Long-term outcomes of intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection (IOCCRC): a randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare combined intraoperative chemotherapy and surgical resection with curative surgical resection alone in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III trial. All eligible patients were randomized and assigned to intraoperative chemotherapy and curative surgical resection or curative surgical resection alone (1:1). Survival actualization after long-term follow-up was performed in patients analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: From January 2011 to January 2016, 696 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to intraoperative chemotherapy and radical surgical resection (n=341) or curative surgical resection alone (n=344). Intraoperative chemotherapy with surgical resection showed no significant survival benefit over surgical resection alone in colorectal cancer patients (3-year DFS: 91.1% vs. 90.0%, P=0.328; 3-year OS: 94.4% vs. 95.9%, P=0.756). However, colon cancer patients benefitted from intraoperative chemotherapy, with a relative 4% reduction in liver and peritoneal metastasis (HR=0.336, 95% CI: 0.148-0.759, P=0.015) and a 6.5% improvement in 3-year DFS (HR=0.579, 95% CI: 0.353-0.949, P=0.032). Meanwhile, patients with colon cancer and abnormal pretreatment CEA levels achieved significant survival benefits from intraoperative chemotherapy (DFS: HR=0.464, 95% CI: 0.233-0.921, P=0.029 and OS: (HR=0.476, 95% CI: 0.223-1.017, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative chemotherapy showed no significant extra prognostic benefit in total colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgical resection; however, in colon cancer patients with abnormal pretreatment serum CEA levels (> 5 ng/ml), intraoperative chemotherapy could improve long-term survival.

Long-Term Outcomes of dMMR/MSI-H Rectal Cancer Treated With Anti-PD-1-Based Immunotherapy as Curative-Intent Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy has shown encouraging efficacy in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), which suggests its potential as a curative-intent therapy and a promising treatment option for organ preservation. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with dMMR/MSI-H LARC who experienced clinical complete response (cCR) after anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with dMMR/MSI-H LARC who achieved cCR and received nonoperative management following neoadjuvant anti-PD-1-based treatment from 4 Chinese medical centers. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year after they achieved cCR, their clinical data were collected, and survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients who achieved cCR and received nonoperative management from March 2018 to May 2022 were included, with a median age of 51.0 years (range, 19.0-77.0 years). The median treatment course to reach cCR was 6.0 (range, 1.0-12.0). Fifteen patients (62.5%) continued their treatments after experiencing cCR, and the median treatment course was 17.0 (range, 3.0-36.0). No local regrowth or distant metastasis was observed in a median follow-up time of 29.1 months (range, 12.6-48.5 months) after cCR. The 3-year disease-free and overall survivals were both 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced or low-lying rectal cancer who achieved cCR following anti-PD-1-based therapy had promising long-term outcomes. A prospective clinical trial with a larger sample size is required to further validate these findings.

Efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors for colorectal cancer and polyps in Lynch syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor is effective for colorectal cancer (CRC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We aimed to explore its effects on CRCs and colonic polyps in Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. METHODS: LS patients with CRC who had evaluable tumours and received at least 2 cycles of PD-1 inhibitors were retrospectively included. PD-1 inhibitors were given as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, including anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 treatment, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Correlations of treatment responses with clinicopathological characteristics and genomic profiles were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 75 LS patients were included, with a median age of 39 years. The median duration of follow-up was 27 months (range, 3-71). The objective response rate (ORR) was 70.7%, including 28.0% (n = 21) complete responses and 42.7% (n = 32) partial responses. Four of five cases of LS CRCs displaying proficient MMR (pMMR) or microsatellite stable (MSS) were not responsive. Mucinous/signet-ring cell differentiation was associated with a lower ORR (P = 0.013). The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 91.2% and 82.2%, respectively. A polyp was detected in 26 patients during surveillance. Seven adenomas disappeared after treatment, and they were all larger than 7 mm. CONCLUSION: PD-1 inhibitors are highly effective for dMMR and MSI-H LS CRCs, but not for pMMR or MSS LS CRCs or mucinous/signet-ring cell CRC. Large LS adenomas may also be eliminated by anti-PD-1 treatment. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: Due to the privacy of patients, the related data cannot be available for public access but can be obtained from Pei-Rong Ding (dingpr@sysucc.org.cn) upon reasonable request. The key raw data have been uploaded to the Research Data Deposit public platform (www.researchdata.org.cn).

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Improves Organ Preservation in T4bM0 Colorectal Cancer With Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer with mismatch repair deficiency is usually less aggressive and associated with a lower risk of distant metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibition, rather than traditional chemoradiotherapy, has shown great advantages in treating such patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify the hypothesis that locally very advanced (T4b) colorectal cancer without distant metastases might present with higher probability of mismatch repair deficiency and be more sensitive to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition. DESIGN: This study was designed as a single-center retrospective observational study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a tertiary referral center in China. PATIENTS: The study included patients who were clinically diagnosed with T4bM0 colorectal cancer from 2008 to 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinicopathological characteristics, mismatch repair status, and survival outcomes of patients with mismatch repair deficiency were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were included. The incidence of patients with mismatch repair deficiency in the T4bM0 population was 27.6% (75/268), with 84.0% (63/75) in the colon and 16.0% (12/75) in the rectum. For tumors located in the proximal colon, 45.0% (50/111) exhibited mismatch repair deficiency, whereas the incidence of mismatch repair deficiency in sigmoid colon cancer and rectal cancer was only 15.9% (25/157). Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition significantly reduced the open surgery rate ( p = 0.000) and multivisceral resection rate ( p = 0.025). The pathological complete remission rate in the neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition group was significantly higher than that in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy group (70.0% vs 0%; p = 0.004). No tumor downstaging was observed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition provided significantly better disease-free survival ( p = 0.0078) and relatively longer overall survival ( p = 0.15) than other groups. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the possible selection bias and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our data depicted the high incidence of mismatch repair deficiency in T4bM0 mismatch repair deficiency and the effectiveness of the neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition group in organ preservation. Precision oncology requires identification of the protein status of mismatch repair at initial diagnosis to make a rational treatment decision for these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B952 . LA INHIBICIN DEL PUNTO DE CONTROL INMUNITARIO NEOADYUVANTE MEJORA LA PRESERVACIN DE RGANOS EN EL CNCER COLORRECTAL TBM CON DEFICIENCIA DE REPARACIN DE ERRORES DE COINCIDENCIA UN ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL RETROSPECTIVO: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal con deficiencia en la reparación de desajustes suelen (dMMR) ser menos agresivos y se asocian con un menor riesgo de metástasis a distancia. La inhibición del punto de control inmunitario, en lugar de la quimiorradioterapia tradicional, ha mostrado grandes ventajas en el tratamiento de estos pacientes.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo verificar nuestra hipótesis de que el CCR localmente muy avanzado (T4b) sin metástasis a distancia podría presentarse con una mayor probabilidad de dMMR y ser más sensible a la inhibición del punto de control inmunitario neoadyuvante.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue diseñado como un estudio observacional retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONFIGURACIÓN:El estudio se realizó en un centro de referencia terciario en China.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de CCR T4bM0 desde 2008 hasta 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se analizaron las características clinicopatológicas, el estado de MMR y los resultados de supervivencia de los pacientes con dMMR.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 268 pacientes. La incidencia de dMMR en la población T4bM0 fue del 27,6% (75/268), con un 84,0% (63/75) en colon y un 16,0% (12/75) en recto. Para los tumores ubicados en el colon proximal, el 45,0% (50/111) exhibió dMMR, mientras que la incidencia de dMMR en el cáncer de colon sigmoideo y el cáncer de recto fue solo del 15,9% (25/157). La inhibición del punto de control inmunitario neoadyuvante redujo significativamente la cirugía abierta y la tasa de resección multivisceral ( p = 0,000 y p = 0,025, respectivamente). La tasa de PCR en el grupo de inhibición del punto de control inmunitario neoadyuvante fue significativamente mayor que en el grupo de quimiorradioterapia/quimioterapia neoadyuvante (70,0% frente a 0%, p = 0,004). No se observó reducción del estadio del tumor después de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante. La inhibición del punto de control inmunitario neoadyuvante proporcionó una supervivencia sin enfermedad significativamente mejor ( p = 0,0078) y una supervivencia general relativamente más larga ( p = 0,15) que otros grupos.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por el posible sesgo de selección y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros datos representan la alta incidencia de dMMR en T4bM0 CRC y la eficacia del grupo de inhibición del punto de control inmunitario neoadyuvante en la preservación de órganos. La oncología de precisión requiere la identificación del estado de la proteína MMR en el diagnóstico inicial para tomar una decisión de tratamiento racional para estos pacientes especiales. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B952 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Low prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in Chinese colorectal cancers: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Although universal testing for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) has been recommended to all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, related evidence for the Chinese population is lacking. Here, we investigated the prevalence and clinicopathological features of dMMR patients in a large Chinese CRC cohort. METHODS: We included 7,373 CRC patients treated at four Chinese medical centers between August 2010 and September 2016. Patients' baseline characteristics and pathological features were recorded. The clinicopathological features were compared between patients with MLH1/PMS2 deficiency (dMLH1/PMS2) and MSH2/MSH6 deficiency (dMSH2/MSH6). RESULTS: Among the investigated patients, 654 (8.9%) were identified with dMMR CRCs and, of them, 401 (61.3%) were males, with a median age of 55 years (range, 22-87 years); 355 (54.3%) had stage II CRC based on American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition. The prevalence of the dMLH1/PMS2 group and the dMSH2/MSH6 group were 51.5% (337/654) and 25.1% (164/654), respectively. Compared with dMSH2/MSH6 patients, those with dMLH1/PMS2 were older (57 vs 52 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be female (45.7% vs 31.5%, P = 0.004), prone to having tumors located in the right-hand side of the colon (59.0% vs 47.6%, P = 0.015), and less likely to have a family history of tumors (29.7% vs 43.3%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of dMMR in Chinese CRC patients was low, especially in the dMLH1/PMS2 group. The clinicopathological features were different between dMMR subgroups.

A Four-Methylated lncRNAs-Based Prognostic Signature for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Currently, an increasing number of studies suggest that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and methylation-regulated lncRNAs play a critical role in the pathogenesis of various cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, methylated differentially expressed lncRNAs (MDELs) may be critical biomarkers of HCC. In this study, 63 MDELs were identified by screening The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HCC lncRNAs expression data set and lncRNAs methylation data set. Based on univariate and multivariate survival analysis, four MDELs (AC025016.1, LINC01164, LINC01183 and LINC01269) were selected to construct the survival prognosis prediction model. Through the PI formula, the study indicates that our new prediction model performed well and is superior to the traditional staging method. At the same time, compared with the previous prediction models reported in the literature, the results of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis show that our 4-MDELs model predicted overall survival (OS) stability and provided better prognosis. In addition, we also applied the prognostic model to Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) cell lines and classified different hepatoma cell lines through the model to evaluate the sensitivity of different hepatoma cell lines to different drugs. In conclusion, we have established a new risk scoring system to predict the prognosis, which may have a very important guiding significance for the individualized treatment of HCC patients.