Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach to the assessment of labor progress is by digital vaginal examination; however, it is subjective and imprecise. Recent studies have investigated the role of transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent by measuring the angle of progression and head-perineum distance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate factors that affected labor progress, which were defined by the transperineal ultrasonographic parameters, in women who achieved vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy who underwent labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent (parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance) were made serially after the commencement of labor induction until full cervical dilation. The researchers were blinded to the findings of the clinical team's vaginal examination and vice versa. The repeated measure data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors (age ≥35 years, obesity, parity, methods of labor induction, and epidural anesthesia) that affected the relationship between parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation. RESULTS: The total number of paired vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessments among the 261 women (82.9%) with vaginal delivery was 945, with a median of 3 per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range, 4.3-5.2). Multiparity and mechanical methods of labor induction were associated with a faster rate of fetal head descent, which was determined by head-perineum distance against fetal head station, than nulliparity and the use of a slow-release vaginal pessary, respectively. An additional increase of 0.10 cm in head-perineum distance was observed, for an unit increase in fetal head station in nulliparous women (P=.03) and women who had a slow-release vaginal pessary (P=.02), compared with multiparous women and those who had mechanical methods for labor induction. The use of epidural anesthesia was associated with a slower rate of fetal head descent, which was determined by both parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance, against fetal head station. An additional decrease of 3.66 degrees in parasagittal angle of progression (P=.04) and an additional increase in 0.33 cm in head-perineum distance (P≤.001) were observed for a unit increase in fetal head station in women with the use of epidural anesthesia, compared with those without. Obese women had higher head-perineum distance overall, compared with normal weight women; at different cross-sections of time periods, obesity appeared to be associated with a slower rate of change between head-perineum distance and cervical dilation. Advanced maternal age did not affect transperineal ultrasound-determined labor progress (P>.05). CONCLUSION: Parity, methods of labor induction, the use of epidural anesthesia, and obesity affect labor progress, which has been illustrated objectively by serial transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent.

Pre-Induction Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment for the Prediction of Labor Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To examine (1) the concordance of manual and automated para-symphyseal angle of progression (psAOP) measurements, (2) the repeatability of psAOP, head-symphysis distance, head-perineum distance, and sonographic cervical dilatation, and (3) the value of transperineal ultrasound (TPU) in predicting induction of labor (IOL) outcome. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 308 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL at term. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which maternal factors, Bishop score, method of IOL, and TPU parameters were significant predictors of cesarean section (CS) and CS due to no progress (CS-NP). RESULTS: There was vaginal delivery in 225 (83.0%) and CS in 46 (17.0%) cases. The intra-class correlation coefficient between manual and automated psAOP was 0.866, but automated psAOP was 4.6° wider than manual measurement. All TPU parameters had an inter-observer intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.800. Significant independent prediction of CS and CS-NP was provided by maternal factors, previous vaginal delivery, and psAOP. There was no improvement in area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve with the addition of psAOP to maternal factors. CONCLUSIONS: All TPU parameters are reproducible. Comparing the three TPU parameters for fetal head station, only psAOP is a significant independent predictor of CS; however, it is unlikely to be useful in predicting IOL outcome.