Quality assurance in corneal transplants: Donor cornea assessment and oversight.

The cornea is the most frequently transplanted human tissue, and corneal transplantation represents the most successful allogeneic transplant worldwide. In order to obtain good surgical outcome and visual rehabilitation and to ensure the safety of the recipient, accurate screening of donors and donor tissues is necessary throughout the process. This mitigates the risks of transmission to the recipient, including infectious diseases and environmental contaminants, and ensures high optical and functional quality of the tissues. The process can be divided into 3 stages: (1) donor evaluation and selection before tissue harvest performed by the retrieval team, (2) tissue analysis during the storage phase conducted by the eye bank technicians after the retrieval, and, (3) tissue quality checks undertaken by the surgeons in the operating room before transplantation. Although process improvements over the years have greatly enhanced safety, quality, and outcome of the corneal transplants, a lack of standardization between centers during certain phases of the process still remains, and may impact on the quality and number of transplanted corneas. Here we detail the donor screening process for the retrieval teams, eye bank operators. and ophthalmic surgeons and examine the limitations associated with each of these stages.

Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (sequential DMEK) and DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (combined DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus. Comparative studies reporting sequential DMEK and combined DMEK in FECD patients were included. The main outcome measure of the study was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate and primary graft failure rate. Bias risk was assessed and a quality appraisal of the body of evidence was completed using the Cochrane Robin-I tool. A total of 667 eyes (5 studies) were included in this review, 292 eyes (43.77%) underwent a combined DMEK, while 375 (56.22%) eyes underwent a sequential DMEK surgery. We found no evidence of a difference between the two groups (mean difference, 95% CI) regarding: (1) CDVA improvement (-0.06; -0.14, 0.03 LogMAR; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86); (2) postoperative ECD (-62; -190, 67 cells/mm2 ; 4 studies, I2 : 67%; p = 0.35); (3) rebubbling (risks ratio: 1.04; 0.59, 1.85; 4 studies, I2 : 48%; p = 0.89); and primary graft failure rate (risks ratio: 0.91; 0.32, 2.57; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86). Of all the 5 non-randomized studies, all (100%) were graded as low quality. The overall quality of the analysed studies was low. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm no difference or superiority of one approach in terms of CDVA, endothelial cell count and postoperative complication rate between the two arms.

Preoperative surgeon evaluation of corneal endothelial status: the Viability Control of Human Endothelial Cells before Keratoplasty (V-CHECK) study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The success of keratoplasty strongly depends on the health status of the transplanted endothelial cells. Donor corneal tissues are routinely screened for endothelial damage before shipment; however, surgical teams have currently no means of assessing the overall viability of corneal endothelium immediately prior to transplantation. The aim of this study is to validate a preoperative method of evaluating the endothelial health of donor corneal tissues, to assess the proportion of tissues deemed suitable for transplantation by the surgeons and to prospectively record the clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients undergoing keratoplasty in relation to preoperatively defined endothelial viability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing keratoplasty (perforating keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), ultra-thin DSAEK (UT-DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) will be enrolled and followed-up for 1 year. Before transplantation, the endothelial viability of the donor corneal tissue will be evaluated preoperatively through trypan blue staining and custom image analysis to estimate the overall percentage of trypan blue-positive areas (TBPAs), a proxy of endothelial damage. Functional and structural outcomes at the end of the follow-up will be correlated with preoperatively assessed TBPA values. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol will be reviewed by the ethical committees of participating centres, with the sponsor centre issuing the final definitive approval. The results will be disseminated on ClinicalTrials.gov, at national and international conferences, by partner patient groups and in open access, peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05847387.

P27-A149†Liverpool research eye biobank-our exerience of expanding to collect from living donors.

PURPOSE: The Liverpool Research Eye Biobank (LREB) collects tissue for researchers who wish to study a wide range of ophthalmic conditions and develop new and more effective treatments. Historically the LREB has collected whole globes and conjunctiva from cadaveric donors but in 2021 we expanded to start collecting tissues from living donors who were undergoing ophthalmic surgery in the St Paul's Eye Unit in Liverpool. The aim was to provide tissue and fluid samples from patients with specific eye disease to research projects and create a bank of ophthalmic samples that can be provided to future research projects. Here we reflect on our experience after a year of collections. METHODS: The clinical team discuss donation with patients during the pre-op appointment. Consent is taken on the day of surgery using an electronic consent form available on PENS. Samples are taken according to the patient's consent preference and then stored appropriately within a fridge/freezer close to theatre. Samples are then transferred for processing to the University of Liverpool (UoL). Fluids such as aqueous and vitreous are preserved at -80°C. The majority of ocular tissue collected is preserved by fixing in 10% neutral buffered formalin then transferred to 70% ethanol for long term storage. On request samples have been preserved using alternative methods such as snap freezing in liquid nitrogen. All samples are logged using a laboratory information management system. RESULTS: Collections depend on the cooperation of the clinical teams and we have had very good engagement from them. The UoL works closely with St Pauls Eye Unit and the physical proximity between the two has been helpful. The location of the storage fridges close to theatre is important to limit extra effort for busy clinical teams. Regular training of consenters was key to ensure compliance with SOPs. In 11 months, we consented 419 donors and collected 673 samples including corneal tissue, iris, sclera, lens/capsule, retinal membranes, tenons, muscle, aqueous, vitreous, blood. CONCLUSION: After the success of collections from one site we plan to expand to collect from multiple sites including Aintree and Alder Hey Children's Hospital.

Incidence and management of early postoperative complications in lamellar corneal transplantation.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review of the incidence, risk factors, and management of early complications after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: A literature review of complications, that can occur from the time of the transplant up to 1 month after the transplant procedure, was conducted. Case reports and case series were included in the review. RESULTS: Complications in the earliest postoperative days following anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty have shown to affect graft survival. These complications include, but are not limited to, double anterior chamber, sclerokeratitis endothelial graft detachment, acute glaucoma, fluid misdirection syndrome, donor-transmitted and recurrent infection, and Uretts-Zavalia syndrome. CONCLUSION: It is essential for surgeons and clinicians to not only be aware of these complications but also know how to manage them to minimize their impact on long-term transplant survival and visual outcomes.

Thinning rate over 24 months in ultrathin DSAEK.

AIM: To describe the changes in corneal graft thickness following ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) comparing pre- and postoperative values over a 24-month period. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center case series, patients who received eye bank-prepared tissues for UT-DSAEK surgery were included. Preoperative and postoperative graft thickness measurements were determined in the eye bank and in clinic using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images. Graft thickness measurements and their percentage change between preoperative values and values at 1 day, 1 week and 1, 6, 12, 24 months were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 47 eyes of 47 patients with a mean age of 69 ± 11 years (29 males) were included. Twnty-three patients had Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (49%) and the remaining 24 had pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (51%). In total, 29/47 eyes underwent UT-DSAEK alone (62%) and 18/47 received combined cataract surgery as a triple procedure (38%). Preoperative donor graft thickness was 92 ± 28 µm. Compared to preoperative values, where graft thickness increased to 194 ± 101.3 µm at 1 day, 151.1 ± 71.4 µm at 1 week, and 108.4 ± 52.5 µm at 1 month. Graft thickness continued to gradually decrease over time until 6 months (91.7 ± 33.6 µm), and then plateaued at 12 months (83.9 ± 25.0 µm), showing minimal changes at 2 years (101.4 ± 37.5 µm). CONCLUSION: Preoperative DSAEK graft thickness measurements as reported by the eye bank are a valid approximation of DSAEK graft thickness at 6 months after surgery and these measurements tend to stabilize over time up to 2 years after surgery.

DMEK graft: One size does not fit all.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a popular procedure for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases mainly targeting Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). Although DMEK has multiple advantages, it is challenging in terms of graft preparation and delivery. One of the crucial factors of DMEK graft preparation is determining the size of the graft. Evaluating risks and benefits of transplanting larger or smaller grafts compared with the descemetorhexis performed following a standard DMEK procedure thus becomes important. Advanced techniques like pre-loaded DMEK requires pre-selection of graft diameter without physical examination of the eye making it more challenging. Therefore, recognizing the benefits of graft size and the number of transplanted endothelial cells becomes essential. Smaller DMEK grafts have been preferred and accepted for grafting. Larger diameter grafts have advantages but can be challenging due to higher detachment rates. We thus aim to review the challenges of preparing and delivering DMEK tissues with small or large diameter based on selected descemetorhexis area, discuss the outcomes based on different graft sizes, highlight related complications and suggest which cases may benefit from adopting smaller or larger graft size.

Posterior stromal ripples increase risk of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachment worsening over time.

PURPOSE: To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) features of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts associated with graft attachment worsening over time. METHODS: Retrospective case series on patients who received uncomplicated DMEK surgery and for whom subsequent AS-OCT data were available for analysis. Patients' demographics and surgical details were collected. AS-OCT was analysed for graft detachment axial extension, presence of posterior stromal ripples, quadrant involvement (location and number), degree of detachment extension, peripheral roll, presence and amount of air in the anterior chamber (AC). Features associated with re-bubbling and graft detachment worsening over time were identified. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 9.8 years (63% females) were included. AS-OCT was performed at 2.9 ± 2.4 days after surgery. AS-OCT factors associated with re-bubbling were posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.004) and detachment axial extension (p < 0.001). At first follow-up, of the 147 DMEK, 67 showed complete attachment and 80 partial detachment. In those cases of initially completely attached grafts, posterior stromal ripples were associated with the risk of subsequent graft detachment (p = 0.014) together with recipient age (p = 0.043), phaco-combined surgery (p = 0.018) and AS-OCT timing (p = 0.033); while, in the initially partially detached grafts, detachment worsening was associated with posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.025), detachment axial extension (p = 0.003), degrees of detachment involvement (p = 0.029), peripheral roll-in shape (p = 0.033) and presence of air in the AC (p = 0.032). Relative risk (RR) of graft detachment worsening in patients with moderate/severe posterior stromal ripples was 1.75 (95% CI = 1.09-2.81). CONCLUSION: Posterior stromal ripples and detachment axial extension >1/3 of graft surface area were the main risk factors for detachment worsening over time, and patients showing these features should be monitored closely to identify the need for re-bubbling at an early stage, thus improving surgical outcomes.

Update on Suture Techniques in Corneal Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Effective suturing remains key to achieving successful outcomes in corneal surgery, especially anterior lamellar keratoplasty and full thickness transplantation. Limitations in the technique may result in complications such as wound leak, infection, or high astigmatism post corneal graft. By using a systematic approach, this study reviews articles and conducts content analysis based on update 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria). The aim of this paper is to summarize the state of the art of corneal suturing techniques for every type of corneal transplant and patient age and also their outcomes regarding astigmatism and complications. Future developments for corneal transplantation will be also discussed. This is important because especially the young surgeon must have knowledge of the implications of every suture performed in order to achieve consistent and predictable post-operative outcomes and also be aware of all the possible complications.

Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of the eye bank-prepared and surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. METHODS: In this laboratory study, corneal tissues for research were randomly allocated in the following groups: a) surgeon-cut DSAEK and b) eye bank-prepared (pre-cut and pre-loaded) DSAEK. Endothelial cell loss (ECL), immunostaining for tight junction protein ZO-1, elastic modulus, and adhesion force were investigated. RESULTS: ECL was not found to be significantly different between surgeon-cut DSAEK (7.8% ±6.5%), pre-cut DSAEK (8.6% ±2.3%), and pre-loaded DSAEK (11.1% ±4.8%) (P = 0.5910). ZO-1 was expressed equally across all groups. Surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts showed a significantly higher elastic modulus compared to pre-cut and pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0047 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Adhesion force was significantly greater in the surgeon-cut DSAEK compared to pre-cut (P < 0.0001) or pre-loaded DSAEK groups (P = 0.0101). CONCLUSION: The laboratory data on the biomechanics of DSAEK grafts suggests that surgeon-cut DSAEK grafts present higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to eye bank-prepared DSAEK grafts.

Eye bank versus surgeon prepared DMEK tissues: influence on adhesion and re-bubbling rate.

AIM: To investigate the difference in adhesion and rebubbling rate between eye bank and surgeon prepared Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissues. METHODS: Laboratory and clinical retrospective comparative interventional case series. Research corneal tissues were obtained for laboratory investigation. The clinical study involved patients with endothelial dysfunction who underwent DMEK surgery and tamponade with air. Tissues were stripped using a standard DMEK stripping technique (SCUBA) and shipped as prestripped or loaded in a 2.2 intra-ocular lens cartridge with endothelium facing inwards (preloaded) before transporting from the eye bank to the surgeon. For surgeon prepared tissues, all the grafts were stripped in the theatre and transplanted or stripped in the laboratory and tested immediately. Adhesion force and elastic modulus were measured in the centre and mid-periphery in a laboratory ex vivo investigation using atomic force microscopy, while rebubbling rates were recorded in the clinical study. RESULTS: There was no difference in endothelial cell viability between surgeon or eye bank prepared tissue. Surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts in the laboratory investigation showed significantly higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to prestripped and preloaded tissues (p<0.0001). In the clinical data, rebubbling rates of 48%, 40% and 15% were observed in preloaded, prestripped and surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts, respectively. Rebubbling rates were significantly associated with combined cataract surgery (p=0.009) and with time from harvesting the graft to the surgery (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased adhesion forces and elastic modulus in eye bank prepared tissues may contribute to increased rebubbling rates.

29†Production of ultra-thin decellularised dermis to treat severe ocular diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The ocular surface may be damaged by several ocular conditions such as chemical trauma, infection, neoplasia or autoimmune disease causing a loss of tissue and function leading to a painful loss of vision. Tissue regeneration is needed to re-establish homeostasis of the ocular surface and to preserve vision. Present replacement strategies have limitations ranging from availability of the same type of tissue to long-term stability. NHSBT currently produces decellularised dermis (DCD) for clinical allografting; comprising a "thin" (up to 1.0 mm) and a thick (>1.2 mm) DCD, used to treat non-healing leg ulcers or in rotator cuff repair. Even the thin DCD, however, is too thick for ophthalmic purposes. The objective of this study was to develop a new ultra-thin DCD for ocular allografting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Skin was retrieved, with consent for non-clinical use, from the back, front and back of the thighs of 3 different deceased donors, within 48 hours post-mortem. The tissue was cut into 5x5 cm squares and decellularised over 5 days as follows: decontamination with antimicrobials, de-epidermalisation (1M NaCl), hypotonic washes, detergent washes (with 0.01% SDS) and nuclease incubation. The DCD obtained was examined for integrity, handleability, residual remaining DNA and potential ultra-structural changes (by histology, DAPI and hematoxylin and eosin staining). RESULTS: We obtained an intact ultra-thin DCD using the same standard GMP protocol, regularly used to decellularise skin for clinical use. Tissue handleability was comparable to amniotic membrane, as evaluated by the ophthalmic surgeons as well as tissue bank assistants. The mean thickness of the tissue was 0.25 mm (±0.11) at the end of processing (total N=18 samples from 3 donors). Histology confirmed successful removal of epithelial cells and integrity of the extracellular matrix. CONCLUSION: We have successfully validated standard operating procedures for the production of ultra-thin DCD, in the attempt to obtain a valid alternative to amnion for the reconstruction of specific ocular regions (fornix, eye lids), where increased strength may be required. The thickness measurements at the end of processing suggest ultra-thin DCD obtained could represent a promising scaffold for regeneration of conjunctival tissue.

Biofabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches in the Anterior Ocular Segment.

The anterior segment of the eye is a complex set of structures that collectively act to maintain the integrity of the globe and direct light towards the posteriorly located retina. The eye is exposed to numerous physical and environmental insults such as infection, UV radiation, physical or chemical injuries. Loss of transparency to the cornea or lens (cataract) and dysfunctional regulation of intra ocular pressure (glaucoma) are leading causes of worldwide blindness. Whilst traditional therapeutic approaches can improve vision, their effect often fails to control the multiple pathological events that lead to long-term vision loss. Regenerative medicine approaches in the eye have already had success with ocular stem cell therapy and ex vivo production of cornea and conjunctival tissue for transplant recovering patients' vision. However, advancements are required to increase the efficacy of these as well as develop other ocular cell therapies. One of the most important challenges that determines the success of regenerative approaches is the preservation of the stem cell properties during expansion culture in vitro. To achieve this, the environment must provide the physical, chemical and biological factors that ensure the maintenance of their undifferentiated state, as well as their proliferative capacity. This is likely to be accomplished by replicating the natural stem cell niche in vitro. Due to the complex nature of the cell microenvironment, the creation of such artificial niches requires the use of bioengineering techniques which can replicate the physico-chemical properties and the dynamic cell-extracellular matrix interactions that maintain the stem cell phenotype. This review discusses the progress made in the replication of stem cell niches from the anterior ocular segment by using bioengineering approaches and their therapeutic implications.

Cost analysis of eye bank versus surgeon prepared endothelial grafts.

BACKGROUND: Selective lamellar corneal transplantation (keratoplasty) has overtaken full thickness penetrating keratoplasty as the graft choice for endothelial failure. Even more recently eye bank prepared tissues are becoming increasing popular as a way to reduce the risks of tissue loss and stress during endothelial keratoplasty preparation in the surgical theatre. This study compares costs between surgeon and eye bank prepared tissues for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Retrospective study conducted at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital including endothelial keratoplasties with a minimum of 6 months follow-up time. Cost analysis included surgical expenses, tissue acquisition fees, cost of patient's ward admission and out-patient expenses, including cost of re-bubbling procedures, costs of visits, anterior segment imaging and optometrist visits within the first 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients were included in the study of which 42 underwent DSAEK surgery and 56 DMEK surgery. Cost analysis of surgical expenses in the DSAEK group showed a significant difference between using surgeon prepared and eye bank prepared tissue (£3866 ± 296 and £4389 ± 360, respectively; p < 0.01) and the same was found in the DMEK group (£3682 ± 167 and £4162 ± 167 for surgeon prepared and eye bank prepared tissues, respectively; p < 0.01). Cost of out-patient visits did not differ significantly in either group. CONCLUSIONS: At the Royal Liverpool University Hospital, eye bank prepared tissues had higher surgical expenses compared to those prepared by the surgeon, while the post-operative care expenses were similar between the two groups.

Tips, Tricks, and Guides in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Learning Curve.

Lamellar keratoplasty is fast becoming the most popular form of corneal transplantation. The adoption of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in the management of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy is partly responsible for this shift in the paradigm of management of corneal pathology. The learning curve of DMEK, however, has been proven to be much steeper than previous endothelial keratoplasty procedures. To ease the procedure, experts have proposed multiple innovative techniques from tissue preparation to graft unfolding to aid the more novice surgeon. Here, we collate and share tips and tricks from our collective experiences to support the learning curve and outcomes in DMEK for both the novice and more experienced corneal transplant surgeons.

Rebubbling rate in preloaded versus surgeon prepared DSAEK.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of eye bank preloaded Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) grafts and surgeon prepared. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the data were obtained from two groups (a) surgeon cut DSAEK where tissue was prepared by the surgeon immediately before surgery, and (b) preloaded DSAEK tissue shipped to the surgeon after preparation by the eye bank. Standard DSAEK preparations using Moria microkeratome with single pass method were performed. For the tissues prepared by the eye banks, they were preloaded in an iGlide device and shipped in transport media. Standard DSAEK surgery using bimanual pull-through technique was performed for all the grafts. Air was used as a tamponade. Main outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and rebubbling rate. RESULT: Out of 107 eyes of 101 patients that underwent DSAEK surgery, 33 tissues were prepared by the surgeon (sc-DSAEK), while 74 were prepared by the eye bank (pl-DSAEK). sc-DSAEK showed a rebubbling rate of 9.1%, compared to the 16.2% for the preloaded DSAEK (p = 0.11). There was no statistical difference in postoperative BCVA between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed no association between detachment rate and cataract surgery, graft preparation method, graft diameter and reason for graft. CONCLUSION: Preloaded grafts have similar rebubbling rate and visual acuity achieved compared with surgeon prepared grafts.

Ultra-thin DSAEK using an innovative artificial anterior chamber pressuriser: a proof-of-concept study.

PURPOSE: To report the impact of establishing and maintaining a high intracameral pressure (ICP) of 200 mmHg on UT-DSAEK graft preparation using an artificial anterior chamber pressuriser (ACP) control unit (Moria SA, Antony, France). METHOD: Retrospective laboratory and clinical study. Four paired donor corneas were mounted on an artificial anterior chamber and subjected to 70 mmHg ("low") and 200 mmHg ("high") ICP using an ACP system. The central corneal thinning rate was measured after 5 min using AS-OCT and the endothelial cell viability was analysed using trypan blue and live/dead staining following 70 mmHg and 200 mmHg ICP. Visual outcomes and complications in a clinical case series of nine patients with bullous keratopathy who underwent UT-DSAEK using 200 mmHg ICP during graft preparation are reported. RESULTS: Laboratory outcomes showed 2 ± 1% and 2 ± 2% dead cells following 70 mmHg and 200 mmHg ICP respectively. Percentage viability in the 70 mmHg group (52.94 ± 5.88%) was not found to be significantly different (p = 0.7) compared to the 200 mmHg group (59.14 ± 10.43%). The mean corneal thinning rate after applying 200 mmHg ICP was 27 ± 13 µm/min centrally (7.2%/min). In the clinical case series, two cases were combined with cataract surgery. Re-bubbling rate was 11%. At the last follow-up (259 ± 109 days), graft thickness was 83 ± 22 µm centrally, endothelial cell density was 1175 ± 566 cell/mm2 and the BCVA of 0.08 ± 0.12 logMAR was recorded with no episodes of rejection. CONCLUSION: ACP control unit for UT-DSAEK graft preparation helps in consistently obtaining UT-DSAEK grafts without compromising endothelial cell viability.