Screening and identification of key genes and pathways in metastatic uveal melanoma based on gene expression using bioinformatic analysis.

The current study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms and identify the potential key genes and pathways for metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) using bioinformatics analysis.Gene expression microarray data from GSE39717 included 39 primary UM tissue samples and 2 metastatic UM tissue samples. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were generated using Gene Expression Omnibus 2R. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the online Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) tool. The web-based STRING tool was adopted to construct a protein--protein interaction (PPI) network. The MCODE tool in Cytoscape was used to generate significant modules of the PPI network.A total of 213 DEGs were identified. GO and KEGG analyses revealed that the upregulated genes were mainly enriched in extracellular matrix organization and blood coagulation cascades, while the downregulated DEGs were mainly related to protein binding, negative regulation of ERK cascade, nucleus and chromatin modification, and lung and renal cell carcinoma. The most significant module was extracted from the PPI network. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of the module revealed that the genes were mainly enriched in the extracellular region and space organization, blood coagulation process, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Hub genes, including FN1, APOB, F2, SERPINC1, SERPINA1, APOA1, FGG, PROC, ITIH2, VCAN, TFPI, CXCL8, CDH2, and HP, were identified from DEGs. Survival analysis and hierarchical clustering results revealed that most of the hub genes were associated with prognosis and clinical progression.Results of this bioinformatics analysis may provide predictive biomarkers and potential candidate therapeutic targets for individuals with metastatic UM.

Comparison of Three Intraocular Lens Implantation Procedures for Aphakic Eyes With Insufficient Capsular Support: A Network Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes and main complications of transscleral-fixated (TSF), intrascleral-fixated (ISF), and iris-fixated (IF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles up to April 2017 with no language restrictions, and related studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included. A Bayesian framework was applied to compare the visual outcomes and complications of these 3 approaches. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 845 eyes were included in the present report. There was no significant difference between any pair of surgical approaches in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in final BCVA achieving 20/40 or better (Snellen). ISF presented a lower risk of cystoid macular edema (CME) compared with TSF (risk ratio [RR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], [0.18, 1.0]). IF showed superiorities in less intraocular hemorrhage (IOH) than ISF (RR, 0.078; 95% CI [0.0095, 0.38]), as well as TSF (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, [0.09, 0.72]). IF had a lower risk of glaucoma escalation; the difference was slightly higher than the conventional level of significance (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, [0.16, 1.04]). Moreover, the surgical time in IF was shorter than TSF (standard mean difference [SMD], -2.98; 95% CI, [-4.32, -1.64]) and ISF (SMD, -2.60; 95% CI, [-3.71, -1.49]). However, IF was associated with a significantly higher risk of endothelial cell density (ECD) impairment (SMD, -0.54; 95% CI, [-1.02, -0.05]) and significantly greater postoperative corneal endothelial cell loss rate (ECLR, %) (SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, [0.08, 0.63]) compared with TSF. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative visual outcomes were comparable among TSF, ISF, and IF for eyes with insufficient capsular support. However, the risk of some complications differed among approaches. IF showed its superiorities in lower risk of IOH and glaucoma escalation as well as shorter surgical time, while IF was at a disadvantage in greater endothelial cell impairment. Since some patients might have a clear contraindication to one of the surgical approaches, the decision of surgical approach eventually depends on surgeon experience and the presenting pathology.

Bevacizumab as adjuvant therapy in the management of pterygium: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical effect of bevacizumab in pterygium treatment. METHODS: A systematic review and quantitative Meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane database were searched for eligible literatures published in English until June 2016. The endpoint was recurrence rate and pooled risk ratio (RR) was calculated. RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were included and Meta-analysis results showed no significantly difference in patients treated with bevacizumab in short term follow-up [3mo: RR=0.70 (0.34, 1.45); 6mo: RR=0.55 (0.23, 1.32)] compared with control groups. No significant effects were observed in favor of bevacizumab in subgroup analyses: patients with subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab [3mo: RR=0.95 (0.70, 1.29); 6mo: RR=0.83 (0.55, 1.28)], primary pterygium [3mo: RR=0.59 (0.23, 1.54; 6mo: RR=0.59 (0.23, 1.53)], simple pterygium excision [3mo: 0.32 (0.05, 2.04), P=0.23; 6mo: 0.27 (0.05, 1.53)] and excision with conjunctival autograft [3mo: 1.51 (0.25, 9.15); 6mo: 1.11 (0.06, 21.69)]. CONCLUSION: In this Meta-analysis, we did not found the significant effect of bevacizumab in pterygium treatment, at least in short term follow-up (3mo and 6mo).

Artisan iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation in combination with pupilloplasty-correction of aphakia with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the efficacy and safety of applying pupilloplasty in combination with Artisan iris-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the treatment for aphakia with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six aphakic eyes with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support (from 26 patients) were included in the study. METHODS: The study patients underwent pupilloplasty in combination with Artisan iris-fixated IOL implantation. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 1 week and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean uncorrected visual acuity was significantly improved from logMAR 1.15 ± 0.29 to logMAR 0.37 ± 0.17, and the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was significantly decreased from 12.07 ± 2.20 D to -0.69 ± 0.70 D at 6 month after surgery (p < 0.05). The pupil diameter decreased significantly, from 5.7 ± 1.1 mm preoperatively to 4.5 ± 0.8 mm at 6 months after pupilloplasty (p < 0.05). Patients experienced less photophobia postoperatively. The safety parameters, including endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, corneal astigmatism, best-corrected visual acuity, and central corneal thickness, showed no significant differences in values before and after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Artisan iris-fixated IOL implantation in combination with pupilloplasty can be used as an alternative way to correct aphakia with pathologically large pupil and insufficient capsular support.

Preoperative Biometric Parameters Predict the Vault after ICL Implantation: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between the preoperative biometric parameters of the anterior segment and the vault after implantable Collamer lens (ICL) implantation via this retrospective study. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. METHODS: A total of 78 eyes from 41 patients who underwent ICL implantation surgery were included in this study. Preoperative biometric parameters, including white-to-white (WTW) diameter, central corneal thickness, keratometer, pupil diameter, anterior chamber depth, sulcus-to-sulcus diameter, anterior chamber area (ACA) and central curvature radius of the anterior surface of the lens (Lenscur), were measured. Lenscur and ACA were measured with Rhinoceros 5.0 software on the image scanned with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The vault was assessed by UBM 3 months after surgery. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was employed to identify the variables that were correlated with the vault. RESULTS: The results showed that the vault was correlated with 3 variables: ACA (22.4 ± 4.25 mm2), WTW (11.36 ± 0.29 mm) and Lenscur (9.15 ± 1.21 mm). The regressive equation was: vault (mm) = 1.785 + 0.017 × ACA + 0.051 × Lenscur - 0.203 × WTW. CONCLUSIONS: Biometric parameters of the anterior segment (ACA, WTW and Lenscur) can predict the vault after ICL implantation using a new regression equation.

Implantable collamer lens versus iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens implantation to correct myopia: a meta-analysis.

This study is a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy, predictability, and safety of correcting myopia via implantation of two types of phakic intraocular lens (PIOLs): the implantable collamer lens (ICL) and iris-fixed PIOL. The Cochrane library, Pubmed, and EMBASE were searched. Study selection, data exclusion, and quality assessment were performed by two independent observers. The pooled relative risk (RR), pooled standardized mean difference (SMD), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare lenses. Seven studies, involving 511 eyes, were included. The pooled SMD in postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) comparing ICLs to iris-fixed PIOLs was -0.22 (95% CI, -0.58 to 0.13; P = .22). The pooled RR values of UDVA of 20/20 or better and of 20/40 or better comparing ICLs to iris-fixed PIOLs were 1.15 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.47; P = .29) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.08; P = .75), respectively. The pooled RR of loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and gain in BSCVA comparing ICLs to iris-fixed PIOLs were 1.20 (95% CI, 0.24 to 6.00; P = .82) and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.48; P = .31), respectively. The pooled RR comparing ICLs to iris-fixed PIOLs was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.29 to 2.12; P = .63) for all reported complications and 2.80 (95% CI, 1.04 to 7.52; P = .04) for severe complications. The pooled RR of achieving a result within ± 0.5 D (diopter) of the intended target comparing ICLs to iris-fixed PIOLs was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.77; P = .03). Overall, there is no significant difference in efficacy between the two types of PIOLs or in safety, except that the ICL is associated with a greater incidence of severe complications, especially anterior subcapsular cataract, primarily in the Version 2 and Version 3 groups. However, ICL has better predictability.