Prehospital plasma is associated with survival principally in patients transferred from the scene of injury: A secondary analysis of the PAMPer trial.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize if prehospital transfer origin from the scene of injury (SCENE) or from a referral emergency department (REF) alters the survival benefit attributable to prehospital plasma resuscitation in patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a recently completed prehospital plasma clinical trial. All of the enrolled patients from either the SCENE or REF groups were included. The demographics, injury characteristics, shock severity and resuscitation needs were compared. The primary outcome was a 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox-hazard regression were used to characterize the independent survival benefits of prehospital plasma for transport origin groups. RESULTS: Of the 501 enrolled patients, the REF group patients (n = 111) accounted for 22% with the remaining (n = 390) originating from the scene. The SCENE group patients had higher injury severity and were more likely intubated prehospital. The REF group patients had longer prehospital times and received greater prehospital crystalloid and blood products. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant 30-day survival benefit associated with prehospital plasma in the SCENE group (P < .01) with no difference found in the REF group patients (P = .36). The Cox-regression verified after controlling for relevant confounders that prehospital plasma was independently associated with a 30-day survival in the SCENE group patients (hazard ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.89; P = .01) with no significant relationship found in the REF group patients (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.4-3.0). CONCLUSION: Important differences across the SCENE and REF cohorts exist that are essential to understand when planning prehospital studies. Prehospital plasma is associated with a survival benefit primarily in SCENE group patients. The results are exploratory but suggest transfer origin may be an important determinant of prehospital plasma benefit.

Optimal Pain Control after Outpatient Surgery for Cutaneous Malignancies.

Postoperative pain managed with opioids has contributed to the opioid crisis through overprescribing practices. We assessed opioid-prescribing habits and their use by patients undergoing surgery for cutaneous malignancies. An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis was conducted for patients who underwent skin cancer resection between January 2018 and June 2018. Data were collected from the electronic medical record, and opioid-related data were collected from patient interviews and state registries. There were 120 study participants (42 females and 78 males) with a median age of 67 years (range, 21-94 years). All received preincision local anesthetic: 64 had liposomal bupivacaine (LB) (53%) and 56 had non-LB bupivacaine (47%). Most participants (n = 88) used 0 opioids (73%), including 43 LB-anesthetic (67%) and 45 non-LB-anesthetic (80%). No significance was seen between those with a diagnosis of chronic pain, narcotic tolerance, an area of resection, and nodal sampling groups in opioid use. Four patients (3%) requested a refill. Of 105 prescriptions written for opioids, 99 had leftover opioids for an overprescribing rate of 94 per cent. This study suggests pain after skin cancer surgery is manageable with very limited opioid requirements. Our results support prescribing no more than five opioid tablets for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing resection for skin malignancies.

Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Is a Viable Alternative to Autologous Skin Graft in Patients with Cutaneous Malignancy.

Skin substitutes have shown success in complex wound reconstruction. We evaluate the use of a human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) as a viable alternative to autologous skin grafting for defects secondary to skin cancer excision. An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of ADM-reconstructed defects secondary to skin cancer excision between 2012 and 2018 was conducted. ADM was indicated in patients with preclusive factors for general anesthesia, protracted procedure time, reluctance for additional donor site wound, and personal choice. We reviewed defect characteristics, healing time, postoperative outcomes, and patient demographics. The 228 participants (151 males, 77 females) had a median age of 72 years (range, 29-95 years), with melanoma diagnosed in 113 (49.6%), squamous cell carcinoma in 61 (26.8%), and basal cell carcinoma in 28 (12.2%) patients. The median interval to complete epidermal coverage was 42 days, with graft failure evident in six patients (2.6%). ADM is a viable, low-morbid alternative for reconstruction of defects secondary to skin cancer excision, with no donor site morbidity. With exception to complete healing time, outcomes are similar to those of autologous grafting.