[Clinical manifestation and imaging diagnostic analysis of fat embolism syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To explore characteristics of clinical and imaging findings in patients with fat embolism syndrome. METHODS: From January 2021 to October 2022,clinical manifestations of 13 patients with fat embolism due to fracture or orthopaedic surgery were retrospectively analyzed,including 11 males and 2 females,aged from 17 to 60 years old. Mental and respiratory abnormalities and changes in vital signs occurred after admission or after surgery,and patient's chest and brain imaging results were abnormal. The patient's mental and respiratory abnormalities,vital signs,chest and brain imaging results were continuously monitored. RESULTS: The main clinical manifestations of fat embolism syndrome were abnormal pulmonary respiration in 13 patients,abnormal central nervous function in 7 patients,and spotted rash in 2 patients. Chest CT showed diffuse distribution of ground glass shadows in 13 patients,and severe symptoms were "snowstorm". Nine patients with ground glass fusion consolidation,5 patients with multiple nodules and 4 patients accompanied by bilateral pleural effusion. Head CT findings of 5 patients were negative,and head MRI findings of 1 patient showed multiple T1WI low signal,T2WI high signal shadow,DWI high signal shadow,and "starry sky sign" in basal ganglia,radiative crown,hemioval center,thalamus,frontal parietal cortex and subcortex. CONCLUSION: Fat embolism syndrome has a high mortality rate. Clinical manifestations of respiratory system and nervous system are not specific,and the skin spot rash has a characteristic manifestation. The "blizzard" sign is the specific manifestation of chest X-ray and CT examination of fat embolism,and the "starry sky" sign is the typical manifestation of diffusion-weighted sequence of brain MRI examination of fat embolism.

A Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Value of CTA and MRA in Anterior Dislocation of Shoulder.

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of CTA and MRA in anterior dislocation of shoulder. Methods: The detection of inferior glenohumeral ligament injuries, anterior inferior labrum injuries, and bone and cartilage injuries by the two examination procedures was observed and compared with the results of arthroscopy or surgery on patients referred to our hospital owing to anterior dislocation of shoulder. Results. A total of 36 patients with shoulder injuries were gathered for this study. 32 cases with anterior inferior labrum tearings (27 cases detected by CTA and 30 cases by MRA), 24 cases with inferior glenohumeral ligament tearings (14 cases detected by CTA and 22 cases by MRA), 24 cases with inferior glenohumeral ligament tearings (14 cases detected by CTA and 22 cases by MRA), and 24 cases with inferior glenohumeral ligament tearings (14 cases detected by CTA and 22 cases by MRA) were detected. There were 30 bone and cartilage injuries, including 18 fractures (CTA identified 18), 10 bone contusions (CTA detected 0), and 5 cartilage damage (CTA detected 0) (CTA detected 0, MRA detected 5). Conclusion: The detection rate of MRA is better than that of CTA for inferior glenohumeral ligament injuries. For anterior inferior labrum injury, the detection rate of CTA and MRA was similar. CTA is more conducive to the detection of fracture blocks, while MRA is more advantageous for the observation of bone contusion and cartilage damage.