Vinorelbine in bladder-preserving multimodality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer-a valid option for cisplatin-unfit patients?

PURPOSE: Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains challenging, especially for elderly and/or comorbid patients. Patients who are unfit for or refuse surgery should receive bladder-preserving multimodality treatment (BPMT), consisting of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURB) followed by combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of vinorelbine, a chemotherapeutic agent not routinely used for MIBC, in patients referred to CRT who are unfit for standard chemotherapy and would thus rely solely on radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 consecutive patients with MIBC who received standard CRT with cisplatin (n = 14), CRT with vinorelbine (n = 26), or RT alone (n = 12). Primary endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and median cancer-specific survival (CSS). Secondary endpoints were median local control (LC), median distant control (DC), and OS, CSS, LC, and DC after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. RESULTS: Median OS and CSS were significantly higher for patients who received vinorelbine as compared to RT alone (OS 8 vs. 22 months, p = 0.003; CSS 11 months vs. not reached, p = 0.001). Median LC and DC did not differ significantly between groups. Vinorelbine was well tolerated with no reported side effects >grade II. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that CRT with vinorelbine is well tolerated and superior to RT alone in terms of OS and CSS. Therefore, this treatment regime might constitute a new treatment option for patients with MIBC who are unfit for or refuse surgery or standard chemotherapy. This study encourages a randomized controlled trial to compare this new regime to current standard therapies.

Fibrinogen supplementation ex vivo increasesclot firmness comparable to platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen concentrate can improve clot firmness and offers a better safety profile than platelet concentrates. Reduction or avoidance of blood transfusions represents a strategy to reduce associated risks. We investigated whether supplementation of fibrinogen concentrate ex vivo can compensate for clot strength as compared with platelet transfusion in vivo METHODS: One hundred patients in need of platelet transfusion (PT) were enrolled. Blood samples were collected immediately before PT and at 1 h and 24 h after PT. Fibrinogen concentrate was added to these citrated whole blood samples at concentrations of 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg kg-1 and the maximum clot firmness (MCF) was analysed using ROTEM thromboelastometry. RESULTS: Fibrinogen supplementation increased MCF significantly and dose-dependently before and after PT. The effect of fibrinogen concentrate (equivalent to doses of 100 and 200 mg kg-1) ex vivo was comparable to that of PT in vivo, whereas 400 mg kg-1 fibrinogen significantly improved MCF compared with PT (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinogen concentrate can match the effect of PT on MCF in thrombocytopenia. This potential alternative haemostatic intervention should be evaluated in clinical trials.