Gap patterns and radiographic follow-up of newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty designs.

BACKGROUND: Interest in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased with advancement of biomaterials and implant design and associated improved longevity. We sought to evaluate the gap patterns and radiolucent zones radiographically for 2 newer-generation cementless TKA designs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our single-institution database between January 2017 and December 2019. We identified patients with a porous keeled tibia base-plate with 4-bullet cruciform spikes and peri-apatite coated femoral component (study group 1) and patients who received a cementless porous coated femoral component and rotating platform tibia baseplate with 4 peripheral porous coated pegs around a central cone (study group 2). We identified gap patterns at 6 weeks and at 1 year or more postoperatively on radiographs, noting indications for reoperation. RESULTS: We identified 228 patients in study group 1 and 41 patients in study group 2. At 1-year follow-up, we found evidence of resolved femoral gaps in 52 (72.2%) of 72 patients in study group 1 and 10 (58.8%) of 17 patients in study group 2 (p = 0.124). We identified 27 (84.3%) of 32 patients in study group 1 and 7 (70.0%) of 10 patients in study group 2 with resolved tibia gaps (p = 0.313). After 1 year, there were significantly more Zone 3a femoral zonal radiolucent gaps (p = 0.001) and Zone 8 tibia zonal radiolucent gaps (p = 0.002) in study group 2 than in study group 1. There were 4 reoperations for study group 1 and 0 reoperations for study group 2. CONCLUSION: The modern cementless TKA systems have varied gap patterns in postoperative radiographs, which may be attributed to the implant design. Most radiolucent gaps resolve radiographically on follow-up.

Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for a Single Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using Hybrid Fixation and Press-Fit Stems.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid fixation, utilizing diaphyseal press-fit stems and cement fixation in the tibial and femoral metaphyseal areas, has long been a strategy for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorships of hybrid fixation using a single rTKA revision system with a minimum of 5 years follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively collected database to identify 281 patients who underwent rTKA using a single revision system with hybrid fixation and press-fit stems between July 2006 and August 2016. We reviewed the clinical outcome scores, including the Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey. We also evaluated the 5 and 10-year survivorships and the indications for reoperations. The cohort had a mean age of 70 years (range, 45.2 to 92.0) and a mean body mass index of 33.4 (range, 17.3 to 55.8). The mean time from rTKA surgery was 11.1 years (range, 5.3 to 15.5). RESULTS: Paired t-test analyses showed significant improvements from preoperative versus postoperative clinical outcome scores (P < .001) for Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical component. Prosthetic joint infections after index rTKA were the most common failure mode with 29 patients requiring reoperations. Rerevision due to aseptic loosening was uncommon (6 patients) with a cumulative survival rate of 95.2% at 5 years and 94.2% at 10 years. CONCLUSION: The use of this single rTKA system utilizing press fit stems combined with hybrid fixation provided significant improvements in the clinical outcomes and excellent survivorships at 5 and 10 years.

No Difference in Subsidence Between Modern Monoblock and Modular Titanium Fluted Tapered Femoral Stems.

BACKGROUND: Subsidence remains a concern when utilizing tapered fluted titanium (TFT) femoral stems and may lead to leg length discrepancy, impingement, instability, and failure to obtain osseointegration. This study aims to compare stem subsidence across 3 modern TFT stems. Our secondary aim was to investigate the influence of bicortical contact or "scratch fit" on subsidence, as well as the role of intraoperative imaging in maximizing bicortical contact and preventing stem subsidence. METHODS: A retrospective review of 271 hip arthroplasties utilizing modern TFT stems at a single institution was performed. Three stem designs were included in the analysis: 1 monoblock TFT stem (n = 91) and 2 modular TFT stems (n = 90; n = 90). Patient demographics, Paprosky femoral bone loss classification, bicortical contact, utilization of intraoperative imaging, and stem subsidence (comparison of initial postoperative radiograph to the latest follow-up radiograph-minimum 3 months) were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in overall subsidence (P = .191) or the incidence of subsidence >5 millimeters between stems (P = .126). Subgroup analysis based on femoral bone loss grading showed no difference in subsidence between stems. Increased bicortical contact was associated with reduced subsidence (P = .004). Intraoperative imaging was used in 46.5% (126 of 271) of cases; this was not correlated with bicortical contact (P = .673) or subsidence (P = .521). CONCLUSION: All 3 modern TFT stems were highly successful and associated with low rates of subsidence, regardless of modular or monoblock design. Surgeons should select the stem that they feel is most clinically appropriate.

Intra-articular Loose Body with Concomitant Bankart Lesion after a Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: The spectrum of pathoanatomic lesions encountered in anterior shoulder dislocation is broad. There could be a presence of loose bodies, chondral and osteochondral, in the shoulder joint and also concomitant rotator cuff partial tears resulting from acute and chronic shoulder instability. CASE REPORT: We present one case report of a 46-year-old male Chinese with an uncommon case of Bankart lesion, with a full thickness chondral defect over the superior glenoid articular surface manifesting as a large intra-articular loose cartilaginous body. The patient presented with persistent shoulder pain with signs of shoulder instability. He underwent arthroscopic repair of his Bankart lesion with the removal of intra-articular loose body. We aim to discuss the diagnosis, radiological imaging, as well as, arthroscopic treatment of loose body in the glenohumeral joint due to anterior shoulder dislocation in our report. CONCLUSION: In our case report, we highlight the importance to identify other associated injuries from the history and examination after an episode of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Arthroscopic treatment is a useful minimally invasive option to remove the large fragment of intra-articular loose body and also repair the Bankart lesion in the same setting. Both of these lesions must be treated as they are crucial for pain relief, as well as stabilizing the shoulder, to prevent further episodes of dislocation.

Comparison of patient quality of life scores and satisfaction after common orthopedic surgical interventions.

Patient quality of life scores are commonly used to assess patient-reported satisfaction following orthopedic interventions. Our main aim was to review the satisfaction scores of four common orthopedic interventions in our tertiary institution, primary hallux valgus (HV) corrective surgery, primary single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent four different types of orthopedic surgeries using the SF-36 score and two questions adopted from North American Spine Society Questionnaire. The database of a tertiary hospital between January 2007 and December 2009 was reviewed. There were 3488, 374, 184 and 73 patients who underwent TKA, THA, TLIF and HV surgery, respectively. Patients who underwent primary TLIF, TKA and THA had significant degree of improvement in all aspects of SF-36 scores at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.001). Postoperatively at 2 years, the most satisfied postoperative patients were those who underwent THA (91.9 %), followed by TKA (90.5 %), TLIF (86.1 %) and HV (77.4 %). This study shows a significant degree of postoperative improvement in terms of SF-36 scores for common orthopedic interventions in particular to primary TKA, THA and TLIF at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up. With a significant degree of improvement in SF-36 scores postoperatively, this also translated into patient satisfaction and meeting their expectations of surgery.

Primary osteosarcoma of the spine: a review of 10 cases.

The authors describe 10 cases of osteosarcoma of the spine treated between January 1951 and December 2010, and obtained from the Tumour Registry of their hospital. The mean age at presentation was 38.8 years (range: 16-73 years); the mean duration of symptoms was 5.1 months (range: 3 weeks-1 year). Pain was the commonest complaint (9 patients), followed by neurological compromise (6 patients). The thoracic spine and male gender were predominant. Seven patients underwent marginal resection, 3 underwent intralesional resection. All, except one, had adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, pre- and/or postoperatively. This rare sarcoma has a dismal prognosis : the median survival period was only 23 years. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 40% and 20%. Astonishingly, marginal resection (7 cases) did not lead to a longer survival than intralesional resection (3 cases): respectively 30 months and 42 months. Quite logically, local recurrence in 6 patients was linked to a survival of only 36 months, while the other 4 patients survived 52 months. Age below 40 was a positive factor, but not significantly. All patients had a reasonable quality of life with outcomes consistent with the available literature. Recent literature stresses that there is a trend toward improved survival with en bloc resection.

A positive hip arthrogram may predict lower function in patients with primary hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A local anesthetic hip arthrogram is a simple test mainly used as an adjunct to define the origin of hip pain. Temporary pain relief (a positive response) following an injection may lead to a surgeon recommending hip surgery. However, it is unclear whether relief of pain corresponds to better postoperative pain relief or function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore compared the function in patients with a positive response to a local anesthetic hip arthrogram who underwent primary THA and patients with typical osteoarthritis presentation who underwent primary THA without a preoperative arthrogram. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who had a positive response to a local anesthetic hip arthrogram who subsequently underwent primary hip arthroplasty and a control group of 74 patients who had typical osteoarthritis hip pain and subsequent primary hip arthroplasty without having a previous arthrogram. All patients completed the Oxford Hip Score, WOMAC™ function short form, and the SF-12 preoperatively and at regular clinical followups. The minimum followups were 28 months (mean, 42 months; range, 28-72 months) for the study group and 33 months (mean, 52 months; range, 33-73 months) for the control group. RESULTS: Patients in the arthrogram group had lower mean functional scores: 30 versus 39 for the Oxford Hip Score, 39 versus 46 for the WOMAC™, and 36 versus 42 for the physical component of the SF-12. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative use of a local anesthetic hip arthrogram remains an important tool to differentiate spinal disorders or confirm the hip as the cause of pain. However, patients who have a preoperative hip arthrogram to clarify symptoms may report a lower function score and pain relief than patients who do not.