The Utility of Breast Cancer Index (BCI) Over Clinical Prognostic Tools for Predicting the Need for Extended Endocrine Therapy: A Safety Net Hospital Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefits select patients with early-stage hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) but also incurs side effects and cost. The Clinical Treatment Score at Five Years (CTS5) is a free tool that estimates risks of late relapse in estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) BC using clinicopathologic factors. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) incorporates 2 genomic assays to estimate late relapse risk and likelihood of benefit from EET. This retrospective study assesses the utility of BCI in selecting EET candidates in a safety net hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review on 69 women with early-stage HR+, HER2- BC diagnosed at our institution from December 2009 to February 2016 on whom BCI was submitted. The CTS5 score was also calculated to assess clinical risk of late relapse. RESULTS: Median age was 53 years. All patients included in our analysis had early ER+ HER2-negative BC. Roughly half of the patients (55%) were postmenopausal and 61% were of Hispanic origin. A total of 34 patients (49%) were deemed high-risk (>5%) for late relapse by CTS5, compared to 42 (61%) by BCI. BCI identified 31 (45%) patients that would benefit from EET and of those, 74%% were advised EET. 16 (47%) clinical high-risk patients were advised against EET due to low benefit predicted by BCI. In the clinical low risk group, 9 (26%) were recommended EET based on high benefit predicted by BCI. CONCLUSION: BCI is reasonable to consider in early-stage HR+ BC and offered clinically relevant information over clinical pathologic information alone.

Patterns of Failure in Patients With Double Hit or Double Expressor Lymphomas: Implications for Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Lymphomas with MYC and either BLC2 or BCL6 rearrangements or MYC and BCL-2 protein overexpression, classified as double-hit (DHL) or double-expressor (DEL) lymphomas, respectively, are associated with poorer response to standard immunochemotherapy. Optimal therapy is not clear, and little information exists on the contribution of consolidative radiation therapy in these patients. This study describes the patterns of failure of DHL/DEL in relation to initial sites of disease and indications for radiation therapy in unselected diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective single-institution study of all patients with diagnoses of non-Hodgkin lymphoma between 2011 and 2015 was performed. DHL status was determined by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and DEL status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the end of chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox modeling was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Screening of 275 DLBCL patients yielded a 53-patient cohort, including 32 patients with DHL, 10 with DEL, 9 with a triple rearrangement, and 2 triple expressors. Of the 26 patients whose disease progressed, 15 had primary refractory disease. The remaining 11 failures were relapses after complete response to initial chemotherapy. Of those failures, 6 (55%) occurred at initially involved site(s), and 4 (36%) were isolated initial site relapses. Consolidative radiation therapy was associated significantly with improved PFS on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.94, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: DHL/DEL are associated with high relapse rates, which preferentially occur at initially involved sites. Among patients achieving complete response to chemotherapy, consolidative radiation therapy was associated with improved PFS. This provides a rationale for the continued role of radiation therapy in the treatment of DHL and DEL and requires validation in a larger cohort.