55 [44-67] years; 266 [76.9%] women) were randomized to 1 of the 2 tests. In the total cohort assessed for eligibility, 3140 thyroid nodules were assessed, and 427 (13.6%) nodules were cytologically indeterminate. The prevalence of malignancy was 20% among indeterminate nodules. The benign call rate was 53% (95% CI, 47%-61%) for the RNA test and 61% (95% CI, 53%-68%) for the DNA-RNA test. The specificities of the RNA test and DNA-RNA test were 80% (95% CI, 72%-86%) and 85% (95% CI, 77%-91%), respectively (P = .33); the positive predictive values (PPV) of the RNA test and DNA-RNA test were 53% (95% CI, 40%-67%) and 63% (95% CI, 48%-77%), respectively (P = .33). The RNA test exhibited a higher PPV compared with the prior test version (Afirma gene expression classifier) (54% [95% CI, 40%-67%] vs 38% [95% CI, 27%-48%]; P = .01). The DNA-RNA test had no statistically significant difference in PPV compared with its prior version (ThyroSeq v2 next-generation sequencing) (63% [95% CI, 48%-77%] vs 58% [95% CI, 43%-73%]; P = .75). Diagnostic thyroidectomy was avoided in 87 (51%) patients tested with the RNA test and 83 (49%) patients tested with the DNA-RNA test. Surveillance ultrasonography was available for 90 nodules, of which 85 (94%) remained stable over a median of 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both the RNA test and DNA-RNA test displayed high specificity and allowed 49% of patients with indeterminate nodules to avoid diagnostic surgery. Although previous trials demonstrated that the prior version of the DNA-RNA test was more specific than the prior version of the RNA test, the current molecular test techniques have no statistically significant difference in performance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02681328.

Trends in the Surgical Management of Known or Suspected Differentiated Thyroid Cancer at a Single Institution, 2010-2018.

Background: The surgical management of nodular thyroid disease has been influenced by the advent of molecular diagnostics and recent guidelines recommending a more conservative approach to low-risk thyroid tumors. The purpose of this study was to assess practice changes arising from the early adoption of current literature within a single high-volume center. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients evaluated or surgically treated for known or suspected thyroid cancer at a single institution was performed (2010-2018). We analyzed the yield of diagnostic thyroidectomy for indeterminate (Bethesda III and IV) nodules, the choice of initial operation for likely malignant (Bethesda V and VI) nodules, and the rate of completion thyroidectomy. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess the significance of any observed trends. Results: Of 2497 patients who underwent initial thyroidectomy from 2010 to 2018, 1791 patients had a tissue diagnosis of suspected or known thyroid cancer by cytopathology (Bethesda III-VI) or surgical pathology (differentiated thyroid cancer). In patients with likely malignant nodules but no clinical evidence of invasive or metastatic disease, the proportion managed with total thyroidectomy plus prophylactic neck dissection fell from 50% to 10% (p = 0.007). The proportion with likely malignant nodules managed definitively with thyroid lobectomy rose from 2% to 19% (p < 0.001). The rate of completion thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer found in the initial lobectomy specimen declined from 73% to 26% (p < 0.001). Among all patients with cytologically indeterminate nodules (n = 1036), we observed a decrease in the rate of diagnostic thyroidectomy from 67% to 35% over the study period (p = 0.015). Conclusions: The early adoption of new diagnostic technology and management guidelines has manifested in a less aggressive surgical approach to known or suspected thyroid cancer. Long-term follow-up will be required to assess oncologic and patient-centered outcomes arising from this modern strategy.

Gene Expression Classifier vs Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.

Context: Molecular testing has reduced the need for diagnostic hemithyroidectomy for indeterminate thyroid nodules. No studies have directly compared molecular testing techniques. Objective: Compare the diagnostic performance of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) with that of ThyroSeq v2 next-generation sequencing assay. Design: Parallel randomized trial, monthly block randomization of patients with Bethesda III/IV cytology to GEC or ThyroSeq v2. Setting: University of California, Los Angeles. Participants: Patients who underwent thyroid biopsy (April 2016 to June 2017). Intervention: Testing with GEC or ThyroSeq v2. Main Outcome Measure: Molecular test performance. Results: Of 1372 thyroid nodules, 176 (13%) had indeterminate cytology and 149 of 157 eligible indeterminate nodules (95%) were included in the study. Of nodules tested with GEC, 49% were suspicious, 43% were benign, and 9% were insufficient. Of nodules tested with ThyroSeq v2, 19% were mutation positive, 77% were mutation negative, and 4% were insufficient. The specificities of GEC and ThyroSeq v2 were 66% and 91%, respectively (P = 0.002); the positive predictive values of GEC and ThyroSeq v2 were 39% and 57%, respectively. Diagnostic hemithyroidectomy was avoided in 28 patients tested with GEC (39%) and 49 patients tested with ThyroSeq v2 (62%). Surveillance ultrasonography was available for 46 nodules (45 remained stable). Conclusions: ThyroSeq v2 had higher specificity than Afirma GEC and allowed more patients to avoid surgery. Long-term surveillance is necessary to assess the false-negative rate of these particular molecular tests. Further studies are required for comparison with other available molecular diagnostics and for newer tests as they are developed.

Irrigation after Laparoscopic Power Morcellation and the Dispersal of Leiomyoma Cells: A Pilot Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if copious irrigation and suctioning after electromechanical power morcellation will reduce myoma cell dissemination and if there is a difference between sterile water and normal saline. DESIGN: Prospective single-center cohort pilot study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Sixteen women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy with 1 surgeon between January 1, 2017 and August 31, 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Peritoneal washings were collected 3 specific times during surgery: after dissection of myoma(s) and hysterotomy repair but before morcellation, after morcellation, and after irrigation with 3 L normal saline or sterile water. The primary outcome was the detection of benign spindle cells (BSCs) in peritoneal washings. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study. Eight were randomized to the normal saline group and 8 to the sterile water group. In the normal saline group BSCs were detected in 3 of 8 patients (37.5%) after closure of the hysterotomy but before morcellation, in 3 of 8 (37.5%) after morcellation, and in 0 of 8 (0%) after irrigation and suctioning of the peritoneal cavity with 3 L normal saline. In the sterile water group BSCs were detected in 3 of 8 patients (37.5%) after closure of the hysterotomy but before morcellation, 2 of 8 (25%) after morcellation, and in 0 of 8 (0%) after irrigation and suctioning with 3 L sterile water. Thus, no differences were found between the normal saline and sterile water groups. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study myoma cells were disseminated before electromechanical morcellation. Irrigation and suctioning with 3 L normal saline or sterile water after morcellation may reduce myoma cell dissemination.

Has Afirma gene expression classifier testing refined the indeterminate thyroid category in cytology?

BACKGROUND: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Up to 30% of cases are diagnosed as indeterminate by FNA, including atypia of undetermined significance, follicular lesion of undetermined significance, suspicious for a follicular neoplasm, and follicular neoplasm, with approximately two-thirds having a benign outcome. The gene expression classifier (GEC) test is a molecular test for cases with indeterminate cytology. The purpose of the current study was to examine the refining role of the GEC test within a single institution. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all thyroid FNAs during a 20-month period after implementation of GEC was performed. Cases of indeterminate cytology with concomitant GEC testing were selected and divided further in 4 subgroups. Correlation with surgical follow-up, when available, was performed. The results were compared with previously published data from the study institution before the implementation of GEC testing. RESULTS: Among the 217 cases, there were 189 with indeterminate cytology, 42% of which were benign and 50% of which were suspicious by GEC. The excisional rate of atypia of undetermined significance-follicular lesion of undetermined significance in the pre-GEC category was 63%, which decreased to 35% in the post-GEC category, whereas the malignancy rate in the excised thyroids increased from 35% in the pre-GEC category to 47% in the post-GEC category. Similar findings also were obtained for suspicious for a follicular neoplasm-follicular neoplasm lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the GEC test appears to lie in its ability to reclassify 42% of indeterminate cytology cases as benign, thereby decreasing the number of unnecessary surgical procedures.

Effect of malignancy rates on cost-effectiveness of routine gene expression classifier testing for indeterminate thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: The value of gene expression classifier (GEC) testing for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules lies in its negative predictive value, which is influenced by the prevalence of malignancy. We incorporated actual GEC test performance data from a tertiary referral center into a cost-effectiveness analysis of GEC testing. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients who underwent GEC testing for Bethesda category III and IV nodules from 2012 to 2014. Routine GEC testing was compared with conventional management by the use of a decision tree model. Additional model variables were determined via literature review. A cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was used. RESULTS: The prevalence of malignancy was 24.3% (52/214). Sensitivity and specificity of GEC testing were 96% and 60%. Conventional management cost $11,119 and yielded 22.15 QALYs. Routine GEC testing was more effective and more costly, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $119,700/QALY, making it not cost-effective. At malignancy rates of 15, 25, or 35%, routine GEC testing became cost-effective when the cost of GEC testing fell below $3,167, $2,595, or $2,023. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of routine GEC testing varies inversely with the underlying prevalence of malignancy in the tested population. The value of routine GEC testing should be assessed within the context of institution-specific malignancy rates.

Comparative study of ProEx C immunocytochemistry and UroVysion fluorescent in-situ hybridization assays on urine cytology specimens.

BACKGROUND: Detection of urothelial carcinoma (UC) by urine cytology can be challenging. Recently, ProEx C has been studied as a marker to improve detection of UC. ProEx C is an assay targeting expression of topoisomerase IIa and minichromosome maintenance protein-2 and is currently utilized to assist in diagnoses of the gynecological specimens. In this study, we compared the utility of ProEx C and UroVysion in urine specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven urine specimens with UroVysion assay analysis and surgical biopsy follow-up were selected. The smears were stained with ProEx C. ProEx C and UroVysion assay results were separated into two categories based on surgical biopsy follow-up (benign or neoplastic). Surgical biopsy diagnoses were used as the gold standard for comparative evaluation of the two assays. The surgical follow-up was 9 benign, 2 low grade, and 16 high grade UCs. RESULTS: The sensitivity was 88.9% for ProEx C and 55.6% for UroVysion, while the specificity was 77.8% for ProEx C and 44.4% for UroVysion. Positive predictive value was 88.9% for ProEx C and 66.7% for UroVysion. Negative predictive value was 77.8% and 33.3% for ProEx C and UroVysion, respectively. Using the two-tailed paired t-test, P value of 0.033 was obtained when ProEx C stain was compared with the UroVysion assay. CONCLUSION: ProEx C immunocytochemistry has a more favorable performance than fluorescent in-situ hybridization with a significant difference between the two assays using paired two-tail t-test (P = 0.0033).

Comparative evaluation of ProEx C and ImmunoCyt/uCyt assays in atypical urine cytology.

CONTEXT: Detection of urothelial carcinoma by urine cytology can be challenging. Recently, ProEx C has been studied as a marker to improve detection of urothelial carcinoma. ProEx C is an assay targeting expression of topoisomerase II-α and the minichromosome maintenance protein-2 and is used to assist in diagnoses of gynecologic specimens. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of ProEx C and uCyt in atypical urine cytology. DESIGN: Sixty-eight specimens with a diagnosis of atypical urine cytology, concurrent uCyt testing, and surgical biopsy follow-up were included. Slides were restained with ProEx C. ProEx C was recorded as positive when nuclear staining was seen in at least one morphologically atypical urothelial cell. The uCyt was scored as positive if at least one morphologically atypical urothelial cell showed positive fluorescence staining. Thirteen cases (19%) had benign histologic diagnoses, 18 (26%) had low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma, and 37 (54%) had high-grade urothelial carcinoma. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity was 85% for ProEx C, 85% for uCyt, and 93% for the combination of the 2 assays. The overall specificity was 69% for ProEx C, 31% for uCyt, and 23% for the combination of the 2 tests. In predicting high-grade urothelial carcinoma, sensitivity was 92% for ProEx C, 86% for uCyt, and 92% for both tests. In predicting low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma, sensitivity was best with the combination of the 2 tests at 94%. CONCLUSION: ProEx C has superior specificity to uCyt. The combination of the 2 tests yielded high sensitivity not only for high-grade urothelial carcinoma but also for low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma.

ProEx C as an adjunct marker to improve cytological detection of urothelial carcinoma in urinary specimens.

BACKGROUND: ProEx C is an antibody cocktail targeting the expression of topoisomerase IIα and minichromosome maintenance protein-2. ProEx C staining is being used to assist in diagnoses of the gynecological specimens. This study was designed to determine the utility of ProEx C in urine cytology samples for improving the detection of urothelial carcinomas where a significant number of urine cytology specimens are diagnosed as "atypia." METHODS: Sixty urinary specimens (12 negative, 13 positive, and 35 atypical cases) were stained with ProEx C, and ProEx C results were recorded as positive when nuclear staining was only seen in at least one morphologically atypical urothelial cell. RESULTS: All 12 benign cytology samples showed negative staining with ProEx C. Twelve of 13 cases that had a malignant cytologic diagnosis showed a positive nuclear staining of the malignant cells. Eighteen of 35 cases with atypical cytologic diagnoses showed positive nuclear staining. Of the 35 cases with "atypia," 17 had a malignant histopathologic follow-up. In this study, ProEx C stain had an overall sensitivity of 78.4%, specificity of 95.7%%, positive predictive value of 96.7%, and negative predictive value of 73.3% for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: ProEx C stain is a useful adjunct test to urine cytologic analysis, even in specimens with limited cellularity. In urinary smears, this test is most useful in stratification of the "atypical" diagnoses into benign and malignant subsets. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study of ProEx C application in urine cytology as an adjunct marker for detection of urothelial carcinoma.

In Papanicolaou smears, benign appearing endometrial cells bear no significance in predicting uterine endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Reporting of benign appearing endometrial cells (BECs) in the Papanicolaou smears of women aging 40 years or older was mandated in the Bethesda System 2001 aiming at predicting the uterine pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical significance of the BECs in patients in our Medical Center. A two-arm study was designed in ≥40-years-old women with BECs and without BECs in their Pap smears from January 2002 to December 2004. Of 21,965 patients, 882 had BECs in their Pap smears and the rest did not. Among the patients with BECs, 186 (study group) and among those without BECs, 2,064 (control group) had histopathologic follow-ups. There were 4 patients in the study and 47 in the control groups who had uterine adenocarcinoma. The Chi-square P-value for adenocarcinoma between the two groups was 0.91; indicating insignificant differences between the two groups. We conclude that presence of BECs in the Pap smears of ≥40-years-old women signal no significance as a harbinger of endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.

Urine cytology coupled with cystoscopic examination has been and remains the standard in the initial evaluation of lower urinary tract lesions to rule out bladder cancer. However, cystoscopy is invasive and may miss some flat lesions, whereas cytology has low sensitivity in low-grade papillary disease. Additional lab-based or office-based markers are needed to aid in the evaluation of these lesions. Recently, many such markers have been developed for the purpose of improving the cytologic diagnosis of bladder malignancies. In this review, we will first discuss conventional cytomorphologic analysis of urine cytology followed by a discussion of markers that have been developed in the past for detection and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma. We will focus on how these markers can be used in conjunction with urine cytology in daily practice.

Comparison of ImmunoCyt, UroVysion, and urine cytology in detection of recurrent urothelial carcinoma: a "split-sample" study.

BACKGROUND: ImmunoCyt (uCyt) and UroVysion are ancillary studies that may aid in the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens. We compared ImmunoCyt and UroVysion to urine cytology in the ability to detect recurrent urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: Single voided urine samples were obtained from 100 patients who had a previous history of bladder cancer. All patients underwent cystoscopy immediately after urine sample collection. Forty-one cystoscopically suspicious lesions were biopsied. Urine samples were divided and processed blindly and independently in 3 different laboratories for ImmunoCyt, UroVysion, and urine cytology (ThinPrep method). RESULTS: Of the 41 cystoscopically positive cases, most cystoscopy findings showed multiple tumors that were papillary and less than 1 cm. Biopsies showed many low-grade tumors (54%). Overall sensitivity of cytology for low- and high-grade urothelial cell carcinoma was 15% and 27%, whereas ImmunoCyt was 62% and 91% and UroVysion was 8% and 18%, respectively. Overall specificity of cytology was 97%, whereas ImmunoCyt was 63% and UroVysion was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: ImmunoCyt is more sensitive than either cytology or UroVysion in detecting low-grade tumors. Both cytology and UroVysion have comparable specificity in cystoscopically negative cases. Whereas ImmunoCyt may improve the cytological detection of recurrent bladder cancer, UroVysion may be used as a confirmatory test for either cytology or ImmunoCyt.