Preceptors' preparedness to teach about substance and opioid use disorder: a qualitative study.

STUDY AIM: Little is known about preceptors' comfort and readiness to teach clinical students about the care of patients with substance and opioid use disorder (SUD/OUD). This study explores preceptors' views about caring for such patients, and their preparedness to teach about SUD/OUD management, to improve graduate competencies. METHODS: Participants were recruited by convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physician, physician assistant, and nurse practitioner preceptors who taught medical and physician assistant students. Interviews were conducted via Zoom® videoconferencing. Transcripts were generated and independently analyzed for themes by 4 experienced coders using constant comparison and a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Fifteen interviews were conducted to theme saturation. We identified 3 major themes and 10 subthemes supported by exemplar quotes. The major themes were: education about SUD/OUD in primary care (subthemes include need for longitudinal curriculum, redefining 'success' in treatment, and precepting challenges), treatment of SUD/OUD in primary care (need for systemic support and care continuity), and medication-assisted therapy (MAT) training as a tool for teaching (preceptors' own training, and need for clinical students to be trained). CONCLUSIONS: Preceptors agreed that treatment of SUD/OUD belongs in primary care and students should learn about SUD/OUD from the start of their medical education. Data analysis enabled the construction of an emerging conceptual framework reflecting a diversity of experiences and opinions of preceptor comfort and preparedness to teach about SUD/OUD, associated with various barriers and motivators. This framework can guide future strategies to address facilitators and obstacles to advance and promote preceptor preparedness to teach students about the care and management of patients with SUD/OUD.

Validation of a Novel Statistical Method to Identify Aberrant Patient Logging: A Multi-Institutional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Student patient encounter logging informs the quality of supervised clinical practice experiences (SCPEs). Yet, it is unknown whether logs accurately reflect patient encounters, and the faculty resources necessary to review for potential aberrant logging are significant. The purpose of this study was to identify a statistical method to identify aberrant logging. METHODS: A multi-institutional (n = 6) study examined a statistical method for identifying potentially aberrant logging behavior. An automated statistical Mahalanobis Distance (MD) measurement was used to categorize student logs as aberrant if they were identified as probable multivariate outliers. This approach was validated using a gold standard for aberrant logging behavior with manual review by 4 experienced faculty ("faculty consensus") and then comparing interrater agreement between faculty and MD-based categorization. In secondary analyses, we compared the relative accuracy of MD-based categorization to individual faculty categorizing data from their own program ("own program" categorization). RESULTS: 323 student logging records from 6 physician assistant (PA) programs were included. Compared to "faculty consensus" (the gold standard), MD-based categorization was highly sensitive (0.846, 95% CI: 0.650, 1.000) and specific (0.766, 95% CI: 0.645, 0.887). Additionally, there was no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value between MD-based categorization and "own program" categorization. DISCUSSION: The MD-based method of identifying aberrant and nonaberrant student logging compared favorably to the more traditional, faculty-intensive approach of reviewing individual student logging records. This supports MD-based screening as a less labor-intensive alternative to individual faculty review to identify aberrant logging. Identification of aberrant logging may facilitate early intervention with students to improve clinical exposure logging during their SCPEs.

Addressing the Opioid Crisis: Medication-Assisted Therapy Waiver Training for Students.

PURPOSE: Physician assistant (PA) graduates should be prepared to care for patients with substance use disorders. Medication-assisted therapy (MAT) allows PA graduates to provide that care by becoming licensed to prescribe buprenorphine. However, it is unclear how feasible and effective it is to implement online MAT waiver training during PA school. This study examined student knowledge and attitudes after training to assess its impact and perceived value. METHODS: We conducted a 15-question survey after one class of students completed training during clinical rotations. Students self-reported pre/post change in awareness, knowledge, interest, comfort and confidence, perceived usefulness to practice, and assessed quality using 5-point Likert scale (higher scores = more positive) and narrative responses. Data analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and descriptive statistics. Free text comments were analyzed for themes using constant comparison. RESULTS: Fifty-five (100%) students completed training within 6 weeks. The survey response rate was 49/55 (89%). Pre-to-post score changes were significant (p < .05) from +0.39 to +1.35 with the greatest changes seen in knowledge (+1.35), comfort (+1.14), awareness (+1.06), and confidence (+1.08); the lowest change was in interest (score change +0.39). Students reported being satisfied with content organization and quality (mean 3.82) and recommended training to colleagues (3.98); 82% reported they would have preferred 3 months to complete training; 46% would have preferred training prior to the start of clinical rotations. Major themes indicated a desire for better preparation and flexibility of platform, with ambivalence about relevance to practice. CONCLUSION: Online MAT waiver training is feasible and effective. However, students may not be convinced of its relevance to future practice. Faculty should offer adequate preparation and optimize integration into existing curricula.

How practice setting affects family physicians' views on genetic screening: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Genetic screening (GS), defined as the clinical testing of a population to identify asymptomatic individuals with the aim of providing those identified as high risk with prevention, early treatment, or reproductive options. Genetic screening (GS) improves patient outcomes and is accessible to the community. Family physicians (FPs) are ideally placed to offer GS. There is a need for FPs to adopt GS to address anticipated genetic specialist shortages. OBJECTIVE: To explore FP attitudes, perceived roles, motivators and barriers, towards GS; and explore similarities and differences between private and public sector FPs. METHODS: We developed a semi-structured interview guide using existing literature. We interviewed private and public sector FPs recruited by purposive, convenience and snowballing strategies, by telephone or video to theme saturation. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded for themes by two independent researchers with an adjudicator. RESULTS: Thirty FPs were interviewed (15 private, 15 public). Theme saturation was reached for each group. A total of 12 themes (6 common, 3 from private-practice participants, 3 public-employed participants) emerged. Six common major themes emerged: personal lack of training and experience, roles and relevance of GS to family medicine, reluctance and resistance to adding GS to practice, FP motivations for adoption, patient factors as barrier, and potential solutions. Three themes (all facilitators) were unique to the private group: strong rapport with patients, high practice autonomy, and high patient literacy. Three themes (all barriers) were unique to the public group: lack of control, patients' lower socioeconomic status, and rigid administrative infrastructure. CONCLUSION: FPs are motivated to incorporate GS but need support for implementation. Policy-makers should consider the practice setting when introducing new screening functions. Strategies to change FP behaviours should be sensitive to their sense of autonomy, and the external factors (either as facilitators or as barriers) shaping FP practices in a given clinical setting.

Inclusion of the homeless in health equity curricula: a needs assessment study.

Exposure to homeless patients is a potential strategy to teach about social determinants of health and health inequities. Little is known about student attitudes and preferences for learning about the homeless in curricula addressing vulnerable populations. A needs assessment to determine student readiness may inform strategies for teaching. A mixed-methods study of one matriculating physician assistant student class, with a cross-sectional survey and 3 focus groups (FG). The validated 19-item Health Professionals' Attitudes Toward Homelessness inventory (HPATHI) and new 7-item Learning Attitudes scale were administered to explore perceptions and preferences about relevance of caring for the homeless to future practice. FGs were conducted to theme saturation. Verbatim transcripts were independently read and coded by 3 researchers using constant comparison. Survey response rate was 100% (N = 60). Overall HPATHI mean score was 3.97 ± 0.04 of 5, indicating positive attitudes toward the homeless. The highest mean score (4.26 ± 0.04) was for the social advocacy subscale; the lowest (3.02 ± 0.06) for personal advocacy. The Learning Attitude scale (Cronbach's alpha 0.89) mean score was 4.47 ± 0.07 out of 5, showing a positive attitude toward curricular exposure. Older students and those with prior experience with the homeless had higher HPATHI scores (p < 0.05). Four major themes emerged: vulnerable patients cannot advocate for themselves; learning about homelessness is relevant to future practice; preference for multiple teaching strategies and adequate preparation for street rotations; and anticipated anxiety about safety. Students recognize the value of learning from homeless patients as part of gaining skills in caring for vulnerable populations. Experiential learning opportunities focusing on this group are seen as an acceptable and valuable way to gain skills applicable to all vulnerable patients. Students express fear and anxiety around non-traditional settings such as the street. Their anxieties should be adequately addressed when designing clinical rotations.

Impact of a Longitudinal Medical Spanish Curriculum on Student Communication Skills.

PURPOSE: This study describes and examines the short- and longer-term impact of a required longitudinal medical Spanish curriculum on physician assistant student preparedness and ability to communicate with patients in Spanish during clinical rotations. METHODS: Fifty-eight preclinical students participated in an 80-hour curriculum delivered weekly over 3 semesters. Teaching followed a framework of second-language acquisition and included structured grammar and medical vocabulary practice with didactic, interactive, and group assignments. Vocabulary and grammar were assessed with quizzes. Oral proficiency was assessed by faculty with Spanish Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations at midpoint and end using the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR), a 6-level scale (immediate outcome). Students self-rated proficiency and confidence and evaluated curriculum effectiveness for preparing them to care for Spanish-speaking patients (longer-term outcomes). RESULTS: All students passed the written and oral quizzes. Faculty-scored ILR verbal proficiency at the OSCEs increased by a mean level of 0.5 over 6 months. Student self-assessed proficiency improved on average by one level from baseline to 24 months later. Students rated highly curriculum effectiveness, preparedness to communicate in Spanish during clinical rotations, ability to judge when an interpreter was needed, and the importance of medical Spanish to future practice. CONCLUSIONS: A required integrated longitudinal medical Spanish curriculum was well received. Physician assistant students demonstrated short-term interval progression in Spanish proficiency, with improvements in both faculty and self-rating scores, and readiness to apply the skill to practice. They valued active learning associated with repeated practice with feedback, role playing, and interval assessments throughout the curriculum.

Video Technology to BOOST Preceptor Recruitment: A Mixed Methods Study.

PURPOSE: This study's aim was to examine the impact of a brief video presentation for changing clinician knowledge and attitude about precepting physician assistant (PA) students. METHODS: In this mixed methods study, we developed a 12-minute video and made presentations to potential preceptors. Change in knowledge and attitudes was assessed with a pre/post survey. We conducted focus groups (FGs) to elicit barriers and motivators for precepting PA students and assessed acceptability and impact of the video. RESULTS: Twenty-three preceptors participated in three 45-minute presentations. Participants showed significant knowledge increase in 7 of 10 survey questions. After the presentation, willingness to precept PA students was high. Major FG themes were: teaching is motivating, need clarity about PA students' needs, need support to teach, prefer video presentation to email, and similarities with medical student teaching is positive. CONCLUSIONS: A brief in-person video presentation is acceptable and is associated with increased knowledge and comfort in precepting PA students.

The influence of Malay cultural beliefs on breast cancer screening and genetic testing: A focus group study.

OBJECTIVE: Malays comprise an Asian cultural group reported to have low breast cancer screening uptake rates and poor cancer outcomes. Little is known about Malay cultural factors influencing beliefs and practice of cancer screening and genetic testing. Our study aims to explore health beliefs of Malay women around breast cancer screening and genetic testing. METHODS: We conducted focus groups among healthy English-speaking Malay women in Singapore, aged 40 to 69 years, using a structured guide developed through literature review, expertise input and participant refinement. Thematic analysis was conducted to extract dominant themes representing key motivators and barriers to screening and genetic testing. We used grounded theory to interpret results and derive a framework of understanding, with implications for improving uptake of services. RESULTS: Five focus groups (four to six participants per group) comprising 27 women were conducted to theme saturation. Major themes were (a) spiritual and religious beliefs act as barriers towards uptake of screening and genetic testing; (b) preference for traditional medicine competes with Western medicine recommendations; (c) family and community influence health-related decisions, complexed by differences in intergenerational beliefs creating contrasting attitudes towards screening and prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions to participate in breast cancer screening and genetic testing are influenced by cultural, traditional, spiritual/religious, and intergenerational beliefs. Strategies to increase uptake should include acknowledgement and integration of these beliefs into counseling and education and collaboration with key influential Malay stakeholders and leaders.

Evaluating Medical Spanish Proficiency: A Comparison of Physician Assistant Student Self-Assessment to Standardized Patient and Expert Faculty Member Ratings.

PURPOSE: Whether physician assistant (PA) students' self-assessment or standardized patient (SP) evaluations of students' medical Spanish proficiency accurately reflect their language proficiency is unclear. This study compares PA student and SP ratings with an expert faculty member's rating to determine whether student or SP ratings can be used to evaluate language proficiency. METHODS: Fifty-eight students participated in a single-station Spanish Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) at the midpoint of a medical Spanish curriculum. Using the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR)-a 6-point, single-item language proficiency scale previously validated among physicians-PA students and SPs evaluated students' medical Spanish proficiency. Their scores were then compared with the scores derived by an expert faculty rater who had viewed a video of each student-SP encounter. The faculty's score was considered the gold standard. Correlation between scores was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Mean student scores were highest when rated by SPs (M = 3.8, SD = 0.9), followed by self (M = 3.0, SD = 0.9), and then faculty (M = 2.5, SD = 1.2). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed a strong positive correlation between students and the expert faculty rater (rs = 0.67, P < .001) and between SPs and the expert faculty rater (rs = 0.72, P < .001). The correlation was stronger for high- than for low-proficiency students. Students' self-rated scores showed significant improvement from baseline to the OSCE. CONCLUSIONS: PA students participating in a medical Spanish curriculum and SPs show good correlation with an expert faculty rater in assessing Spanish proficiency during an OSCE. Standardized patients demonstrate scoring leniency. The ILR has potential for tracking aggregate student progress and curriculum effectiveness. With training, student self-rating could be used for interval assessment of medical Spanish communication.

A Pilot Comparison of In-Room and Video Ratings of Team Behaviors of Students in Interprofesional Teams.

Objective. To examine concordance between in-room and video faculty ratings of interprofessional behaviors in a standardized team objective structured clinical encounter (TOSCE). Methods. In-room and video-rated student performance scores in an interprofessional 2-station TOSCE were compared using a validated 3-point scale assessing six team competencies. Scores for each student were derived from two in-room faculty members and one faculty member who viewed video recordings of the same team encounter from equivalent visual vantage points. All faculty members received the same rigorous rater training. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare individual student scores. McNemar's test was used to compare student pass/fail rates to determine the impact of rating modality on performance scores. Results. In-room and video student scores were captured for 12 novice teams (47 students) with each team consisting of students from four professions (medicine, pharmacy, physician assistant, nursing). Video ratings were consistently lower for all competencies and significantly lower for competencies of roles and responsibilities, and conflict management. Using a criterion of an average score of 2 out of 3 for at least one station for passing, 56% of students passed when rated in-room compared with 20% when rated by video. Conclusion. In-room and video ratings are not equal. Educators should consider scoring discrepancies based on modality when assessing team behaviors.

Impact of a Required Service-Learning Curriculum on Preclinical Students.

PURPOSE: The impact of brief service-learning curricula on physician assistant (PA) students is not well reported. This study explores student learning immediately and then one to 2 years after a preclinical service-learning experience through written reflections and a survey. METHODS: The 16-hour curriculum within a behavioral science course involved community immersion and engagement with underserved clients. Reflections written by students from 3 consecutive classes were coded for major themes, and theme frequency was assessed. We then administered a survey to explore the curricular impact after students completed their clinical clerkships. RESULTS: All students (132/132) completed the required curriculum. We identified 4 major themes from 132 reflections. The themes were (most to least frequent) self-discovery (54/132), patient focus (30/132), community resources (28/132), and patient-provider relationship (20/132). The primary attitude change (self-discovery) was student awareness of their own biases and recognition of the need for cultural humility when caring for underserved clients. In the postcurriculum survey (response 69/95), students recalled community resources as the most important learning, followed by self-discovery. Students viewed the curriculum positively and noted that the exposure increased their comfort with caring for underserved patients in their clerkships. CONCLUSIONS: Immersion in a community-based service-learning experience with underserved clients is associated with increased self-awareness and intent to change behavior. Students perceive the experience as important for future clerkships. Preclinical service-learning curricula prepare students to care for underserved patients.

Complexities and Challenges of Singapore Nurses Providing Postacute Home Care in Multicultural Communities: A Grounded Theory Study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies are needed to inform the preparation of community nurses to address patient behavioral and social factors contributing to unnecessary readmissions to hospital. This study uses nurses' input to understand challenges faced during home care, to derive a framework to address the challenges. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted to saturation with 16 community nurses in Singapore. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and transcripts independently coded for emergent themes. Themes were interpreted using grounded theory. RESULTS: Seven major themes emerged from 16 interviews: Strained social relationships, complex care decision-making processes within families, communication barriers, patient's or caregiver neglect of health issues, building and maintaining trust, trial-and-error nature of work, and dealing with uncertainty. DISCUSSION: Community nurses identified uncertainty arising from complexities in social-relational, personal, and organizational factors as a central challenge. Nursing education should focus on navigating and managing uncertainty at the personal, patient, and family levels.

Factors influencing the decision to share cancer genetic results among family members: An in-depth interview study of women in an Asian setting.

OBJECTIVE: Reluctance to share hereditary cancer syndrome genetic test results with family is reported among Asian patients. This study aims to explore patient factors influencing result sharing with family, to improve overall testing uptake. METHODS: Participants were women with a personal/family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer who received a positive, negative, or variant of uncertain significance test result. In-depth interviews were conducted to theme saturation to explore facilitators and barriers for sharing results with family. Grounded theory with thematic analysis was applied in analysis and interpretation. RESULTS: Twenty-four women participated. Three themes representing facilitators emerged for all results categories: family closeness, involvement of families in the testing process, and perception of low emotional impact of results. In the positive result category, 2 facilitator themes emerged: presence of actionable results and perception of family members' acceptance. In the negative and variant of uncertain significance result categories, 2 themes representing barriers to sharing emerged: perception of no genetic or medical implication for family and result ambiguity. CONCLUSION: Facilitators and barriers for result sharing are similar to those among Western women. A framework to explain Asian patients' decision-making process identifies optimal counselling opportunities to enhance communication with family.

Understanding Medical Students' Experience with Stress and Its Related Constructs: A Focus Group Study from Singapore.

OBJECTIVE: In order to protect medical students from burnout and its untoward psychiatric effects, it is imperative to understand their stress, burnout, coping, and resilience experiences. This study aimed to derive collective definitions from the medical student perspective, to identify common themes of students' experiences, and to distinguish pre-clinical and clinical year students' experiences relating to these four constructs. METHODS: The authors conducted focus groups of medical students in Singapore across 4 years using a semi-structured question guide. Participants shared their understanding, experiences, and the relationships between stress, burnout, coping, and resilience. Coders independently evaluated construct definitions and derived common themes through an iterative process, and compared transcripts of pre-clinical and clinical year students to determine differences in experience over time. RESULTS: Nine focus groups (54 students, 28 females, mean age 24.3) were conducted. Students identified common definitions for each construct. Nine themes emerged within three domains: (1) relating constructs to personal experience, (2) interrelating stress, burnout, coping, and resilience, and (3) understanding the necessity of stress. Compared to clinical students, pre-clinical students reported theory-based rather than reality-based experiences and exam-induced stress, defined constructs using present rather than future situations, and described constructs as independent rather than interrelated. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of medical students in Singapore shares a common understanding of stress, burnout, coping, and resilience, but experiences these uniquely. They perceive a positive role for stress. These findings build upon prior literature, suggesting an interrelationship between stress and its related constructs and adding the novel perspective of students from an Asian country.

Understanding Experiences of Youth Growing Up with Anorectal Malformation or Hirschsprung's Disease to Inform Transition Care: A Qualitative In-Depth Interview Study.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of anorectal malformation (ARM) or Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in children continues into adulthood despite early surgical correction. We aimed to explore the physical, social, and emotional impacts of these conditions on youth to inform best transition care strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible participants were those aged between 14 and 21 years who had undergone surgery for ARM/HD in our institution. We conducted one-on-one in-depth interviews to saturation using a question guide developed from literature review and clinician expertise. Deidentified transcripts were coded by four coders (two pediatric surgeons, one psychiatrist, and one qualitative expert) for major themes using a constant comparison approach. A theoretical model for understanding the transition experience was developed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Out of 120 patients identified as eligible, 11 youth (6 males) participated in the study. Interviews lasted from 50 to 60 minutes. Four major themes emerged: (1) social support (subthemes: family as core, friends as outer support), (2) cognitive and emotional change (subthemes: realization/recognition of illness, matching emotional response), (3) impact of physical symptoms (subthemes: adverse effects of abnormal bowel habits, gaining bowel continence control leading to overall feeling of control, need to keep disease private), and (4) healthcare providers (viewed as important information sources). Themes did not differ by gender. CONCLUSION: Our model suggests that participants' understanding of bowel disease evolved over time with a "lightbulb" moment in preteens or early teens accompanied by increasing disease ownership and self-management. Clinicians should independently engage with patients in late childhood to address evolving emotional and information needs and encourage increasing autonomy. Future studies should explore communication approaches to meet transition needs of patients.

A Systematic Review of the Quality and Utility of Observer-Based Instruments for Assessing Medical Professionalism.

BACKGROUND: Professionalism, which encompasses behavioral, ethical, and related domains, is a core competency of medical practice. While observer-based instruments to assess medical professionalism are available, information on their psychometric properties and utility is limited. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed the psychometric properties and utility of existing observer-based instruments for assessing professionalism in medical trainees. METHODS: After selecting eligible studies, we employed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria to score study methodological quality. We identified eligible instruments and performed quality assessment of psychometric properties for each selected instrument. We scored the utility of each instrument based on the ability to distinguish performance levels over time, availability of objective scoring criteria, validity evidence in medical students and residents, and instrument length. RESULTS: Ten instruments from 16 studies met criteria for consideration, with studies having acceptable methodological quality. Psychometric properties were variably assessed. Among 10 instruments, the Education Outcomes Service (EOS) group questionnaire and Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) possessed the best psychometric properties, with the P-MEX scoring higher on utility than the EOS group questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 2 instruments with best psychometric properties, with 1 also showing acceptable utility for assessing professionalism in trainees. The P-MEX may be an option for program directors to adopt as an observer-based instrument for formative assessment of medical professionalism. Further studies of the 2 instruments to aggregate additional validity evidence is recommended, particularly in the domain of content validity before they are used in specific cultural settings and in summative assessments.

Psychological Comfort of Paramedics with Field Death Pronouncement: A National Asian Study to Prepare Paramedics for Field Termination of Resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: Paramedics' decision to terminate field resuscitation without a physician present may depend on personal and external factors. This study investigates factors associated with paramedic psychological comfort with termination of resuscitation (TOR) to inform future training. METHODS: We administered an anonymous survey to all practicing paramedics in a large urban Asian Emergency Medical Services system where formal TOR training had not yet been conducted and field TOR was not routinely applied. The survey assessed psychological comfort using the validated Psychological Comfort Total (PCT) scale (summed score of 28 items, with higher scores representing greater comfort). We examined scores associated with four personal (prior resolution of personal loss, knowledge of survival probability, religious affiliation and experience with death pronouncements) and two external (location of patient and perceived trust of family) factors. Data were entered into Excel and analyzed by t-tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: Response rate was 73.6% (254/345). Respondents were 30.3 years (mean, SD 7.1) with 7.2 years (mean, SD 5.54) of practice experience. Over 60% had been involved in 6 or more field death pronouncements in the prior 12 months. Higher PCT scores were associated with prior resolution of personal loss and knowledge of survival probability. Lower PCT scores were associated with patient location in a public place and perceived family lack of trust. PCT scores were not associated with paramedic religious affiliation or number of prior death pronouncements. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic psychological comfort with field death pronouncement is associated with personal and external factors. Since paramedic comfort is important for protocol adoption, TOR education should target not only knowledge, but also public arena management, communication skills for engaging with families, and help paramedics resolve prior personal loss.