Low Socioeconomic Status is Associated With Higher In-Hospital Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015 to 2020.

INTRODUCTION: Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is characterized by a high in-hospital mortality rate and necessitates urgent surgical intervention. While socioeconomic status is known to influence health-care outcomes, its specific association with TAAD remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the population-based association between socioeconomic status with TAAD repair outcomes using a national registry. METHODS: Patients who had TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. National Inpatient Sample stratified estimated median household income of residents within a patient's ZIP code. Patients residing in neighborhoods of incomes in the lowest and highest quartiles were selected as the study cohorts. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes, adjusted for demographics, comorbid conditions, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer status. RESULTS: Compared to patients from high-income neighborhoods, patients in low-income communities had higher risks of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.45, P = 0.01), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.225, P = 0.03), and infection (aOR 1.474, P = 0.02), as well as longer wait from admission to operation (24.96 ± 2.64 versus 18.00 ± 1.92 h, P = 0.03) and longer length of stay (15.06 ± 0.38 versus 13.80 ± 0.36 d, P = 0.01). In contrast, patients from low-income communities had less risk of hemorrhage/hematoma (aOR 0.691, P < 0.01) and lower total hospital charge (428,746 ± 10,658 versus 487,017 ± 16,770 US dollars, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests patients from lower-income communities may have limited access to health care and treatment delays, leading to higher mortality and complications. The underlying reasons for these disparities in economically disadvantaged communities warrant further investigation, which could focus on health-care accessibility, timely detection of TAAD, and prompt transfers to specialized centers.

Coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes of patients with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020.

Individuals affected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have a growing demand for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) due to heightened risk for cardiovascular diseases and extended life expectancy. However, CABG outcomes in HIV patients are not well-established, with insights only from small case series studies. This study conducted a comprehensive, population-based examination of in-hospital CABG outcomes in HIV patients. Patients underwent CABG were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Patients with age < 18 years and concomitant procedures were excluded. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to address preoperative group differences. Among patients who underwent CABG, 613 (0.36%) had HIV and were matched to 3119 out of 167,569 non-HIV patients. For selected HIV patients, CABG is relatively safe, presenting largely similar outcomes. After matching, HIV and non-HIV patients had comparable in-hospital mortality rates (2.13% vs. 1.67%, p = 0.40). Risk factors associated with mortality among HIV patients included previous CABG (aOR = 14.32, p = 0.01), chronic pulmonary disease (aOR = 8.24, p < 0.01), advanced renal failure (aOR = 7.49, p = 0.01), and peripheral vascular disease (aOR = 6.92, p = 0.01), which can be used for preoperative risk stratification. While HIV patients had higher acute kidney injury (AKI; 26.77% vs. 21.77%, p = 0.01) and infection (8.21% vs. 4.18%, p < 0.01), other complications were comparable between the groups.

Female patients have higher in-hospital mortality after type A aortic dissection repair: A population study from the national inpatient sample.

BACKGROUND: Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is an emergent condition with high in-hospital mortality. Gender disparity in TAAD has been a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to conduct a population-based examination of gender disparities in short-term TAAD outcomes using the National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest all-payer database in the US. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAAD repair were identified in NIS from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between male and female patients, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer status. RESULTS: There were 1454 female and 2828 male patients identified who underwent TAAD repair. Female patients presented with TAAD were at a more advanced mean age (64.03 ± 13.81 vs. 58.28 ± 13.43 years, p < 0.01) and had greater comorbid burden. Compared to male patients, female patients had higher risks of in-hospital mortality (17.88% vs. 13.68%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.266, p = 0.01). In addition, female patients had higher pericardial complications (20.29% vs. 17.22%, aOR = 1.227, p = 0.02), but lower acute kidney injury (AKI; 39.96% vs. 53.47%, aOR = 0.476, p < 0.01) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; 1.38% vs. 2.65%, aOR = 0.517, p = 0.01). Female patients had comparable time from admission to operation and transfer-in status, longer hospital stays, but fewer total hospital expenses. CONCLUSION: Female patients were 1.27 times as likely to die in-hospital after TAAD repair but had less AKI and VTE. While there is no evidence suggesting delay in TAAD repair for female patients, the disparities might stem from other differences such as in care provided or intrinsic physiological variations.

Preoperative depression is an independent risk factor for short-term morbidities in autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Depression is notably common among patients who have undergone mastectomy. Several post-mastectomy patients opt for elective breast reconstruction. However, evidence on the influence of preoperative depression on breast reconstruction outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative depression on the short-term outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) using a comprehensive national registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent ABR or IBR were identified from the national inpatient sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between the patients with and without depression, adjusted for demographics, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among the 12,984 patients who underwent ABR, 1578 (12 %) had depression whereas 1980 (11 %) out of 17,963 patients who underwent IBR had depression. In ABR and IBR, preoperative depression was associated with higher superficial wound complications (ABR, aOR = 1.386, 95 % CI = 1.035-1.856, p = 0.03; IBR, aOR = 1.281, 95 % CI = 1.001-1.638, p = 0.04), hemorrhage/hematoma (ABR, aOR = 1.164, 95 % CI = 1.010-1.355, p = 0.04; IBR, aOR = 1.614, 95 % CI = 1.279-2.037, p < 0.01), and longer hospital length of stay (p < 0.01). In ABR, patients with depression had higher incidences of infection (aOR = 1.906, 95 % CI = 1.246-2.917, p < 0.01) and sepsis (aOR = 15.609, 95 % CI = 1.411-172.65, p = 0.03). In IBR, patients with depression had higher risks of capsular contracture (aOR = 1.477, 95 % CI = 1.105-1.976, p = 0.01) and seroma (aOR = 1.489, 95 % CI = 1.005-2.208, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Preoperative depression is independently associated with major morbidities after ABR and IBR. Preoperative screening for depression can be beneficial. Findings from this study can facilitate preoperative risk stratification and post-operative care for patients with depression.

In-hospital outcome of type A aortic dissection repair in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A population study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity that has been linked to higher mortality and respiratory complications in cardiac surgery. However, the postoperative outcomes for COPD patients undergoing Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) repair remain unexplored. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of COPD on in-hospital outcomes of TAAD repair in a national registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without COPD, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer status were adjusted. RESULTS: There were 701 (16.37 %) COPD patients and 3581 (83.63 %) non-COPD patients who went under TAAD repair, where the prevalence of COPD was higher than in the general population (6 %). COPD and non-COPD patients have comparable rates of in-hospital mortality (14.69 % vs 15.19 %, aOR 1.016, 95 CI 0.797-1.295, p = 0.9) and there was no indication of delayed surgery. However, COPD patients had a higher risk of mechanical ventilation (37.80 % vs 31.42 %, aOR 1.521, 95 CI 1.267-1.825, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of transferring out to other facilities (38.37 % vs 32.23 %, aOR 1.271, 95 CI 1.054-1.533, p = 0.01). In addition, COPD patients had a longer hospital length of stay (14.28 ± 11.32 vs 13.85 ± 12.78 days, F = 5.61, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The presence of COPD could be a risk factor for the development of aortic dissection. However, outcomes for COPD patients were largely similar to those without COPD. These findings can be valuable for preoperative assessments and tailoring perioperative care for COPD patients undergoing TAAD repair.

Dependent functional status is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality and morbidities following colectomy for volvulus: An ACS-NSQIP study from the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Colonic volvulus is a common cause of bowel obstructions and surgery is the definitive treatment. Functional status is often associated with adverse postoperative outcomes but its effect on colectomy for volvulus remained under-explored. This study sought to analyze the effect of functional status on the 30-day outcomes of colectomy for volvulus. MATERIALS AND METHOD: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted colectomy database from 2012 to 2022 was utilized. Only patients with volvulus as the primary indication for colectomy were included. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with dependent functional status (DFS) and independent functional status (IFS), adjusted for demographics, baseline characteristics, preoperative preparation, indication for surgery, and operative approaches by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 1,476 patients with DFS (945 partially DFS and 531 fully DFS) and 8,824 (85.67 %) IFS patients who underwent colectomy for volvulus. After multivariable analysis, DFS patients had higher risks of mortality (aOR=1.671, 95 CI=1.37-2.038, p < 0.01), pulmonary complications (aOR=2.166, 95 CI=1.85-2.536, p < 0.01), sepsis (aOR=1.31, 95 CI=1.107-1.551, p < 0.01), prolonged postoperative nothing by mouth (NPO) or nasogastric tube (NGT) use (aOR=1.436, 95 CI=1.269-1.626, p < 0.01), discharge not to home (aOR=3.774, 95 CI=3.23-4.411, p < 0.01), and 30-day readmission (aOR=1.196, 95 CI=1.007-1.42, p = 0.04). Moreover, DFS patients had a longer length of stay (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: DFS was identified as an independent risk factor for increased mortality and complications after colectomy for volvulus. Given the substantial overlap between DFS patients and those who have colonic volvulus, these insights can contribute to preoperative risk assessments and postoperative care in these patients.

Higher risk of in-hospital mortality and hepatic encephalopathy during weekend admission in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt procedure.

OBJECTIVES: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure used to alleviate portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. The weekend effect refers to a higher risk of adverse outcomes associated with procedures performed on weekends compared to weekdays. The goal of this study is to determine whether a weekend effect is evident in TIPS procedures. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study identified patients who underwent TIPS procedures in the NIS database from 2015 to 2020. Patients who were admitted on the weekday or weekends were classified into two cohorts. Preoperative variables, including demographics, comorbidities, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were noted. Multivariable analysis was used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to patients admitted on the weekdays, weekend patients had higher in-hospital mortality (12.87 % vs. 7.96 %, aOR = 1.62, 95 CI 1.32-1.00, p < 0.01), hepatic encephalopathy (33.24 % vs. 26.18 %, aOR = 1.41, 95 CI 1.23-1.63, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (39.03 % vs. 28.36 %, aOR = 1.68, 95 CI 1.46-1.93, p < 0.01), and transfer out (15.91 % vs. 12.76 %, aOR=1.33, 95 CI 1.11-1.60, p < 0.01). It was also found that weekend patients had longer wait from admission to operation (3.83 ± 0.15 days vs 2.82 ± 0.07 days, p < 0.01), longer LOS (11.22 ± 0.33 days vs 8.38 ± 0.15 days, p < 0.01), and higher total hospital charge (219,973 ± 7,352 dollars vs 172,663 ± 3,183 dollars, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our research unveiled a significant relationship between weekend admission and a higher risk of mortality and morbidity post-TIPS procedure. Eliminating delays in treatment associated with the weekend effect may mitigate this gap to deliver consistent and high-quality care to all patients.

African Americans have worse in-hospital outcomes in autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction: a population-based study from the National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020.

African Americans have a long history of disparities in healthcare. However, whether their racial disparity exists in breast reconstruction outcomes is less clear. This study compared short-term outcomes of African Americans and Caucasians who underwent autologous (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Patients having ABR or IBR were identified in the National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between African Americans and Caucasians, adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. In ABR, there were 8296 (63.89%) Caucasians and 1809 (13.93%) African Americans. In IBR, there were 12,258 (68.24%) Caucasians and 1847 (10.28%) African Americans. During the same period, 32,406 (64.87%) Caucasians and 7702 (15.42%) African Americans underwent mastectomy, indicating a lower reconstruction rate in African Americans, particularly in IBR. African Americans presented with significant preoperative differences, including younger age, higher comorbid burden, and pronounced socioeconomic disadvantages. After accounting for preoperative differences, in ABR, African Americans had higher renal complications (aOR = 1.575, 95 CI = 1.024-2.423, p = 0.04) hemorrhage/hematoma (aOR = 1.355, 95 CI = 1.169-1.571, p < 0.01), and transfer rate (aOR = 2.176, 95 CI = 1.257-3.768, p = 0.01). In IBR, African Americans had higher superficial wound complications (aOR = 1.303, 95 CI = 1.01-1.681, p = 0.04), flap revision (aOR = 4.19, 95 CI = 1.229-14.283, p = 0.02), and hemorrhage/hematoma (aOR = 1.791, 95 CI = 1.401-2.291, p < 0.01). In both ABR and IBR, African Americans had longer hospital length of stay (p < 0.01). These results highlight evident racial disparities in breast reconstruction for African Americans. Targeted interventions are needed to guarantee equitable access to breast reconstruction services and to address postoperative complications in African Americans.

Prior abdominal surgery is not associated with 30-day mortality or morbidities after endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Prior abdominal surgery (PAS) has the potential to affect outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Recently, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been expanded among patients with complex AAA, which involves visceral branches in the upper abdominal aortic. However, outcomes of EVAR for complex AAA in patients with PAS have not been examined. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on 30-day outcomes in EVAR for complex AAA. METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR for complex AAA were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012 to 2022. Complex AAA was defined as juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal proximal extent, Type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm, or aneurysms treated with Zenith Fenestrated endograft. Patients with age less than 18 years, ruptured AAA with or without hypotension, acute intraoperative conversion to open, and emergency presentation were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes of patients with and without PAS. Demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, indication for surgery, proximal and distant aneurysm extent, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures were adjusted. RESULTS: There were 515 (28.34%) and 1302 (71.66%) patients with and without PAS, respectively, who underwent EVAR for complex AAA. Patients with and without PAS had comparable 30-day mortality (3.11% vs 3.00%, aOR = 0.766, 95 CI = 0.407-1.442, p = .41). Organ system complications including cardiac complications, stroke, pulmonary complications, and renal complications were comparable between patients with and without PAS. All other 30-day outcomes were similar between groups. However, patients with PAS had higher 30-day readmission rate (11.65% vs 7.14%, aOR = 1.634, 95 CI = 1.145-2.331, p = .01). CONCLUSION: While PAS has high prevalence among patients undergoing EVAR for complex AAA, it does not impact 30-day mortality and morbidities. Thus, EVAR for complex AAA can be considered safe for patients with PAS in terms of short-term outcomes, despite the long-term prognosis in these patients being needed in further studies.

A longitudinal evaluation of personalized intrinsic network topography and cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease.

Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) offers insight into how synchrony within and between brain networks is altered in disease states. Individual and disease-related variability in intrinsic connectivity networks may influence our interpretation of R-fMRI data. We used a personalized approach designed to account for individual variation in the spatial location of correlation maxima to evaluate R-fMRI differences between Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who showed cognitive decline, those who remained cognitively stable and cognitively stable controls. We compared fMRI data from these participant groups, studied at baseline and 18 months later, using both network-based statistics (NBS) and calculations of mean inter- and intra-network connectivity within pre-defined functional networks. The NBS analysis showed that PD participants who remained cognitively stable showed exclusively (at baseline) or predominantly (at follow-up) increased intra-network connectivity, whereas decliners showed exclusively reduced intra-network and inter- (ventral attention and default mode) connectivity, in comparison with the control group. Evaluation of mean connectivity between all regions of interest (ROIs) within a priori networks showed that decliners had consistently reduced inter-network connectivity for ventral attention, somatomotor, visual and striatal networks and reduced intra-network connectivity for ventral attention network to striatum and cerebellum. These findings suggest that specific functional connectivity covariance patterns differentiate PD cognitive subtypes and may predict cognitive decline. Further, increased intra and inter-network synchrony may support cognitive function in the face of PD-related network disruptions.

Development and validation of a 30-day point-scoring risk calculator for small bowel obstruction surgery.

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is one of the most frequent causes of general emergency surgery. The 30-day mortality rate post-surgery ranges widely from 2 to 30%, contingent upon the patient population, which renders risk assessment tools helpful. this study aimed to develop a 30-day point-scoring risk calculator designed for patients undergoing SBO surgery. Patients who underwent SBO surgery were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2021. Patients were randomly sampled into an experimental (2/3) and a validation (1/3) group. A weighted point scoring system was developed for the risk of 30-day mortality, utilizing multivariable regression on preoperative risk variables based on Sullivan's method. The risk scores underwent both internal and external validation. Furthermore, the efficacy of the risk score was evaluated in 30-day major surgical complications. A total of 93,517 patients were identified, with 63,521 and 29,996 assigned to the experimental and validation groups, respectively. The risk calculator is structured to assign points based on age (> 85 years, 4 points; 75-85 years, 3 points; 65-75 years, 2 points; 55-65 years, 1 point), disseminated cancer (2 points), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of 4 or 5 (1 point), preoperative sepsis (1 point), hypoalbuminemia (1 point), and fully dependent functional status (1 point). The risk calculator showed strong discrimination (c-statistic = 0.825, 95% CI 0.818-0.831) and good calibration (Brier score = 0.043) in the experimental group. The point scoring system was successfully translated from individual preoperative variables (c-statistic = 0.840, 95% CI 0.834-0.847) and was externally validated in ACS-NSQIP (c-statistic = 0.827, 95% = CI 0.834-0.847, Brier score = 0.043). The SBO risk score can effectively discriminate major surgical complications including major adverse cardiovascular events (c-statistic = 0.734), cardiac complications (c-statistic = 0.732), stroke (c-statistic = 0.725), pulmonary complications (c-statistic = 0.727), renal complications (c-statistic = 0.692), bleeding (c-statistic 0.674), sepsis (c-statistic = 0.670), with high predictive accuracy (all Brier scores < 0.1). This study developed and validated a concise yet robust 10-point risk scoring system for patients undergoing SBO surgery. It can be informative to determine treatment plans and to prepare for potential perioperative complications in patients undergoing SBO surgery.

Patients with metastatic cancer have worse short-term coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes: A population-based study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is a hallmark for cancer progression. While patients with metastatic cancer (MC) have higher risk profiles, outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in these patients have not been established, likely due to their smaller representation in the CABG patient population. This study aimed to examine the short-term outcomes of patients with MC who underwent CABG. METHODS: Patients who underwent CABG were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, concomitant procedures, and non-metastatic malignancies. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address differences in demographics, socioeconomic status, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and transfer/admission status between MC and non-MCC patients. In-hospital post-CABG outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 379 (0.23 %) patients with MC who underwent CABG. All MC patients were matched to 1161 out of 164,351 non-MC patients who underwent CABG during the same period. Patients with MC had higher risks of mortality (4.76 % vs 2.58 %, p = 0.04), pacemaker implantation (2.91 % vs 1.12 %, p = 0.03), venous thromboembolism (1.85 % vs 0.43 %, p = 0.01), and hemorrhage/hematoma (61.11 % vs 55.04 %, p = 0.04). In addition, MC patients had a longer time from admission to operation (3.35 ± 4.19 vs 2.82 ± 3.54 days, p = 0.03) and longer hospital length of stay (11.86 ± 8.17 vs 10.65 ± 8.08 days, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with MC had higher short-term mortality and morbidities after CABG. These findings can help provide insights for clinicians in the management of patients with concurrent coronary artery disease and MC, particularly in terms of preoperative risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Timing to surgery in elderly patients with small bowel obstruction: an insight on frailty.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) frequently necessitates emergency surgical intervention. The impact of frailty and age on operative outcomes is uncertain. This study evaluated postoperative outcomes of SBO surgery based on patient's age and frailty and explore the optimal timing to operation in elderly and/or frail patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent SBO surgery were identified in ACS-NSQIP database 2005-2021. Patients aged ≥65 years were defined as elderly. Patients with 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index≥2 were defined as frail. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day post-operative outcomes between elderly frail versus non-frail patients, as well as between non-frail young versus elderly patients. RESULTS: 49,344 patients had SBO surgery, with 7,089 (14.37%) patients classified as elderly frail, 17,821 (36.12%) as elderly non-frail, and 21,849 (44.28%) as young non-frail. Elderly frail patients had higher mortality (aOR = 1.541, p < .01) and postoperative complications compared to their elderly non-frail counterparts; these patients also had longer wait until definitive operation (p < .01). Among non-frail patients, when compared to young patients, the elderly had higher mortality (aOR = 2.388, p < .01) and complications, and longer time to operation (p < .01). In elderly non-frail patients, a higher mortality was observed when surgery was postponed after 2 days. Mortality risk for frail elderly patients is heightened from their already higher baseline when surgery is delayed after 4 days. CONCLUSION: When SBO surgery is postponed for more than 2 days, elderly non-frail patients have an increased mortality risk. Consequently, upon admission, these patients should be placed under a nasogastric tube and undergo an initial gastrograffin challenge. If there is no contrast in colon, they should be operated on within 2 days. Conversely, elderly frail patients with SBO have a higher mortality risk when surgery is delayed beyond 4 days. Thus, following the same scheme, they should be operated on before 4 days if gastrograffin challenge fails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.

Socioeconomic disparity in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: a population study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020.

There is limited data on the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) outcomes for aortic stenosis (AS). This study conducted a population-based analysis to assess the influence of SES on valve replacement outcomes. Patients with AS undergoing TAVR or SAVR were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients living in neighborhoods of income at the lowest and highest quartiles. Of 613,785 AS patients, 9.77% underwent TAVR and 10.13% had SAVR. These rates decline with lower neighborhood income levels, with TAVR/SAVR ratio also declining in lower-income areas. Excluding concomitant procedures, 58,064 patients received isolated TAVR (12,355 low-income and 15,212 high-income) and 43,694 underwent isolated SAVR (10,029 low-income and 10,811 high-income). Low-income patients, in both TAVR and SAVR, were younger but had more comorbid burden. For isolated TAVR, outcomes were similar across income groups. However, for isolated SAVR, low-income patients experienced higher in-hospital mortality (aOR = 1.44, p < 0.01), pulmonary (aOR = 1.13, p = 0.01), and renal complications (aOR = 1.14, p < 0.01). They also had more transfers, longer waits for operations, and extended hospital stays. Lower-income communities had reduced access to TAVR and SAVR, with TAVR accessibility being particularly limited. When given access to TAVR, patients from lower-income neighborhoods had mostly comparable outcomes. However, patients from low-income communities faced worse outcomes in SAVR, possibly due to delays in treatment. Ensuring equitable specialized healthcare resources including expanding TAVR access in economically disadvantaged communities is crucial.

Locoregional Anesthesia Has Lower Risks of Cardiac Complications Than General Anesthesia After Prolonged Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Although general anesthesia is the primary anesthesia in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), some studies suggest locoregional anesthesia could be a feasible alternative for eligible patients. However, most evidence was from retrospective studies and was subjected to an inherent selection bias that general anesthesia is often chosen for more complex and prolonged cases. To mitigate this selection bias, this study aimed to compare 30-day outcomes of prolonged, nonemergent, intact, infrarenal EVAR in patients undergoing locoregional or general anesthesia. In addition, risk factors associated with prolonged operative time in EVAR were identified. DESIGN: Retrospective large-scale national registry study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2012 to 2022. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4,075 out of 16,438 patients (24.79%) had prolonged EVAR. Among patients with prolonged EVAR, 324 patients (7.95%) were under locoregional anesthesia. There were 3,751 patients (92.05%) under general anesthesia, and 955 of them were matched to the locoregional anesthesia cohort. INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR were included. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, emergency cases, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, and acute intraoperative conversion to open. Only cases with prolonged operative times (>157 minutes) were selected. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distant aneurysm extent, and concomitant procedures between patients under locoregional and general anesthesia. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. Moreover, factors associated with prolonged EVAR were identified by multivariate logistic regression. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Except for general anesthesia contraindications, patients undergoing locoregional or general anesthesia exhibited largely similar preoperative characteristics. After propensity-score matching, patients under locoregional and general anesthesia had a lower risk of myocardial infarction (0.93% v 2.83%, p = 0.04), but comparable 30-day mortality (3.72% v 2.72%, p = 0.35) and other complications. Specific concomitant procedures, aneurysm anatomy, and comorbidities associated with prolonged EVAR were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional anesthesia can be a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia, particularly in EVAR cases with anticipated complexity and prolonged operative times, as it offers the potential benefit of reduced cardiac complications. Risk factors associated with prolonged EVAR can aid in preoperative risk stratification and inform the decision-making process regarding anesthesia choice.

Letter re: Misidentification of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization by Current Procedural Terminology.

In this letter, we discussed the selection of patients undergoing Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We examined a previous study using CPT code 37215 to identify TCAR cases using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. As an ACS-NSQIP participating site, we have complete access to the ACS-NSQIP database, and we performed a more in-depth examination of the method. We found significant discrepancies in the method described and conclude that it is methodologically flawed to use CPT code 37215 to differentiate TCAR cases. This study not only re-evaluates the validity of the previous study but also has the potential to prevent other researchers from employing the erroneous methodology for TCAR selection using the CPT code, which is one of the most widely used standardizations of medical communication for surgical procedures. This is particularly pertinent given the recent "TCAR revolution", where significant attention has been focused on TCAR.

Trends in Plasma Exchange Use in Optic Neuritis Hospitalizations in the United States.

PURPOSE: To report use trends of plasma exchange (PLEX) as well as sociodemographic and medical comorbidities associated with PLEX in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted for inpatient hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample database was compiled to assess PLEX use rates between 2000 and 2020. The cohorts of patients receiving PLEX versus not receiving PLEX were analyzed between quarter 4 of 2015 through 2020 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10], only) for patient sociodemographic variables, medical diagnoses, insurance types, hospital characteristics, cause of disease, time to therapy, length of stay (LOS), and total charges incurred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of ON, incidence of PLEX, demographics, diagnoses associated with PLEX therapy, total charges, and LOS. RESULTS: From 2000 through 2020, 11 209 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ON were identified, with a significant majority managed at urban teaching hospitals. Use of PLEX increased steadily over 2 decades from 0.63% to 5.46%. Use was greatest in the western United States and least in the eastern United States. In the subset of ICD-10 cases, 3215 patients were identified. The median time to therapy of PLEX was 1 day after admission, and PLEX use was highest in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) (21.21%) and lowest in multiple sclerosis-associated ON (3.80%). Use of PLEX was associated with significantly longer LOS and higher total charges incurred. Medical comorbidities associated with PLEX included adverse reaction to glucocorticoids (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 31.50), hemiplegia (aOR, 28.48), neuralgia (aOR, 4.81), optic atrophy (aOR, 3.74), paralytic strabismus (aOR, 2.36), and psoriasis (aOR, 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 2 decades in the United States, PLEX therapy for ON has increased, with the highest use in the western United States and for patients with the diagnosis NMOSD ON. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index is a Succinct yet Effective Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is an age-related, clinically recognizable state marked by increased susceptibility. The 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) offers a concise assessment of frailty and has demonstrated its efficacy in various surgical fields. While the mFI-5 has been validated for endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), its applicability in open surgical repair (OSR) for AAA remains largely unexplored. This study sought to evaluate the utility of mFI-5 in predicting 30-day outcomes following OSR for AAA. METHODS: Patients underwent OSR for AAA were identified in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted database from 2012 to 2021. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts: mFI-5 score of 0 (control), 1, and 2+. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between frail patients and controls adjusting preoperative variables with P value <0.1. RESULTS: Of the 5,249 patients who underwent OSR for AAA, 1,043 were controls, 2,938 had an mFI-5 score of 1 and 1,268 had an mFI-5 score of 2+. When compared to the control group, patients with an mFI-5 = 1 were more likely to have pulmonary events (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.452, P < 0.01), bleeding events (aOR = 1.33, P < 0.01), wound complications (aOR = 2.214, P < 0.01), ischemic colitis (aOR = 1.616, P = 0.01), and unplanned reoperation (aOR = 1.292, P = 0.04). Those with an mFI-5 = 2+ demonstrated higher risks of mortality (aOR = 1.709, P < 0.01), major adverse cardiovascular events (aOR = 1.347, P = 0.04), pulmonary events (aOR = 2.045, P < 0.01), renal dysfunction (aOR = 1.568, P < 0.01), sepsis (aOR = 1.587, P = 0.01), bleeding events (aOR = 1.429, P < 0.01), wound complications (aOR = 2.338, P < 0.01), ischemic colitis (aOR = 1.775, P = 0.01), unplanned reoperation (aOR = 1.445, P = 0.01), operation over 4 hours (aOR = 1.34, P < 0.01), length of stay over 7 days (aOR = 1.324, <0.01), discharge not to home (aOR = 1.547, P < 0.01), 30-day readmission (aOR = 1.657, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The mFI-5 emerges as a succinct yet effective indicator of frailty for patients undergoing OSR for AAA. Especially, an mFI-5 score of 2+ is linked with increased 30-day mortality and complications. As such, mFI-5 can be used as a valuable screening tool for frailty in patients undergoing OSR for AAA.

In hospital outcomes of autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbid condition that can be associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, the outcome profile of patients with COPD after breast reconstruction has yet to be established. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes in patients with COPD who underwent autologous (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent ABR or IBR from Q4 2015 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare inhospital outcomes between COPD and non-COPD patients while adjusting for demographics, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: There were 1288 (9.92%) COPD and 11,696 non-COPD patients who underwent ABR. Meanwhile, 1742 (9.70%) COPD and 16,221 non-COPD patients underwent IBR. In both ABR and IBR, patients with COPD had higher rates of seroma (ABR, aOR = 1.863, 95% CI = 1.022-3.397, and p = 0.04; IBR, aOR = 1.524, 95% CI = 1.014-2.291, and p = 0.04), infection (ABR, aOR = 1.863, 95% CI = 1.022-3.397, and p = 0.04; IBR, aOR = 1.956, 95% CI = 1.205-3.176, and p = 0.01), and prolonged LOS (p < 0.01). Specifically, patients with COPD in ABR had higher risks of respiratory complications (aOR = 1.991, 95% CI = 1.291-3.071, and p < 0.01) and incurred higher total hospital charges (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, patients with COPD undergoing IBR had elevated risks of renal complications (aOR = 3.421, 95% CI = 2.108-5.55, and p < 0.01), deep wound complications (aOR = 3.191, 95% CI = 1.423-7.153, and p < 0.01), and a higher rate of transfers out (aOR = 1.815, 95% CI = 1.081-3.05, and p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: COPD is an independent risk factor associated with distinct adverse outcomes in ABR and IBR. These findings can be valuable for preoperative risk stratification, determining surgical candidacy, and planning postoperative management in patients with COPD.