Maintaining skin integrity in the aged: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In aged nursing care receivers, the prevalence of adverse skin conditions such as xerosis cutis, intertrigo, pressure ulcers or skin tears is high. Adequate skin care strategies are an effective method for maintaining and enhancing skin health and integrity in this population. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to summarize the empirical evidence about the effects and effectiveness of non-drug topical skin care interventions to promote and to maintain skin integrity and skin barrier function in the aged, to identify outcome domains and outcome measurement instruments in this field. DESIGN: An update of a previous systematic review published in 2013 was conducted. DATA SOURCES: Databases MEDLINE and EMBASE via OvidSP and CINAHL (original search January 1990 to August 2012, update September 2012 to May 2018) and reference lists were searched. Forward searches in Web of Science were conducted. METHODS: A review protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42018100792). Main inclusion criteria were primary intervention studies reporting treatment effects of basic skin care strategies in aged people with a lower limit of age range of 50 years and published between 1990 and 2018. Primary empirical studies were included with experimental study designs including randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs. Methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for assessing risk of bias. Levels of evidence were assigned to all included studies. RESULTS: Sixty-three articles were included in the final analysis reporting effects of interventions to treat and/or to prevent skin dryness, pruritus, general skin barrier improvement, incontinence-associated dermatitis, skin tears and pressure ulcers. Skin cleansers containing syndets or amphotheric surfactants compared with standard soap and water improved skin dryness. Lipophilic leave-on products containing humectants decreased skin dryness and reduced pruritus. Products with pH 4 improved the skin barrier. Application of skin protectants and structured skin care protocols decreased the severity of incontinence-associated dermatitis. Formulations containing glycerin and petrolatum reduced the incidence of skin tears. Thirty-five outcome domains were identified with nearly 100 different outcome measurement instruments. CONCLUSION: Included studies showed substantial heterogeneity regarding design, interventions and outcomes. Basic skin care strategies including low-irritating cleansers and lipophilic humectant-containing leave-on products are helpful for treating dry skin and improving skin barrier in the aged. Lower pH of leave-on products improves the skin barrier. The number of different outcome domains was unexpectedly high. We recommend to identify critical outcome domains in the field of skin care to make trial results more comparable in the future and to measure possible performance differences between different skin care strategies and products.

Dry skin in home care: A representative prevalence study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence and severity of dry skin in the home care nursing setting in Germany and to determine demographic and health characteristics associated with skin dryness. BACKGROUND: Advanced age and skin care dependency are risk factors for the development of skin dryness. Dry skin has a negative impact on the quality of life and increases the risk for secondary cutaneous infections and other adverse skin conditions. The prevalence of dry skin in home care is unknown. DESIGN: A representative multicenter prevalence study was conducted in home care services in Germany during July 2015. METHODS: A random selection of home care services and clients was performed. Nurses, who were instructed how to perform the data collection using standardized forms, performed data collection. Demographic, functional and health variables were documented and analyzed. RESULTS: More than half of all participating clients (n = 923; median age 83 years (range 21-104)) were affected by dry skin (51.7 (95% CI 48.5 to 54.9). The most often affected skin areas were the distal extremities. Males and immobile clients were more often affected than females and mobile clients. In the adjusted analysis pruritus and the presence of incontinence-associated dermatitis were most strongly associated with dry skin. CONCLUSION: Dry skin occurs widely in home care and is strongly associated with pruritus. Fundamental skin care is an easy but powerful nursing intervention to treat this condition successfully. Preventive skin care strategies need to be implemented in the home care setting to improve skin health and integrity either by nurses and/or informal caregivers.

Transepidermal water loss in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis update.

BACKGROUND: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is one of the most important skin barrier characteristics. Higher TEWL is usually associated with skin barrier impairments, and lower TEWL with healthy skin. OBJECTIVES: To update an existing systematic review and meta-analysis to provide TEWL reference values for healthy skin in adults. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE and Embase and other sources were searched. This update includes studies identified by two combined searches that cover the period from 1947 to 13 April 2017. Primary empirical observational and interventional studies in healthy adults providing quantitative estimates of TEWL measurements including measures of spread, such as SDs, with clear reporting of skin areas and age were included. Data were extracted per skin area and statistically pooled. RESULTS: After full-text assessment, the results of 45 studies were included additionally to the existing meta-analysis. TEWL estimates were identified for 86 skin areas in 212 studies. The lowest TEWL of 2·3 g m-2 h-1 (95% confidence interval 1·9-2·7) was reported for breast skin and the highest TEWL of 44·0 g m-2 h-1 (95% confidence interval 39·8-48·2) for the axilla. Sample sizes ranged from four (forehead middle left middle) to 4013 (mid volar right forearm). The clinical relevance of the difference between TEWL estimates for different measurement devices seems to be minimal. TEWL in elderly patients was either similar to or lower than values in the younger group. CONCLUSIONS: Reference estimates are useful for clinical study planning and interpretation of results. TEWL is highly dependent on skin area, and our results further support the symmetry between right and left measuring sites. TEWL in elderly people seems to be generally similar or decreased compared with younger individuals, but available evidence is limited. Reporting of TEWL should be improved: mean and spread parameters should always be reported in future studies.