Cone beam CT (CBCT) evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction motion for patients undergoing brain radiotherapy immobilized using a commercial thermoplastic mask on a robotic couch.

Patients receiving fractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for brain tumors are often immobilized with a thermoplastic mask; however, masks do not perfectly re-orient the patient due to factors including the maximum pressure which can be applied to the face, deformations of the mask assembly, patient compliance, etc. Consequently, ~3-5mm PTV margins (beyond the CTV) are often recommended. We aimed to determine if smaller PTV margins are feasible using mask immobilization coupled with 1) a gantry mounted CBCT image guidance system and 2) position corrections provided by a full six-degree of freedom (6-DOF) robotic couch. A cohort of 34 brain tumor patients was treated with fractionated IMRT. After the mask set-up, an initial CBCT was obtained and registered to the planning CT. The robotic couch corrected the misalignments in all 6-DOF and a pre-treatment verification CBCT was then obtained. The results indicated a repositioning alignment within our threshold of 1.5 mm (3D). Treatment was subsequently delivered. A post-treatment CBCT was obtained to quantify intra-fraction motion. Initial, pre-treatment and post-treatment CBCT image data was analyzed. A total of 505 radiation fractions were delivered to the 34 patients resulting in ~1800 CBCT scans. The initial median 3D (magnitude) set-up positioning error was 2.60 mm. Robotic couch corrections reduced the 3D median error to 0.53 mm prior to treatment. Intra-fraction movement was responsible for increasing the median 3D positioning error to 0.86 mm, with 8% of fractions having a 3D positioning error greater than 2 mm. Clearly CBCT image guidance coupled with a robotic 6-DOF couch dramatically improved the positioning accuracy for patients immobilized in a thermoplastic mask system; however, such intra-fraction motion would be too large for single fraction radiosurgery.

Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases.

Our clinic routinely treats brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6 megavoltage (MV) linear accelerator, cones, and a surgically attached head frame. Four patients declined repeat radiosurgery for new lesions due to their previous discomfort and a fifth patient could not complete radiosurgery because of uncontrolled nausea. Instead patients were treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT). This report discusses the spatial dose distribution of HT as measured in a head phantom and the clinical course of these five patients. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 3 mm geometric expansion of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The prescribed dose to the PTV was 27 Gy in five daily fractions with the distribution optimised to deliver 30 Gy to the GTV. Patients were immobilised with a mask and the lesions were targeted by MV computerised tomography, an inherent feature of the system. One patient died six weeks later from systemic disease; the remaining patients survived eight to 16 months. No patient experienced an exacerbation of neurological symptoms following Helical Tomotherapy. These results suggest that fractionated Helical Tomotherapy for brain metastases may be a viable alternative to radiosurgery in patients unable or unwilling to undergo that procedure.

Contamination during a brachytherapy procedure.

This paper describes an unusual contamination incident that occurred during the treatment of a prostate cancer patient with seeds containing 125I. The incident became particularly interesting as the radiation safety procedures in place prior to the incident were, in fact, inappropriate for the type of incident that occurred, resulting in a series of response errors. Strands containing 108 125I seeds with a total activity of 1.61 GBq (43.6 mCi) were implanted into a patient's prostate and the patient was sent to the recovery room. A radiation survey detected radiation levels of up to 15 microR h(-1), 10 cm from the surface of the implantation needles. Multiple individuals entered the room and were potentially exposed to contamination. Contamination was detected in a sample of the patient's urine, indicating that one or more implanted seeds were leaking. Initial test results for staff showed that 12 of 15 had thyroid levels potentially above their corresponding minimum detectable activity levels, with calculated thyroid burdens ranging from 0.17 kBq to 0.94 kBq, but, subsequent measurements, using each staff member's thigh counts as background, suggested that no staff member had been contaminated. The patient showed high uptake of 125I in his neck 10 d following the incident, estimated to correspond to an initial thyroid burden of 58 kBq. The possibility of contamination was not immediately considered due to the suspicion of the more common problem of a misplaced source. The initial measurements suggesting thyroidal contamination in staff point to an error in our thyroid screening method.

Fluorescent screen for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy quality assurance.

This article describes apparatus for quickly checking the positioning and dwell times of a high-dose-rate (HDR) afterloader as part of daily quality assurance (QA). A groove was milled into an aluminum plate to align an HDR applicator, and fluorescent screens were placed on either side of the groove. Lines were drawn at the fluorescent screen corresponding to distances to which the radioactive source should travel in our daily QA treatment protocol. By dimming the room lights, the fluorescence from the source was seen with a closed-circuit video camera, and the positioning accuracy and dwell time of the source could be efficiently verified. Not only is this an excellent QA tool, but it also provides good training for radiation therapists and other HDR professionals.

Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group no. 68.

Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems (ISPSs) are used to position patients prior to precise radiation treatment of localized lesions of the brain. Often, the lesion is located in close proximity to critical anatomic features whose functions should be maintained. Many types of ISPSs have been described in the literature and are commercially available. These are briefly reviewed. ISPS systems provide two critical functions. The first is to establish a coordinate system upon which a guided therapy can be applied. The second is to provide a method to reapply the coordinate system to the patient such that the coordinates assigned to the patient's anatomy are identical from application to application. Without limiting this study to any particular approach to ISPSs, this report introduces nomenclature and suggests performance tests to quantify both the stability of the ISPS to map diagnostic data to a coordinate system, as well as the ISPS's ability to be realigned to the patient's anatomy. For users who desire to develop a new ISPS system, it may be necessary for the clinical team to establish the accuracy and precision of each of these functions. For commercially available systems that have demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy and precision, the clinical team may need to demonstrate local ability to apply the system in a manner consistent with that employed during the published testing. The level of accuracy and precision required of an individual ISPS system is dependent upon the clinical protocol (e.g., fractionation, margin, pathology, etc.). Each clinical team should provide routine quality assurance procedures that are sufficient to support the assumptions of accuracy and precision used during the planning process. The testing of ISPS systems can be grouped into two broad categories, type testing, which occurs prior to general commercialization, and site testing, performed when a commercial system is installed at a clinic. Guidelines to help select the appropriate tests as well as recommendations to help establish the required frequency of testing are provided. Because of the broad scope of different systems, it is important that both the manufacturer and user rigorously critique the system and set QA tests appropriate to the particular device and its possible weaknesses. Major recommendations of the Task Group include: introduction of a new nomenclature for reporting repositioning accuracy; comprehensive analysis of patient characteristics that might adversely affect positioning accuracy; performance of testing immediately before each treatment to establish that there are no gross positioning errors; a general request to the Medical Physics community for improved QA tools; implementation of weekly portal imaging (perhaps cone beam CT in the future) as a method of tracking fractionated patients (as per TG 40); and periodic routine reviews of positioning accuracy.

Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 68.

Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems (ISPSs) are used to position patients prior to precise radiation treatment of localized lesions of the brain. Often, the lesion is located in close proximity to critical anatomic features whose functions should be maintained. Many types of ISPSs have been described in the literature and are commercially available. These are briefly reviewed. ISPS systems provide two critical functions. The first is to establish a coordinate system upon which a guided therapy can be applied. The second is to provide a method to reapply the coordinate system to the patient such that the coordinates assigned to the patient's anatomy are identical from application to application. Without limiting this study to any particular approach to ISPSs, this report introduces nomenclature and suggests performance tests to quantify both the stability of the ISPS to map diagnostic data to a coordinate system, as well as the ISPS's ability to be realigned to the patient's anatomy. For users who desire to develop a new ISPS system, it may be necessary for the clinical team to establish the accuracy and precision of each of these functions. For commercially available systems that have demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy and precision, the clinical team may need to demonstrate local ability to apply the system in a manner consistent with that employed during the published testing. The level of accuracy and precision required of an individual ISPS system is dependent upon the clinical protocol (e.g., fractionation, margin, pathology, etc.). Each clinical team should provide routine quality assurance procedures that are sufficient to support the assumptions of accuracy and precision used during the planning process. The testing of ISPS systems can be grouped into two broad categories, type testing, which occurs prior to general commercialization, and site testing, performed when a commercial system is installed at a clinic. Guidelines to help select the appropriate tests as well as recommendations to help establish the required frequency of testing are provided. Because of the broad scope of different systems, it is important that both the manufacturer and user rigorously critique the system and set QA tests appropriate to the particular device and its possible weaknesses. Major recommendations of the Task Group include: introduction of a new nomenclature for reporting repositioning accuracy; comprehensive analysis of patient characteristics that might adversely affect positioning accuracy; performance of testing immediately before each treatment to establish that there are no gross positioning errors; a general request to the Medical Physics community for improved QA tools; implementation of weekly portal imaging (perhaps cone beam CT in the future) as a method of tracking fractionated patients (as per TG 40); and periodic routine reviews of positioning accuracy.

Automatic verification of step-and-shoot IMRT field segments using portal imaging.

In step-and-shoot IMRT, many individual beam segments are delivered. These segments are generated by the IMRT treatment planning system and subsequently transmitted electronically through computer hardware and software modules before they are finally delivered. Hence, an independent system that monitors the actual field shape during treatment delivery is an added level of quality assurance in this complicated process. In this paper we describe the development and testing of such a system. The system verifies the field shape by comparing the radiation field detected by the built-in portal imaging system on the linac to the actual field shape planned on the treatment planning system. The comparison is based on a software algorithm that detects the leaf edge positions of the radiation field on the portal image and compares that to the calculated positions. The process is fully automated and requires minimal intervention of the radiation therapists. The system has been tested with actual clinical plan sequences and was able to alert the operator of incorrect settings in real time.

Exceptional increases in electron cone output as the backup diaphragms are opened.

Some linac manufacturers provide cones for defining circular electron fields. During commissioning of one of our new radiotherapy units, we noted that the output of these cones has a strong dependence on the diaphragm opening that precedes the cone. In particular, for the 8 MeV beam, the output of a 3 cm diameter cone increased by more than a factor of 2 as the diaphragm was opened from 5 x 5 to 20 x 20 cm. One concludes that the particular mechanical design results in an output factor dependency that is exceptional when compared to the data presented in standard texts such as Khan's "The Physics of Radiation Therapy." The importance of quality assurance and communications with the manufacturer is underscored by this example.

Implementation of multiple isocentre treatment for dynamic radiosurgery.

Radiosurgery using the dynamic rotation technique with a single isocentre was introduced at the Toronto-Bayview Regional Cancer Centre (T-BRCC) in 1988. Since then, over 100 patients have been treated. It was soon recognized that 25-30% of patients were referred with either non-spherical lesions or multiple lesions located sufficiently close together that consideration had to be given to the overlapping dose distributions throughout the treated volume. To treat these more complex targets a multiple isocentre technique was developed which also took account of these effects and the resulting normalization problem. This technique was implemented in September 1992. Comparisons between calculated doses and actual doses delivered have been undertaken using a spherical phantom containing radiochromic film. Measured dose distributions agreed with the planned distributions to within +/- 1 mm. The effect of multiple isocentres on the penumbra of dose distributions has been examined. The methods adopted for the normalization of treatment plans and clinical examples illustrating the application of the multiple isocentre technique are presented.

Fluorescent screen video imaging for checking linac beams in dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery.

Precise beam targeting is crucial to stereotactic radiosurgery. A monitoring system is described consisting of a fluorescent screen, video camera, and computer interface. Approximately ten frames are analyzed each second, verifying the beam intensity, uniformity, position, and diameter. When mounted on the gantry, the system can indicate the dynamic isocenter position using the "ball test" technique. The fluorescent screen video indicates that the 6-MV beam used for radiosurgery at our facility is acceptably stable; moreover, the small isocenter shift versus gantry and couch angles is reasonably reproducible. At our facility, quality assurance tests with this apparatus are performed every month.

The use of radiochromic film in treatment verification of dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery.

Standard silver-based films are usually too sensitive to be used as direct indicators of dose in dynamic radiosurgery because of optical saturation. This paper describes the use of a new radiochromic film to measure 6-MV radiosurgery doses and dose distributions in a head phantom. Dose calibration of the radiochromic film was performed in the range of 2.3-50.2 Gy using light of 632- and 530-nm wavelengths. Radiosurgery dose distributions were measured using the radiochromic film in a head phantom undergoing the same treatment as a patient, and were compared with the planned distributions. For an example case (nominal 2.0-cm-diam cone), film measurement verified the calculated dose distribution in one plane. The simple measurement technique described led to experimental uncertainties of +/- 0.1 cm for the 90% and 50% isodose lines, +/- 0.3 cm for the 20% line, and +/- 0.5 cm for the 10% line. Isocenter dose was measured with an uncertainty of +/- 3%. Refinements to the technique should allow more precise measurements. It is concluded that the radiochromic film, with some limitations, is a convenient and useful tool for dynamic radiosurgery quality assurance.