Metastasizing basal cell carcinoma: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 22 cases.

Basal cell carcinomas metastasize rarely, and there have been limited studies of potential drivers for this metastasis. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) may play a role, although this has not been investigated in detail. We reviewed clinicopathologic features of 22 patients with metastasizing basal cell carcinoma (MBCC). Immunohistochemical markers of EMT, including CD44, E-cadherin, claudin, smooth muscle actin, beta-catenin, Twist1, and Oct 3/4, were evaluated on 10 MBCC (primary and metastases) and 18 non-metastasizing BCC. Primary sites included the head and neck, trunk, and extremity, while metastatic sites included lymph nodes, lung, bone, and soft tissue. Of 19 cases with follow-up, the range of follow-up after diagnosis of metastasis was 5 to 248 months (median: 50 months). Two cases were of unknown primary, nine metastases were diagnosed concurrently with primary tumors, and remaining cases showed a median latency between diagnosis of primary and metastatic tumors of 27.5 months (range: 3-81 months). Median survival was 66 months. Compared to non-metastasizing BCC, MBCC demonstrated reduced CD44 expression (primary [P = .0036], metastatic [P = .011]) and increased Twist1 expression (primary, P = .0017). MBCC shows variably aggressive behavior, and reduced CD44 and increased Twist1 expression may indicate significant EMT in metastasizing tumors and signify a metastatic phenotype.

Seminal Vesicle Adherent to Rectal Wall Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Potential False-Positive Diagnostic Pitfall.

The standard of care for stage T3 and stage T4 rectal adenocarcinomas involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by either low anterior resection or abdominopelvic resection. The presence of residual adenocarcinoma or positive surgical margins provides useful prognostic information and can influence ongoing adjuvant therapy. Although uncommon, mimics of treated adenocarcinoma may be present in the surgical specimen. A high index of suspicion is critical in avoiding potential false-positive pitfalls, and the exclusion of mimics of treated adenocarcinoma is paramount to accurate diagnosis and treatment. Seminal vesicle epithelium has long been a challenge in differentiating prostatic adenocarcinoma from benign epithelium. However, the role of incidental seminal vesiculectomy in rectal resections due to fibrous adhesion to the rectal wall secondary to chemoradiation has not been studied. As the seminal vesicle epithelium can show markedly atypical nuclei with radiation-type effect at baseline, the potential risk of misinterpretation as residual adenocarcinoma is high. In this article, we present 2 case reports of rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by transabdominal resection (low anterior resection or abdominopelvic resection) with incidental seminal vesiculectomies mimicking either residual adenocarcinoma or residual adenocarcinoma at a margin of resection.