Combination of optimized tissue engineering bone implantation with heel-strike like mechanical loading to repair segmental bone defect in New Zealand rabbits.

In this study, effects of combining optimized tissue engineering bone (TEB) implantation with heel-strike like mechanical loading to repair segmental bone defect in New Zealand rabbits were investigated. Physiological characteristics of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs), compact bone cells (CBCs), and bone marrow and compact bone coculture cells (BMMSC-CBCs) were compared to select the optimal seed cells for optimized TEB construction. Rabbits with segmental bone defects were treated in different ways (cancellous bone scaffold for group A, cancellous bone scaffold and mechanical loading for group B, optimized TEB for group C, optimized TEB and mechanical loading for group D, n = 4), and the bone repair were compared. BMMSC-CBCs showed better proliferation capacity than CBCs (p < 0.01) and stronger osteogenic differentiation ability than BMMSCs (p < 0.05). Heel-strike like mechanical loading improved proliferation and osteogenic differentiation ability and expression levels of TGFß1 as well as BMP2 of seed cells in vitro (p < 0.05). At week 12 post-operation, group D showed the best bone repair, followed by groups B and C, while group A finished last (p < 0.05). During week 4 to 12 post-operation, group D peaked in terms of expression levels of TGFß1, BMP2, and OCN, followed by groups B and C, while group A finished last (p < 0.05). Thus, BMMSC-CBCs showed good proliferation and osteogenic differentiation ability, and they were thought to be better as seed cells than BMMSCs and CBCs. The optimized TEB implantation combined with heel-strike like mechanical loading had a synergistic effect on bone defect healing, and enhanced expression of TGFß1 and BMP2 played an important role in this process.

Circular RNA atlas in osteoclast differentiation with and without alendronate treatment.

BACKGROUND: Alendronate (AL) is the most widely used bisphosphonate in the treatment of osteoporosis (OP). However, the role of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in the treatment of OP with AL remains unclear. METHODS: In this study, we showed that osteoclast (OC) precursors (OPCSs) could be induced into OCs with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) treatment. Subsequently, the OCs were treated with AL. OC differentiation-related biomarkers including RANK, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and cathepsin K (CTSK) were analyzed with TRAP staining, quantitative real-time (qPCR), and western blotting. Differentially expressed circRNAs (DECs) were identified among the OPCS, OC, and OC + AL groups. In addition, the expression levels of 10 DECs related to OC differentiation were verified by qPCR. RESULTS: TRAP staining showed that MCSF and RANKL treatment effectively induced OPCSs to differentiate into OCs. In addition, qPCR and western blot analysis revealed that the three biomarkers of OC (RANK, TRAP, and CTSK) were expressed significantly more in the OC group than those in the OPCS group. In contrast, the mRNA and protein expression levels of these three biomarkers decreased significantly in OCs treated with AL compared with those non-treated OCs. GO analysis of the DECs in the OPCS group vs. the OC group revealed that their functions were mainly related to cell, cell part, binding, and single-organism terms. KEGG analysis of the top 20 DECs in a comparison between the OPCS and OC groups showed that genes involved in mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling were the most common. Results of functional analyses of DECs in an OC vs. OC + AL comparison were similar to those in the OPCS vs. OC comparison. Finally, qPCR showed that, in the OC + AL vs. OC group comparison, the expression levels of seven and three DECs significantly decreased and increased, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Having successfully induced OPCSs to differentiate into OCs, we showed that AL suppresses the differentiation of OPCS into OC and that 10 DECs were involved in the regulation of this process. This indicates that these DECs might be important to the treatment of OP.

Co-culture of the bone and bone marrow: a novel way to obtain mesenchymal stem cells with enhanced osteogenic ability for fracture healing in SD rats.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have great potential for the repair and regeneration of bone fracture, but their optimal origins remain controversial. METHODS: Bone marrow-MSCs (BM-MSCs) and bone-bone marrow-MSCs (B-BM-MSCs) were isolated from 12 SD rats, and the morphology, MSC-associated markers, and proliferative capacity of these cells were compared using an inverted microscope, flow cytometry, and CCK-8 assays, respectively. After 14 days of osteoblastic induction, osteoblast phenotypes were detected by ALP and calcium nodule staining, and the expression of BMP-2 and TGF-ß1 was observed by western blotting. Then, the rat tibia fracture model was established with 3 groups (n = 6 per group), the control, BM-MSC, and B-BM-MSC groups. Computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed to evaluate fracture healing at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Finally, the fractured bones were removed at weeks 4 and 6, and HE staining was performed to evaluate fracture healing. RESULTS: Although the 2 types of MSCs shared the same cellular morphology and MSC-associated markers, B-BM-MSCs had a higher proliferative rate than BM-MSCs from day 9 to day 12 (p < 0.05), and the expression levels of ALP and calcium were obviously higher in B-BM-MSCs than in BM-MSCs after osteogenic induction (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Western blot results showed that the expression levels of BMP-2 and TGF-ß1 in B-BM-MSCs were higher than in BM-MSCs before and after osteogenic induction (p < 0.01). In the animal experiments, CT imaging and gross observation showed that B-BM-MSCs had a greater capacity than BM-MSCs to promote fracture healing, as the Lane-Sandhu scores of B-BM-MSCs at weeks 4 and 6 after operation (3.00 ± 0.81 and 9.67 ± 0.94, respectively) were higher than those of BM-MSCs (1.33 ± 0.47 and 6.67 ± 1.25, respectively; both p < 0.05). The HE staining results further supported this conclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our study results proved that MSCs obtained by co-culturing the bone and bone marrow from SD rats had better proliferative, osteogenic differentiation, and fracture healing capacities than BM-MSCs, perhaps suggesting a novel way to obtain MSCs for bone tissue repair.

[Effect of stromal cell-derived factor 1α/cysteine X cysteine receptor 4 signaling pathway on axial stress stimulation promoting bone regeneration].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the change of stromal cell-derived factor 1α/cysteine X cysteine receptor 4 (SDF-1α/CXCR4) signaling pathway during the process of axial stress stimulation promoting bone regeneration, and to further explore its mechanism. METHODS: A total of 72 male New Zealand white rabbits were selected to prepare the single cortical bone defect in diameter of 8 mm at the proximal end of the right tibia that repaired with deproteinized cancellous bone. All models were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n=24). Group A was treated with intraperitoneally injection of PBS; Group B was treated with stress stimulation and intraperitoneally injection of PBS; Group C was treated with stress stimulation and intraperitoneally injection of AMD3100 solution. The X-ray films were taken and Lane-Sandhu scores of bone healing were scored at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, while specimens were harvested for HE staining, immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CXCR4, and Western blot (SDF-1α and CXCR4). The bone healing area was scanned by Micro-CT at 12 weeks after operation, and the volume and density of new bone were calculated. RESULTS: X-ray film showed that the Lane-Sandhu scores of bone healing in group B were significantly higher than those in groups A and C at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation ( P<0.05). Micro-CT scan showed that the bone defect was repaired in group B and the pulp cavity was re-passed at 12 weeks after operation. The volume and density of new bone were higher in group B than in groups A and C ( P<0.05). HE staining showed that the new bone growth in bone defect area and the degradation of scaffolds were faster in group B than in groups A and C after 4 weeks. The immunohistochemical staining showed that the expressions of VEGF and CXCR4 in 3 groups reached the peak at 4 weeks, and group B was higher than groups A and C ( P<0.05). Western blot analysis showed that the expressions of SDF-1α and CXCR4 in group B were significantly higher than those in groups A and C at 4 and 8 weeks after operation ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Axial stress stimulation can promote the expression of SDF-1α in bone defect tissue, activate and regulate the CXCR4 signal collected by marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and accelerate bone regeneration in bone defect area.