Longitudinal reduction in fluoroscopy with continued use of 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems in catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia - then and now.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is a first-line treatment for symptomatic, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This study aims to demonstrate if 3D-electroanatomic mapping (EAM) during SVT ablation reduces fluoroscopy time (FT) and determine if further reductions in FT are observed longitudinally. METHODS: All cases of SVT ablation between May 2011-May 2022 at a single tertiary centre were prospectively recruited. FT between the cohorts with and without EAM were compared. Within the EAM subset, the trend of FT across the years was analysed. RESULTS: There were 1758 cases included, 563 without EAM, 1195 with EAM. EAM was associated with a longer procedure time (mean + 8.8 min, p = 0.001), but with mean reductions in FT and dose area product (DAP) by 19.6 min and 18 621 mGy*cm2 respectively (p < 0.001). There was comparable efficacy without any increase in complication rates. Over time (2011-2022), further reduction in FT of 0.9 min year on year was observed (p = 0.001). Between 2011 and 2017, there was a significant reduction in FT of 1.1 min year on year (p = 0.019), which was not observed from 2017 onwards (p = 0.061). The greatest reduction in FT was after the first year of adoption. CONCLUSION: EAM in SVT ablation reduces fluoroscopy use. FT was initially observed to reduce further over time before plateauing, likely due to increased operator experience. While there is increased interest in zero fluoroscopy SVT ablation, complementary use of fluoroscopy may still be necessary in complex cases.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with higher rates of mortality and reduced quality of life. In this study we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia in patients with an ICD. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CA vs control. The primary outcomes were recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves for these outcomes were digitized to obtain individual patient data, which were pooled in a 1-stage meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes included cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, syncope, appropriate ICD therapies, appropriate ICD shocks, and inappropriate shocks. For these, study-level HRs or risk ratios were obtained and pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed for trials that investigated prophylactic CA (before or during ICD implantation). RESULTS: Data on 9 studies and 1103 patients were retrieved. CA significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation recurrence compared with control (shared frailty HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81; P < 0.001) but not mortality (shared frailty HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23; P = 0.361). CA was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, appropriate ICD therapies and shocks, but not syncope or inappropriate shocks. Subgroup analysis showed similar results for prophylactic CA except that no significant difference was observed for cardiac hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: CA is associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmia recurrence, appropriate ICD therapies/shocks, electrical storm, and cardiac hospitalization, and might be effective in preventing future morbidity. Future trials are needed to support the continued benefit of these promising results, and to investigate the optimal timing of ablation.

Initial experience of left bundle branch pacing using the Abbott Agilis HisPro Catheter with stylet-driven leads.

AIMS: Conduction system pacing has gained steady interest over recent years. While the majority of tools and delivery techniques were developed for His bundle pacing (HBP), the feasibility and reproducibility of using these similar tools for left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has yet to be determined. We describe our technique for performing LBBP using the Abbott Agilis HisPro™ Steerable Catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: A series of 22 patients with a mean age of 71.7 years (16 males, 72.7%), underwent LBBP procedure with this catheter between May and October 2021. Nineteen patients (86%) had successful LBBP lead implantation. There were no major complications or mortality. CONCLUSION: The Agilis HisPro™ catheter along with the stylet driven Tendril STS Model 2088TC lead is a safe and feasible delivery system for LBBP.

Randomized controlled trial of internal and external targeted temperature management methods in post- cardiac arrest patients.

BACKGROUND: Targeted temperature management post-cardiac arrest is currently implemented using various methods, broadly categorized as internal and external. This study aimed to evaluate survival-to-hospital discharge and neurological outcomes (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Score) of post-cardiac arrest patients undergoing internal cooling verses external cooling. METHODOLOGY: A randomized controlled trial of post-resuscitation cardiac arrest patients was conducted from October 2008-September 2014. Patients were randomized to either internal or external cooling methods. Historical controls were selected matched by age and gender. Analysis using SPSS version 21.0 presented descriptive statistics and frequencies while univariate logistic regression was done using R 3.1.3. RESULTS: 23 patients were randomized to internal cooling and 22 patients to external cooling and 42 matched controls were selected. No significant difference was seen between internal and external cooling in terms of survival, neurological outcomes and complications. However in the internal cooling arm, there was lower risk of developing overcooling (p=0.01) and rebound hyperthermia (p=0.02). Compared to normothermia, internal cooling had higher survival (OR=3.36, 95% CI=(1.130, 10.412), and lower risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias (OR=0.18, 95% CI=(0.04, 0.63)). Subgroup analysis showed those with cardiac cause of arrest (OR=4.29, 95% CI=(1.26, 15.80)) and sustained ROSC (OR=5.50, 95% CI=(1.64, 20.39)) had better survival with internal cooling compared to normothermia. Cooling curves showed tighter temperature control for internal compared to external cooling. CONCLUSION: Internal cooling showed tighter temperature control compared to external cooling. Internal cooling can potentially provide better survival-to-hospital discharge outcomes and reduce cardiac arrhythmia complications in carefully selected patients as compared to normothermia.

Remote monitoring of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Southeast Asian, single-centre pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has been shown to improve patient safety and reduce in-office visits. We report our experience with remote monitoring via the Medtronic CareLink(®) network. METHODS: Patients were followed up for six months with scheduled monthly remote monitoring transmissions in addition to routine in-office checks. The efficacy of remote monitoring was evaluated by recording compliance to transmissions, number of device alerts requiring intervention and time from transmission to review. Questionnaires were administered to evaluate the experiences of patients, physicians and medical technicians. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were enrolled; 16 (28.1%) had permanent pacemakers, 34 (59.6%) had implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 7 (12.3%) had cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators. Overall, of 334 remote transmissions scheduled, 73.7% were on time, 14.5% were overdue and 11.8% were missed. 84.6% of wireless transmissions were on time, compared to 53.8% of non-wireless transmissions. Among all transmissions, 4.4% contained alerts for which physicians were informed and only 1.8% required intervention. 98.6% of remote transmissions were reviewed by the second working day. 73.2% of patients preferred remote monitoring. Physicians agreed that remote transmissions provided information equivalent to in-office checks 97.1% of the time. 77.8% of medical technicians felt that remote monitoring would help the hospital improve patient management. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring of CIED is safe and feasible. It has possible benefits to patient safety through earlier detection of arrhythmias or device malfunction, permitting earlier intervention. Wireless remote monitoring, in particular, may improve compliance to device monitoring. Patients may prefer remote monitoring due to possible improvements in quality of life.

First clinical experience of the safety and feasibility of total subcutaneous implantable defibrillator in an Asian population.

AIMS: The safety and feasibility of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been demonstrated in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT). Nonetheless, its safety and feasibility in an Asian population with smaller body-build is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one Asian patients who underwent S-ICD from 1 April 2014 to 2 February 2015 in five institutions in Hong Kong and Singapore were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 50.0 ± 14.1 years (range 29-77 years, 82.6% male) were included. Among them, 17 (81.0%) were Chinese, 3 (14.3%) were Malay, and 1 (4.8%) was Indian. Their mean body mass index was 23.0 ± 4.0 kg/m(2). An S-ICD was implanted for primary and secondary prevention in 13 (61.9%) and 8 (38.1%) patients, respectively. The indications included Brugada syndrome (n = 6, 28.6%), ischaemic cardiomyopathy (CMP, n = 6, 28.6%), dilated CMP (n = 4, 19.0%), hypertrophic CMP (n = 2, 9.5%), and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n = 2, 9.5%). Three patients (14.3%) had prior infected transvenous ICD. There were no acute complications but eight wound complications (persistent wound bleeding requiring intervention = 2; delayed wound healing: upper sternal wound = 3; generator site = 1; local wound infection = 2) were observed in six (28.2%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 107.2 ± 81.3 days (range of 14-254 days), one patient underwent three successful appropriate shocks for treatment of VTs. No inappropriate therapy was documented. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience shows that S-ICD is a feasible treatment for VT among an Asian population with smaller body-build. There was nonetheless a relatively high rate of wound complications.