Derangement of the endothelial glycocalyx in sepsis.

The vascular endothelial surface is coated by the glycocalyx, a ubiquitous gel-like layer composed of a membrane-binding domain that contains proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycan side-chains, and plasma proteins such as albumin and antithrombin. The endothelial glycocalyx plays a critical role in maintaining vascular homeostasis. However, this component is highly vulnerable to damage and is also difficult to examine. Recent advances in analytical techniques have enabled biochemical, visual and computational investigation of this vascular component. The glycocalyx modulates leukocyte-endothelial interactions, thrombus formation and other processes that lead to microcirculatory dysfunction and critical organ injury in sepsis. It also acts as a regulator of vascular permeability and contains mechanosensors as well as receptors for growth factors and anticoagulants. During the initial onset of sepsis, the glycocalyx is damaged and circulating levels of glycocalyx components, including syndecans, heparan sulfate and hyaluronic acid, can be measured and are reportedly useful as biomarkers for sepsis. Also, a new methodology using side-stream dark-field imaging is now clinically available for assessing the glycocalyx. Multiple factors including hypervolemia and hyperglycemia are toxic to the glycocalyx, and several agents have been proposed as therapeutic modalities, although no single treatment has been proven to be clinically effective. In this article, we review the derangement of the glycocalyx in sepsis. Despite the accumulated knowledge regarding the important roles of the glycocalyx, the relationship between derangement of the endothelial glycocalyx and severity of sepsis or disseminated intravascular coagulation has not been adequately elucidated and further work is needed.

Sugammadex hypersensitivity and underlying mechanisms: a randomised study of healthy non-anaesthetised volunteers.

BACKGROUND: We investigated potential for hypersensitivity reactions after repeated sugammadex administration and explored the mechanism of hypersensitivity. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT00988065), 448 healthy volunteers were randomised to one of three arms to receive three repeat i.v. administrations of either sugammadex 4 mg kg-1, 16 mg kg-1, or placebo. Primary endpoint was percentage of subjects with hypersensitivity (assessed by an independent adjudication committee). Secondary endpoint of anaphylaxis was classified per Sampson and Brighton criteria. Exploratory endpoints included skin testing, serum tryptase, anti-sugammadex antibodies [immunoglobulin (Ig) E/IgG], and other immunologic parameters. RESULTS: Hypersensitivity was adjudicated for 1/148 (0.7%), 7/150 (4.7%), and 0/150 (0.0%) subjects after sugammadex 4 mg kg-1, 16 mg kg-1, and placebo, respectively. After sugammadex 16 mg kg-1, one subject met Sampson criterion 1 and Brighton level 1 (highest certainty) anaphylaxis criteria; two met Brighton level 2 criteria. After database lock it was determined that certain protocol deviations could have introduced bias in the reporting of hypersensitivity signs/symptoms in a subject subset. Objective laboratory investigations indicated that potential underlying hypersensitivity mechanisms were unlikely to have been activated; the results suggest that most of the observed hypersensitivity reactions were unlikely IgE/IgG-mediated. CONCLUSION: Dose-dependent hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis reactions to sugammadex were observed when administered without prior neuromuscular blocking agent. Laboratory investigations do not suggest prevalent allergen-specific IgE/IgG-mediated immunologic hypersensitivity. Because it could not be fully excluded that estimates of hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis incidence were unbiased, an additional study was conducted to characterise the potential for hypersensitivity reactions and is described in a companion report. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00988065; Protocol number P06042.

Inflammation and thrombosis: roles of neutrophils, platelets and endothelial cells and their interactions in thrombus formation during sepsis.

The inflammatory response and the activation of coagulation are two important responses in a host's defense against infection. These mechanisms do not work independently, but cooperate in a complex and synchronous manner. Recent research has also shed light on the critical role of thrombus formation, which prevents the dissemination of microorganisms. The cellular components of blood vessels, i.e. leukocytes, platelets, erythrocytes, and vascular endothelial cells, play significant roles in the development of thrombi in combination with activation of the coagulation system. In addition to the cellular components, alarmins such as histones and high-mobility group box 1, microparticles and secreted granule proteins are all important for clot formation. In this summary, we review the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced coagulopathy and the role of cellular components and critical factors released from damaged cells. In addition, we review important therapeutic approaches that have been developed, are under investigation and are currently available in certain countries, including antithrombin, recombinant thrombomodulin, anti-Toll-like receptor 4 therapy, anti-damage associated molecular pattern therapy, and hemoadsorption with a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column.

Rivaroxaban reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate or tranexamic acid in healthy volunteers.

Essentials Specific reversal agents for managing severe factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding are lacking. We assessed 4-factor-prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA). 4F-PCC, but not TXA, reduced the prothrombin time and increased endogenous thrombin potential. These agents may be viable options for reversal of therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban. SUMMARY: Background Oral activated factor X inhibitors such as rivaroxaban are widely used, but specific reversal agents are lacking. Although four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA) are sometimes used to manage serious bleeding, their efficacy is unknown. Prior studies in healthy subjects taking rivaroxaban revealed that 4F-PCC partially reverses the prolonged prothrombin time (PT), and fully restores the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The effect of TXA has not been evaluated. Methods In this double-blind, parallel-group study, 147 healthy volunteers given rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily for 3 days were randomized after their morning dose on day 4 to receive intravenous 4F-PCC (50 IU kg-1 ), TXA (1.0 g), or saline. Standardized punch biopsies were performed at baseline and after 4F-PCC, TXA or saline administration. Reversal was assessed by measuring bleeding duration and bleeding volume at biopsy sites, and by determining the PT and ETP. Results As compared with saline, 4F-PCC partially reversed the PT and completely reversed the ETP, whereas TXA had no effect. Neither 4F-PCC nor TXA reduced bleeding duration or volume. All treatments were well tolerated, with no recorded adverse events. Conclusions Although 4F-PCC reduced the PT and increased the ETP in volunteers given supratherapeutic doses of rivaroxaban, neither 4F-PCC nor TXA influenced punch biopsy bleeding.

What is the evidence for platelet transfusion in perioperative settings?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Platelet transfusions are widely administered to restore perioperative haemostasis in haemorrhagic patients; however, the role of platelet transfusion is not well understood and administration is often based on empiric data. This review aims to explore consensus regarding platelet transfusion trigger, dose and how the haemostatic efficacy of platelet transfusion was assessed for the treatment of perioperative bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE (PubMed) on 28 February 2017, to identify publications reporting the effect of platelet transfusion in relation to triggers, dose and assessment of haemostatic efficacy in bleeding patients in a perioperative setting. RESULTS: Eight publications were identified across a variety of settings, covering both prophylactic and therapeutic platelet transfusion in adult patients; the majority of the reports were in cardiac surgery. A high degree of variability was observed in the published studies, with only 50% of articles specifying a trigger for platelet transfusion. The most commonly used trigger was platelet count (25% of publications), with no consensus identified regarding the platelet count values used as triggers. Doses reported per transfusion varied from 1 to 12 units, and outcome measures were mixed, although the majority of publications (63%) assessed the requirement for transfusion with other blood products. CONCLUSION: The lack of consensus in published studies hinders our ability to draw conclusions regarding platelet transfusion and highlights the need for further studies to assess the appropriate dose and triggers for use in perioperative patients.

Adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international survey of transfusion and anticoagulation techniques.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a method of life support for either isolated cardiac failure or respiratory failure, with or without cardiac failure. When used for hemodynamic support, the ECMO circuit presents a non-endothelialized, artificial surface to blood inciting an inflammatory response which activates haemostatic pathways. Anticoagulation may complicate a pre-existing coagulopathy and/or inadequate surgical hemostasis of varying severity. There is no standardized method to achieve and monitor anticoagulation or guide transfusion therapy during ECMO. We tested the hypothesis that institutions across the world conduct similar management of anticoagulation and transfusion during adult ECMO support. METHODS: This is a descriptive, self-reporting cross-sectional survey of anticoagulation and transfusion practice for patients age 18 or older on ECMO. This 38 multiple-choice question survey was sent to 166 institutions, internationally, utilizing adult ECMO. About 32·4% (54) of institutions responded. Responses were anonymously collected. Descriptive analyses were calculated. RESULTS: Our findings indicate there appears to be a significant practice variation among institutions regarding anticoagulation and transfusion during adult ECMO support. DISCUSSION: The lack of standard practices among institutions may reflect a paucity of data regarding optimal anticoagulation and transfusion for patients requiring ECMO. Standardized protocols for anticoagulation and transfusion may help increase quality of care for and reduce morbidity, mortality and cost to patients and healthcare centres. Further study is required for standardized, high quality care.

The recommended dose of idarucizumab may not always be sufficient for sustained reversal of dabigatran.

Essentials Reversal of anticoagulant effects of dabigatran may occur despite application of idarucizumab. Monitoring of dabigatran level after antidote application is crucial to detect rebound. Repeated doses of idarucizumab may be necessary in cases of massive dabigatran accumulation. Combination of antidote application and renal replacement therapy may offer additional benefit. SUMMARY: Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment designed for reversing the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. Administration is recommended as two intravenous boluses of 2.5 g within 15 min of each other or as a single 5 g bolus. However, in certain situations a second dose of the drug could be necessary. We report the case of a 77-year-old man, treated with dabigatran for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. He presented at our department with acute renal failure, concomitant massive dabigatran accumulation and subsequent acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Fifty minutes after the administration of idarucizumab, the dabigatran plasma concentration decreased from a peak of 1630 ng ml-1 to a level below the detection limit of 30 ng ml-1 and bleeding stopped. Eight hours after administration, the dabigatran plasma level started to increase up to 1560 ng ml-1 (96% of the maximum value obtained), accompanied by a further drop in hemoglobin. Concomitant hemodialysis and hemofiltration led to a continuous decrease in dabigatran plasma levels. However, sepsis and multiorgan failure ensued, which led to death. With this case report we raise the question of whether massive dabigatran accumulation requires repeated doses of idarucizumab, or alternatively, if the combination of antidote with hemodialysis/renal replacement therapy is advisable in order to remove circulating levels of dabigatran.

Perioperative management of the bleeding patient.

Perioperative bleeding remains a major complication during and after surgery, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. The principal causes of non-vascular sources of haemostatic perioperative bleeding are a preexisting undetected bleeding disorder, the nature of the operation itself, or acquired coagulation abnormalities secondary to haemorrhage, haemodilution, or haemostatic factor consumption. In the bleeding patient, standard therapeutic approaches include allogeneic blood product administration, concomitant pharmacologic agents, and increasing application of purified and recombinant haemostatic factors. Multiple haemostatic changes occur perioperatively after trauma and complex surgical procedures including cardiac surgery and liver transplantation. Novel strategies for both prophylaxis and therapy of perioperative bleeding include tranexamic acid, desmopressin, fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrates. Point-of-care patient testing using thromboelastography, rotational thromboelastometry, and platelet function assays has allowed for more detailed assessment of specific targeted therapy for haemostasis. Strategic multimodal management is needed to improve management, reduce allogeneic blood product administration, and minimize associated risks related to transfusion.

Randomized evaluation of fibrinogen vs placebo in complex cardiovascular surgery (REPLACE): a double-blind phase III study of haemostatic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Single-dose human fibrinogen concentrate (FCH) might have haemostatic benefits in complex cardiovascular surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly assigned to receive FCH or placebo. Study medication was administered to patients with a 5 min bleeding mass of 60-250 g after separation from bypass and surgical haemostasis. A standardized algorithm for allogeneic blood product transfusion was followed if bleeding continued after study medication. RESULTS: 519 patients from 34 centres were randomized, of whom 152 (29%) met inclusion criteria for study medication. Median (IQR) pretreatment 5 min bleeding mass was 107 (76-138) and 91 (71-112) g in the FCH and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.13). More allogeneic blood product units were administered during the first 24 h after FCH, 5.0 (2.0-11.0), when compared with placebo, 3.0 (0.0-7.0), P=0.026. Fewer patients avoided transfusion in the FCH group (15.4%) compared with placebo (28.4%), P=0.047. The FCH immediately increased plasma fibrinogen concentration and fibrin-based clot strength. Adverse event rates were comparable in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Human fibrinogen concentrate was associated with increased allogeneic blood product transfusion, an unexpected finding contrary to previous studies. Human fibrinogen concentrate may not be effective in this setting when administered according to 5-minute bleeding mass. Low bleeding rates and normal-range plasma fibrinogen concentrations before study medication, and variability in adherence to the complex transfusion algorithm, may have contributed to these results. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT01475669; EudraCT trial no. 2011-002685-20.

[Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administration for the prevention and/or the treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a systematic review with meta-analysis]. / Efficacité et sécurité de l'acide tranexamique en prévention et/ou en traitement de l'hémorragie du post-partum : une revue systématique de la littérature avec méta-analyse.

OBJECTIVE(S): Assess the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administration for the prevention and/or the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic review of the literature with the aim of identifying prospective, randomised, controlled trials that assessed the effect of tranexamic acid on peripartum blood loss and transfusion requirement in three clinical contexts: (i) prevention of post-partum haemorrhage in case of elective caesarean section, (ii) prevention of post-partum haemorrhage in case of vaginal delivery, (iii) treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. RESULTS: Prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid reduced blood loss (mean difference for intraoperative blood loss: -177.9mL, IC 95%: -189.51 to -166.35, total blood loss: -183.94, IC 95%: -198.29 to -169.60), and the incidence of severe post-partum haemorrhage (OR: 0.49, IC 95%: 0.33 to 0.74). None of the published trials assessed the effect of tranexamic acid on blood products administration or transfusion requirement. Only one study assessed and reported the efficacy of tranexamic acid when administered as a treatment for postpartum haemorrhage. A significant reduction in blood loss was reported within 30 minutes after randomisation (P=0.03) and confirmed after 6 hours (median: 170mL (58-323) vs 221mL (110-543), P=0.04). None of the included studies adequately studied the incidence of side effects after tranexamic acid administration. CONCLUSION: Although tranexamic acid administration seemed to significantly reduce blood loss and the incidence of severe post-partum haemorrhage, further prospective trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of tranexamic administration in the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Those studies should assess the pharmacokinetic profile and the safety of this drug in pregnant women.

Cryoprecipitate therapy.

Cryoprecipitate, originally developed as a therapy for patients with antihaemophilic factor deficiency, or haemophilia A, has been in use for almost 50 yr. However, cryoprecipitate is no longer administered according to its original purpose, and is now most commonly used to replenish fibrinogen levels in patients with acquired coagulopathy, such as in clinical settings with haemorrhage including cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation (LT), or obstetric haemorrhage. Cryoprecipitate is a pooled product that does not undergo pathogen inactivation, and its administration has been associated with a number of adverse events, particularly transmission of blood-borne pathogens and transfusion-related acute lung injury. As a result of these safety concerns, along with emerging availability of alternative fibrinogen preparations, cryoprecipitate has been withdrawn from use in a number of European countries. Compared with the plasma from which it is prepared, cryoprecipitate contains a high concentration of coagulation factor VIII, coagulation factor XIII, and fibrinogen. Cryoprecipitate is usually licensed by regulatory authorities for the treatment of hypofibrinogenaemia, and recommended for supplementation when plasma fibrinogen levels decrease below 1 g litre(-1); however, this threshold is empiric and is not based on solid clinical evidence. Consequently, there is uncertainty over the appropriate dosing and optimal administration of cryoprecipitate, with some guidelines from professional societies to guide clinical practice. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of cryoprecipitate, compared with the efficacy of alternative preparations. These trials will allow the development of evidence-based guidelines in order to inform physicians and guide clinical practice.

Comparison of three-factor and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates regarding reversal of the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), which contain factor II, FVII, FIX, and FX, have shown the potential to reverse the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a three-factor PCC, which contains little FVII, has a similar effect. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an open-label, single-center, parallel-group study comparing the effect of a three-factor PCC (Profilnine SD) with that of a four-factor PCC (Beriplex P/N) on the pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in 35 healthy volunteers. After receiving 4 days of rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily to obtain supratherapeutic steady-state concentrations, volunteers were randomized to receive a single 50 IU kg(-1) bolus dose of four-factor PCC, three-factor PCC or saline 4 h after the morning dose of rivaroxaban on day 5, and the effects of these interventions on prothrombin time and thrombin generation were determined. Within 30 min, four-factor PCC reduced mean prothrombin time by 2.5-3.5 s, whereas three-factor PCC produced only a 0.6-1.0-s reduction. In contrast, three-factor PCC reversed rivaroxaban-induced changes in thrombin generation more than four-factor PCC. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential of both three-factor and four-factor PCCs to at least partially reverse the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in healthy adults. The discrepant effects of the PCC preparations may reflect differences in the procoagulant components present in each.

Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7).

The question of whether storage of red blood cells (RBCs) alters their capacity to deliver oxygen and affects patient outcomes remains in a state of clinical equipoise. Studies of the changes which occur while RBCs are stored have led to several physiologically plausible hypotheses that these changes impair RBC function when the units are transfused. Although there is some evidence of this effect in vivo from animal model experiments, the results of several largely retrospective patient studies have not been consistent. Some studies have shown an association between worse clinical outcomes and transfusion of RBC which have been stored for longer periods of time, while others have found no effect. Three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials have been developed to address this important, but currently unanswered, question. Two clinical trials, one in low birth weight neonates and the other in intensive care unit patients, are enrolling subjects in Canada (the Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants; the Age of Blood Study). The third trial, which is being developed in the United States, is the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS). This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures who are likely to require RBC transfusion will be randomized to receive RBC units stored for either 10 or fewer days or 21 or more days. Randomization will only occur if the blood bank has enough units of RBC of both storage times to meet the crossmatch request; hence, subjects randomized to the 21 day arm will receive RBC of the same storage time as they would have following standard inventory practice of "oldest units out first". The primary outcome is the change in the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), a composite measure of multiorgan dysfunction, by day 7. Secondary outcomes include the change in the MODS by day 28, all-cause mortality, and several composite and single measures of specific organ system function. The estimated total sample size required will be 1434 evaluable subjects (717 per arm).