A comparison of the classic and a modified laryngeal mask airway (OPLAC™) in adult patients.

BACKGROUND: A modified disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (Oro-Pharyngo-Laryngeal Airway Cap, OPLAC™) was developed in our department. In this study, we compared the performance of the LMA Classic™ with that of the OPLAC. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-blinded, crossover study involving 60 paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients. Both devices were inserted into each patient in different sequences after anesthesia had been induced. In 30 patients, the LMA was inserted first and in 30 patients, the OPLAC was inserted first. The success rate, insertion time, fiberoptic view, peak airway pressure, sealing pressure, incidence of gastric insufflations, trace of blood on the device, and incidence of postoperative sore throat were evaluated. RESULTS: The success rate of placement on the first attempt was high for both devices. The insertion time was significantly shorter and better engagement was noted on fiberoptic view with the OPLAC than with the LMA. The sealing pressure was significantly higher and the incidence of gastric insufflations was significantly lower with the OPLAC. The overall incidence of sore throat was 13.33%. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices have comparable airflow resistance and are easy to insert. The OPLAC requires less insertion time, has less variation on insertion time, fits better into the laryngopharynx, is less likely to cause gastric insufflations, and has a higher sealing pressure.

Epidural cyst with cauda equina syndrome after epidural anesthesia.

A 40-year-old woman without remarkable medical history received epidural anesthesia for uterine cervix conization. Six hours after the operation, cauda equina syndrome occurred. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine revealed epidural fluid accumulation around L5, as well as L4/5 herniated intervertebral disc found incidentally. Surgical decompression was performed with H-reflex monitoring. Epidural injection could result in cystic accumulation complicated with cauda equina syndrome.

Management of postdural puncture headache by epidural saline delivered with a patient-controlled pump--a case report.

Unintentional dural puncture is the most frequent cause of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Conservative treatments of PDPH include bed rest, oral analgesics, and hydration. When conservative measures fail, epidural blood patch is an effective substitute. However, epidural blood patch carries some risks, such as subdural hematoma, pneumocephalus, exacerbation of PDPH and new dural puncture. Many patients may refuse the procedure due to the risks involved. We describe a female patient who had her PDPH successfully treated with epidural saline delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia device (Abbott Pain Management-APM) without molestation of her daily activities.

A 'membrane in syringe' technique that allows identification of the epidural space with saline while avoids injection of air into the epidural space.

BACKGROUND: The 'MEMBRANE IN SYRINGE' technique is, in principle, a modification of the loss of resistance technique for identifying the epidural space in epidural anaesthesia. A plastic membrane is placed halfway inside a syringe dividing the syringe into two compartments. The saline compartment encompasses the nozzle of the syringe (the distal compartment). The plunger is installed in the opposite half of the hallow cylinder. Air is trapped in the space between the membrane and the rubber plunger (air compartment). METHODS: There were altogether 20 epidural procedures to put to the test for this technique. The time spent in the undertaking of the procedure, the amount of normal saline injected, whether there was a feel of loss of resistance with wrinkling of the membrane in the syringe, inadvertent puncture of the dura, the level of epidural block and the insertion depth of epidural needle were recorded. RESULTS: The procedure took less than 4 minutes to complete in most of the cases. There was no inadvertent dural puncture. The average amount of normal saline injected was less than 1 ml. In 3 cases, despite the absence of the feel of loss of resistance the epidural space was still successfully identified by visible wrinkling of the membrane in the syringe. All catheters were inserted smoothly through the epidural needle and appropriate level of anesthesia was achieved in all the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of this technique is twofold. Firstly when the syringe is filled with both normal saline and air, it can prevent injection of the air into the epidural space during identification while at the same time it does not molest the feel of compressibility. Secondly, with the membrane separating the normal saline and air, correct placement of the needle tip can also be ascertained with loss of resistance while, as will be seen, the plastic membrane will wrinkle when saline is released into the epidural space.