Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e3836-e3841, 2021 12 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32766767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about pertussis among pregnant women, a population at increased risk for severe morbidity from respiratory infections such as influenza. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Enhanced Pertussis Surveillance (EPS) system to describe pertussis epidemiology among pregnant and nonpregnant women of childbearing age. METHODS: Pertussis cases in women aged 18-44 years with cough onset between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017 were identified in 7 EPS states. Surveillance data were collected through patient and provider interviews and immunization registries. Bridged-race, intercensal population data and live birth estimates were used as denominators. RESULTS: We identified 1582 pertussis cases among women aged 18-44 years; 5.1% (76/1499) of patients with a known pregnancy status were pregnant at cough onset. Of the pregnant patients with complete information, 81.7% (49/60) reported onset during the second or third trimester. The median ages of pregnant and nonpregnant patients were 29.0 and 33.0 years, respectively. Most pregnant and nonpregnant patients were White (78.3% vs. 86.4%, respectively; P = .09) and non-Hispanic (72.6% vs. 77.3%, respectively; P = .35). The average annual incidence of pertussis was 7.7/100000 among pregnancy women and 7/3/100000 among nonpregnant women. Compared to nonpregnant patients, more pregnant patients reported whoop (41.9% vs. 31.3%, respectively), posttussive vomiting (58.1% vs. 47.9%, respectively), and apnea (37.3% vs. 29.0%, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant (P values > .05 for all). A similar proportion of pregnant and nonpregnant patients reported ever having received Tdap (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine; 31.6% vs. 32.7%, respectively; P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that incidence of pertussis and clinical characteristics of disease are similar among pregnant and nonpregnant women. Continued monitoring is important to further define pertussis epidemiology in pregnant women.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular , Tétano , Coqueluche , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gestantes , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Coqueluche/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(2): 201-211, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30288661

RESUMO

Objectives The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend that pregnant women receive the Tdap vaccine during every pregnancy. The objectives of this paper are to evaluate disparities in Tdap vaccination among pregnant women in the U.S., and to assess whether race/ethnicity and other characteristics are associated with factors that inform pregnant women's decisions about Tdap vaccination. Methods We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional web-based survey of pregnant women in the U.S. during June-July 2014. The primary outcome was self-reported vaccination status with Tdap during pregnancy, categorized as vaccinated, unvaccinated with intent to be vaccinated during the current pregnancy, and unvaccinated with no intent to be vaccinated during the current pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included factors that influenced women's decisions about vaccination and information needs. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios for associations between race/ethnicity and the outcomes. Results Among pregnant women who completed the survey, 41% (95% CI 36-45%) reported that they had received Tdap during the current pregnancy. Among those women in the third trimester at the time of survey, 52% (95% CI 43-60%) had received Tdap during the current pregnancy. Hispanic women had higher Tdap vaccination than white women and black women (53%, p < 0.05, compared with 38 and 36%, respectively). In logistic regression models adjusting for maternal age, geographic region, education, and income, Hispanic women were more likely to have been vaccinated with Tdap compared with white women (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.20-4.37). Higher income and residing in the western U.S. were also independently associated with Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. Twenty-six percent of surveyed women had not been vaccinated with Tdap yet but intended to receive the vaccine during the current pregnancy; this proportion did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity. The most common factor that influenced women to get vaccinated was a health care provider (HCP) recommendation. The most common reason for not getting vaccinated was a concern about safety of the vaccine. Conclusions This study found that some disparities exist in Tdap vaccination among pregnant women in the U.S., and HCPs have an important role in providing information and recommendations about the maternal Tdap recommendation to pregnant women so they can make informed vaccination decisions.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/uso terapêutico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento de Busca de Informação , Avaliação das Necessidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestantes , Vacinação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
3.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 67(2): 1-44, 2018 04 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29702631

RESUMO

This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding prevention and control of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in the United States. As a comprehensive summary of previously published recommendations, this report does not contain any new recommendations and replaces all previously published reports and policy notes; it is intended for use by clinicians and public health providers as a resource. ACIP recommends routine vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis. Infants and young children are recommended to receive a 5-dose series of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines, with one adolescent booster dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Adults who have never received Tdap also are recommended to receive a booster dose of Tdap. Women are recommended to receive a dose of Tdap during each pregnancy, which should be administered from 27 through 36 weeks' gestation, regardless of previous receipt of Tdap. After receipt of Tdap, adolescents and adults are recommended to receive a booster tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine every 10 years to assure ongoing protection against tetanus and diphtheria.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/normas , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Difteria/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Tétano/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Acad Pediatr ; 18(7): 763-768, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29678594

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) made a category B recommendation for use of serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines, meaning individual clinical decision-making should guide recommendations. This was the first use of a category B recommendation pertaining to a large population and the first such recommendation for adolescents. As part of a survey regarding MenB vaccine, our objectives were to assess among pediatricians (Peds) and family physicians (FPs) nationally: 1) knowledge of the meaning of category A versus B recommendations and insurance coverage implications, and 2) attitudes about category A and B recommendations. METHODS: We surveyed a nationally representative sample of Peds and FPs via e-mail and mail from October to December 2016. RESULTS: The response rate was 72% (660 of 916). Although >80% correctly identified the definition of a category A recommendation, only 24% were correct about the definition for category B. Fifty-five percent did not know that private insurance would pay for vaccines recommended as category B, and 51% did not know that category B-recommended vaccines would be covered by the Vaccines for Children program. Fifty-nine percent found it difficult to explain category B recommendations to patients; 22% thought ACIP should not make category B recommendations; and 39% were in favor of category B recommendations because they provide leeway in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: For category B recommendations to be useful in guiding practice, primary care clinicians will need to have a better understanding of their meaning, their implications for insurance payment, and guidance on how to discuss them with parents and patients.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Competência Clínica , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/uso terapêutico , Pediatras , Médicos de Família , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo B , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(41): 1105-1108, 2017 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29049273

RESUMO

Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is recommended during the third trimester of each pregnancy to provide protection to newborns, who are at risk for pertussis-related morbidity and mortality (1). As part of its case-control surveillance study of medications and birth defects, the Birth Defects Study of the Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University (the Birth Defects Study) has recorded data on vaccinations received during pregnancy since 2006. Among 5,606 mothers of infants without structural birth defects in this population (control group), <1% had received Tdap vaccine before 2009. By 2012, the percentage of mothers of infants in the control group (control infants) who had received Tdap increased to approximately 9%, and then in 2013 and continuing through 2015, increased markedly, to 28% and 54%, respectively. As the prevalence of maternal Tdap vaccination increased, so did the proportion of pregnant women who received Tdap in the third trimester, as recommended (94%-100% from 2010 to 2015). The vast majority of Tdap vaccinations (96%) were received in a traditional health care setting (e.g., the office of the woman's obstetrician or primary care physician or her prenatal clinic). Increasing vaccination coverage during pregnancy could help reduce the impact of pertussis on infant morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Difteria/epidemiologia , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Trimestres da Gravidez , Tétano/epidemiologia , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 53(4): 537-546, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28545743

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare personnel (HCP) are at risk for pertussis infection exposure or transmitting the disease to patients in their work settings. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination for HCP to minimize these risks. This study assessed Tdap vaccination coverage among U.S. HCP by sociodemographic and occupation-related characteristics. METHODS: The 2012, 2013, and 2014 Internet Panel Surveys were analyzed in 2015 to assess HCP Tdap vaccination. Effective sample sizes for 2012, 2013, and 2014 survey years were 2,038, 1613, and 1633, respectively. Missing values were assigned using multiple imputation. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with HCP Tdap vaccination. Statistical measures were calculated with an assumption of random sampling. RESULTS: Overall, Tdap vaccination coverage among HCP was 34.8% (95% CI=30.6%, 39.0%); 40.2% (95% CI=36.1%, 44.4%); and 42.4% (95% CI=38.7%, 46.0%) in 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Nurse practitioners/physician's assistants, physicians, nurses, and HCP working in hospitals and ambulatory care settings had higher Tdap coverage. Having contact with an infant aged ≤6 months and influenza vaccination receipt were associated with increased Tdap vaccination. Non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity, having an associate/bachelor's degree, being below poverty, non-clinical personnel status, and working in a long-term care setting were associated with decreased Tdap vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: HCP Tdap vaccination coverage increased during 2012-2014; however, coverage remains low. Vaccination coverage varied widely by healthcare occupation, occupational setting, and sociodemographic characteristics. Evidence-based employer strategies used to increase HCP influenza vaccination, if applied to Tdap, may increase Tdap coverage.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Community Health ; 42(3): 573-582, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837358

RESUMO

Pertussis is a common vaccine-preventable disease (VPD) worldwide. Its reported incidence has increased steadily in the United States, where it is endemic. Tetanus is a rare but potentially fatal VPD. Foreign-born adults have lower tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap) and tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccination coverage than do U.S.-born adults. We studied the association of migration-related, socio-demographic, and access-to-care factors with Tdap and Td vaccination among foreign-born adults living in the United States. The 2012 and 2013 National Health Interview Survey data for foreign-born respondents were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to calculate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals, and to identify variables independently associated with Tdap and Td vaccination among foreign-born adults. Tdap and Td vaccination status was available for 9316 and 12,363 individuals, respectively. Overall vaccination coverage was 9.1% for Tdap and 49.8% for Td. Younger age, higher education, having private health insurance (vs. public insurance or uninsured), having visited a doctor in the previous year, and region of residence were independently associated with Tdap and Td vaccination. Among those reporting a doctor visit, two-thirds had not received Tdap. This study provides further evidence of the need to enhance access to health care and immunization services and reduce missed opportunities for Tdap and Td vaccination for foreign-born adults in the United States. These findings apply to all foreign-born, irrespective of their birthplace, citizenship, language and years of residence in the United States. Addressing vaccination disparities among the foreign-born will help achieve national vaccination goals and protect all communities in the United States.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria e Tétano , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Adolesc Health ; 59(4): 457-64, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27523976

RESUMO

PURPOSE: During March-November 2013, five cases of serogroup B meningococcal disease occurred among University A undergraduates. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used the unlicensed MenB-4C (Bexsero, Novartis Vaccines), a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine, to control the outbreak. All undergraduates (n = 19,257) were offered two doses; 51% of undergraduates received ≥1 dose of MenB-4C. We conducted a knowledge, attitudes, and practice survey to understand which factors and sources of information impacted their decision on whether or not to receive vaccine. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was sent to University A undergraduates. The survey was implemented in June 2-30, 2014, and covered demographics, MenB-4C vaccination decision, and sources of information. Descriptive analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 1,341 students completed the survey (response rate = 7.0%), of these 873 received ≥1 dose of MenB-4C. Among vaccinated respondents, the predominant reasons for receiving vaccine were knowledge of disease severity, parental recommendation, and believing that vaccination offered the best protection. Among unvaccinated respondents, the predominant reasons for not receiving vaccine were perception of low disease risk and concern over vaccine newness and safety. Respondents' top primary sources of information were e-mails from the university followed by their parents. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons behind respondents' decision to receive an unlicensed vaccine were similar to those reported for routinely recommended vaccines. Given the challenges around communicating the importance of receiving a vaccine that is not routinely recommended, respondents' primary sources of information, the university and their parents, could be targeted to improve coverage rates.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comportamento de Escolha , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Meningocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Universidades , Adulto Jovem
9.
Vaccine ; 34(15): 1832-8, 2016 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899377

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The United States experienced a substantial increase in reported pertussis cases over the last decade. Since 2005, persons 11 years and older have been routinely recommended to receive a single dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of recommending a second dose of Tdap. METHODS: A static cohort model was used to calculate the epidemiologic and economic impact of adding a second dose of Tdap at age 16 or 21 years. Projected costs and outcomes were examined from a societal perspective over a 20-year period. Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALY) saved were calculated. RESULTS: Using baseline pertussis incidence from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, Tdap revaccination at either age 16 or 21 years would reduce outpatient visits by 433 (5%) and 285 (4%), and hospitalization cases by 7 (7%) and 5 (5%), respectively. The costs per QALY saved with a second dose of Tdap were approximately US $19.7 million (16 years) and $26.2 million (21 years). In sensitivity analyses, incidence most influenced the model; as incidence increased, the costs per QALY decreased. To a lesser degree, initial vaccine effectiveness and waning of effectiveness also affected cost outcomes. Multivariate sensitivity analyses showed that under a set of optimistic assumptions, the cost per QALY saved would be approximately $163,361 (16 years) and $204,556 (21 years). CONCLUSION: A second dose of Tdap resulted in a slight decrease in the number of cases and other outcomes, and that trend is more apparent when revaccinating at age 16 years than at age 21 years. Both revaccination strategies had high dollar per QALY saved even under optimistic assumptions in a multivariate sensitivity analysis.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Imunização Secundária/economia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/economia , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Am J Prev Med ; 50(5): 616-626, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26614276

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends a single dose of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) for adults followed by tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) booster doses every 10 years thereafter. This study assessed recent Td and Tdap vaccination among adult populations. METHODS: The 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were analyzed in 2015 to assess Td and Tdap vaccination coverage among adults at national and state levels. Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal models were performed to identify factors independently associated with vaccination. RESULTS: Overall, national vaccination coverage among adults aged ≥18 years for Td was 57.5% and for Tdap was 28.9%. Among states, Td vaccination coverage ranged from 47.8% in Nevada to 73.1% in Minnesota, and Tdap coverage ranged from 17.7% in Mississippi to 47.6% in Minnesota. Characteristics independently associated with an increased likelihood of Tdap vaccination among adults aged ≥18 years were younger age; being female; American Indian/Alaska Native race; being never married; higher education; not being in the workforce; reporting a household income ≥$75,000; living in the West or Midwest U.S.; reporting excellent, very good, good, or fair health; having health insurance; having a healthcare provider; having a routine checkup in the previous year; receipt of influenza vaccination in the previous year; and having ever received pneumococcal vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: By 2013, Td and Tdap vaccination coverage were 57.5% and 28.9%, respectively. Coverage varied by state. Implementation of evidence-based programs is needed to improve Td and Tdap vaccination levels among adult populations.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria e Tétano/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Vaccine ; 32(5): 572-8, 2014 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24308960

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health-care personnel (HCP) are at risk for exposure to and possible transmission of vaccine-preventable diseases. Receiving recommended vaccines is an essential prevention practice for HCP to protect themselves and their patients. The tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) was recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for HCP in 2006 for protection against pertussis. We assessed the recent compliance of U.S. HCP in receiving Tdap vaccination. METHODS: To estimate Tdap vaccination coverage among HCP, we analyzed data from the 2011 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal models were performed to identify factors independently associated with vaccination among HCP. RESULTS: Overall, Tdap vaccination coverage was 26.9% among HCP aged 18-64 years (95% confidence interval (CI)=24.3%, 29.7%), which was significantly higher compared with non-HCP among the same age group (11.1%; 10.5-11.8%). Overall, vaccination coverage was significantly higher among physicians (41.5%) compared with nurses (36.5%) and other types of HCP (range 11.7-29.9%). Vaccination coverage was significantly higher among HCP aged 18-49 years compared with those 50-64 years (30.0% vs. 19.2%, respectively). Characteristics independently associated with an increased likelihood of Tdap vaccination among HCP were: younger age, higher education, living in the western United States, being hospitalized within past year, having a place for routine health care in clinic or health center, and receipt of influenza vaccination in the previous year. Marital status of widowed, divorced, or separated was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of Tdap vaccination among HCP. CONCLUSIONS: By 2011, Tdap vaccination coverage was only 26.9% among HCP. Vaccination coverage varied widely by types of HCP and demographic characteristics. Emphasizing the benefits of HCP vaccination for staff and patients, providing vaccinations in the workplace and other non-traditional settings, and providing Tdap at no charge may help increase Tdap vaccination among HCP in all health-care settings.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Pediatrics ; 131(6): e1748-56, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23713104

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infants <2 months of age are at highest risk of pertussis morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended protecting young infants by "cocooning" or vaccination of postpartum mothers and other close contacts with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis, adsorbed (Tdap) booster vaccine. ACIP recommends pregnancy vaccination as a preferred and safe alternative to postpartum vaccination. The ACIP cocooning recommendation has not changed. METHODS: We used a cohort model reflecting US 2009 births and the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis schedule to simulate a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy compared with postpartum vaccination with or without vaccination of other close contacts (ie, cocooning). We analyzed infant pertussis cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, as well as direct disease, indirect, and public health costs for infants in the first year of life. All costs were updated to 2011 US dollars. RESULTS: Pregnancy vaccination could reduce annual infant pertussis incidence by more than postpartum vaccination, reducing cases by 33% versus 20%, hospitalizations by 38% versus 19%, and deaths by 49% versus 16%. Additional cocooning doses in a father and 1 grandparent could avert an additional 16% of cases but at higher cost. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved for pregnancy vaccination was substantially less than postpartum vaccination ($414 523 vs $1 172 825). CONCLUSIONS: Tdap vaccination during pregnancy could avert more infant cases and deaths at lower cost than postpartum vaccination, even when postpartum vaccination is combined with additional cocooning doses. Pregnancy dose vaccination is the preferred alternative to postpartum vaccination for preventing infant pertussis.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Coqueluche/economia , Coqueluche/epidemiologia
13.
Int J Infect Dis ; 16(5): e382-90, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22424896

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the extent of implementation or the effectiveness of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) recommended non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in schools to control the spread of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 (pH1N1). METHODS: A web-based, cross-sectional survey of all public K-12 schools in Georgia, USA was conducted about preparedness and response to pH1N1, and absenteeism and respiratory illness. Schools that reported ≥10% absenteeism and at least two times the normal level of respiratory illness in the same week were designated as having experienced significant respiratory illness and absenteeism (SRIA) during that week. RESULTS: Of 2248 schools surveyed, 704 (31.3%) provided sufficient data to include in our analysis. Participating schools were spread throughout Georgia, USA and were similar to non-participating schools. Of 704 schools, 160 (22.7%) reported at least 1 week of SRIA. Most schools reported implementing the CDC recommendations for the control of pH1N1, and only two schools reported canceling or postponing activities. Schools that communicated with parents about influenza in the summer, had shorter school days, and were located in urban areas were less likely to experience SRIA. CONCLUSIONS: Most Georgia schools in the United States adopted the CDC recommendations for pH1N1 mitigation and few disruptions of school activities were reported. Early and timely communication with parents, as well as shorter school days, may have been effective in limiting the effect of pH1N1 on schools.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Absenteísmo , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Revelação , Feminino , Georgia , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Instituições Acadêmicas , Inquéritos e Questionários
14.
Public Health Rep ; 126(6): 868-74, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22043103

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In 2006, the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges reported that the shortage (≥ 1,500) of public health veterinarians is expected to increase tenfold by 2020. In 2008, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Preventive Medicine Fellows conducted a pilot project among CDC veterinarians to identify national veterinary public health workforce concerns and potential policy strategies. METHODS: Fellows surveyed a convenience sample (19/91) of public health veterinarians at CDC to identify veterinary workforce recruitment and retention problems faced by federal agencies; responses were categorized into themes. A focus group (20/91) of staff veterinarians subsequently prioritized the categorized themes from least to most important. Participants identified activities to address the three recruitment concerns with the highest combined weight. RESULTS: Participants identified the following three highest prioritized problems faced by federal agencies when recruiting veterinarians to public health: (1) lack of awareness of veterinarians' contributions to public health practice, (2) competitive salaries, and (3) employment and training opportunities. Similarly, key concerns identified regarding retention of public health practice veterinarians included: (1) lack of recognition of veterinary qualifications, (2) competitive salaries, and (3) seamless integration of veterinary and human public health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings identified multiple barriers that can affect recruitment and retention of veterinarians engaged in public health practice. Next steps should include replicating project efforts among a national sample of public health veterinarians. A committed and determined long-term effort might be required to sustain initiatives and policy proposals to increase U.S. veterinary public health capacity.


Assuntos
Educação Profissional em Saúde Pública/tendências , Educação em Veterinária/tendências , Prática de Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos Veterinários/provisão & distribuição , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conscientização , Escolha da Profissão , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Seleção de Pessoal/métodos , Projetos Piloto , Papel Profissional , Prática de Saúde Pública/economia , Salários e Benefícios , Estados Unidos , Médicos Veterinários/economia
15.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 80(5): 769-73, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19407122

RESUMO

Assessing the interruption of lymphatic filariasis transmission after annual mass drug administration (MDA) requires a better understanding of how to interpret results obtained with the available diagnostic tools. We conducted parasitologic, serologic, and entomologic surveys in three villages in American Samoa after sentinel site surveys suggested filarial antigen prevalence was < 1% after five annual MDAs with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole. Antigen and antifilarial antibody prevalence ranged from 3.7% to 4.6% and from 12.5% to 14.9%, respectively, by village. Only one person was microfilaria positive. Although no children less than 10 years of age were antigen positive, antifilarial antibody prevalence in this age group was 5.1% and antibody-positive children were detected in all three villages. Wuchereria bancrofti-infected mosquitoes were also detected in all three villages. Thus, monitoring of infections in mosquitoes and antifilarial antibody levels in children may serve as indicators of local transmission and be useful for making decisions about program endpoints.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Samoa Americana/epidemiologia , Anticorpos Anti-Helmínticos/sangue , Antígenos de Helmintos/análise , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
16.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 78(6): 924-8, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18541771

RESUMO

American Samoa began a territory-wide mass drug administration (MDA) program with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole in 2000 after baseline surveys indicated that 16.5% of 2,989 residents were infected with Wuchereria bancrofti based on tests for circulating filarial antigen. Follow-up surveys were conducted in 2001, 2003, and 2006, using convenience samples of residents of sentinel villages. Antigenemia prevalence in 2001 (11.5%) and 2003 (13.5%) showed no change. After the 2003 sentinel assessment, improvements were made in the social mobilization and drug distribution strategies. In 2006, after a total of 5 years of MDA and 3 years of improved MDA participation, the antigenemia prevalence dropped from 11.5% (2001) to 0.95% (2006) (P < 0.0001). In 2006, antigenemia prevalence was greater in males (1.5%) than females (0.4%) (P = 0.04). The decline in antigenemia prevalence shows the effectiveness of MDA and changes made in social mobilization and drug distribution.


Assuntos
Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Anti-Helmínticos/uso terapêutico , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Filariose/tratamento farmacológico , Wuchereria bancrofti/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Samoa Americana/epidemiologia , Animais , Anti-Helmínticos/administração & dosagem , Antígenos de Helmintos/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Filariose/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Wuchereria bancrofti/imunologia
17.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 55(12): 1-30, 2006 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17183230

RESUMO

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Since 1971, CDC, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists have collaboratively maintained the Waterborne Disease and Outbreak Surveillance System for collecting and reporting waterborne disease and outbreak (WBDO)-related data. In 1978, WBDOs associated with recreational water (natural and treated water) were added. This system is the primary source of data regarding the scope and effects of WBDOs in the United States. REPORTING PERIOD: Data presented summarize WBDOs associated with recreational water that occurred during January 2003-December 2004 and one previously unreported outbreak from 2002. DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM: Public health departments in the states, territories, localities, and the Freely Associated States (i.e., the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau, formerly parts of the U.S.-administered Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands) have primary responsibility for detecting, investigating, and voluntarily reporting WBDOs to CDC. Although the surveillance system includes data for WBDOs associated with drinking water, recreational water, and water not intended for drinking, only cases and outbreaks associated with recreational water are summarized in this report. RESULTS: During 2003-2004, a total 62 WBDOs associated with recreational water were reported by 26 states and Guam. Illness occurred in 2,698 persons, resulting in 58 hospitalizations and one death. The median outbreak size was 14 persons (range: 1-617 persons). Of the 62 WBDOs, 30 (48.4%) were outbreaks of gastroenteritis that resulted from infectious agents, chemicals, or toxins; 13 (21.0%) were outbreaks of dermatitis; and seven (11.3%) were outbreaks of acute respiratory illness (ARI). The remaining 12 WBDOs resulted in primary amebic meningoencephalitis (n = one), meningitis (n = one), leptospirosis (n = one), otitis externa (n = one), and mixed illnesses (n = eight). WBDOs associated with gastroenteritis resulted in 1,945 (72.1%) of 2,698 illnesses. Forty-three (69.4%) WBDOs occurred at treated water venues, resulting in 2,446 (90.7%) cases of illness. The etiologic agent was confirmed in 44 (71.0%) of the 62 WBDOs, suspected in 15 (24.2%), and unidentified in three (4.8%). Twenty (32.3%) WBDOs had a bacterial etiology; 15 (24.2%), parasitic; six (9.7%), viral; and three (4.8%), chemical or toxin. Among the 30 gastroenteritis outbreaks, Cryptosporidium was confirmed as the causal agent in 11 (36.7%), and all except one of these outbreaks occurred in treated water venues where Cryptosporidium caused 55.6% (10/18) of the gastroenteritis outbreaks. In this report, 142 Vibrio illnesses (reported to the Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance System) that were associated with recreational water exposure were analyzed separately. The most commonly reported species were Vibrio vulnificus, V. alginolyticus, and V. parahaemolyticus. V. vulnificus illnesses associated with recreational water exposure had the highest Vibrio illness hospitalization (87.2%) and mortality (12.8%) rates. INTERPRETATION: The number of WBDOs summarized in this report and the trends in recreational water-associated disease and outbreaks are consistent with previous years. Outbreaks, especially the largest ones, are most likely to be associated with summer months, treated water venues, and gastrointestinal illness. Approximately 60% of illnesses reported for 2003-2004 were associated with the seven largest outbreaks (>100 cases). Deficiencies leading to WBDOs included problems with water quality, venue design, usage, and maintenance. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS: CDC uses WBDO surveillance data to 1) identify the etiologic agents, types of aquatic venues, water-treatment systems, and deficiencies associated with outbreaks; 2) evaluate the adequacy of efforts (i.e., regulations and public awareness activities) to provide safe recreational water; and 3) establish public health prevention priorities that might lead to improved regulations and prevention measures at the local, state, and federal levels.


Assuntos
Praias , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Rios , Piscinas , Microbiologia da Água , Poluição da Água , Humanos , Vigilância da População , Recreação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 55(12): 31-65, 2006 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17183231

RESUMO

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Since 1971, CDC, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists have maintained a collaborative Waterborne Disease and Outbreaks Surveillance System for collecting and reporting data related to occurrences and causes of waterborne disease and outbreaks (WBDOs). This surveillance system is the primary source of data concerning the scope and effects of WBDOs in the United States. REPORTING PERIOD: Data presented summarize 36 WBDOs that occurred during January 2003-December 2004 and nine previously unreported WBDOs that occurred during 1982-2002. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: The surveillance system includes data on WBDOs associated with drinking water, water not intended for drinking (excluding recreational water), and water of unknown intent. Public health departments in the states, territories, localities, and Freely Associated States (i.e., the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau, formerly parts of the U.S.-administered Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands) are primarily responsible for detecting and investigating WBDOs and voluntarily reporting them to CDC by using a standard form. RESULTS: During 2003-2004, a total of 36 WBDOs were reported by 19 states; 30 were associated with drinking water, three were associated with water not intended for drinking, and three were associated with water of unknown intent. The 30 drinking water-associated WBDOs caused illness among an estimated 2,760 persons and were linked to four deaths. Etiologic agents were identified in 25 (83.3%) of these WBDOs: 17 (68.0%) involved pathogens (i.e., 13 bacterial, one parasitic, one viral, one mixed bacterial/parasitic, and one mixed bacterial/parasitic/viral), and eight (32.0%) involved chemical/toxin poisonings. Gastroenteritis represented 67.7% of the illness related to drinking water-associated WBDOs; acute respiratory illness represented 25.8%, and dermatitis represented 6.5%. The classification of deficiencies contributing to WBDOs has been revised to reflect the categories of concerns associated with contamination at or in the source water, treatment facility, or distribution system (SWTD) that are under the jurisdiction of water utilities, versus those at points not under the jurisdiction of a water utility or at the point of water use (NWU/POU), which includes commercially bottled water. A total of 33 deficiencies were cited in the 30 WBDOs associated with drinking water: 17 (51.5%) NWU/POU, 14 (42.4%) SWTD, and two (6.1%) unknown. The most frequently cited NWU/POU deficiencies involved Legionella spp. in the drinking water system (n = eight [47.1%]). The most frequently cited SWTD deficiencies were associated with distribution system contamination (n = six [42.9%]). Contaminated ground water was a contributing factor in seven times as many WBDOs (n = seven) as contaminated surface water (n = one). INTERPRETATION: Approximately half (51.5%) of the drinking water deficiencies occurred outside the jurisdiction of a water utility in situations not currently regulated by EPA. The majority of the WBDOs in which deficiencies were not regulated by EPA were associated with Legionella spp. or chemicals/toxins. Problems in the distribution system were the most commonly identified deficiencies under the jurisdiction of a water utility, underscoring the importance of preventing contamination after water treatment. The substantial proportion of WBDOs involving contaminated ground water provides support for the Ground Water Rule (finalized in October 2006), which specifies when corrective action is required for public ground water systems. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS: CDC and EPA use surveillance data to identify the types of water systems, deficiencies, and etiologic agents associated with WBDOs and to evaluate the adequacy of current technologies and practices for providing safe drinking water. Surveillance data also are used to establish research priorities, which can lead to improved water-quality regulation development. The growing proportion of drinking water deficiencies that are not addressed by current EPA rules emphasizes the need to address risk factors for water contamination in the distribution system and at points not under the jurisdiction of water utilities.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Microbiologia da Água , Poluição da Água , Abastecimento de Água , Humanos , Vigilância da População , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Purificação da Água
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...