Automated data extraction tool (DET) for external applications in radiotherapy.

Oncological Information Systems (OIS) manage information in radiotherapy (RT) departments. Due to database structure limitations, stored information can rarely be directly used except for vendor-specific purposes. Our aim is to enable the use of such data in various external applications by creating a tool for automatic data extraction, cleaning and formatting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used OIS data from a nine-linac RT department in Sweden (70 weeks, 2015-16). Extracted data included patients' referrals and appointments with details for RT sub-tasks. The data extraction tool to prepare the data for external use was built in C# programming language. It used excel-automation queries to remove unassigned/duplicated values, substitute missing data and perform application-specific calculations. Descriptive statistics were used to verify the output with the manually prepared dataset from the corresponding time period. RESULTS: From the initial raw data, 2030 (51 %)/907 (23 %) patients had known curative and palliative treatment intent for 84 different cancer diagnoses. After removal of incomplete entries, 373 (10 %) patients had unknown treatment intents which were substituted based on the known curative/palliative ratio. Automatically- and manuallyprepared datasets differed < 1 % for Mould, Treatment planning, Quality assurance and ± 5 % for Fractions and Magnetic resonance imaging with overestimations in 80/140 (57 %) entries by the tool. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented a software tool to prepare ready-to-use OIS datasets for external applications. Our evaluations showed overall results close to the manually-prepared dataset. The time taken to prepare the dataset using our automated strategy can reduce the time for manual preparation from weeks to seconds.

Linear accelerator utilization: Concept and tool to aid the scheduling of patients for radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Resources in radiotherapy (RT) need to be used effectively to meet the current clinical demand. The aim of this data-driven study is to identify temporal trends in the scheduling of patients for RT and to develop a tool for a visual overview of future scheduling levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Scheduling data at an eight-linac modern RT department in Sweden were collected twice daily for planned and observed linac use in 2018-2020. Information was retrieved each day for the present (Day 0) and the forthcoming 100 weekdays with total linac utilization rates (LURs) calculated for two activity categories: treatment and non-treatment. An in-house tool based on the LUR concept, database queries from the oncology information system (OIS)/automatic calculations was developed and evaluated by RT managers and scheduling staff (n = 10). RESULTS: Overall median LURs were 87%/89% (planned/observed; p < 0.01) with more frequent and larger daily increase for non-treatment activities compared with treatment activities. LUR increased with shorter planning horizons and reached 100% for fully-operating linacs ≈3 weeks before Day 0. The tool was reported by 88% to ease the work and to contribute towards an even scheduling of patients (responses: 8/10). CONCLUSION: Alterations from a planned RT schedule occurs frequently. Having a tool that helps to reduce the abundance of booking information into clinically relevant overviews promise to increase the understanding of present and future scheduling levels. Our proposed concept and tool suggest that this is a feasible approach to schedule patients for RT more evenly.

Resource planning principles for the radiotherapy process using simulations applied to a longer vacation period use case.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) resources need to be used wisely to balance workload and patient throughput. There are no known strategies on how to plan resource use around longer vacation periods to avoid patient waiting times. We created a simulation model over the RT workflow to evaluate different scenarios for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The simulation model mimics a large modern RT department in Sweden. It was based on real data on patient referral patterns and resource use extracted from clinical systems (3666 treatment courses). Workshops with managers and staff were held to investigate nine different scenarios for the summer vacation period including one scenario to validate the model. Different capacity reductions, vacation period lengths and timing of the vacation periods between the preparatory part of the RT workflow and the treatment part were evaluated. RESULTS: For an eight-week period, resource utilization was predicted to be high both before and after the vacation period regardless of timing. However, more patients would be waiting with completed preparations with simultaneous vacation periods than when the preparatory part started one-two weeks prior to the treatment part. With shorter vacation periods, treatment would require overtime during the vacation period with higher levels of patients waiting compared to an eight-week scenario. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed strategy aided managers to identify a preferred scenario for the summer vacation period with the preparatory part starting one-two weeks prior to the treatment part for an eight-week vacation period. This can help other RT departments to plan for similar situations.

An analytical approach to aggregate patient inflows to a simulation model over the radiotherapy process.

BACKGROUND: In meeting input data requirements for a system dynamics (SD) model simulating the radiotherapy (RT) process, the number of patient care pathways (RT workflows) needs to be kept low to simplify the model without affecting the overall performance. A large RT department can have more than 100 workflows, which results in a complex model structure if each is to be handled separately. Here we investigated effects on model performance by reducing the number of workflows for a model of the preparatory steps of the RT process. METHODS: We created a SD model sub-structure capturing the preparatory RT process. Real data for patients treated in 2015-2016 at a modern RT department in Sweden were used. RT workflow similarity was quantified by averaged pairwise utilization rate differences (%) and the size of corresponding correlation coefficients (r). Grouping of RT workflows was determined using two accepted strategies (80/20 Pareto rule; merging all data into one group) and a customized algorithm with r≥0.75:0.05:0.95 as criteria for group inclusion by two strategies (A1 and A2). Number of waiting patients for each grouping strategy were compared to the reference of all workflows handled separately. RESULTS: There were 128 RT workflows for 3209 patients during the studied period. The 80/20 Pareto rule resulted in 14/8/21 groups for curative/palliative/disregarding treatment intent. Correspondingly, A1 and A2 resulted in 7-40/≤4-36/7-82 groups depending on r cutoff. Results for the Pareto rule and A2 at r≥85 were comparable to the reference. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a simulation model over the RT process will depend on the grouping strategy of patient input data. Either the Pareto rule or the grouping of patients by resource use can be expected to better reflect overall departmental effects to various changes than when merging all data into one group. Our proposed approach to identify groups based on similarity in resource use can potentially be used in any setting with variable incoming flows of objects which go through a multi-step process comparable to RT where the aim is to reduce the complexity of associated model structures without compromising with overall performance.

A national perspective about the current work situation at modern radiotherapy departments.

BACKGROUND: The radiotherapy (RT) community faces great challenges to meet the growing cancer incidence, especially regarding workload and recruitment of personnel. Workflow-related issues affect involved professions differently since they have specific expertise and various roles in the workflow. To obtain an objective understanding of the current working situation and identify workflow bottle necks in RT, we conducted a national survey on this topic in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 17 (photon-based) RT departments in Sweden were invited to participate in the study, which targeted both managers and employees in RT. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each profession and for small, medium and large departments (2/3-4/≥5 linacs). RESULTS: Altogether, 364 filled-in questionnaires were returned (32/332 managers/employees; 94% response rate). Managers reported a general need for more staff (all professions). Small departments reported no problems with waiting times (0/3); whereas 2/3 of medium and large departments did (medium: 5/8, large: 2/3). All professions had a positive attitude towards working in RT (mean = 86%, 0/100%=negative/positive attitude). Organizational issues were ranked highest among reoccurring events that were most frustrating/had most negative effect on the work environment. The most severe workflow-related problems were reported to originate at contouring. CONCLUSION: Future efforts to improve the modern RT workflow need to focus on how to make positive mechanisms at small departments useful in larger settings. Our data also reveal that strong leadership and improved routines at contouring are warranted by all RT professions to reduce frustration related to organizational issues and to increase work effectivity.