Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Urol ; 157(6): 2303-5, 1997 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9146659

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of periurethral collagen injection for urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 11 children (mean age 10.6 years) who had incontinence and neurogenic bladder dysfunction with periurethral injections of glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen. All patients were on anticholinergics and all but 1 were on clean intermittent catheterization preoperatively. Four patients had previously undergone augmentation cystoplasty. All patients were assessed before and after injection with a subjective continence scale and multichannel urodynamics. Followup ranged from 4 to 20 months from the last injection. RESULTS: Mean group Valsalva leak point pressure was 34.5 cm. water. Four of the 11 patients had an identifiable detrusor leak point pressure. Overall success rate was 55% with 4 patients dry and 2 improved. Success correlated with a minimum increase in Valsalva leak point pressure of 20 to 25 cm. water to greater than 60 cm. water. Three patients had no demonstrable Valsalva leak point pressure after injection. All 5 patients in whom treatment failed had no change in Valsalva leak point pressure, including 2 with small capacity, poorly compliant bladders preoperatively. Because they had a component of sphincteric insufficiency, they underwent injection in the hope of increasing capacity with increased continence. In 3 patients Valsalva leak point pressure was greater than 50 cm. water. Detrusor leak point pressure developed in 3 patients postoperatively, including 1 with significantly increased Valsalva leak point pressure. One patient with significantly increased Valsalva leak point pressure had urethral hypermobility postoperatively. Of the 3 patients who subsequently underwent augmentation cystoplasty 1 is now dry, 1 is wet and 1 died of complications unrelated to urological disease. Patients underwent 1 to 4 procedures (mean 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Periurethral collagen injection may be effective for urinary incontinence in patients who have adequate capacity with good compliance and low Valsalva leak point pressure. When there is no response to repeat injections or a transient response, one should consider the possibility of bladder decompensation.


Assuntos
Colágeno/administração & dosagem , Próteses e Implantes , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Uretra , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/complicações , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/fisiopatologia
2.
J Urol ; 156(2 Pt 2): 673-6, 1996 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8683757

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is little known about the effect of urinary diversion on the bladder of children with posterior urethral valves. There is a fear that diversion may result in contracted noncompliant bladders. We wished to compare urodynamic parameters in patients who underwent primary ablation of posterior urethral valves and in those who underwent diversion in the form of vesicostomy or pyelostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urodynamics were done in 32 boys with a history of posterior urethral valves divided into 3 groups based on initial treatment: 1) transurethral valve ablation; 2) cutaneous vesicostomy, subsequent closure and valve ablation, and 3) proximal cutaneous pyelostomy, subsequent reconstitution and valve ablation. RESULTS: Patients who underwent initial diversion with vesicostomy or pyelostomy had bladders with larger functional capacity, better compliance and less instability. Chronic renal failure developed in 25% of the patients who underwent primary valve ablation and 33% of those who underwent diversion. Average period of diversion in vesicostomy and pyelostomy patients was 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings temporary diversion does not seem to damage bladders. On the contrary, placing a damaged bladder at rest may help to improve bladder function. Bladder function following reconstitution correlated poorly with ultimate outcome and progression to renal failure. While we do not recommend temporary diversion as the treatment of choice for patients with posterior urethral valves, we believe that when chosen as treatment, it can be safely performed with little risk of further damage to the bladder.


Assuntos
Cistostomia , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Uretra/anormalidades , Uretra/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Derivação Urinária , Urodinâmica , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...