Esophageal perforation in South of Sweden: results of surgical treatment in 125 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: For many years there has been a debate as to which is the method of choice in treating patients with esophageal perforation. The literature consists mainly of small case series. Strategies for aiding patients struck with this disease is changing as new and less traumatic treatment options are developing. We studied a relatively large consecutive material of esophageal perforations in an effort to evaluate prognostic factors, diagnostic efforts and treatment strategy in these patients. METHODS: 125 consecutive patients treated at the University Hospital of Lund from 1970 to 2006 were studied retrospectively. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Pre-operative ASA score was the only factor that significantly influenced outcome. Neck incision for cervical perforation (n = 8) and treatment with a covered stent with or without open drainage for a thoracic perforation (n = 6) had the lowest mortality. Esophageal resection (n = 8) had the highest mortality. A CAT scan or an oesophageal X-ray with oral contrast were the most efficient diagnostic tools. The preferred treatment strategy changed over the course of the study period, from a more aggressive surgical approach towards using covered stents to seal the perforation. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative ASA score was the only factor that significantly influenced outcome in this study. Treatment strategies are changing as less traumatic options have become available. Sealing an esophageal perforation with a covered stent, in combination with open or closed drainage when necessary, is a promising treatment strategy.

Reoperations are common following VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax: study of risk factors.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for reoperation following surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical study conducted on 240 consecutive patients operated on for spontaneous pneumothorax in Lund University Hospital between January 1996 and December 2003. Patient information was gained from medical charts and operation reports. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors. Median follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was used in 93% of the patients, where bullectomy with or without pleurodesis/pleurectomy was performed in most cases. Conversion to anterolateral thoracotomy was required in 6 cases (2.3%). Operative mortality (<30 days) was 0.8% (0% after VATS). Altogether 35 patients (13.7%) required a reoperation. Twenty patients were reoperated on within one month from surgery, most often due to prolonged air leakage (n=13, 5.1%) and bleeding (n=6, 2.3%). Fifteen patients (5.8%) were reoperated on because of recurrent pneumothorax, on average 17 months (range 1-39 months) after the primary operation. Significant independent risk factors for reoperation were; young age, operations performed for secondary pneumothorax due to emphysema and recurrent pneumothorax. The risk was also increased in patients where wedge resection was not performed. However, the type of pleurodesis or pleurectomy was not related to increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of patients require reoperation after VATS for pneumothorax. Most reoperations are due to prolonged air leakage or recurrent pneumothorax. The risk for reoperation is increased in younger patients, patients operated for recurrent or secondary pneumothorax, and in cases where pulmonary wedge resection is not performed.