To PCR or not? The impact of shifting policy from PCR to rapid antigen tests to diagnose COVID-19 during the omicron epidemic: a nationwide surveillance study.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had caused huge impacts worldwide. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the mainstay diagnostic modality. In most hospitals in Taiwan, samples for PCR are collected at emergency department (ER) or outdoor clinics to avoid virus spread inside hospitals. Home rapid antigen test (RAT) is a feasible, low-cost, and convenient tool with moderate sensitivity and high specificity, which can be performed at home to reduce hospital visits. Due to comparably low severity of omicron variant and high vaccine coverage (~80% residents fully vaccinated with AstraZeneca, Moderna, or Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines as of March 2022), the policy was shifted from containment to co-existing with COVID-19 in Taiwan. Virus spread rapidly in the community after the ease of social restrictive measurements. To acquire a confirmed diagnosis, PCR testing was requested for people with suspected COVID-19 infection. As a consequence, people with respiratory symptoms or contact history surged into hospitals for PCR testing, thus, the medical capacity was challenged. The diagnostic policy was altered from PCR to RAT, but the impact of diagnostic policy change remains unclear. Objectives: We conducted this study to investigate the number of COVID-19 cases, PCR testing, hospitalizations, mortalities, and hospital visits during the epidemic and evaluate the impact of diagnostic policy change on hospital visits. Methods: The diagnostic policy change was implemented in late May 2022. We used nationwide and hospital-based data of COVID-19 cases, PCR testing, hospitalizations, mortalities, and hospital visits before and after policy change as of 31 Jul 2022. Results: During the omicron epidemic, significant and synchronous increase of COVID-19 patients, PCR testing, hospital visits were observed. COVID-19 cases increased exponentially since April 2022 and the COVID-19 patients peaked in June (1,943, 55,571, and 61,511 average daily new cases in April, May, and June, respectively). The PCR testing peaked in May (85,788 daily tests) with high positive rate (81%). The policy of RAT as confirmatory diagnosis was implemented on 26 May 2022 and a substantial decline of PCR testing numbers occurred (85,788 and 83,113 daily tests in May and June). People hospitalized for COVID-19 peaked in June (821.8 patients per day) and decreased in July (549.5 patients). The mortality cases also peaked in June (147 cases/day). This trend was also validated by the hospital-based data with a significant decrease of emergency department visits (11,397 visits in May while 8,126 visits in June) and PCR testing (21,314 in May and 6,158 in June). The proportion of people purely for PCR testing also decreased (10-26 vs. 5-14%, before and after policy change, respectively). Conclusions: The impact of diagnostic policy change was a complicated issue and our study demonstrated the huge impact of diagnostic policy on health seeking behavior. The PCR testing numbers and emergency department visits had substantial decrease after diagnostic policy change, and the plateau of epidemic peak eased gradually in ~1 month later. Widespread RAT application may contribute to the decreased hospital visits and preserve medical capacity. Our study provides some evidences for policy maker's reference.

The impact of COVID-19 on routine vaccinations in Taiwan and an unexpected surge of pneumococcal vaccination.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had substantial impacts, including disruptions in routine vaccinations. In Taiwan, COVID-19 was relatively controllable, and the reduction in routine vaccinations was not profound. The impact of the pandemic on vaccination remained unclear. We collected vaccination uptake data at our hospital and analyzed the weekly trends of different vaccines. We calculated the monthly number of vaccinations and compared consumption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (year 2019 vs years 2020 and 2021). Except for self-paid pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13), a mild (14.6%, p < .001) monthly decrease in government-funded routine vaccination and a moderate (28.2%, p = .018) monthly decrease in self-paid vaccination were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, an unexpected surge of PCV13 vaccination occurred with a 355.8% increase. The shortage of COVID-19 vaccines and the potential benefits of PCV13 against COVID-19 may have contributed to this surge. In conclusion, our study found an obvious disruption of vaccination rates in Taiwan during the COVID-19 epidemic. However, an increase in PCV13 vaccination was also observed, and the important role of the infodemic was emphasized.

Repurposing Colchicine in Treating Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had caused huge health losses worldwide. Several drugs had been applied to treat patients with COVID-19, and repurposing colchicine had been proposed for its anti-inflammatory properties via several pathways. In this systematic review, we evaluated the effects of colchicine treatment. From inception to May 31, 2021, databases, including PubMed, EMbase, medRxiv, and Research Square were searched, and 11 studies were enrolled. A total of 17,205 COVID-19 patients with male predominance (62.9%) were analyzed. Patients with colchicine treatment had a significantly lower risk of mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.87, I2: 72%; p < 0.01) and a non-significantly lower rate of mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.39-1.15). The side effects were mild and not significantly different (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 0.51-8.09). Subgroup analysis with randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant difference in the mortality (OR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.44-1.46, I2: 33%; p = 0.22). In conclusion, our meta-analysis found that colchicine treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19. However, this benefit was not observed in the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the potential benefits of colchicine treatment.

Increased Risk of Ulcerative Colitis in Patients with Periodontal Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Both periodontal disease (PD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are important diseases of the alimentary tract. Microbiome and immune-mediated inflammatory processes play important roles in these diseases. An association between PD and IBD may exist. This study investigated the risk of IBD in patients with PD. This study used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from 1996 to 2013. A total of 27,041 patients with PD were enrolled as a study group, and 108,149 patients without PD were selected as the control group after matching by gender, age, insured region, urbanization, and income with a 1:4 ratio. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the risk of IBD. Of the 135,190 participants enrolled in this study, 5392 (4%) with newly diagnosed IBD were identified. The overall incidence of subsequent IBD was similar in both groups (3.8% vs. 4%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94⁻1.08). However, an increased risk of UC in the PD group was found after adjusting confounding factors (aHR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13⁻2.15; p < 0.05). This study demonstrated that patients with PD had approximately one-half higher risk of subsequent UC. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the relationship between PD and UC.

Acute torsion of wandering spleen: report of one case.

Wandering spleen is a rare condition that can lead to splenic infarction or rupture if torsion persists. Early diagnosis and intervention are necessary, and abdominal ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography are well accepted as the diagnostic imaging modalities. In this study, we present a boy with nic infarction due to acute torsion of a wandering spleen, after initial failure to demonstrate an ectopic spleen. Instead, acute torsion of the wandering spleen with spontaneous partial detorsion was incidentally found by multi-detector row CT with angiography. The patient was managed by splenectomy instead of splenopexy, because poor reperfusion after Laparoscopic detorsion.