Corneal endothelial cell loss and intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification using a new viscous-cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device.

PURPOSE: To compare results of two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs)-Viscoat (a dispersive OVD, Alcon) and FR-Pro (a viscous-cohesive OVD, Rayner), in phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study. Patients undergoing phacoemulsification were randomly assigned to receive one of the two OVDs. Exclusion criteria were age under 40, preoperative endothelial cell count (ECC) below 1,500 cells/mm2 and an eventful surgery. The primary outcome was change in ECC from baseline to postoperative month one and month three. Secondary outcomes were the difference between ECC at postoperative month one and month three, changes in IOP and occurrence of an IOP spike ≥ 30 mmHg after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 84 eyes-43 in the Viscoat group and 41 in the FR-Pro group. Mean cell density loss at month one and month three was 17.0 and 19.2%, respectively, for the Viscoat group and 18.4 and 18.8%, respectively, for the FR-Pro group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.772 and p = 0.671, respectively). The mean ECC difference between the month one and month three visits was 50.5 cells/mm2 and was not statistically significant (p = 0.285). One eye in each group had an IOP spike ≥ 30 mmHg, both normalized by postoperative week one. CONCLUSIONS: Viscoat and FR-Pro have comparable results following phacoemulsification surgery, suggesting that while FR-Pro is not a dispersive OVD, its endothelial cell protection may be comparable to one, perhaps due to the addition of sorbitol. Furthermore, a one-month follow-up of ECC seems sufficient in such trials.

Psychiatric Comorbidities Associated With Keratoconus.

Importance: Evaluating risk factors for keratoconus, often associated with recurrent eye rubbing, could generate hypotheses to be tested in future interventional trials. Objective: To assess the risk for keratoconus associated with psychiatric comorbidities in adolescents and adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study included medical records of Israeli adolescents and adults in military service from January 2011 through December 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), autism, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was evaluated in individuals with and without keratoconus. The association between keratoconus and psychiatric comorbidities was tested using univariate and multivariant analyses. Results: Overall, 940 763 adolescents and adults were included. Mean (SD) age was 17.56 (1.47) years, and 59.3% were male. Keratoconus was documented in 1533 individuals, with a prevalence of 0.16%. Patients with keratoconus were more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD compared with the general population (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.38-1.81; P < .001). After adjusting for age, sex, intellectual status, height, and weight, the results remained unchanged (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.67; P < .001). Stratification according to age showed an association between keratoconus and ADHD for males (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.39-1.90; P < .001) but not for females (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.96-1.74; P = .09). Conclusions and Relevance: In a large cohort of adolescents and adults, ADHD was associated with a diagnosis of keratoconus in male patients, even after adjusting for possible confounders. Although a causative effect could not be ascribed, these findings support further investigation into the potential value of education regarding eye rubbing in this population.

Validation of the Hebrew version of the MoCA test as a screening instrument for the early detection of mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals.

INTRODUCTION: The English version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test has been shown to be reliable in screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the sensitivity and specificity of the Hebrew version of this instrument are yet to be determined. METHODS: The study population consisted of 2 groups of older individuals, 74 patients diagnosed with MCI and 80 patients who were cognitively asymptomatic. Cognitive evaluation included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Mindstreams computerized cognitive assessment, and the MoCA test. RESULTS: The Hebrew version of MoCA distinguished between cognitively asymptomatic older individuals and those with MCI, with a sensitivity of 94.6% and a specificity of 76.3%, using a cutoff of 26/30 points. CONCLUSIONS: The Hebrew version of the MoCA test is effective for identifying MCI in older patients. As a screening instrument for MCI, its higher sensitivity makes it preferable o the MMSE, which is used extensively in the clinical setting.