RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of the aortic stump in open surgical conversion (OSC) after Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is debated. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacies and safety between the bifurcated prosthetic vascular graft in situ stump reconstruction (p-graft ISSR) and aortic stump closure (ASC) in OSC. METHODS: We analyzed 973 elective AAA patients admitted from January 01, 2001 to December 31, 2020, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. We conducted a statistical analysis of the clinical characteristics, procedural data, as well as outcomes and technique considerations of aortic stump management in OSC patients. RESULTS: A total of 24 male patients had OSC after EVAR. The rate of stent graft infection was 54.17% before OSC. Eleven patients underwent ASC, and 13 patients were treated with p-graft ISSR. The major complication after OSC was aortic stump bleeding (total incidence was 37.50%) (1 patient with a periaortic hematoma and 8 patients with a stump blowout). The total incidences of stump blowout between the patients with ASC and those with p-graft ISSR were significantly different (45.45% vs. 23.08%, P < 0.05). The total perioperative mortality was 25.00% (6 patients with stump blowouts). The perioperative survival rates between these 2 aortic stump management approaches were 72.72% and 76.92% (ASC vs. p-graft ISSR, P < 0.05). In total, 18 patients were followed up (3-180 months). There were 3 aorta-related deaths during the late follow-up period (including both of the 2 stump-blowout-related deaths just treated with ASC). CONCLUSIONS: If the condition of the aorta and peri-aortic tissue are suitable for a prosthetic graft bypass, the p-graft ISSR is highly recommended for OSC patients after EVAR.
