Coordinate changes in Myosin heavy chain isoform gene expression are selectively associated with alterations in dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype.

BACKGROUND: The most common cause of chronic heart failure in the US is secondary or primary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The DCM phenotype exhibits changes in the expression of genes that regulate contractile function and pathologic hypertrophy. However, it is unclear if any of these alterations in gene expression are disease producing or modifying. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One approach to providing evidence for cause-effect of a disease-influencing gene is to quantitatively compare changes in phenotype to changes in gene expression by employing serial measurements in a longitudinal experimental design. We investigated the quantitative relationships between changes in gene expression and phenotype n 47 patients with idiopathic DCM. In endomyocardial biopsies at baseline and 6 months later, we measured mRNA expression of genes regulating contractile function (beta-adrenergic receptors, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2) + ATPase, and alpha- and beta-myosin heavy chain isoforms) or associated with pathologic hypertrophy (beta-myosin heavy chain and atrial natriuretic peptide), plus beta-adrenergic receptor protein expression. Left ventricular phenotype was assessed by radionuclide ejection fraction. RESULTS: Improvement in DCM phenotype was directly related to a coordinate increase in alpha- and a decrease in beta-myosin heavy chain mRNA expression. In contrast, modification of phenotype was unrelated to changes in the expression of beta(1)- or beta(2)-adrenergic receptor mRNA or protein, or to the mRNA expression of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2) + ATPase and atrial natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in human DCM, phenotypic modification is selectively associated with myosin heavy chain isoform changes. These data support the hypothesis that myosin heavy chain isoform changes contribute to disease progression in human DCM.

Predicting response to carvedilol for the treatment of heart failure: a multivariate retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol has been shown to decrease the progression of heart failure and improve left ventricular function and survival in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%. However, not all patients respond uniformly to this therapy. We proposed to identify variables that could, potentially, be used to predict response to carvedilol therapy as measured by the change in LVEF after treatment (Delta LVEF), and to identify pretreatment variables associated with hospitalization for heart failure after carvedilol therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of 98 patients treated with open-label carvedilol for a mean period of 16 months was performed by using bivariate and step-wise multivariate analyses. Bivariate analysis showed a positive correlation of Delta LVEF with heart rate at baseline (P =.001). There was a negative correlation of Delta LVEF with baseline LVEF (P <.01), diabetes mellitus (P =.04), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (P =.0002). Multivariate analysis showed a positive correlation of Delta LVEF with heart rate at baseline (P =.01) and a negative correlation with initial LVEF (P =.02) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (P =.006). Variables associated with hospitalization after initiation of carvedilol therapy were New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (P =.001), lower extremity edema (P =.001), presence of an S3 (P =.02), hyponatremia (P =.02), elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (P =.002), atrial fibrillation (P =.001), diabetes mellitus (P =.02), and obstructive sleep apnea (P =.009). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with the lowest LVEF or the highest heart rate at baseline had the greatest gain in LVEF after treatment with carvedilol. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy derived less benefit. Patients with clinical evidence of decompensated heart failure were at greater risk for hospitalization after initiation of carvedilol therapy.

The effect of three different oral doses of verapamil on the disposition of theophylline.

Results of previous studies suggest that the theophylline-verapamil drug interaction may be dependent on verapamil dose. Therefore, in a randomized four-way cross over study, 12 healthy males received theophylline, as a single intravenous dose of aminophylline, alone (phase I) and after a four day regimen of oral verapamil 40 mg (phase II), 80 mg (phase III), and 120 mg (phase IV) every 8 h. Serial blood samples were collected over a 24 hour period for determination of serum theophylline concentration and subsequent pharmacokinetic analysis. Mean theophylline AUC for phase I-IV was 93.6, 105.6, 110.8, 120.1 mg.h.l-1, respectively. Mean theophylline clearance for phase I-IV was 3.89, 3.59, 3.35, and 3.20 l.h-1, respectively. The changes in AUC, clearance, and lambda z were linearly correlated to verapamil dose. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of verapamil on the pharmacokinetic disposition of theophylline is directly related to verapamil dose.