Comparing reproductive outcomes between conventional in vitro fertilization and nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection in autologous embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System Study.

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes between nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination. Design: Autologous cycles performed from 2014-2017 were identified, excluding frozen oocyte cycles. Outcomes were compared between conventional insemination (in vitro fertilization [IVF]) and nonindiated ICSI and analyzed separately for fresh, frozen-thawed preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and frozen-thawed non-PGT cycles. Setting: US-based fertility clinics reporting to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Participants: A total of 187,520 patients underwent 318,930 cycles, 57,516 (18.0%) using conventional IVF and 261,414 ICSI (82.0%). Interventions: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with or without indications (male factor, prior fertilization failure or any PGT [2012 recommendations]/single-gene PGT [2020 recommendations]). Main Outcome Measures: Odds ratios (ORs) for live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were calculated after multivariable adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, infertility etiologies, prior IVF births, and number oocytes retrieved. Results: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was indicated in 151,627 (58.0%) of cycles according to 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee recommendations, and 108,895 (41.7%) according to 2020 recommendations. In multivariable models, nonindicated ICSI among fresh cycles was associated with reduced odds of completing a blastocyst-stage transfer (OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.7, 0.75]; P<.001), resulting in reduced odds of live birth (OR, 0.80; 95% CI [0.78, 0.83]; P<.001). Among completed fresh transfers, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable between nonindicated ICSI and IVF. Nonindicated ICSI in frozen-thawed cycles with PGT and without PGT was associated with comparable live birth and clinical pregnancy rates with IVF in multivariable models. Conclusion: Nonindicated ICSI was associated with reduced blastocyst availability in fresh cycles compared with IVF, leading to lower live birth rates. Outcomes from completed transfers were clinically comparable.

Higher live birth rates are associated with a normal body mass index in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body mass index (BMI) was associated with live birth in patients undergoing transfer of frozen-thawed preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) embryos. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. SUBJECTS: All autologous and donor recipient PGT-A-tested cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System from 2014 to 2017. INTERVENTION(S): Body mass index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate, and the secondary outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy and biochemical pregnancy rates. Multivariable generalized additive mixed models and log-binomial models were used to model the relationship between BMI and outcome measures. RESULT(S): A total of 77,018 PGT-A cycles from 55,888 patients were analyzed. Of these cycles, 70,752 were autologous, and 6,266 were donor recipient. In autologous cycles, a statistically significant and clear nonlinear relationship was observed between the BMI and live birth rates, with the highest birth rates observed for the BMI range of 23-24.99 kg/m2. When using 23-24.99 kg/m2 as the referent, other BMI ranges demonstrated a lower probability of live birth and clinical pregnancy that continued to decrease as the BMI moved further from the reference value. Patients with a BMI of <18.5 kg/m2 had a 11% lower probability of live birth, whereas those with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m2 had a 27% lower probability than the referent. CONCLUSION(S): A normal-weight BMI range of 23-24.99 kg/m2 was associated with the highest probability of clinical pregnancy and live birth after a frozen-thawed PGT-A-tested blastocyst transfer in both autologous and donor recipient cycles. A BMI outside the range of 23-24.99 kg/m2 is likely associated with a malfunction in the implantation process, which is presumed to be related to a uterine factor and not an oocyte factor, as both autologous and donor recipient cycle outcomes were associated similarly with the BMI of the intended parent.

Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes After Transferring More Than One Embryo in Patients With Preimplantation Genetic Testing.

OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes after single embryo transfer (SET) compared with multiple embryo transfer (MET) from frozen-thawed transfer cycles of embryos that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the SART CORS (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System) national database. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from the SART CORS database for all autologous and donor egg frozen-thawed transfer cycles of embryos that underwent PGT-A between 2014 and 2016, after excluding cycles that used frozen oocytes, fresh embryo transfer, and transfers of embryos from more than one stimulation cycle. Multivariable linear and log-binomial regression models were used to estimate the relative and absolute difference in live-birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight between SET compared with MET. RESULTS: In total, 15,638 autologous egg transfer cycles and 944 donor egg transfer cycles were analyzed. Although the live-birth rate was higher with MET compared with SET in the autologous oocyte cycles (64.7% vs 53.2%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% CI, 1.20-1.28), the multiple pregnancy rate was markedly greater (46.2% vs 1.4%, RR 32.56, 95% CI, 26.55-39.92). Donor oocyte cycles showed similar trends with an increased live-birth rate (62.0% vs 49.7%, RR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.11-1.46) and multiple pregnancy rate (54.0% vs 0.8%) seen with MET compared with SET. Preterm delivery rates and rates of low birth weight were significantly higher in MET compared with SET in both autologous and donor oocyte cycles and were also higher in the subanalysis of singleton deliveries that resulted from MET compared with SET. CONCLUSION: Despite some improvement in live-birth rate, nearly half of the pregnancies that resulted from MET of embryos that underwent PGT-A were multiples. Compared with SET, MET is associated with significantly higher rates of neonatal morbidity, including preterm delivery and low birth weight. The transfer of more than one embryo that underwent PGT-A should continue to be strongly discouraged, and patients should be counseled on the significant potential for adverse outcomes.

The promise and peril of using a large language model to obtain clinical information: ChatGPT performs strongly as a fertility counseling tool with limitations.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the responses of the large language model-based "ChatGPT" to reputable sources when given fertility-related clinical prompts. DESIGN: The "Feb 13" version of ChatGPT by OpenAI was tested against established sources relating to patient-oriented clinical information: 17 "frequently asked questions (FAQs)" about infertility on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Website, 2 validated fertility knowledge surveys, the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale and the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score, as well as the American Society for Reproductive Medicine committee opinion "optimizing natural fertility." SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Online AI Chatbot. INTERVENTION(S): Frequently asked questions, survey questions and rephrased summary statements were entered as prompts in the chatbot over a 1-week period in February 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): For FAQs from CDC: words/response, sentiment analysis polarity and objectivity, total factual statements, rate of statements that were incorrect, referenced a source, or noted the value of consulting providers. FOR FERTILITY KNOWLEDGE SURVEYS: Percentile according to published population data. FOR COMMITTEE OPINION: Whether response to conclusions rephrased as questions identified missing facts. RESULT(S): When administered the CDC's 17 infertility FAQ's, ChatGPT produced responses of similar length (207.8 ChatGPT vs. 181.0 CDC words/response), factual content (8.65 factual statements/response vs. 10.41), sentiment polarity (mean 0.11 vs. 0.11 on a scale of -1 (negative) to 1 (positive)), and subjectivity (mean 0.42 vs. 0.35 on a scale of 0 (objective) to 1 (subjective)). In total, 9 (6.12%) of 147 ChatGPT factual statements were categorized as incorrect, and only 1 (0.68%) statement cited a reference. ChatGPT would have been at the 87th percentile of Bunting's 2013 international cohort for the Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale and at the 95th percentile on the basis of Kudesia's 2017 cohort for the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score. ChatGPT reproduced the missing facts for all 7 summary statements from "optimizing natural fertility." CONCLUSION(S): A February 2023 version of "ChatGPT" demonstrates the ability of generative artificial intelligence to produce relevant, meaningful responses to fertility-related clinical queries comparable to established sources. Although performance may improve with medical domain-specific training, limitations such as the inability to reliably cite sources and the unpredictable possibility of fabricated information may limit its clinical use.

PGT-A is associated with reduced cumulative live birth rate in first reported IVF stimulation cycles age ≤ 40: an analysis of 133,494 autologous cycles reported to SART CORS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in IVF cycles. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of the SART CORS database, comparing CLBR for patients using autologous oocytes, with or without PGT-A. The first reported autologous ovarian stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were donor oocyte cycles, donor embryo cycles, gestational carrier cycles, cycles which included both a fresh embryo transfer (ET) combined with a thawed embryo previously frozen (ET plus FET), or cycles with a fresh ET after PGT-A. RESULTS: A total of 133,494 autologous IVF cycles were analyzed. Amongst patients who had blastocysts available for either ET or PGT-A, including those without transferrable embryos, decreased CLBR was noted in the PGT-A group at all ages, except ages > 40 (p < 0.01). A subgroup analysis of only those patients who had PGT-A and a subsequent FET, excluding those without transferrable embryos, demonstrated a very high CLBR, ranging from 71.2% at age < 35 to 50.2% at age > 42. Rates of multiple gestations, preterm birth, early pregnancy loss, and low birth weight were all greater in the non-PGT-A group. CONCLUSIONS: PGT-A was associated with decreased CLBR amongst all patients who had blastocysts available for ET or PGT-A, except those aged > 40. The negative association of PGT-A use and CLBR per cycle start was especially pronounced at age < 35.

Adherence to embryo transfer guidelines in favorable-prognosis patients aged less than 35 years using autologous oocytes and in recipients using donor oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the consequences of nonadherence with the 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine elective single embryo transfer (eSET) guidelines for favorable-prognosis patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: In vitro fertilization clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 28,311 fresh autologous, 2,500 frozen-thawed autologous, and 3,534 fresh oocyte-donor in vitro fertilization cycles in 2014-2016 at Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-reporting centers. INTERVENTION(S): Patients aged <35 years or using donors aged <35 years underwent first blastocyst transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Singleton birth rate, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight were compared between the eSET and non-eSET groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test or t-tests. RESULT(S): Among fresh transfers, 15,643 (55%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (38.0% vs. 96.5%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.56) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (55.0% vs. 20.1%; aRR, 2.39) and low birth weight (<2,500 g) (40.1% vs. 10.6%; aRR, 3.4) compared with those after eSET. Among frozen-thawed transfers, 1,439 (58%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (41.9% vs. 95.2%; aRR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.73) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (56.4% vs. 19.5%; aRR, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.1) and low birth weight (38.0% vs. 8.9%; aRR, 3.9) compared with those after eSET. Among fresh donor oocyte transfers, 1,946 (55%) underwent eSET. Live births after non-eSETs were less likely singletons (31.3% vs. 97.3%; aRR, 0.48) and more likely complicated by preterm delivery (61.1% vs. 25.7%; aRR, 2.09) and low birth weight (44.3% vs. 11.7%; aRR, 3.39) compared with those after eSET. CONCLUSION(S): Nonadherence with transfer guidelines was associated with dramatically increased multiple pregnancies, preterm births, and low birth weights.

Early experience with universal SARS-CoV-2 testing in a New York-based reproductive endocrinology practice.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic peak around March 2020 led to temporary closures of most fertility clinics. Many clinics reopened but required universal SARS-CoV-2 screening. However, the rate of positive results and the necessity for such testing is unknown. We report here on early results from asingle-center academic NewYork fertility practice utilizing universal SARS-CoV-2 screening. This mixed prospective retrospective cohort included 164 patients who underwent at least one SARS-CoV-2 screening test for fertility treatment between May and July2020. Patients completed 1 to 3 nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 tests per cycle and remained symptom-free to continue fertility treatments. SARS-CoV-2 test results, past results, history of Covid-19 infection, and patient/cycle characteristics were recorded and tabulated through October2020. Outcomes included positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests, rate of prior Covid-19 infections, and clinical courses of patients testing positive. Patients underwent 263 cycles entailing 460 total SARS-CoV-2 screening tests. Fifteen patients reported astrong prior clinical history of Covid-19. Six patients experienced apositive SARS-CoV-2 test (2.3% of all cycles). Among 77 cycles (n = 58 patients) entailing one SARS-CoV-2 test, 2 cases (2.6%) were noted. Among 173 cycles (n = 121 patients) entailing two SARS-CoV-2 tests, 4 cycles (2.3%) were noted. Zero (0%) of 13 cycles (n = 13 patients) entailing 3 SARS-CoV-2 tests were positive. All patients were cleared to resume treatment within one month. Overall, anew asymptomatic infection was identified in 2 cycles (0.8%), while 4 of the 6 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests were among patients with aprior history of Covid-19. 3 of 4 also had adocumented prior positive RNA test. Our data suggest that universal SARS-CoV-2 screening among fertility patients is feasible, with an approximately 2% positive rate per cycle among the patients of this study. Most positive patients had aprior remote infection, but their infectiousness while being screened remains unclear.Abbreviations: REI: reproductive endocrinology and infertility; IUI: intrauterine insemination; IVF: in vitro fertilization; sono: sonography; cryo: cryopreservation; FET: frozen embryo transfer.

Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients' choices.

PURPOSE: Women with cancer may desire fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiating cancer treatment, but undergoing FP may result in treatment delays. This study sought to determine whether such delays existed in our population and which factors were associated with patients' decision to proceed with FP. METHODS: This was a historical cohort study performed at Montefiore Medical Center's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health. Reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer and consulted for FP were included. The main outcome measure was the number of days between FP consultation and cancer treatment initiation. Factors associated with patients' decisions to proceed with FP were also analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty out of 51 women in our study underwent FP including embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, or GnRH agonist treatment. The majority of women who underwent FP chose embryo cryopreservation (36.7%), followed by oocyte cryopreservation (33.3%). Of the 20 patients with partners who underwent FP, 13 (65%) froze embryos. Only 4 of the 30 women who underwent FP had all, or a portion of their services, covered by insurance. The mean treatment delay was 18 days (p = 0.007), with a mean consultation to oncologic treatment gap of 23 ± 16.8 and 41.4 ± 25.9 days in the non-FP and FP groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Women with cancer diagnosis who underwent FP prior to initiating cancer treatment experienced a statistically significant delay in initiating cancer treatment. However, the clinical significance of this finding is unknown since FP treatments have not been associated with increased recurrence or mortality.

Psychological experience and coping strategies of patients in the Northeast US delaying care for infertility during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: On March 17, 2020 an expert ASRM task force recommended the temporary suspension of new, non-urgent fertility treatments during an ongoing world-wide pandemic of Covid-19. We surveyed at the time of resumption of fertility care the psychological experience and coping strategies of patients pausing their care due to Covid-19 and examined which factors were associated and predictive of resilience, anxiety, stress and hopefulness. METHODS: Cross sectional cohort patient survey using an anonymous, self-reported, single time, web-based, HIPPA compliant platform (REDCap). Survey sampled two Northeast academic fertility practices (Yale Medicine Fertility Center in CT and Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health in NY). Data from multiple choice and open response questions collected demographic, reproductive history, experience and attitudes about Covid-19, prior infertility treatment, sense of hopefulness and stress, coping strategies for mitigating stress and two validated psychological surveys to assess anxiety (six-item short-form State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAl-6)) and resilience (10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, (CD-RISC-10). RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-four patients were sent invitations to participate. Two hundred fourteen of 734 (29.2%) completed the survey. Patients reported their fertility journey had been delayed a mean of 10 weeks while 60% had been actively trying to conceive > 1.5 years. The top 5 ranked coping skills from a choice of 19 were establishing a daily routine, going outside regularly, exercising, maintaining social connection via phone, social media or Zoom and continuing to work. Having a history of anxiety (p < 0.0001) and having received oral medication as prior infertility treatment (p < 0.0001) were associated with lower resilience. Increased hopefulness about having a child at the time of completing the survey (p < 0.0001) and higher resilience scores (p < 0.0001) were associated with decreased anxiety. Higher reported stress scores (p < 0.0001) were associated with increased anxiety. Multiple multivariate regression showed being non-Hispanic black (p = 0.035) to be predictive of more resilience while variables predictive of less resilience were being a full-time homemaker (p = 0.03), having received oral medication as prior infertility treatment (p = 0.003) and having higher scores on the STAI-6 (< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prior to and in anticipation of further pauses in treatment the clinical staff should consider pretreatment screening for psychological distress and provide referral sources. In addition, utilization of a patient centered approach to care should be employed.

Presence of endometrial nucleolar channel systems at the time of frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles with successful implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To detect nucleolar channel systems (NCSs) in cells in endometrial aspirations obtained immediately before embryo transfer during blastocyst hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles without affecting implantation. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: University-affiliated fertility clinic. PATIENTS: Five patients who underwent an HRT-FET cycle consented to lower uterine segment aspiration using an open-tip embryo transfer catheter during a routine mock transfer performed immediately before embryo transfer. INTERVENTIONS: Exfoliated cells in the aspirated endometrial secretions were analyzed for the presence of NCSs using indirect immunofluorescence and, in one case, electron microscopy for unambiguous identification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On the basis of a previous study, positive NCS status was defined as the presence of NCSs in at least 3 endometrial epithelial cells (EECs). The effect of endometrial aspiration on implantation and pregnancy outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Biochemical pregnancy, as evidenced by positive ß-human chorionic gonadotropin, was seen in 5 of 5 patients, and clinical pregnancy was seen in 2 of 5 patients. NCSs were detected in exfoliated EECs of uterine secretions in 4 of 5 patient samples and could not be unequivocally identified in 1 of 5 patient samples, which was designated as indeterminate. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of NCS detection in HRT-FET cycles in the absence of follicular development and ovulation. NCS status can be determined in exfoliated EECs of uterine secretions obtained at the time of embryo transfer while maintaining implantation. Our study furthers the goal of establishing whether individualized point of care testing of NCS status in HRT-FET cycles can determine optimal endometrial receptivity and improve pregnancy outcomes.

Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of both controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) length and total gonadotropin (GN) dose individually and in concert on live birth rates (LBR) in both fresh and freeze-all in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): The U.S. national database from the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System from 2014 to 2015 was used to identify patients undergoing autologous GN stimulation IVF cycles with the use of GnRH antagonist-based suppression protocols where a single embryo transfer was performed as part of a fresh IVF-ET cycle (fresh, n = 14,866) or the first frozen embryo transfer after a freeze-all cycle (frozen, n = 2,964), and not including preimplantation genetic testing cycles. The patients' demographic and cycle characteristics, duration of COH, total GN dose, and pregnancy outcomes were extracted. Binomial regression models estimated trend and relative risk of live birth with respect to days of stimulation and total GN dose singularly, and after adjustment for a priori confounders including age, parity, body mass index, diagnosis, and maximum follicle-stimulating hormone in both fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Both days of stimulation and total GN dose were then added to the multivariate model to show whether they were independently associated with LBR. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate. RESULTS: In both fresh and frozen cycles, length of COH was significantly associated with total GN dose. On univariate analysis, LBR decreased significantly with increasing length of stimulation and increasing total GN dose in both fresh and frozen cycles. On multivariable analysis including both days of stimulation and total GN dose, days of stimulation was no longer significantly correlated with LBR, whereas total GN dose remained significantly correlated with LBR in fresh cycles only. When total GN doses ranging from <2,000 IU through 5,000 IU to >5,000 IU were compared, a significant improvement in live birth rate was noted with lower total GN doses. Specifically, GN doses <2,000 IU had a 27% higher rate of live birth compared with GN dose >5,000 IU. For GN dose groups up to 4,000 IU, the estimated effect on LBR was similar. There was a marginal improvement (13%) in LBR with GN doses of 4,000 IU to 5,000 IU compared with >5,000 IU. When the multivariate model was applied to the frozen cycles, neither total GN dose nor days of stimulation was significantly associated with LBR. CONCLUSIONS: High total GN dose but not prolonged COH is associated with decreasing LBRs in fresh cycles, whereas neither factor significantly affects LBR in frozen cycles. Consideration should be given to minimizing the total GN dose when possible in fresh autologous cycles, either by decreasing the daily dose or by limiting the length of stimulation to improve LBRs. In freeze-all cycles, the use of higher GN doses does not seem to adversely affect the LBR of the first frozen embryo transfer. High total GN dose likely exerts a negative impact on the endometrium and/or oocyte/embryo unrelated to the length of stimulation. The differential effect of total GN dose on LBR in fresh and frozen cycles may imply a greater impact exerted on the endometrium rather than the oocyte.

Length of ovarian stimulation does not impact live birth rate in fresh donor oocyte cycles: a SART CORS study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation length and total gonadotropin (GN) dose on recipient live birth rate (LBR) in fresh donor oocyte cycles. METHODS: Data was obtained from SART CORS on all fresh donor oocyte GnRH antagonist cycles (n = 1049) between 2014 and 2015 which resulted in a single embryo transferred. Donor and recipient demographic information and cycle characteristics were extracted. Binomial regression was used to estimate LBR with respect to days of stimulation (DOS) and total GN dose. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate these relationships after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Overall LBR in fresh donor oocyte cycles was 57%. Average stimulation length was 14.3 ± 4.9 days, and total GN dose was 2464 ± 1062 IU. On univariate analysis, neither days of stimulation (p = 0.5) nor total GN dose (p = 0.57) was independently correlated with LBR. However, in prolonged stimulations (> 15 days) with high total GN dose (> 3000 IU), as both the cycle length and total GN dose increased, LBR significantly decreased from 63.81 to 48.15% (p = 0.02) and from 67.61 to 48.15% (p = 0.01), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed no significant effect of either DOS or total GN dose on LBR. CONCLUSIONS: LBR is significantly decreased in fresh donor oocyte cycles when cycles are prolonged with high total GN dose. However, after controlling for confounders neither DOS nor total GN dose significantly affects LBR.

Counseling patients on reproductive aging and elective fertility preservation-a survey of obstetricians and gynecologists' experience, approach, and knowledge.

PURPOSE: What are the experience, approach, and knowledge of US Obstetricians and Gynecologists' (ob-gyn) towards counseling patients on reproductive aging (RA) and elective fertility preservation (EFP). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey emailed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to 5000 ACOG fellows consisting of 9 demographic and 28 questions relating to counseling patients on RA and EFP. RESULTS: Seven hundred and eighty-four responders completed the survey. Although 82.8% agreed that conversations relating to RA should take place with patients desiring future childbearing and delaying due to social reasons, only 27.6% stated that they frequently counsel these women aged 18-34 years old, compared to 75.8% aged 35-44 years old (P < 0.01). Limited time (75.8%) and limited knowledge (41.4%) were amongst the most frequent reported barriers towards counseling patients on RA. Fifty-eight percent stated that they have been asked about EFP by patients. Although 74.8% agreed that conversations should take place related to EFP in women desiring future childbearing and delaying due to social reasons, only 27.6% stated that they frequently counsel these patients on EFP (P < 0.01). Limited time (75%) and limited knowledge (59.9%) were amongst the most frequent barriers towards counseling on EFP. CONCLUSIONS: In the USA, methods to improve patient counseling and provider knowledge on RA and EFP are warranted and further studies are needed to address optimal methods to improve counseling and knowledge related to these topics.

Status of nucleolar channel systems in uterine secretions accurately reflects their prevalence-a marker for the window of implantation-in simultaneously obtained endometrial biopsies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether nucleolar channel systems (NCSs) can be detected in exfoliated endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) of uterine secretions and whether such noninvasively determined NCS status is associated with significant NCS prevalence in simultaneously obtained endometrial biopsies. DESIGN: Prospective study (December 2015-February 2017). SETTING: University-affiliated and private fertility clinics. PATIENT(S): Luteal-phase patients of reproductive age requiring endometrial biopsy for medical indications. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine secretion aspiration before endometrial biopsy. Cells in uterine secretions were spun onto slides and fixed. NCSs were identified and quantified in cells and paraffin-embedded tissue sections by indirect immunofluorescence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of NCS status of uterine secretions with NCS prevalence in biopsies. Based on NCS detection, uterine secretions were assigned a status of NCS-positive (n = 15) or NCS-negative (n = 7). NCS prevalence in biopsies was expressed as a percentage of NCSs per EECs. RESULT(S): NCSs can be detected in exfoliated EECs of uterine secretions. Median NCS prevalence in endometrial biopsies from patients with NCS-positive secretions was 41.9% (interquartile range [IQR], 21.1-53.9) versus 2.0% (IQR, 0-6.9) when secretions were NCS-negative. The NCS status of secretions identified a significant difference in NCS prevalence of simultaneously obtained biopsies. CONCLUSION(S): NCS status of secretions accurately reflects NCS prevalence of biopsies, a marker for the implantation window. As secretion aspiration is compatible with same-day ET, our study provides proof of principle for a minimally invasive approach to determine endometrial receptivity for timing frozen ET.