Voriconazole pharmacokinetics in liver transplant recipients.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole and the potential correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and patient variables in liver transplant patients on a fixed-dose prophylactic regimen. Multiple blood samples were collected within one dosing interval from 15 patients who were initiated on a prophylactic regimen of voriconazole at 200 mg enterally (tablets) twice daily starting immediately posttransplant. Voriconazole plasma concentrations were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean apparent systemic clearance over bioavailability (CL/F), apparent steady-state volume of distribution over bioavailability (Vss/F), and half-life (t1/2) were 5.8+/-5.5 liters/h, 94.5+/-54.9 liters, and 15.7+/-7.0 h, respectively. There was a good correlation between the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-infinity) and trough voriconazole plasma concentrations. t1/2, maximum drug concentration in plasma (Cmax), trough level, AUC0-infinity, area under the first moment of the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUMC0-infinity), and mean residence time from 0 h to infinity (MRT0-infinity) were significantly correlated with postoperative time. t1/2, lambda, AUC0-infinity, and CL/F were significantly correlated with indices of liver function (aspartate transaminase [AST], total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio [INR]). The Cmax, last concentration in plasma at 12 h (Clast), AUMC0-infinity, and MRT0-infinity were significantly lower in the presence of deficient CYP2C19*2 alleles. Donor characteristics had no significant correlation with any of the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated. A fixed dosing regimen of voriconazole results in a highly variable exposure of voriconazole in liver transplant patients. Given that trough voriconazole concentration is a good measure of drug exposure (AUC), the voriconazole dose can be individualized based on trough concentration measurements in liver transplant patients.

Cryptococcosis in liver and kidney transplant recipients receiving anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab.

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and alemtuzumab have been used for induction or preconditioning and for the treatment of acute rejection in organ transplant recipients in many centers. Such regimens may lead to a substantial decline in the CD4 lymphocyte count to levels seen in other population groups at high risk of cryptococcosis. In view of this, we examined the impact of such therapy on the cumulative incidence of cryptococcosis among liver and kidney recipients. A total of 834 liver and 727 kidney transplants were performed during the study period. Seven hundred and eighty-one patients did not receive ATG or alemtuzumab; 646 received 1 dose of either drug, and 134 patients received 2 doses of either drug. The cumulative incidence of cryptococcosis was 0.26% (2/781) among those who did not receive ATG or alemtuzumab; 0.3% (2/646) among those who received only 1 dose, and 2.24% (3/134) among those who received 2 doses (P=0.03). There were 5 cases of cryptococcosis in liver recipients and 2 in kidney recipients. There were 3 cases of cryptococcal meningitis, 3 of pneumonia, and 1 of disseminated disease. The 2 kidney recipients had meningitis. Diagnosis occurred at a median of 255 days (range 7-517) after transplantation. The mortality rate was 14.2%. We conclude that the use of 1 dose of ATG or alemtuzumab is not associated with an increased cumulative incidence of cryptococcosis, but that those patients receiving 2 doses are at increased risk.

Determinants of vancomycin resistance and mortality rates in enterococcal bacteremia. a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Enterococcus species are major nosocomial pathogens and are exhibiting vancomycin resistance with increasing frequency. Previous studies have not resolved whether vancomycin resistance is an independent risk factor for death in patients with invasive disease due to Enterococcus species or whether antibiotic therapy alters the outcome of enterococcal bacteremia. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vancomycin resistance is an independent predictor of death in patients with enterococcal bacteremia and whether appropriate antimicrobial therapy influences outcome. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Four academic medical centers and a community hospital. PATIENTS: All patients with enterococcal bacteremia. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics; underlying disease; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores; antibiotic therapy, immunosuppression, and procedures before onset; and antibiotic therapy during the ensuing 6 weeks. The major end point was 14-day survival. RESULTS: Of 398 episodes, 60% were caused by E. faecalis and 37% were caused by E. faecium. Thirty-seven percent of isolates exhibited resistance or intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin. Twenty-two percent of E. faecium isolates showed reduced susceptibility to quinupristin-dalfopristin. Previous vancomycin use (odds ratio [OR], 5.82 [95% CI, 3.20 to 10.58]; P < 0.001), previous corticosteroid use (OR, 2.43 [CI, 1.22 to 4.86]; P = 0.01), and total APACHE II score (OR, 1.06 per unit change [CI, 1.02 to 1.10 per unit change]; P = 0.003) were associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia. The mortality rate was 19% at 14 days. Hematologic malignancy (OR, 3.83 [CI, 1.56 to 9.39]; P = 0.003), vancomycin resistance (OR, 2.10 [CI, 1.14 to 3.88]; P = 0.02), and APACHE II score (OR, 1.10 per unit change [CI, 1.05 to 1.14 per unit change]; P < 0.001) were associated with 14-day mortality. Among patients with monomicrobial enterococcal bacteremia, receipt of effective antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours independently predicted survival (OR for death, 0.21 [CI, 0.06 to 0.80]; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin resistance is an independent predictor of death from enterococcal bacteremia. Early, effective antimicrobial therapy is associated with a significant improvement in survival.

Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections with quinupristin/dalfopristin.

Clinicians caring for patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections face severe constraints in the selection of treatment. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) is active in vitro against VREF, with a MIC(90) of 1.0 microg/mL. We investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of this agent in a multicenter, prospective, noncomparative, emergency-use study of 396 patients. Patients were included if they had signs and symptoms of active infection, including bacteremia of unknown origin, intra-abdominal infection, and skin and skin-structure infection, with no alternative antibiotic therapy available. The mean duration of treatment was 20 days (range, 4-40 days). The clinical response rate was 68.8% in the evaluable subset, and the overall response rate was 65.6%. The most common adverse events related to quinupristin/dalfopristin were arthralgias and myalgias. Related laboratory abnormalities were rare. In this severely ill patient population, quinupristin/dalfopristin was efficacious and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of VREF infection.

Hyperbilirubinemia during quinupristin-dalfopristin therapy in liver transplant recipients: correlation with available liver biopsy results.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the liver histopathology in transplant recipients who developed hyperbilirubinemia during therapy with quinupristin-dalfopristin, a new streptogramin antibiotic, and to ascertain whether objective histologic evidence of adverse drug effect could be correlated to serum bilirubin levels. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. PATIENTS: From a database of 34 liver recipients who received quinupristin-dalfopristin for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infection who were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, emergency-use protocol, the data for a subset of 25 patients who underwent one or more liver biopsies during therapy were reviewed for this study. INTERVENTIONS: Quinupristin-dalfopristin was administered intravenously at 7.5 mg/kg every 8 hours. Available serum bilirubin levels from before, during, and 1 week after therapy were tabulated. Liver biopsy results obtained within 1 week before and during therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Histopathologic results were characterized and correlated to bilirubin level. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cholestatic changes were already present in 15 of 17 patients who underwent biopsy before therapy. During therapy, the most common findings from 40 biopsies (25 patients) were cholestasis (33 biopsies), acute rejection (10), and periportal inflammation (8). There was no evidence of drug-specific histopathologic injury. CONCLUSION: Hyperbilirubinemia in these patients was likely multifactorial and most frequently due to sepsis and prior graft injury.

The efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin for the treatment of infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Synercid Emergency-Use Study Group.

A progressive increase in the incidence of vancomycin resistance in strains of Enterococcus faecium (VREF) has severely constrained treatment options for patients with infection caused by this emerging pathogen. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), the first injectable streptogramin antibiotic, is active in vitro against VREF, with an MIC90 of 1.0 mg/L. We studied the clinical efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of VREF infection. Two prospective studies were conducted simultaneously. The first enrolled only patients with VREF infection; the second included patients with infection caused by other gram-positive bacterial pathogens in addition to VREF. Patients were enrolled if they had signs and symptoms of active infection and no appropriate alternative antibiotic therapy. The recommended treatment regimen of quinupristin/dalfopristin was 7.5 mg/kg i.v. every 8 h for a duration judged appropriate by the investigator. A total of 396 patients with VREF infection were enrolled. The most frequent indications for treatment included intra-abdominal infection, bacteraemia of unknown origin, urinary tract infection, catheter-related bacteraemia, and skin and skin structure infection. This patient population had a high prevalence of severe underlying illness, including a history of diabetes mellitus, transplantation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, chronic liver disease with cirrhosis and oncological disorders. The mean (+/- S.D.) duration of treatment was 14.5 +/- 10.7 days (range: 1-108). The majority of patients (82.1%) were treated every 8 h, as assessed on day 2 of treatment, while 15.9% were treated every 12 h. The clinical success rate was 73.6% [142/193 clinically evaluable patients; 95% confidence interval (CI): 67.4%, 79.8%], the bacteriological success rate 70.5% (110/156 bacteriologically evaluable patients; 95% CI: 63.4%, 77.7%) and the overall success (both clinical and bacteriological success) rate 65.8% (102/156 bacteriologically evaluable patients; 95% CI: 57.9%, 72.9%). VREF bacteraemia at entry, mechanical ventilation and laparotomy were associated with a worse outcome. Quinupristin/dalfopristin was generally well tolerated. The most common systemic adverse events related to treatment were arthralgias (9.1%) and myalgias (6.6%). Related laboratory abnormalities were infrequent. In these severely ill patients with VREF infection and no other clinically appropriate therapeutic alternatives, quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrated substantial efficacy and a good nervous system, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic tolerability.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: the clinical effect of a common nosocomial pathogen.

Enterococcus spp. is now the third most common pathogen among hospitalized patients, accounting for nearly 12% of nosocomial infections. Enterococcus faecalis is the most prevalent enterococcal species (85%-89%), whereas Enterococcus faecium accounts for 10%-15% of enterococcal isolates. Only 5% of E. faecalis isolates are resistant to glycopeptides. E. faecium has also been shown to be resistant to nonglycopeptide compounds, such as penicillins (97%), high-level gentamicin (52.1%), and high-level streptomycin (58.3%). Numerous risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have been identified, including as length of hospital- or ICU-stay, proximity to a hospitalized, colonized VRE, patient severity of illness, renal failure, recent surgery, immunosuppression, and organ recipient status. An important risk factor is prior exposure to antibiotics such as vancomycin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and metronidazole, as well as the number and duration of recent antibiotics. Interventions to reduce nosocomial VRE cross-transmission have also been studied. Using gowns in addition to gloves diminished the incidence of VRE in one study, but had a negligible effect in a second study. Studies have shown that in many cases (> 60%) vancomycin usage is inappropriate. While controlling the use of vancomycin alone has only variably diminished VRE colonization, other efforts such as narrowing the spectrum of antibiotics, antiseptics, and reducing immunosuppression may be salutary. Attempts to eradicate VRE intestinal carriage with enteral agents (bacitracin, tetracycline + rifampin, novobiocin) have been reported but seem to have only a transient effect. Non-antimicrobial interventions such as removal of intravenous or bladder catheters and/or surgical or percutaneous drainage may be beneficial. In addition, the development of new antimicrobial agents such as streptogramins, glycopeptides, everninomicins, and oxazalididones will hopefully play an important role in reducing morbidity from these pathogens.

Clinical implications of nosocomial gram-positive bacteremia and superimposed antimicrobial resistance.

The coexistence of a pathogen population with an ever-increasing resistance to many antibiotics and a patient population characterized by increasingly complex clinical problems has contributed to an increase in the bloodstream infections associated with gram-positive bacteria. This serious therapeutic challenge has already been associated with an increase in infection-related morbidity and mortality, a prolongation of hospital stays, and an escalation of healthcare costs. Vancomycin resistance, long prevalent among the enterococci, has emerged in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Several cases of infection caused by S. aureus strains with intermediate-level resistance to vancomycin (MIC=8 microg/mL) have recently been reported. As glycopeptide resistance accelerates among the gram-positive bacteria, so does the potential for adverse clinical consequences associated with bloodstream infections caused by these pathogens. The patients least able to tolerate the effects of uncontrolled bloodstream infections are also those at the highest risk for the development of infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant pathogens. In this at-risk population, a poor outcome may be anticipated if effective antibiotic therapy is unavailable. Appropriate rationing of vancomycin and other antimicrobial agents that increase the selection of antibiotic-resistant strains of gram-positive bacteria and the rapid development of novel antimicrobial agents with reliable gram-positive activity must be immediate priorities if the threat posed by glycopeptide-resistant gram-positive pathogens is to be countered.

Effect of quinupristin/dalfopristin on the outcome of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: comparison with a control cohort.

Serious infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) strains has no proven effective antimicrobial therapy. We compared the clinical and bacteriological outcomes of 20 patients with VREF bacteraemia treated with quinupristin/dalfopristin (RP 59500), an investigational streptogramin, with a historical cohort of 42 patients with VREF bacteraemia treated with other agents. Quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrated in-vitro bacteriostatic activity against all 20 initial VREF blood isolates (MIC range 0.03-0.50 mg/L) by macrobroth dilution. The clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable for major outcome-dependent variables. There were five cases of recurrent VREF bacteraemia in the quinupristin/dalfopristin-treated cohort and 21 in the controls (P = 0.11); persistence of VREF at the primary site was found in six and 18 of the evaluable patients with follow-up cultures in these two cohorts (P = 0.06). In-hospital mortality was high in both groups: 65% in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group and 52% in the control group; however, VREF-associated mortality was significantly lower in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group (five and 17 respectively; P = 0.05). Follow-up susceptibility testing of five VREF isolates in the quinupristin/ dalfopristin group did not demonstrate resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin. Quinupristin/ dalfopristin may be a useful agent for the therapy of serious VREF infection. Further clinical investigations are warranted to confirm or refute its clinical efficacy.

Differences in outcomes for patients with bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium.

To determine the differences in outcome in cases of enterococcal bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant organisms, we compared consecutive patients on a liver transplant service who had clinically significant bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) (n = 54) with a contemporaneous cohort of patients who had vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (VSEF) bacteremia (n = 48). VREF bacteremia occurred significantly later in the hospitalization than did VSEF bacteremia (43 days vs. 24 days, respectively; P < .01); in addition, VREF was more frequently the sole blood pathogen isolated (91% of patients) than was VSEF (56% of patients) (P = .0002). Invasive interventions for intraabdominal and intrathoracic infection were required more often in the VREF cohort than in the VSEF cohort (34 of 45 patients vs. 20 of 41 patients, respectively; P = .01). Vancomycin resistance more frequently resulted in recurrent bacteremia (22 of 54 patients infected with VREF vs. 7 of 48 patients infected with VSEF; P = .006), persistent isolation of Enterococcus species at the primary site (27 of 33 patients infected with VREF vs. 7 of 18 patients infected with VSEF; P = .005), and endovascular infection (4 patients infected with VREF vs. none infected with VSEF). The decrement in patient survival, as measured from the last bacteremic episode, was greater in the VREF cohort (P = .02). Vancomycin resistance, shock, and liver failure were independent risk factors for Enterococcus-associated mortality. Higher rates of refractory infection, serious morbidity, and attributable death occurred in the VREF cohort and were partially mediated by the lack of effective antimicrobial therapy.

The influence of clinical study design on cost-effectiveness projections for the treatment of gram-negative sepsis with human anti-endotoxin antibody.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the effect of entry criteria, patient population, and study design on outcome and projected cost-effectiveness of human anti-endotoxin antibody (HA-1A). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected or documented gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) with sepsis syndrome or shock received HA-1A during an open-label protocol. The patient characteristics and outcome measures of this series were compared with those of a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) of HA-1A. Both data sets were subjected to three published cost-effectiveness models of anti-endotoxin therapy, which were derived from RCT data. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients (43 with gram-negative bacteremia) received HA-1A during a 19-month open-label protocol. Comparison with the RCT results demonstrated greater severity of illness and higher 28-day mortality in the open-label protocol. When projected for open-label recipients, HA-1A was considerably less cost-effective than in the original projections based on RCT-derived data. This reduction in cost-effectiveness was consistent across all three models and their respective sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Extrapolating cost-effectiveness from RCT-derived analyses to open-label usage may yield widely inaccurate projections because of only small differences in patient population and the drug administration protocol.