Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 45(10): 1203-10, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20521871

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide. The aims of the current study were to determine the fecal carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic treatment in surgical patients admitted to hospital due to acute intra-abdominal infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight Swedish surgical units participated in this prospective multicenter investigation. Rectal swabs were obtained on admission to hospital. Cultures were performed on chromogenic agar and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-phenotype was confirmed by Etest. RESULTS: Rectal samples were obtained and analyzed from 208 patients with intra-abdominal surgical infections. Surgery was performed in 134 patients (65%). Cephalosporins were the most frequently used empirical antibiotic therapy. The highest rates of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae were detected for ampicillin (54%), tetracycline (26%), cefuroxime (26%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (20%). The prevalence of decreased susceptibility (I + R) for the other antibiotics tested was for ciprofloxacin 20%, piperacillin-tazobactam 17%, cefotaxime 14%, ertapenem 12%, gentamicin 3% and imipenem 0%. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were found in samples from 10 patients (5%). Three patients had five E. coli isolates producing AmpC enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high rate of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae against antibiotics which are commonly used in Sweden and should have implications for the future choice of antibiotics for surgical patients.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/microbiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Bactérias Aeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Anaeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Abdome Agudo/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Aeróbias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Anaeróbias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Amostragem , Centros Cirúrgicos , Suécia/epidemiologia
2.
Scand J Urol Nephrol ; 43(6): 437-41, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19707953

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In the European Association of Urology guidelines on prostate cancer an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND) is now recommended, instead of a dissection limited to the obturator fossae (lPLND). This recommendation relies on studies reporting that metastatic disease is identified twice as often with ePLND as with lPLND, with only moderately increased complications. However, these studies were from high-volume centres. This study investigated whether these results could be repeated in a hospital with lower surgical volume, more typical for the Nordic countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2002 to September 2007 172 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and PLND at the University Hospital of Lund, 108 with ePLND and 64 with lPLND. Perioperative complications and the number of lymph-node metastases found were registered. RESULTS: A median of 17 lymph nodes was identified with ePLND compared with seven with lPLND. Metastases were identified in four out of 64 patients in the lPLND group (6%), versus 22 out of 108 in the ePLND group (20%). In the ePLND group 10 of the patients with metastases had such exclusively outside the obturator fossae. Complications were significantly more common after ePLND (p=0.007): lymphoceles (18 vs 9%), pulmonary embolism (4.6 vs 1.6%), deep venous thrombosis (1 vs 1.5%) and other (haematomas and infectious including sepsis (8 vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the patients with metastases are misclassified by lPLND. Complications are significantly more common after ePLND. This implies that ePLND should be performed, but in selected patients and by high-volume surgeons only.


Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Linfocele/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Noruega , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...