The Predictive Value of Serum DAO, HDC, and MMP8 for the Gastrointestinal Injury in the Early Stage of Acute Pancreatitis in an Animal Model and a Clinical Study.

Purpose: This study was aimed at exploring the use of the acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade and sensitive biomarkers to investigate gastrointestinal (GI) injury in early stage of acute pancreatitis (AP). Patients and Methods: The AGI grade was used to evaluate intestinal function. Any GI injury above grade I (grades II-IV) was considered as severe. An AP rat model was created by retrograde injection of 4% sodium taurocholate. The pancreatic and intestinal histopathology scores were calculated by hematoxylin-eosin staining. Human and rat sera were assessed using ELISA. Tight junction (TJ) proteins were detected by Western blotting. Results: In clinical study, the GI injury rate in mild acute pancreatitis (MAP), moderate severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP), and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) groups was 26.8%, 78.4%, and 94.8%, respectively (P < 0.05). Diamine oxidase (DAO), histidine decarboxylase (HDC), and matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP8) serum levels were higher in AP patients than in healthy people (P < 0.05). Patients with GI injury had higher serum levels of DAO, HDC, and MMP8 than those without GI injury (P < 0.05). In animal experiments, the serum levels of DAO, HDC, and MMP8 were higher in the AP group than in normal and sham-operated (SO) groups (P < 0.05). The expressions of tricellulin, claudin-1, ZO-1, and occludin were significantly lower in the AP group than in normal and SO groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The serum levels of DAO, HDC, and MMP8 are novel biomarkers of GI injury in the early stage of AP; their elevation indicates the development of GI injury in AP. The intestinal TJ disruption may be a primary mechanism of GI injury and requires more in-depth research.

A modified Ranson score to predict disease severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, and pancreatic infection in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Background: Although there are several scoring systems currently used to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis, each of them has limitations. Determine the accuracy of a modified Ranson score in predicting disease severity and prognosis in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: AP patients admitted or transferred to our institution were allocated to a modeling group (n = 304) or a validation group (n = 192). A modified Ranson score was determined by excluding the fluid sequestration parameter and including the modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI). The diagnostic performance of the modified Ranson score was compared with the Ranson score, modified CTSI, and bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) score in predicting disease severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic infection. Results: The modified Ranson score had significantly better accuracy that the Ranson score in predicting all four outcome measures in the modeling group and in the validation group (all p < 0.05). For the modeling group the modified Ranson score had the best accuracy for predicting disease severity and organ failure, and second-best accuracy for predicting pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic infection. For the verification group, it had the best accuracy for predicting organ failure, second-best accuracy for predicting disease severity and pancreatic necrosis, and third-best accuracy for predicting pancreatic infection. Conclusion: The modified Ranson score provided better accuracy than the Ranson score in predicting disease severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic infection. Relative to the other scoring systems, the modified Ranson system was superior in predicting organ failure.

Clonorchiasis in Patients with Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases: Diagnosis and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have investigated the risk factors for clonorchiasis, but endoscopic findings of this disease in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have not been well characterized. In this study, we evaluated clonorchiasis in ERCP in patients with biliary and pancreatic diseases. METHODS: This was a retrospective two-center study in hospitalized patients who received ERCP between January 2012 and October 2018. All patients were divided into clonorchiasis and nonclonorchiasis groups. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1119 patients were included, and clonorchiasis was diagnosed in 19.2% patients. Detection of Clonorchis sinensis eggs in bile samples was higher than that in fecal samples (85.9% vs. 58.7%; P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.945-4.249, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.945-4.249, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.945-4.249, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.945-4.249, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.945-4.249, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.945-4.249. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of C. sinensis eggs was significantly higher in bile than in fecal samples; thus, bile samples represent a preferable sample for the diagnosis of clonorchiasis in patients with biliary obstruction. We found that male, age ≤ 60 years old, and CBD diameter < 12 mm were independent risk factors for clonorchiasis, while papilla fistula was a protective factor.C. sinensis eggs was significantly higher in bile than in fecal samples; thus, bile samples represent a preferable sample for the diagnosis of clonorchiasis in patients with biliary obstruction. We found that male, age ≤ 60 years old, and CBD diameter < 12 mm were independent risk factors for clonorchiasis, while papilla fistula was a protective factor.

Microbial Profiles and Risk Factors of Preexisting Biliary Infection in Patients with Therapeutic Endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The bile infection may already exist before the administration of an interventional procedure, despite no clinical manifestations of cholangitis detected. Blood cultures remained negative even in more than half of the febrile cases with cholangitis. Risk factors associated with bacterial growth in bile before the intervention are not well defined. To establish the bacterial profiles isolated from the bile samples and to identify risk factors for bacterial colonization in the bile system. METHODS: Individuals who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) interventions were enrolled. Bile samples were aspirated and were immediately transferred into a sterile tube for storage. RESULTS: Positive bile cultures were detected in 363 (38.0%) of 956 patients, including 322 benign diseases and 41 malignances. Of 363 positive cases, 351 (96.7%) were monoinfection and 12 (3.3%) multi-infection. Escherichia coli were the most common Gram-negative bacteria (210, 56.0%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (45, 12.0%). Enterococcus faecalis represented the most common Gram-positive microorganism (19, 5.07%), while Candida albicans (11, 2.93%) were the dominant fungi. Klebsiella pneumoniae were more frequently detected in malignant diseases (P = 0.046). Age, previous ERCP history or OLT history, and CBD diameter were independent risk factors for positive cultures (P < 0.05) while preoperative jaundice drug therapy was the protective factor for bile infection (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Monomicrobial infection was dominant among all infections, and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were more frequently isolated from patients with malignant diseases. To effectively manage patients who are at a high risk for bile infection, a detailed diagnosis and treatment plan for each case should be prepared.