Clinical research progress of novel biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the loss of immune tolerance. Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most common manifestations of severe organ damage in SLE, and also an important cause of disability and death. Its pathogenesis is associated with immune abnormalities such as immune cells, cytokines, and immune complex deposition. Traditional immunosuppressive therapy has been unable to meet the treatment needs of patients while bringing them toxic effects. In recent years, targeted therapies have emerged, and several novel biologics have gradually entered people's sight. This review will briefly introduce the pathogenesis of LN and the mechanism of biological targets, and summarize and analyze the clinical trials of new biologics for treating LN. Although not all biologics show positive results in clinical trials, the experience learned from these trials can help researchers adjust and plan future trial programs to seek better treatment methods.

Efficacy and safety of novel biologics in the treatment of lupus nephritis based on registered clinical trials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of novel biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis based on a reticulated meta-analysis approach. Registered clinical trials in 4 major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials) and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched with a search time frame of build to June 2022. And we screened registered randomized controlled clinical trials of biologics for the treatment of lupus nephritis according to the protocol's nadir criteria. Trials were evaluated for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software to compare and rank differences in effectiveness and safety between the biologics. A total of 10 registered randomized controlled clinical trials involving 2148 subjects were included in this study. The interventions were ranked from best to worst in terms of the primary outcome indicator of effectiveness, renal complete remission: belimumab > anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg > obinutuzumab > ocrelizumab 400 mg > abatacept 30/10 mg/kg > belimumab + rituximab > abatacept 10/10 mg/kg > abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg > placeo > ocrelizumab 1000 mg > rituximab > anifrolumab 300 mg, belimumab was superior to placebo [OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.13, 2.70)] and anifrolumab 300 mg [OR = 3.27, 95% CI (1.05, 10.14)], anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg was superior to anifrolumab 300 mg [OR = 3.56, 95% CI (1.30, 9.76)], and all were statistically significant. The ranking of each intervention in terms of overall renal remission for secondary outcome indicators from best to worst was: obinutuzumab > belimumab + rituximab > anifrolumab (900 + 300) mg > ocrelizumab 1000 mg > ocrelizumab 400 mg > belimumab > rituximab 1000 mg > abatacept 30/10 mg/kg > abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg > placeo > abatacept 10/10 mg/kg > anifrolumab 300 mg, obinutuzumab was superior to placebo [OR = 2.27, 95% CI (1.11, 4.67)] and belimumab was also superior to placebo [OR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.07, 2.27)], and all were statistically significant. In terms of safety, with a focus on serious adverse events and serious infections, the results were: Serious adverse events at 1 year of monitoring occurred better with ocrelizumab 1000 mg than ocrelizumab 400 mg [OR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.29, 0.89)] and were statistically different; serious adverse events at 2 years of monitoring infection adverse events occurred better with obinutuzumab than with abatacept (30/10 + 10/10) mg/kg [OR = 0.24, 95% CI (0.07, 0.81)] and were statistically different. The safety of the new biologics in combination with conventional standard therapies is generally good, but it is belimumab and obinutuzumab that are most effective in achieving complete and overall remission in the kidney. This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, with a registration number of CRD42021262498.

Microwave-assisted extraction of bioactive components from Angelica dahurica using the tailor-made natural deep eutectic solvents.

In the present study, a new, green, efficient, and sustainable microwave-assisted extraction method combined with a deep eutectic solvent was successfully established for the extraction of five important coumarins from Angelica dahurica, namely bergapten, oxypeucedanin, imperatorin, cnidilin, and isoimperatorin. Compared with the conventional extraction method, the extraction efficiency of this method was improved by 10.74%. With increasingly serious global environmental pollution, this green method will be a solution for mainstream sustainable development and lead to a stable improvement in fine industries such as food, medicine, and cosmetics. The findings of this study may provide valuable clues and a scientific basis for further research of A. dahurica and other pharmaceutical components.