Surgical Management of Complex Ankle Fractures in Patients with Diabetes: A National Retrospective Multicentre Study.

Objectives: Patients with ankle fractures associated with diabetes experience more complications following standard open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) than those without diabetes. Augmented fixation strategies, namely extended ORIF and hindfoot nails (HFNs), may offer better results and early weightbearing in this group. The aim of this study was to define the population of patients with diabetes undergoing primary fixation for ankle fractures. Secondarily, we aimed to assess the utilisation of standard and augmented strategies and the effect of these choices on surgical outcomes, including early post-operative weightbearing and surgical complications. Methods: A national multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted between January and June 2019 in 56 centres (10 major trauma centres and 46 trauma units) in the United Kingdom; 1360 patients with specifically defined complex ankle fractures were enrolled. The patients' demographics, fixation choices and surgical and functional outcomes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to compare high-risk patients with and without diabetes. Results: There were 316 patients in the diabetes cohort with a mean age of 63.9 yrs (vs. 49.3 yrs. in the non-diabetes cohort), and a greater frailty score > 4 (24% vs. 14% (non-diabetes cohort) (p < 0.03)); 7.5% had documented neuropathy. In the diabetes cohort, 79.7% underwent standard ORIF, 7.1% extended ORIF and 10.2% an HFN, compared to 87.7%, 3.0% and 10.3% in the non-diabetes cohort. Surgical wound complications after standard-ORIF were higher in the diabetes cohort (15.1% vs. 8.7%) (p < 0.02), but patients with diabetes who underwent augmented techniques showed little difference in surgical outcomes/complications compared to non-diabetes patients, even though early-weightbearing rates were greater than for standard-ORIF. Conclusions: Ankle fractures in diabetes occur in older, frailer patients, whilst lower-than-expected neuropathy rates suggest a need for improved assessment. Augmented surgical techniques may allow earlier weightbearing without increasing complications, in keeping with modern guidelines in ankle fracture management.

Minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery using 3D printed patient specific instrumentation.

In this technical report study, we describe technique for performing the osteotomy and screw passage in minimally invasive fourth-generation hallux valgus surgery with transverse and akin extra-articular metaphyseal osteotomy (META) using a 3D-printed patient-specific surgical instrumentation guide. In an effort to minimize the learning curve and address the variability associated with technical corrections and screw placement, we have initiated the creation of personalized patient-specific instrumentation guides using 3D printing. Our hypothesis is that this approach will enhance safety, precision, decrease surgical time, and reduce exposure to radiation. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Minimally invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) osteotomies without Akin fixation in hallux valgus correction: a case series with 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The minimally invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) is considered the third generation of minimally invasive hallux valgus (HV) surgery, and its original description included fixation of the Akin osteotomy with a screw. The aim of this study is to evaluate a series of patients undergoing HV correction using the MICA technique without screw fixation of the Akin osteotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 58 consecutive patients who underwent surgical correction for HV between August 2018 and March 2020. A total of 69 feet were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical outcomes such as pain (VAS), function (AOFAS), range of movement, criteria personal satisfaction and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The AOFAS score (mean ± standard deviation) significantly improved from 57.0 ± 8.6 preoperatively to 93.9 ± 8.7 postoperatively (p < .001) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The VAS score improved from 6.0 ± 1.8 preoperatively to 0.6 ± 1.4 at 2-year follow-up (p < .001), and the hallux valgus angle reduced from 39.7 ± 6.9 to 8.9 ± 9.0 (p < .001). The majority of patients (95.6%) reported the result as excellent or good, and the most common complication was the need to remove the screw (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of MICA without Akin osteotomy fixation resulted in successful correction of hallux valgus with improvements in clinical and radiographic parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin Osteotomy: Preoperative Planning Using the Radiographic First-Ray Squeeze Test.

Background: Recognizing preoperative first-ray hypermobility is important to planning hallux valgus (HV) surgery. A recent study showed the minimally invasive chevron Akin (MICA) osteotomy increased varus displacement of the proximal fragment of the first metatarsal osteotomy. The present study aims to evaluate the ability of the radiographic first-ray squeeze test to predict the varus displacement of the proximal fragment of the first metatarsal osteotomy when performing the MICA procedure. Methods: A prospective case series of patients with moderate to severe HV who underwent MICA was performed. The HV deformity correction was analyzed by comparing the preoperative and 12-week postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the intermetatarsal angle between the first and second rays (1-2 IMA). The ability of the radiographic first-ray squeeze test to predict the varus displacement of the first metatarsal was done by comparing the preoperative 1-2 IMA measured in the AP radiographic first-ray squeeze test (IMA-ST) with the intermetatarsal angle between the second metatarsal and the axis of the first metatarsal osteotomy proximal fragment (IAPF) taken 12 weeks postoperatively. Results: Between July 2022 and May 2023, a total of 39 feet in 28 patients underwent MICA. The mean IMA improved from 13.8 (SD = 2.2) to 3.8 degrees (SD = 1.5) (P < .001), and the mean HVA improved from 27.8 (SD = 6.1) to 4.9 degrees (SD = 2.5) (P < .001). A linear regression analysis revealed that IMA-ST is highly associated with the 12 week assessed IAPF (P < .001). Conclusion: The preoperative radiographic first-ray squeeze test appears to predict with high fidelity the varus displacement of the proximal fragment of the first metatarsal that can occur after the MICA procedure.Level of Evidence: Level III, prospective cohort study.

Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Intraarticular Calcaneal Fracture: A Prospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study With 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures remains controversial. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery vs nonoperative treatment in displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture up to 2 years. METHODS: All displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures between August 2014 and January 2019 that presented to a level 1 trauma center were considered for inclusion. The decision to treat was made by a multidisciplinary team consisting of fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Operative treatment protocol involved sinus tarsi approach or percutaneous reduction and internal fixation. Nonoperative protocol involved symptomatic management with no attempt at closed reduction. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess foot and ankle and general health related quality of life outcomes, respectively, at 2-year follow-up. Radiographic assessment was performed based on preinjury and 12-week postinjury radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included for analysis between August 2014 and January 2019. We propensity score matched 46 patients in the surgical cohort to 46 patients in the nonsurgical cohort. At 24 months, there was no significant difference in the MOXFQ Index score (P > .05); however, the surgical cohort had a significantly higher EQ-5D-5L Index score (P < .05) and return to work (91% vs 72%, P < .05) and physical activity rate (46 vs 35%, P < .05) despite a higher proportion of more complex fractures in the surgical cohort. The wound complication rate following surgery was 16%. In addition, 14% of patients in the nonoperative cohort subsequently underwent arthrodesis compared with none of the patients in the surgical cohort. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that operative treatments were associated with low rates of surgical complication at 2 years and long-term pain improvement, facilitating earlier and better functional outcomes for complex injury patterns compared with nonoperative treatment for less severe fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort.

Impact of Sesamoid Coverage on Clinical Foot Function Following Fourth-Generation Percutaneous Hallux Valgus Surgery.

Background: The impact of pronation and sesamoid coverage on clinical outcomes following percutaneous hallux valgus surgery are not currently known. The aim of this study was to investigate if sesamoid coverage was associated with worse clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up following percutaneous hallux valgus surgery. Methods: Retrospective comparative observational study of clinical and radiographic outcomes based on a previously published prospective dataset. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts based on the degree of sesamoid coverage (normal, mild, or moderate) on 12-month weightbearing radiographs following fourth-generation percutaneous hallux valgus surgery. Primary outcome was a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Secondary outcomes included Euroqol-5D, VAS Pain, and radiographic deformity correction. Results: Forty-seven feet underwent primary fourth-generation HV surgery and were stratified into 3 cohorts. There were 19, 16, and 12 feet in the normal, mild, and moderate cohorts respectively. There was no significant difference in either pre- or postoperative foot function (all MOXFQ domains, P > .05) or health-related quality of life (EQ-5D Index or VAS, P > .05). The MOXFQ Index preoperatively was as follows: normal cohort, 56.1 ± 26.9; mild cohort, 54.1 ± 17.9; and severe cohort, 49.6 ± 23.8; and postoperatively was as follows: normal cohort, 15.6 ± 21.5; mild cohort, 11.4 ± 15.5; and severe cohort, 11.4 ± 13.6 (P = .737-.908). There was significantly worse hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) between the cohorts (P < .01). Although HVA and IMA were corrected to normal parameters following surgery in all cohorts, there was a significantly worse postoperative HVA in the moderate sesamoid coverage (5.3 ± 3.9 vs 7.9 ± 5.3 vs 11.4 ± 3.7, P < .01); however, IMA was not significantly different (3.4 ± 2.2 vs 4.1 ± 2.7 vs 5.2 ± 2.9, P = .168). Conclusion: This study found that cases where the sesamoids were not reduced had a poorer correction and had worse preoperative deformity. Clinical outcomes and foot function following fourth-generation percutaneous hallux valgus surgery were not affected by sesamoid coverage at the 12-month follow-up. The long-term implications in the difference in radiographic deformity between the 3 cohorts are not known, and further work should explore the relationship of first ray pronation and sesamoid position, particularly with regard to recurrence. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected data.

Investigation and management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: An update for the foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeon.

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) poses a significant challenge in the management of diabetic patients, often leading to severe complications and increased morbidity. Effective management of DFO requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving endocrinologists, infectious disease specialists, vascular surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, and wound care experts. Early diagnosis is paramount, facilitated by advanced imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy. Once diagnosed, the treatment strategy hinges on a combination of medical and surgical interventions. Antibiotic therapy, guided by culture results, plays a central role in managing DFO. Tailored regimens targeting the specific pathogens involved are administered, often for prolonged durations. Surgical intervention becomes necessary when conservative measures fall short. Surgical approaches range from minimally invasive procedures, like percutaneous drainage, to more extensive interventions like debridement and bone resection. Prevention of DFO recurrence is equally vital, emphasising glycemic control, meticulous foot care, patient education, monitoring of at-risk signs, revascularization and early intervention when indicated. The management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis mandates a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the infectious and surgical aspects of the condition. A collaborative, interdisciplinary approach ensures timely diagnosis, tailored treatment, and holistic care. Further research into novel therapeutic modalities and long-term outcomes remains essential in refining the management of this complex and debilitating complication of diabetes.

The Role Of Minimally Invasive Osteotomies In Cavovarus Foot Reconstruction: Detailed Technique And Evidence For Procedures.

Percutaneous correction of cavus foot deformity can be achieved with satisfactory correction of foot anatomy and biomechanics. Surgical management of cavovarus foot reconstruction is an individualized combination of surgical procedures designed to correct deformity. Minimally invasive procedures using high-torque low-speed burr can facilitate large deformity correction without extensive soft tissue stripping. This article presents the operative technique for percutaneous cavus foot correction including a lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy and proximal first ray osteotomy. However, methodologically robust evidence to support this procedure is lacking at present, and further research, particularly, focusing on long-term clinical outcomes and follow-up is required.

Treatment of hallux rigidus with percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a case series with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis is an option for the treatment of hallux rigidus in more advanced cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results at least 2 years after percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus. METHODS: This is a case series of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus grades III and IV with a minimum of 24 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The primary outcome was clinical assessment using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS). Secondary outcomes included American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, patient satisfaction, complications, and bone healing (radiographic analysis). RESULTS: Between August 2017 and February 2020, 29 feet (24 patients) underwent percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. The mean follow-up was 38.4 (range 24-54) months. There was an improvement in the pain (VAS) from 7.8 to 0.6 (p < 0.001) and in the AOFAS score from 49.9 to 83.6 (p < 0.001). There was a rate of bone union of 82.8% and screw removal of 13.8%. All patients considered the result to be excellent or good. CONCLUSION: The treatment of grade III and IV hallux rigidus with percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis demonstrated high patient satisfaction and significantly improves in clinical outcomes but the nonunion rate was higher than reported outcomes for open 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.