Endovascular Coiling of Fenestrated Vertebrobasilar Cerebral Aneurysms.

Fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms are uncommon vascular lesions. Surgical intervention remains extremely challenging due to the deep location and complex anatomy with adjacent cranial nerves and perforator vessels. Endovascular approach is safer and generally accepted as the primary treatment method. Optimal angiographic projections with three-dimensional reconstructions to guide microcatheter selection remain vital to successfully treating aneurysms with challenging fenestration anatomy. This report details the endovascular methods in two cases of fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms with different coiling techniques.

Procedural outcomes associated with use of the AngioVac System for right heart thrombi: A safety report from RAPID registry data.

Background: Right heart thrombi can be a source of considerable morbidity and mortality, especially when associated with pulmonary embolism. Methods: To understand the safety and procedural efficacy associated with vacuum-assisted thrombectomy using the AngioVac System (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY, USA) to remove right heart thrombi, we conducted a subanalysis of the Registry of AngioVac Procedures in Detail (RAPID) multicenter registry representing 47 (20.1%) of 234 participants in the registry. Forty-two (89.4%) patients had thrombi located in the right atrium alone, three (6.4%) in the right ventricle alone, and two (4.3%) in both the right atrium and ventricle. Four (8.5%) patients had concomitant caval thrombi, three (6.4%) also had catheter-related thrombi, and one (2.1%) patient had both caval and catheter-related thrombi with their right heart thrombi. Results: Extracorporeal bypass time was less than 1 hour for 39 (83.0%) procedures. Seventy to 100% removal of thrombus was achieved in 59.6% of patients. Estimated blood loss was less than 250 cc for 43 procedures (91.6%). Mean hemoglobin decreased from 10.7 ± 2.2 g/dL preoperatively to 9.6 ± 1.6 g/dL postoperatively. Transfusions were administered for eight procedures (17.0%), with only one (2.1%) patient receiving more than 2 units of blood. Six patients (12.8%) experienced procedure-related adverse events, including three (6.4%) patients who experienced distal emboli and three (6.4%) patients who developed bleeding-related complications. All adverse events resolved prior to discharge. There was one death (2.1%) reported that was not procedure related. Conclusion: Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy can be performed safely in patients with right heart thrombi. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04414332.

Endovascular Removal of Thrombus and Right Heart Masses Using the AngioVac System: Results of 234 Patients from the Prospective, Multicenter Registry of AngioVac Procedures in Detail (RAPID).

PURPOSE: To assess device and procedural safety and technical success associated with the use of the AngioVac System to remove vascular thrombi and cardiac masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Registry of AngioVac Procedures in Detail (RAPID) study prospectively collected data for 234 patients receiving treatment with AngioVac at 21 sites between March 2016 and August 2019: 84 (35.9%) with caval thromboemboli (CTEs), 113 (48.3%) with right heart masses (RHMs), 20 (8.5%) with catheter-related thrombi (CRTs), and 4 (1.7%) with pulmonary emboli (PEs). Thirteen patients had a combination of procedures during the same admission. RESULTS: Using the AngioVac system, 70%-100% thrombus or mass removal was achieved in 73.6% of patients with CTEs, 58.5% of patients with RHMs, 60% of patients with CRTs, and 57.1% of patients with PEs. Extracorporeal bypass time was < 1 hour for 176 (75.2%) procedures. Estimated blood loss was < 250 mL for 179 procedures (76.5%). Mean hemoglobin decreased from 10.4 g/dL ± 2.9 preoperatively to 9.4 g/dL ± 2.6 postoperatively. Transfusions were administered in 59 procedures (25.2%) with 47 transfusions (78.2%) being ≤ 2 U. There were 36 procedure-related complications, including 1 death. CONCLUSIONS: The RAPID registry data demonstrate that the AngioVac System can be safely and effectively used to remove vascular thrombi and cardiac masses across a broad range of patient populations. The limited use of the device to remove pulmonary emboli in the present series precludes recommending the use of the AngioVac device for this indication.

Collective Intelligence of Peer Learning: Promoting Culture of Learning and Improvement Among Radiologists.

The traditional Scoring-Based Peer Review system has been the predominant radiology performance quality assurance model, which can become a condemning, ineffective process. In 2015, the Institute of Medicine called for "policies and practices that promote a non-punitive culture that values open discussion and feedback on diagnostic performance." The development of Peer Learning (PL), a process that encompasses peer feedback, learning, and improvement, has positively impacted radiology through the recognition of success, identification of mistakes as learning opportunities, and development of a professional culture of trust. Furthermore, collective intelligence advances the PL process within the learning community, optimizing the abilities of a group effort that outperform that of a single individual, especially in the setting of complex medical and diagnostic imaging decision-making. The objective of the review article is to highlight the collective intelligence aspect of PL program, which allows PL to be more effective than established peer review model.

Percutaneous access planning, techniques and considerations for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).

Percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has transformed the field of aortic repair. As techniques and devices improve, interventionalists continue to expand the boundaries of what is possible, enabling these life-saving procedures to be performed on a wider range of more technically challenging cases. This article discusses endovascular access considerations for EVAR including; ultrasound guidance, preclose technique, access vessel options, innovative devices, and bailout strategies that interventionalists should be familiar with to optimize patient outcomes.