RESUMO
Hydrocortisone is widely used for the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects and physiological substitute of endogenous glucocorticoid. Allergic reaction to hydrocortisone is infrequent, but once it occurs, it can affect the disease profile or survival of patients. The present study reported a case of hydrocortisone-induced blood pressure reduction in a patient with anterior pituitary hypofunction due to allergic reaction. The patient was admitted with burns. Anterior pituitary hypofunction was diagnosed during hospitalisation owing to persistent hyponatremia. During hydrocortisone intravenous administration, blood pressure was decreased to 70/40 mmHg, accompanied with flushed face and vasodilation. According to World Health Organization Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) causality assessment and Naranjo scale, there was a probable relationship of reduced blood pressure with hydrocortisone. To the best of our knowledge, we have presented the first case of an anaphylaxis reaction of blood pressure reduction following hydrocortisone administration in the anterior pituitary hypofunction patient.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hidrocortisona , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea , Glucocorticoides , Anti-InflamatóriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical application of the fast track surgery (FTS) model based on preoperative nutritional risk screening (NRS) in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: 180 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgery between January 2008 and April 2014 were randomly divided into study and control groups based on matched-pairs. The study group underwent assessment using the NRS 2002 and received treatment before surgery and the control group was treated by the conventional method. Postoperative indicators including time to first exsufflation, time to defecation, time to chest tube removal, hospitalization duration, and postoperative complications were examined after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the postoperative indicators including time to first exsufflation (88.4±2.76 vs 57.83±2.68 hours), time to first defecation (4.68±1.71 vs 3.28±1.34 days), time to chest tube removal (4.30±0.25 vs 2.70±0.33 days), postoperative hospitalization durations (11.71±1.39 vs 9.00±0.78 days), and total complication rate (18.9% [17/90] vs 6.67% [6/90]) were all significantly reduced in the study group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The FTS model based on NRS can effectively promote postoperative rehabilitation of patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and shorten hospital stay.