Insights into cancer surveillance in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel and Turkey.

The current cancer landscape within transitional economies in central and Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean area is not particularly optimistic. Current perceptions are often based on extrapolations from other countries and regions; and hence the authors collaborated with the South Eastern Europe Oncology Group (SEEROG) to collect information on cancer registration in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel and Turkey. Healthcare authorities and specialist oncology centres in 21 countries in the region were contacted for information on cancer registries in their countries. Based on this information, the authors believe that the recording and reporting of data on cancer in the region is at an acceptable level. The authors discuss and compare institution- and population-based registries, and present opinions on elements of an 'ideal registry' based on the survey replies and comparisons with other registries. A comparison with the sources used for GLOBOCAN 2008 illustrates the need for consistent data to be communicated, published and utilised throughout the region and the oncology community. The authors conclude by considering the potential value of collaboration between health authorities across the region, as well as between the clinical and epidemiological communities, to ensure that cancer data are consistently collected, verified and made public.

Randomised revaccination with pneumococcal polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine in asplenic children previously vaccinated with polysaccharide vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: Asplenic children are at high risk of invasive pneumococcal infection. In this group, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a single revaccination with the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PSV23) 3-5 years after a previous PSV23 dose. Despite potential advantages, there are few data available regarding the safety and immunogenicity of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in this population. The aim of the study was to prospectively determine and to compare, in asplenic children, the vaccine specific antibody titres against the seven serotypes included in the PCV7 after administration of one dose of PCV7 or of PSV23, 3 years or more after an initial vaccination with PSV23. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomised, single-centre study, antibody titres were monitored at baseline, at 1 and 6 months after revaccination in 21 children with anatomic or functional asplenia. Response was considered as positive when there was a four-fold increase in antibody titres from baseline. RESULTS: The most frequently reported adverse events were local reactions in 7/11 of PCV7 subjects and in 5/8 of PSV23 subjects, and general reactions (loss of appetite, sleepiness) in 5/11 of PCV7 subjects and in 1/8 of PSV23 subjects; without any serious adverse events. One child in the PCV7 group had increased temperature (38.4 degrees C). At least half of the PCV7 children responded to four or five serotypes, while more than half of the PSV23 subjects responded to less than 3 serotypes (p=0.285). After 1 month, the immune response for serotype 23F was significantly greater after PCV7 vaccination than after PSV23 vaccination (p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: PCV7 revaccination is safe and immunogenic in asplenic children previously vaccinated with PSV23, and could provide appropriate booster response in this high-risk population. The clinical repercussion on invasive pneumococcal diseases remains to be demonstrated.

A cross-sectional survey of the prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae nasopharyngeal carriage in Belgian infants attending day care centres.

Nasopharyngeal carriage is a major factor in the transmission of pneumococcal disease. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and the distribution of serogroups and serotypes in children aged 3-36 months attending day care centres in Belgium. A single nasopharyngeal swab was cultured from 467 children attending 30 different day care centres between December 2000 and March 2001. S. pneumoniae isolates were serotyped and their antibiotic susceptibilities assessed by disk diffusion. The overall nasopharyngeal carriage rate for S. pneumoniae was 21% in the 467 children. None of the commonly accepted risk factors studied was associated significantly with carriage. Capsular serotypes isolated were 19F (27.3%), 6B (20.2%), 23F (19.2%), 19A (10.1%), 6A (7.1%), 14 (5.1%) and others (11.0%). Theoretical coverage by the seven-valent (serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F) pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was 73.7%. Fourteen (14.1%) of 99 strains were non-susceptible to penicillin, 48 (48.5%) to tetracycline and 61 (61.6%) to erythromycin. Theoretical coverage by the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was 93% for the penicillin-resistant serotypes, 69% for the tetracycline-resistant serotypes and 75% for the erythromycin-resistant serotypes. Use of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine could potentially reduce nasopharyngeal carriage of the antibiotic-resistant strains.

Acute, subchronic and withdrawal sleep EEG changes during treatment with paroxetine and amitriptyline: a double-blind randomized trial in major depression.

Paroxetine (30 mg), a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, was compared in a double-blind trial to amitriptyline (150 mg) in a sample of 40 inpatients aged 18-65 years who fulfilled Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depression. Patients were studied after a placebo drug washout period of 10 days and after an active 4-week treatment period. Sleep EEG recordings were performed before and at the end of the study as well as during acute treatment (first 2 days) and following withdrawal of active medication. Paroxetine shows an antidepressant effect similar to amitriptyline with a different side-effect profile typical of 5-HT reuptake inhibition. Paroxetine and amitriptyline decreased the amount of REM sleep, a well-known effect of classical antidepressants. Paroxetine also shared with other 5-HT reuptake inhibitors an alerting effect on sleep that was not shown to be detrimental on subjective sleep quality.

A double-blind, comparative, multicentre study comparing paroxetine with fluoxetine in depressed patients.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 6-week study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of once or twice daily administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine and fluoxetine. After a 1-week placebo wash-out, patients suffering from DSM-III major depression and with a score of 18 or more on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) received either paroxetine or fluoxetine. The patients were assessed for efficacy using the HRSD, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression; for tolerability, adverse events were elicited by the use of a non-leading question and a side effects checklist. The groups of patients were comparable on entry to the study. One hundred patients were recruited into the study, of whom 78 were evaluable for the efficacy analysis. Paroxetine and fluoxetine showed comparable efficacy at the end of the 6-week treatment period, but a statistically significant difference in the number of responders at week 3 in favour of paroxetine was observed. This could suggest an earlier onset of action with paroxetine. Also, associated anxiety symptoms were significantly reduced on paroxetine compared with fluoxetine at week 3. Patients on paroxetine reported fewer adverse events than those on fluoxetine. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea and vomiting in both groups.