RESUMO
ABSTRACT Sarcopenia, a concept reflecting the loss of skeletal muscle mass, was reported to be associated with the prognosis of several tumors. However, the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with renal cancer remains unclear. We carried out this metaanalysis and systematic review to evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with renal cell carcinomas. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled together. A total of 5 studies consisting of 771 patients were enrolled in this quantitative analysis, 347 (45.0%) of which had sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia had a worse OS compared with those without sarcopenia (HR=1.76; 95%CI, 1.35-2.31; P <0.001). In the subgroup of patients with localized and advanced/metastatic diseases, sarcopenia was also associated with poor OS (HR=1.48, P=0.039; HR=2.14, P <0.001; respectively). With a limited sample size, we did not observe difference of PFS between two groups (HR=1.56, 95% CI, 0.69-3.50, P=0.282). In the present meta-analysis, we observed that patients with sarcopenia had a worse OS compared with those without sarcopenia in RCC. Larger, preferably prospective studies, are needed to confirm and update our findings.
Assuntos
Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/complicações , Sarcopenia/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Increasing evidence suggested that inflammation is associated with the pathogenesis and progression of several solid tumors. This study was conducted to explore the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and survival of prostate cancer (PCa). An electronic search was completed on the basis of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted. Studies evaluating the relation between pretreatment levels of CRP and survival of PCa were included. Sixteen articles incorporating 17,833 patients were eligible for the present meta-analysis. Elevated pretreatment CRP level was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR=1.58, 95% CI 1.31-1.91, P<0.001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR=1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.80, P=0.006), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=1.64, 95%CI 1.03-2.61, P=0.036), and biochemical-recurrence free survival (BC-RFS) (HR=1.29, 95% CI 1.11-1.51, P=0.001). Elevated pretreatment serum CRP level is strongly correlated with worse prognosis in patients with PCa, including OS, CSS, PFS and BC-RFS.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismoRESUMO
Sarcopenia, a concept reflecting the loss of skeletal muscle mass, was reported to be associated with the prognosis of several tumors. However, the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with renal cancer remains unclear. We carried out this meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with renal cell carcinomas. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled together. A total of 5 studies consisting of 771 patients were enrolled in this quantitative analysis, 347 (45.0%) of which had sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia had a worse OS compared with those without sarcopenia (HR=1.76; 95%CI, 1.35-2.31; P<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with localized and advanced/metastatic diseases, sarcopenia was also associated with poor OS (HR=1.48, P=0.039; HR=2.14, P<0.001; respectively). With a limited sample size, we did not observe difference of PFS between two groups (HR=1.56, 95% CI, 0.69-3.50, P=0.282). In the present meta-analysis, we observed that patients with sarcopenia had a worse OS compared with those without sarcopenia in RCC. Larger, preferably prospective studies, are needed to confirm and update our findings.