Asian herbal medicine for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review.

Asian herbal medicines have been known for decades, and some have been used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). This chronic and persistent inflammatory skin condition causes severe morbidity and negatively impacts the quality of life. In numerous trials, traditional Chinese medicines have demonstrated clinical efficacy for AD. However, there is no well-documented summary of the wide variety of Asian herbal medicines used in treating AD. We aimed to systematically summarize the use of Asian herbal medicine in AD. An English-language literature search was performed in three electronic medical databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost using keywords [("atopic dermatitis" OR "atopic eczema") AND ("traditional" OR "herbal")] and limited to references published between January 2015 and December 2022. The literature included newborns, infants, children, adolescents, and adults. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension to determine the main criteria. The content and inclusiveness of the search were filtered using relevant terms (MeSH/Emtree), keywords, titles, and abstracts. Thirteen articles (12 randomized clinical trial + 1 clinical trial) reported a variety of herbal medicine compounds to treat AD with various efficacy. Most studies reported significant improvement when comparing the herbal medicine with a placebo, but only 1 study reported substantial improvement of SCORAD compared to corticosteroids. Asian herbal medicines have been studied and may be used as an alternative treatment in treating AD with fewer adverse effects. However, its role did not change the position of standard treatment in treating atopic dermatitis.

Cutaneous Manifestation in COVID-19: A Lesson Over 2 Years Into the Pandemic.

Cutaneous manifestations related to Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) have been reported over 2 years since the pandemic began. This research aimed to review articles published in English that describe cutaneous manifestations related to COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. A data search for case reports, original studies, and review articles from the onset of the current COVID-19 pandemic to December 31, 2022, was performed using PUBMED, Cochrane Library, ResearchGate, and Google search engines. Keywords were "coronavirus", "novel coronavirus 2019", "COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", and "2019-nCoV" in combination with "cutaneous", "skin" and "dermatology" The extracted data included authors, region, sex, age, number of participants with skin signs, cutaneous signs, its location, symptoms, extracutaneous/associated symptoms, suspected or confirmed status for COVID-19, timeline, and healing duration. Six authors independently reviewed the abstracts and full-texts to identify publications providing these details concerning cutaneous manifestations related to COVID-19. A total of 139 publications with full text (122 case reports, 10 case series, and 7 review articles) that reported cutaneous manifestations were identified, and reviewed from 5 continents. The most common cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 were maculopapular, followed by chilblain-like lesion, urticarial, livedoid/necrotic, vesicular, and other/non-descript rashes/skin lesions. After 2 years into the COVID-19 pandemic, we can conclude that there is no pathognomonic cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19, since it can be also found in other viral infections.

High frequency of KRAS and EGFR mutation profiles in BRAF-negative thyroid carcinomas in Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid cancer incidence has steadily increased in Indonesia. However, data on Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) and EGFR mutations in thyroid cancer in Indonesia remain unavailable, except for BRAF-V600E, the most common BRAF gene mutation. This study aimed to analyze KRAS and EGFR mutation profiles in BRAF-V600E negative thyroid cancer samples. RESULTS: BRAF-V600E mutations were found in papillary thyroid carcinomas in 40.3% patients with mean age of 53 years old. In BRAF-V600E-negative samples, 41.3% had KRAS mutations with mean age of 55.5 years old. KRAS mutation was found in 52.6% of follicular carcinomas and 47.4% of papillary thyroid carcinomas. Additionally, 45.7% had EGFR mutations in patients with mean age of 50.5 years old. EGFR mutation was found in 71.4% of papillary thyroid carcinoma and 28.6% of follicular carcinoma. Nearly half of the BRAF-V600E negative thyroid carcinoma samples harbored either KRAS or EGFR mutations. This finding suggests that in BRAF-V600E negative thyroid carcinoma samples, testing for RAS and EGFR mutation may be warranted for further therapeutic consideration.