Lewis blood genotypes of peptic ulcer and gastric cancer patients in Taiwan.

AIM: The Lewis b (Le(b)) antigen has been implicated as a possible binding site for attachment of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) to gastric mucosa. However, studies both supporting and denying this association have been reported in the literature. Differences in secretor (Se) genotype have been suggested as a possible reason for previous discrepancies. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between Le and Se genotypes and H pylori infection rates in people with peptic ulcer or gastric cancer. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 347 patients with endoscopic evidence of peptic ulcer disease (235 cases of duodenal ulcer, 62 of gastric ulcer, and 50 of combined duodenal ulcer/ gastric ulcer) and 51 patients with gastric cancer on endoscopy. Peripheral blood specimens from 101 unrelated normal volunteers were used as controls. Lewis phenotype was determined using an antibody method, whereas Le and Se genotypes were determined by DNA amplification and restriction enzyme analysis. Gastric or duodenal biopsies taken from patients with endoscopic evidence of peptic ulcer or gastric cancer were cultured for H pylori. Isolates were identified as H pylori by morphology and production of urease and catalase. The H pylori infection status was also evaluated by rapid urease test (CLO test), and urea breath test ((13)C-UBT). Results of studies were analyzed by chi-square test (taken as significant). RESULTS: H pylori was isolated from 83.7% (303/347) of patients with peptic ulcer disease. Statistical analysis did not show any significant difference in Lewis phenotype or genotype between patients with and without H pylori infection. No significant association was found between Lewis genotype and peptic ulcer or gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: Lewis blood genotype or phenotype may not play a role in the pathogenesis of H pylori infection. However, bacterial strain differences and the presence of more than one attachment mechanism may limit the value of epidemiological studies in elucidating this matter.

Metastases from gastric carcinoma to colon in the form of multiple flat elevated lesions: a case report.

Gastric carcinoma is a common malignancy worldwide. Advanced stages of the disease may result in metastases to many other organs of the body. However, colonic metastases are rare. We report a case of gastric carcinoma with symptoms of abdominal fullness and weight loss. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen level was elevated. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed giant folds occupying the whole gastric body and poor expansion of the stomach. Histologic examination of biopsy specimens from the giant fold demonstrated poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring-cell differentiation. Total colonoscopy revealed five or six discrete flat elevated lesions in the distal transverse, descending, and sigmoid colons. These lesions were characterized by a clear margin of 3-5 mm in diameter and erosions on the tips. Polypectomy specimens demonstrated signet ring-cell carcinoma, which was histologically similar to the specimens taken from the gastric lesion. We conclude that this was a rare case in which gastric signet ring-cell carcinoma had metastasized to the colon in the form of flat elevated lesions, combined with rapid and wide lymphatic spread to the thorax and abdomen in a clinical course as short as 46 days.

MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a non-invasive technique for examination of the biliopancreatic tract. Respiratory-triggered 3-dimensional turbo spin echo (3DTSE RT) and breath-hold thick slab single-shot turbo spin echo (ssTSE BH) are both useful MRCP techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare these 2 sequences with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with biliary tract disease. METHODS: Forty four patients with suspected biliary obstruction were recruited to receive MRCP within 3 days before ERCP. MRCP was performed using both 3DTSE RT with maximum intensity projection images and ssTSE BH. ERCP was performed and assessed by 2 endoscopists. RESULTS: MRCP was successfully performed in all patients, whereas ERCP failed in 6 patients (13.6%). MRCP was effective in detecting the presence of choledocholithiasis in 13 of 14 patients, ERCP in 12 of 12, and 2 failed ERCP. MRCP was effective in detecting benign biliary obstruction in 18 of 19 patients, and ERCP in 15 of 15, but 4 patients failed ERCP and choledocholithiasis was misdiagnosed by MRCP in 1 patient. Both MRCP and ERCP correctly diagnosed malignant bile duct obstruction in 10 of 11 patients, and both misdiagnosed that condition as benign obstruction in 1 patient. There was no significant difference between MRCP and successful ERCP in detecting lesions. MRCP was significantly better than ERCP when both successful and failed ERCP were encountered (p = 0.0498). Both 3DTSE RT and ssTSE BH produced the same results in depicting the biliary ducts and lesions in 37 patients (84.1%). Four patients (9.1%) showed better images on 3DTSE RT, whereas 3 patients (6.8%) showed better images on ssTSE BH. CONCLUSIONS: 3DTSE RT and the ssTSE BH were complementary to each other in MRCP studies. Using these 2 techniques, MRCP has a high successful rate and diagnostic accuracy when compared with ERCP in detecting bile duct disease.