Outcomes of systemic anticoagulation with bivalirudin for Impella 5.0.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are used for the management of cardiogenic shock. The Impella 5.0 (Abiomed; Danvers, MA) (IMP5) is a commonly used, surgically implanted, tMCS device that requires systemic anticoagulation and purge solution to avoid pump failure. To avoid heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) from unfractionated heparin (UFH) use, our program has explored the utility of bivalirudin (BIV) for systemic anticoagulation in IMP5. This single center, retrospective study included patients supported on IMP5 with BIV based AC. The efficacy and safety end points were recovery, bridge to left ventricular assist device (LVAD), cardiac transplant (HTX), or death as well as clinically significant bleeding, incidence of Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) use for suspected pump thrombosis, stroke, and device failure. There were 31 patients included, and 26 (84%) received BIV purge solutions. The median duration of IMP5 was 6 (IQR 4-10) days. Most patients were bridged to LVAD (39%, 12); 16% (5) were bridged to HTX, 16% (5) recovered, and 29% (9) died. One patient (3%) suffered from ischemic stroke and 12% (4) patients developed clinically significant bleeding. tPA was administered to 8 (26%) patients. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that duration of IMP5 was a significant predictor of tPA use (OR 1.28; 95% Confidence Interval 1.04-1.56). There were no cases of pump failure. Our experience highlights the feasibility of utilizing BIV for routine AC use in IMP5.

Impact of benzodiazepines on time to awakening in post cardiac arrest patients.

AIM: Although guidelines recommend use of short acting sedation after cardiac arrest, there is significant practice variation. We examined whether benzodiazepine use is associated with delayed awakening in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single center study including comatose patients treated after in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from January 2010 to September 2019. We excluded patients who awakened within 6 h of arrest, those who arrested due to trauma or neurological event, those with nonsurvivable primary brain injury and those with refractory shock. Our primary exposure of interest was high-dose benzodiazepine (>10 mg of midazolam equivalents per day) administration in the first 72-h post arrest. Our primary outcome was time to awakening. We used Cox regression to test for an independent association between exposure and outcome after controlling for biologically plausible covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 2778 patients presented during the study period, 621 met inclusion criteria and 209 (34%) awakened after a median of 4 [IQR 3-7] days. Patients who received high-dose benzodiazepines awakened later than those who did not (5 [IQR 3-11] vs. 3 [IQR 3-6] days, P = 0.004). In adjusted regression, high-dose benzodiazepine exposure was independently associated with delayed awakening (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63 (95% CI 0.43-0.92)). Length of stay, awakening to discharge, and duration of mechanical ventilation were similar across groups. CONCLUSION: High-dose benzodiazepine exposure is independently associated with delayed awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.

A Systemwide Approach for Navigating the Dilemma of Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor Interference With Unfractionated Heparin Anti-Factor Xa Concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Oral factor Xa inhibitors are known to significantly increase heparin anti-Xa concentrations, which leads to inaccuracies when monitoring intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UFH). Guidance for managing this laboratory interference is lacking, creating substantial uncertainty in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To describe a strategy used by a large academic institution for managing the controversy of laboratory interference in the setting of oral factor Xa inhibitor use and provide effectiveness and safety data for this approach. METHODS: In December 2016, a new Heparin IV Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Interference PowerPlan (a comprehensive order set) was made available in the electronic health record (Cerner, North Kansas City, MO) throughout the health system. We retrospectively examined 169 patients with events reported in the error reporting system, RISKMASTER, and evaluated reports with and without the use of the PowerPlan. Effectiveness was determined through evaluation of thrombosis. The Naranjo criteria for causality were applied to assess thrombotic events. RESULTS: Of 56 events that were reported with apixaban when the PowerPlan was not ordered, 4 (7%) thrombotic events occurred within 7 days of UFH initiation. One out of the 4 events (25%) that occurred when the PowerPlan was not appropriately initiated was considered probable using the Naranjo Scale. Three additional events (75%) were possible using the Naranjo Scale. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The Heparin IV DOAC Interference PowerPlan appears to be conducive to positive patient outcomes when evaluating voluntary reported events and may assist clinicians with managing the therapeutic dilemma of this laboratory interference.