Use of Health-Related Apps and Telehealth in Adults with Epilepsy in Germany: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background: Telehealth can improve the treatment of chronic disorders, such as epilepsy. Telehealth prevalence and use increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, familiarity with and use of telehealth and health-related mobile applications (apps) by persons with epilepsy remain unknown. Methods: We investigated telehealth use, demographics, and clinical variables within the multicenter Epi2020 cross-sectional study. Between October and December 2020, adults with epilepsy completed a validated questionnaire, including individual questions regarding knowledge and use of apps and telehealth. Results: Of 476 included individuals (58.2% women; mean age 40.2 ± 15.4 years), 41.6% reported using health-related apps. Health apps were used more frequently (pedometer 32.1%, exercise app 17.6%) than medical apps (health insurance 15.1%, menstrual apps 12.2%) or apps designed for epilepsy (medication reminders 10.3%, seizure calendars 4.6%). Few used seizure detectors (i.e., apps as medical devices 1.9%) or mobile health devices (fitness bracelet 11.3%). A majority (60.9%) had heard the term telehealth, 78.6% of whom had a positive view. However, only 28.6% had a concrete idea of telehealth, and only 16.6% reported personal experience with telehealth. A majority (55%) would attend a teleconsultation follow-up, and 41.2% would in a medical emergency. Data privacy and availability were considered equally important by 50.8%, 21.8% considered data privacy more important, and 20.2% considered data availability more important. Current health-related app use was independently associated with younger age (p = 0.003), higher education (p < 0.001), and subjective COVID-19-related challenges (p = 0.002). Persistent seizure occurrence (vs. seizure freedom ≥12 months) did not affect willingness to use teleconsultations on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Despite positive telehealth views, few persons with epilepsy in Germany are familiar with specific apps or services. Socioeconomic factors influence telehealth use more than baseline epilepsy characteristics. Telehealth education and services should target socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals to reduce the digital care gap. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022024; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1252-5331).

Benefits, safety and outcomes of long-term video EEG monitoring in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate benefits of in-hospital, long-term video EEG monitoring (LVEM) for pediatric patients, from a therapeutic perspective and from the perspectives of patients and their families. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients aged 0-18 years who underwent LVEM for epilepsy surgery eligibility, epilepsy syndrome clarification, or medication adjustment were evaluated regarding paroxysmal event type, change in seizure frequency and patients' benefits using a standardized evaluation protocol. RESULTS: A total of 163 (88 boys and 75 girls, mean age 10.9 years) pediatric patients underwent 178 LVEM sessions, with a mean duration of 5.4 days. The rate of habitual event detection was 69.1%. Epilepsy diagnosis was confirmed in 147 patients and excluded in 16 patients (9.8%). LVEM results altered the diagnosis of 37.4% of patients. Diagnosis remained unchanged in 49.1% of patients and was specified in 13.5% of patients. Epilepsy surgery was performed in 32 patients, and 64% of epilepsy patients deemed ineligible for epilepsy surgery underwent medication adjustments. Patients or their families found LVEM helpful in 75% of cases. Significant seizure reductions and improvements in the disease course were reported by 45% of epilepsy patients. Three episodes of non-convulsive status epilepticus occurred, representing 1.7% of admissions and 1.9% of patients diagnosed with epilepsy, while no injuries were observed. CONCLUSIONS: LVEM is beneficial for pediatric patients from both a medical perspective and from the perspective of patients and their families, even if patients are ineligible for epilepsy surgery. LVEM is well-tolerated with a low risk of status epilepticus and injuries.

Postoperative outcomes and surgical ratio at a newly established epilepsy center: The first 100 procedures.

PURPOSE: To describe the patients' characteristics, surgical ratio, and outcomes following epilepsy surgery at the newly established Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the first 100 consecutive patients, including adult (n = 77) and pediatric (n = 23) patients, with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent resective or ablative surgical procedures at a single, newly established epilepsy center. Patient characteristics, seizure and neuropsychological outcomes, histopathology, complications, and surgical ratio were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 28.8 years (children 10.6 years, adults 34.2 years). The mean epilepsy duration was 11.9 years (children 3.9 years, adults 14.3 years), and the mean follow-up was 1.5 years. At the most recent visit, 64% of patients remained completely seizure free [Engel IA]. The rates of perioperative complications and unexpected new neurological deficits were 5%, each. The proportion of patients showing deficits in one or more cognitive domains increased six months after surgery and decreased to presurgical proportions after two years. Symptoms of depression were significantly decreased and quality of life was significantly increased after surgery. The surgical ratio was 25.3%. CONCLUSION: Similar postsurgical outcomes were achieved at a newly established epilepsy center compared with long-standing epilepsy centers. The lower time to surgery may reflect a general decrease in time to surgery over the last decade or the improved accessibility of a new epilepsy center in a previously underserved area. The surgical ratio was not lower than reported for established centers.