RESUMO
Despite therapeutic advances in the prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia, acute leukemia (AL) patients still have considerable febrile neutropenia-related mortality. However, the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in acute leukemia patients is unclear. In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed 88 BAL samples of patients with acute leukemia and pulmonary infiltrates in spite of treatment with broad-spectrum anti-infective agents. The aim was to investigate the impact of FB with BAL on detecting causative organisms, which would result in a change in treatment regimens. The median age was 59 years, and 86% had acute myeloid leukemia. In 47%, pathogens were detectable in BAL fluid (pathogen bacteria, viruses, and fungi in 2, 15, and 18%, respectively), with Aspergillus fumigatus detected most frequently. BAL-guided anti-infective therapy changes were performed in 15%. The detection of herpes simplex and influenza viruses were the main reasons for treatment changes. Despite broad-spectrum anti-infective treatment, in approximately half of all patients, pathogens could still be isolated in BAL samples. However, consecutive changes in anti-infective treatment were considerably less frequent, with most changes performed in patients with Herpes simplex virus and Influenza A detection. The need for FB with BAL in patients with AL receiving broad-spectrum empiric anti-infective treatment should therefore be weighed carefully.
RESUMO
Severe infectious complications remain the main cause of mortality in leukemia patients due to a long period of profound neutropenia. Standardized regimens for antimicrobial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis and therapy in neutropenic patients have improved infection-associated mortality. Nevertheless, many patients are refractory to these multidrug approaches. Tigecycline is a last-resort antibiotic with a broad-spectrum activity; unfortunately, clinical experience in multidrug-resistant febrile neutropenia is limited. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of tigecycline treatment in comparison to standard treatment in this patient cohort. In this single center analysis, we analyzed the clinical courses of 73 patients with acute leukemia and diagnosis of febrile neutropenia resistant to hospital-based multidrug escalation levels who continued on a standard approach without antibiotics as the last resort (n = 30) or were switched to tigecycline in addition to carbapenem treatment (n = 43). We observed comparable overall response rates (decrease in C-reactive protein or resolution of fever) in both patient cohorts. Switching the antibiotic approach to tigecycline showed lower absolute sepsis (33% vs. 47%, p = 0.235) and infection-associated mortality rates (5% vs. 13%, p = 0.221). Prospective larger randomized studies are necessary to underline these results and to be able to generate reliable statistics.
