Celsior® vs. St Thomas® cardioplegia: analysis of myocardial protection and clinical safety in neonates.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of Celsior® crystalloid solution to St Thomas® solution as cardioplegia in pediatric arterial switch surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 180 patients who underwent arterial switch operation (ASO) between 2005 and 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: the St Thomas group receiving St Thomas solution and the Celsior® group receiving Celsior® solution. The study aimed to assess myocardial protection while evaluating clinical outcomes of patients between groups. Results: Baseline characteristics not different between groups. The postoperative troponin release trends and blood lactate levels were not different between groups. However, the Celsior® group had a significant lower incidence of delayed sternal closure (9.7% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.09) and mechanical circulatory support (ECMO) (4.9% vs. 24.7%; p < 0.001) compared to the St Thomas group. The length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly shorter in the Celsior® group (4.6 ± 3.36 days vs. 8.72 ± 5.08 days, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (2.9% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.147). Conclusion: The study suggests that Celsior® solution is effective and safe for myocardial protection in pediatric arterial switch surgery. It may offer potential benefits such as reduced need for delayed sternal closure and ECMO support, as well as shorter ICU stay. However, the study has limitations including its retrospective design and the use of different cardioplegic solutions during different time periods. Further prospective randomized trials are needed for confirmation. Clinical Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04616222.

Associations of coping and health-related behaviors with medical students' well-being and performance during objective structured clinical examination.

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a valid method to evaluate medical students' competencies. The present cross-sectional study aimed at determining how students' coping and health-related behaviors are associated with their psychological well-being and performance on the day of the OSCE. Fourth-year medical students answered a set of standardized questionnaires assessing their coping (BCI) and health-related behaviors before the examination (sleep PSQI, physical activity GPAQ). Immediately before the OSCE, they reported their level of instant psychological well-being on multi-dimensional visual analogue scales. OSCE performance was assessed by examiners blinded to the study. Associations were explored using multivariable linear regression models. A total of 482 students were included. Instant psychological well-being was positively associated with the level of positive thinking and of physical activity. It was negatively associated with the level of avoidance and of sleep disturbance. Furthermore, performance was negatively associated with the level of avoidance. Positive thinking, good sleep quality, and higher level of physical activity were all associated with improved well-being before the OSCE. Conversely, avoidance coping behaviors seem to be detrimental to both well-being and OSCE performance. The recommendation is to pay special attention to students who engage in avoidance and to consider implementing stress management programs.Clinical trial: The study protocol was registered on clinicaltrial.gov NCT05393206, date of registration: 11 June 2022.

Association of Personality Traits With the Efficacy of Stress Management Interventions for Medical Students Taking Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.

PURPOSE: Personality traits are associated with psychophysiological stress, but few studies focus on medical students. This study aimed to better understand the association of personality traits with the efficacy of stress management interventions for medical students. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with fourth-year students who took the objective structured clinical examination at Bernard University Lyon 1 in December 2021. Students were randomized in cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, and control groups. Each intervention was implemented for 6 minutes before the examination. Physiological stress levels were collected during the intervention. Psychological stress levels were rated by students at baseline and after the intervention. Personality traits were assessed via the Big-Five Inventory. Interactions between personality traits and the efficacy of the interventions were analyzed using multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-one students participated. Higher baseline psychological stress levels were associated with higher neuroticism and agreeableness ( ß = 10.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 7.40-13.13; P < .001] and ß = 3.42 [95% CI, 0.98-5.85; P = .006], respectively) and lower openness ( ß = -4.95; 95% CI, -7.40 to -2.49; P < .001). As compared with the control intervention, both stress management interventions led to lower levels of psychological ( P < .001 for both) and physiological stress levels (biofeedback: P < .001 and mindfulness: P = .009). Biofeedback efficacy varied by extraversion score for psychological ( ß = -5.66; 95% CI, -10.83 to -0.50; P = .03) and physiological stress reduction ( ß = -0.002; 95% CI, -0.003 to -0.00004; P = .045). Mindfulness efficacy varied by agreeableness score for psychological stress reduction ( ß = -7.87; 95% CI, -13.05 to -2.68; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Students with a high score in extraversion may benefit more from biofeedback interventions, while students with high scores in agreeableness may benefit more from mindfulness interventions.

Influence of the embedded participant on learners' performance during high-fidelity simulation sessions in healthcare.

BACKGROUND: The embedded participant (EP) plays a key role during a full scale/high-fidelity simulation (HFS) session. He/she is expected to guide the learner towards the achievement of the educational objectives of the scenario. However, his/her influence on learners' performance stands undetermined and this effect remains briefly addressed in the literature. This study primarily aims to assess whether the EP could have an influence on the performance of the learner during a HFS scenario. The secondary aim was to establish an inventory of the EP practices in France. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in Lyon Claude Bernard University Health Simulation Centre (France). Anaesthesia and critical care residents in postgraduate years 1 to 5 who were scheduled for their HFS sessions during the 2016 to 2021 academic years were included. Two investigators independently evaluated the resident performance regarding both technical and non-technical skills from video recordings. In addition, a nationwide survey was sent out by email through the networks of the Francophone Healthcare Simulation Society (SoFraSimS, Société Francophone de Simulation en Santé) to collect information on EP practices in French-speaking Simulation centres. RESULTS: From a total of 344 HFS videos analysed, a cohort of 19 experienced EPs was identified. The EPs had an influence on the technical and non-technical performances of the learners. The 147 responses to the survey showed that predefined rules of EP good practice existed in only 36% of the simulation centres and 65% of respondents believed that specific EP training would be justified. CONCLUSION: The EP can exert an influence on the performance of the learners during HFS. For acting as an EP, a great variability of practices and a lack of training are reported by professionals working in simulation centres. These results suggest that more attention must be paid to EP training and attitudes during simulation, especially if summative simulations are extensively developed.

The impact of shift work on pain recognition, a robust ability among intensive care nurses.

BACKGROUND: Pain empathy is essential for high-quality of care. The cognitive ability to identify and understand the pain in others remains underexplored in the context of hospital shift work. This study aimed to observe the early subliminal ability to detect pain in other faces and to investigate pain intensity evaluations during day and night shifts. METHODS: Twenty-one nurses (31 ± 7 years, 20 women) from cardio-paediatric intensive care participated in this study. Eighteen nurses completed all testing in the morning and evening hours, before and after the 12-hour day and night shift. In the first test, the nurses had to decide if facial stimuli presented subliminally showed pain or not. During the second test, they consciously determined the intensity of the painful faces on a numerical scale. Sleep, sleepiness and empathy were also measured. RESULTS: Recognition accuracy and pain sensitivity remained stable over time, only sensitivity increased following the work shift (F(1,15) = 7.10, p = 0.018). Intensity ratings remained stable. Sleepiness at the end of the night shift was negatively correlated with accuracy (ρ = -0.51, p = 0.018) and positively correlated with prior night shifts (ρ = -0.50, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The judgement of facial pain expressions seems robust across shift types, only individual factors such as sleepiness interfere with pain recognition. Pain sensitivity may be enhanced during working hours. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Some professions need to know how to assess pain 24/7 and a lack of sleep can disrupt the cognitive processes necessary for this assessment. Night shifts provoke a bias in pain management, and sleep deprivation, a decrease in pain evaluation. By conducting a repeated measure study in the field that applied a different paradigm (subliminal recognition of facial cues) we add evidence to the understanding of pain recognition and the impact of sleep deprivation on the early processing of pain in others.

A new standardized tool for quantification of closed-loop communication in trauma care: CAST Grid reliability study.

BACKROUND: The CAST Grid has been developed to evaluate the use of closed-loop communication (CLC) in the trauma bay. METHODS: The CAST Grid and two validated non-technical team performance assessment tools (the TEAM and T-NOTECHS grids) were completed by 2 independent reviewers based on trauma care simulation videos from a French Level 1 trauma center. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were evaluated for CLC parameters and non-technical performance, and correlations between these parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: The study analyzed 11 videos. The intra- and inter-rater agreement for the number of CLC per minute (CLC/min) was moderate and good, respectively, based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [95%CI] (0.57 [-0.40;0.94] and 0.77 [0.33;0.94]). However, the agreement was poor for the percentage of CLC (0.37 [-0.58;0.89] and -0.36 [-0.71;0.14], respectively). The study found that a lower number of CLC/min was correlated with an increased duration of the simulation (r = -0.75 [-0.93; -0.25]). CONCLUSION: The CAST Grid showed a relatively good inter-rater agreement to quantify the number of CLC/min which was inversely correlated with the duration of care. This tool opens up the possibility of quantifying CLC and allows for new analyses of team functioning and interactions.

Use of a Digital Cognitive Aid Improves Memorization of Military Caregivers After High-Fidelity Simulations of Combat Casualty Care.

INTRODUCTION: High-fidelity simulation is widely used in the ongoing education of caregivers. However, the complex high-stakes simulated crisis environment affects memorization. This study investigated whether participants would remember more key training messages 3 months after a simulated complex emergency situation if they had used a digital cognitive aid (CA) during the simulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was performed during a combat casualty training course for military physicians and nurses. Each pair of care providers completed two scenarios randomized to be undertaken either with or without a digital CA. At the end of each debriefing, instructors gave five scenario-specific key messages aloud. Three months later, learners were asked to recall the messages from their two scenarios and were scored for each scenario. The primary endpoint was the number of key messages recalled. The secondary endpoints were the influence on the results of the profession and the scenario block and age of the leader. RESULTS: Thirty-six pairs of participants were included. Due to operational constraints, only 34 completed the study. The use of the digital CA was associated with a positive effect on memorization at 3 months (F = 82.2, P < .001), unrelated to the leader's profession, age, or the scenario block. The median of the memorization scores was 2/5 [1-3] with the digital CA and 1/5 [1-1] without it, which represents a difference of one memorized element (95% CI, 1-2; η2 = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The digital CA allowed learners to remember twice as many key elements 3 months after simulated training of medical care for military combat casualties. A dedicated digital CA might be an asset for better care in a combat environment and for learning and memorizing critical care procedures following complex emergency situations.

Strategy to Develop a Common Simulation Training Program: Illustration with Anesthesia and Intensive Care Residency in France.

Phenomenon: The urgency of having fair and trustworthy competency-based assessment in medical training is growing. Simulation is increasingly recognized as a potent method for building and assessing applied competencies. The growing use of simulation and its application in summative assessment calls for comprehensive and rigorously designed programs. Defining the current baseline of what is available and feasible is a crucial first step. This paper uses anesthesia and intensive care (AIC) in France as a case study in how to document this baseline. Approach: An IRB-approved, online anonymous closed survey was submitted to AIC residency program directors and AIC simulation program directors in France from January to February 2021. The researcher-developed survey consisted of 65 questions across five sections: centers' characteristics, curricular characteristics, courses' characteristics, instructors' characteristics, and simulation perceptions and perspectives. Findings: The participation rate was 31/31 (100%) with 29 centers affiliated with a university hospital. All centers had AIC simulation activities. Resident training was structured in 94% of centers. Simulation uses were training (100%), research and development (61%), procedural or organizational testing (42%), and summative assessment (13%). Interprofessional full-scale simulation training existed in 90% of centers. Procedural training on simulators prior to clinical patients' care was performed "always" in 16%, "most often" in 45%, "sometimes" in 29% and "rarely" or "not" in 10% of centers. Simulated patients were used in 61% of centers. Main themes were identified for procedural skills, full-scale and simulated patient simulation training. Simulation activity was perceived as increasing in 68% of centers. Centers expressed a desire to participate in developing and using a national common AIC simulation program. Insights: Based on our findings in AIC, we demonstrated a baseline description of nationwide simulation activities. We now have a clearer perspective on a decentralized approach in which individual institutions or regional consortia conduct simulation for a discipline in a relatively homogeneous way, suggesting the feasibility for national guidelines. This approach provides useful clues for AIC and other disciplines to develop a comprehensive and meaningful program matching existing expectations and closing the identified gaps.

Personality traits affect anticipatory stress vulnerability and coping effectiveness in occupational critical care situations.

The present study aimed at investigating the influence of personality on both anticipatory stress vulnerability and the effectiveness of coping strategies in an occupational stressful context. Following assessment of individual personality traits (Big Five Inventory), 147 volunteers were exposed to the anticipation of a stressful event. Anxiety and cardiac reactivity were assessed as markers of vulnerability to anticipatory stress. Participants were then randomly assigned to three groups and subjected to a 5-min intervention: relaxation breathing, relaxation breathing combined with cardiac biofeedback, and control. The effectiveness of coping interventions was determined through the cardiac coherence score achieved during the intervention. Higher neuroticism was associated with higher anticipatory stress vulnerability, whereas higher conscientiousness and extraversion were related to lower anticipatory stress vulnerability. Relaxation breathing and biofeedback coping interventions contributed to improve the cardiac coherence in all participants, albeit with greater effectiveness in individuals presenting higher score of openness to experience. The present findings demonstrated that personality traits are related to both anticipatory stress vulnerability and effectiveness of coping interventions. These results bring new insights into practical guidelines for stress prevention by considering personality traits. Specific practical applications for health professionals, who are likely to manage stressful situations daily, are discussed.

High-Fidelity Simulation to Assess Task Load Index and Performance: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The NASA Task Load Index is a questionnaire widely used in aviation. This index might help for attesting the quality of a scenario in high-fidelity simulation in healthcare. The main purpose of this study was to observe whether NASA Task Load Index for critical care-simulated scenarios, designed for residents, was consistent with the literature. The second purpose was to describe relationships between NASA Task Load Index, performance and generated stress during high-fidelity simulation. METHODS: All residents in anaesthesia and intensive care undergoing high-fidelity simulation were included. The primary endpoint was the task load generated by each scenario assessed by NASA Task Load Index. Based on the literature, the NASA Task Load Index scores between 39 and 61 were considered an acceptable level. Stress level (Visual Analogue Scale) and specific technical and non-technical skills performances (Team Emergency Assessment Measure) were also assessed. RESULTS: Totally 53 residents actively participated in 1 of 10 different scenarios, between June and December 2017. The median NASA Task Load Index score of scenarios was 61 [48-65]. Five scenarios generated acceptable task load levels. There was no association between the NASA Task Load Index score and technical or non-technical skills performance scores, but an association between NASA Task Load Index and the stress level (rho=4.7, P =.001) was observed. CONCLUSION: Simulation scenarios generate different task loads for residents; the task load was deemed acceptable for half of the scenarios. The NASA Task Load Index could be considered as a tool to assess the pedagogic adequacy of scenarios. Scenario and generated stress level, but not task load, can modify residents' performance during simulation. This should be considered when planning normative simulation.

Change in Sleep Quality of Residents the Night Before High-Fidelity Simulation: Results From a Prospective 1-Year National Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The stress level of participants in high-fidelity simulation stems from various factors but may result in anticipatory anxiety causing sleep disturbances during the night prior to simulation. The objective of this survey was to determine the change in sleep quality of residents during the night prior to the simulation. METHODS: The survey was proposed for 1 year to all residents at the beginning of the simulation, in 10 simulation centres. The questionnaire combined demographics and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire using visual analogue scales divided into 4 sleep qualitative domains. The primary outcome was the prevalence of sleep disturbance (>10 mm on 1 domain). Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of severe sleep disturbance (>25 mm), as well as qualitatively and quantitatively reported explanatory sleep parameters. RESULTS: Among respondents, 66% [95% CI: 63 to 69] of residents had more than 10 mm and 27% [95% CI: 24 to 30] had more than 25 mm of sleep disturbance. Residents with a sleep disturbance of more than 10 mm had fewer hours of sleep (6.4 [standard deviation=1.8] vs 7.3 [standard deviation=1.3], difference: -0.9 [95% CI: -1.1 to -0.7]; P < .0001), with a higher number of night-time awakenings (1.3 [standard deviation=1.5] vs 0.7 [standard deviation=0.9], difference: 0.6 [95% CI: 0.4 to 0.8]; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Among residents participating in the simulation, a high prevalence of change in sleep quality during the night before the simulation was noted. Strategies to help residents achieve better sleep prior to simulation should be explored.

Perioperative Hemostatic Management of a Newborn With Hereditary Hemophilia A Undergoing Emergent Surgery for Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries.

Hemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder characterized by a lack of plasma clotting factor VIII (FVIII). In prophylaxis or during surgery, FVIII infusions are necessary to prevent bleeding. The authors describe the perioperative challenges and application of a multidisciplinary hemostatic management approach to a Caucasian male newborn, with antenatal diagnoses of moderate hemophilia A (2 IU/dL) and dextro-transposition of the great arteries requiring arterial switch surgery within the first month of life. Because both conditions are rare, only few reports in the literature are available describing perioperative management of hemophilia in neonates and children undergoing cardiac surgery. After baseline FVIII determination and normal standard coagulation studies, iterative intravenous pharmacist-prepared plasma-derived FVIII boluses were calculated (35 IU/kg) and administered intravenously every 6 hours for 24 hours, then switched to a continuous infusion and guided by daily chromogenic clotting FVIII activity assay for targeted values between 80 and 100 IU/dL. Successful cardiac surgery, using cardiopulmonary bypass, was performed with continuous infusion of FVIII at 5 IU/kg/h. Thirteen days after surgery, the FVIII antibody screening remained negative and continuous infusion was switched in favor of a daily intravenous bolus treatment to facilitate reconciliation to the center of origin. The authors' multidisciplinary strategy, established antenatally, allowed for successful care in this highly complex and rare situation.

Effects of relaxing breathing paired with cardiac biofeedback on performance and relaxation during critical simulated situations: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Active participation in high-fidelity simulation remains stressful for residents. Increased stress levels elicited during such simulation impacts performance. We tested whether relaxing breathing, paired or not with cardiac biofeedback, could lead to enhanced performance of residents during simulation. METHODS: This randomized pilot study involved the fifth-year anesthesiology and critical care residents who participated in high-fidelity at Lyon medical simulation center in 2019. Residents were randomized into three parallel interventions: relaxing breathing, relaxing breathing paired with cardiac biofeedback, and control. Each intervention was applied for five minutes immediately after the scenario briefing. The primary endpoint was the overall performance during the simulation rated by two blinded independent investigators. The secondary endpoints included component scores of overall performance and changes in psychological states. RESULTS: Thirty-four residents were included. Compared to the control group, residents in the relaxing breathing (+ 7%, 98.3% CI: 0.3 to 13.7, P = 0.013) and relaxing breathing paired with cardiac biofeedback (+ 8%, 98.3% CI: 0.82 to 14.81, P = 0.009) groups had a higher overall performance score. Following the interventions, compared to the control group, stress level was lower when participants had performed relaxing breathing alone (P = 0.029) or paired with biofeedback (P = 0.035). The internal relaxation level was higher in both the relaxing breathing alone (P = 0.016) and paired with biofeedback groups (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Performing five minutes of relaxing breathing before the scenario resulted in better overall simulation performance. These preliminary findings suggest that short breathing interventions are effective in improving performance during simulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04141124 , 28/10/2019).

Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events-study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and Mortality conference provides the necessary improvement measures for patient safety. However, they are an underused resource mainly because the conclusions to be drawn from the discussion and their implications for practice are not always well integrated by inpatient care teams. We therefore propose in this study two interventions to optimise their effectiveness: a passive feedback with wide dissemination by e-mail and/or on paper of the results of the Morbidity and Mortality conference to inpatient care teams and an active feedback with in situ inter-professional simulation-training programme in which scenarios will be based on cases studied in Morbidity and Mortality conference. In the present study, we hypothesise that the greatest reduction the occurrence of adverse event will be in the active feedback arm. METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled study will be performed at four study sites. The unit of randomisation is wards within the study sites. Fifteen wards will be randomly assigned to passive feedback, active feedback, or a standard MMC (control arm). Passive feedback and active feedback arms will be compared to standard arm in terms of occurrence of adverse events. The trigger tool methodology used to identify adverse events is a retrospective review of inpatient records using "triggers": an adverse event is defined as a patient's stay with at least one positive trigger. DISCUSSION: The in situ simulation training based on cases processed in Morbidity and Mortality conference is built according to the main topics identified for the successful implementation of healthcare simulation in patient safety programmes: technical skills, nontechnical skills, assessment, effectiveness, and system probing. The in situ simulation-training programme conducted as part of the study has the potential to improve patient safety during hospitalisation. We therefore expect the greatest reduction in the occurrence of adverse events in patients hospitalised in the active feedback arm. This expected result would have a direct impact on patient safety and would place in situ simulation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771613. Registered on May 12, 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set can be found within the protocol.

Preload Dependence Fails to Predict Hemodynamic Instability During a Fluid Removal Challenge in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Fluid overload increases morbidity and mortality in PICU patients. Active fluid removal improves the prognosis but may worsen organ dysfunction. Preload dependence in adults does predict hemodynamic instability induced by a fluid removal challenge (FRC). We sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic and static markers of preload in predicting hemodynamic instability and reduction of stroke volume during an FRC in children. We followed the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy statement to design conduct and report this study. DESIGN: Prospective noninterventional cohort study. SETTINGS: From June 2017 to April 2019 in a pediatric cardiac ICU in a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients 8 years old or younger, with symptoms of fluid overload after cardiac surgery, were studied. INTERVENTIONS: We confirmed preload dependence by echocardiography before and during a calibrated abdominal compression test. We then performed a challenge to remove 10-mL/kg fluid in less than 120 minutes with an infusion of diuretics. Hemodynamic instability was defined as a decrease of 10% of mean arterial pressure. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared patients showing hemodynamic instability with patients remaining stable, and we built receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves. Among 58 patients studied, 10 showed hemodynamic instability. The area under the ROC curve was 0.55 for the preload dependence test (95% CI, 0.34-0.75). Using a threshold of 10% increase in stroke volume index (SVi) during calibrated abdominal compression, the specificity was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.00-0.60) and the sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65-0.88). Mean arterial pressure variation and SVi variation were not correlated during fluid removal; r = 0.19; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.43; p = 0.139. CONCLUSIONS: Preload dependence is not accurate to predict hemodynamic instability during an FRC. Our data do not support a reduction in intravascular volume being mainly responsible for the reduction in arterial pressure during an FRC in children.

Use of simulation to teach in the operating room - Don't let the COVID-19 pandemic interrupt education:an observational clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education has become the most important part of resident training in anesthesiology, especially during the pandemic. It allows learning the skills and the management of different situations without putting residents in risk of contamination, considering COVID-19 is highly contagious. The hypothesis was that simulation is still associated with improvement of knowledge acquisitions despite the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Residents of anesthesiology and intensive care subjected to an anaphylaxis simulation scenario. Their knowledge levels were assessed by true/false questions before and one month after the simulation session. The STAI test was used to measure anxiety levels before and after the scenario. Data were analyzed statistically using Wilcoxon and McNemar tests. RESULTS: Junior residents (< 2 years) received significantly higher scores in post-training theoretical tests compared to their pre-training scores (79.2 ± 9.6, 84.5 ± 8.2, p = 0.002, n = 21). There was no difference between pre- and post-test scores of seniors (80.2 ± 9, 81.8 ± 10.4, p = 0.3). Pre- and post-anxiety inventory scores were nearly the same and both were in the moderate group (39.8 ± 10.1, 39.3 ± 12.1, p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Simulation-based education improved the knowledge levels of the residents without raising anxiety levels. Thus, simulation-based training showed its value as an important tool of education during the pandemic, which needs to be further popularized for training at all institutions. Enlightening medical educators about this accomplished teaching method may lead to improved quality of medical education in developing countries and reshape how tomorrow's doctors are trained during pandemics.

Impact of a Digital Cognitive Aid on the Performance of Military Healthcare Teams During Critical Care Management in a Warfront Injury Situation: A Simulation Randomized Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Initial healthcare delivery after warfront injury is unpredictably challenging for military forces. As preparatory training, healthcare providers use simulation to improve their performance in stressful critical situations. This study investigated whether a digital CA held by the team leader improved performance in simulated combat casualty care. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was performed during a combat casualty training course for military physicians and nurses in France. Each pair of care providers completed 2 scenarios randomized to be undertaken either with or without a digital CA. The primary end point was the technical performance evaluated from a video recording by 2 independent raters using a pre-established score grid (up to 100%) according to military protocols. The secondary end point was the nontechnical performance (TEAM scale, maximum: 54 points). RESULTS: Thirty-six pairs of participants were included. Use of the digital CA improved both technical (74% vs 53%, P < 0.001) and nontechnical (42 vs 32, P < 0.001) performance. CONCLUSIONS: The digital CA improved technical and nontechnical performance during training of medical care for military combat casualties. Use of a dedicated digital CA might improve care in a combat environment. STUDY TYPE: This study is a randomized controlled trial.