[Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. : Indications, technique and results 30 years after the first description]. / Periazetabuläre Osteotomie nach Ganz : Indikationen, Technik und Ergebnisse 30 Jahre nach Erstbeschreibung.

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical technique for the treatment of (1) hip dysplasia and (2) femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. The aim of the surgery is to prevent secondary osteoarthritis by improvement of the hip biomechanics. In contrast to other pelvic osteotomies, the posterior column remains intact with this technique. This improves the inherent stability of the acetabular fragment and thereby facilitates postoperative rehabilitation. The birth canal remains unchanged. Through a shortened ilioinguinal incision, four osteotomies and one controlled fracture around the acetabulum are performed. The direction of acetabular reorientation differs for both indications while the sequence of the osteotomies remains the same. This surgical approach allows for a concomitant osteochondroplasty in the case of an aspherical femoral head-neck junction. The complication rate is relatively low despite the complexity of the procedure. The key point for a successful long term outcome is an optimal reorientation of the acetabulum for both indications. With an optimal reorientation and a spherical femoral head, the cumulative survivorship of the hip after 10 years is 80-90 %. For the very first 75 patients, the cumulative 20-year survivorship was 60 %. The preliminary evaluation of the same series at a 30-year follow-up still showed a survivorship of approximately 30 %. The PAO has become the standard procedure for the surgical therapy of hip dysplasia in adolescents and adults.

Size and shape of the lunate surface in different types of pincer impingement: theoretical implications for surgical therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Acetabular rim trimming is indicated in pincer hips with an oversized lunate surface but could result in a critically decreased size of the lunate surface in pincer hips with acetabular malorientation. There is a lack of detailed three-dimensional anatomy of lunate surface in pincer hips. Therefore, we questioned how does (1) size and (2) shape of the lunate surface differ among hips with different types of pincer impingement? METHOD: We retrospectively compared size and shape of the lunate surface between acetabular retroversion (48 hips), deep acetabulum (34 hips), protrusio acetabuli (seven hips), normal acetabuli (30 hips), and hip dysplasia (45 hips). Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arthrography with radial slices we measured size in percentage of the femoral head coverage and shape using the outer (inner) center-edge angles and width of lunate surface. RESULTS: Hips with retroversion had a decreased size and deep hips had normal size of the lunate surface. Both had a normal shape of the outer acetabular rim. Protrusio hips had an increased size and a prominent outer acetabular rim. In all three types of pincer hips the acetabular fossa was increased. CONCLUSION: Size and shape of the lunate surface differs substantially among different types of pincer impingement. In contrast to hips with protrusio acetabuli, retroverted and deep hips do not have an increased size of the lunate surface. Acetabular rim trimming in retroverted and deep hips should be performed with caution. Based on our results, acetabular reorientation would theoretically be the treatment of choice in retroverted hips.