RESUMO
Electrospinning technique is well-known for the generation of different fibers. While it is a "simple" technique, it lies in the fact that the fibers are typically produced in the form of densely packed two-dimensional (2D) mats with limited thickness, shape, and porosity. The highly demanded three-dimensional (3D) fiber assemblies have been explored by time-consuming postprocessing and/or complex setup modifications. Here, we use a classic electrospinning setup to directly produce 3D fiber macrostructures only by modulating the spinning solution. Increasing solution conductivity modifies electrodynamic jet behavior and fiber assembling process; both are observed in situ using a high-speed camera. More viscous solutions render thicker fibers that own enhanced mechanical stiffness as examined by finite element analysis. We reveal the correlation between the universal solution parameters and the dimensionality of fiber assemblies, thereof, enlightening the design of more "3D spinnable" solutions that are compatible with any commercial electrospinning equipment. After a calcination step, ultralightweight ceramic fiber assemblies are generated. These inexpensive materials can clean up exceptionally large fractions of oil spillages and provide high-performance thermal insulation. This work would drive the development and scale-up production of next-generation 3D fiber materials for engineering, biomedical, and environmental applications.
RESUMO
Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA) is the most popular material for manufacturing mouthguards. However, EVA mouthguards are problematic, for example inconsistent thicknesses across the mouthguard. Additive manufacturing provides a promising solution to this problem, as it can manufacture mouthguards with a greater precision. This paper compares the energy dissipation of EVA, the current material used for mouthguards, to various designs of a 3D printed material, some of which contain air cells. Impact testing was carried out at three different strain rates. The Split-Hopkinson bar was used for medium and high strain rate tests, and an Instron test rig was used for low strain rate testing. The best performing design dissipated 25% more energy than EVA in the medium and high strain rate testing respectively while the low strain rate testing was inconclusive. This research has shown that additive manufacturing provides a viable method of manufacturing mouthguards. This opens up the opportunity for embedding electronics/sensors into additive manufactured mouthguards.
