Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lakartidningen ; 1202023 11 15.
Artigo em Sueco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965866

RESUMO

A considerable amount of spending in health care is deemed wasteful. Overdiagnosis, i.e. the labelling of a person with a diagnosis that lacks net benefit, is an entity within the overarching concept of ¼too much medicine«. Overdiagnosis includes overdetection and overdefinition. Disease mongering is a type of overdefinition with economic drivers. Overtesting and overtreatment are other aspects of ¼too much medicine«, but are not overdiagnosis per se. Medical research tends to focus on benefits of diagnostics and therapy, whereas overdiagnosis and other harms receive less attention, leading to overestimation of benefits. The international network Choosing Wisely has been successful in changing the diagnostic mindset in several countries and a Swedish campaign is under way, yielding new possibilities to counteract ¼too much medicine« and the specific problem of overdiagnosis.


Assuntos
Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde , Sobrediagnóstico , Humanos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle
2.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 37(4): 402-408, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31496331

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate whether patients' pre-consultation knowledge of the time frames for the consultation influences the actual consultation time and/or patient and physician related outcomes; satisfaction and enablement.Design: Randomised controlled blinded intervention study.Setting: Four strategically chosen Primary Health Care Centres (PHCC:s) in Kronoberg county in Sweden participated.Intervention: Pre-consultation information on planned consultation time. During one week in each PHCC consecutive patients were randomised to intervention group or control group, when booking an appointment with a physician.Subjects: Patients >18 years of age.Main outcome measures: Consultation time, patient satisfaction, patient enablement and physician satisfaction.Results: No significant difference in consultation time was found between the intervention group and control group. No differences were seen between intervention group and control group regarding any of the other measures. Stratified data showed significantly shorter consultation time for the intervention group in one of the PHCC:s and for employed physicians. Employed physicians also rated consultations as being easier and were more satisfied with their consultations compared to non-employed physicians.Conclusion: Information on the planned consultation time has a potential to decrease consultation time in certain settings. No negative side effects were found in this study. Key pointsPatients prepare before their consultation but to influence its contents and length is difficult.Informing patients on estimated consultation time can influence actual consultation time.Informing patients on planned consultation time has no adverse effects in this study.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Satisfação do Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...